― buya, Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:21 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:33 (nineteen years ago)
― rizzx (Rizz), Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:35 (nineteen years ago)
― joshua, Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:37 (nineteen years ago)
shock effect WRAA
― rizzx (Rizz), Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:39 (nineteen years ago)
Anyways:http://www.sethputnam.com/images/tumb-porncover.jpg
― Øystein (Øystein), Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:43 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)
so banal, isnt it? and the mushroom cloud..stanly kubrik probably didnt imagine such an intensive use from he's image (dr. strangelove).
― yeltsin, Sunday, 12 February 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Jones (Brian Jones), Sunday, 12 February 2006 14:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Mike Dixn (Mike Dixon), Sunday, 12 February 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Sunday, 12 February 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)
― TRG (TRG), Sunday, 12 February 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)
― TRG (TRG), Sunday, 12 February 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
nice gimmick
― fot, Sunday, 12 February 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
"NOT!"
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Sunday, 12 February 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)
"MOMO!"
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Sunday, 12 February 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)
http://www1.tip.nl/~t089148/slapaham/7.htmhttp://www1.tip.nl/~t089148/slapaham/12.htmhttp://www1.tip.nl/~t089148/slapaham/42.htm
― Matt LC (flightsatdusk), Sunday, 12 February 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)
― James, Sunday, 12 February 2006 18:57 (nineteen years ago)
― James, Sunday, 12 February 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)
― stu (stu), Sunday, 12 February 2006 19:04 (nineteen years ago)
― powpowpow, Sunday, 12 February 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
― xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 12 February 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)
The shortest duration of a hit containing vocals is 1 minute 15 seconds. This record is held by Nukleuz DJs. The title/lead track of their 2003 'DJ Nation - Bootleg Edition' EP was a mix of each of the other six tracks on the EP (available on three separate CD/12" singles) clocking in at just 75 seconds.
In terms of a complete song (ie. not a medley) the shortest duration is 1 minute 27 seconds. In fact, this applies to two tracks; Elvis Presley's 'Party' (1957) and Liam Lynch's 2002 offering 'United States of Whatever' (though the sleeve of this states 1 minute 26 seconds; there was also a longer mix, 2 minutes 3 seconds on the CD.)
The shortest chart-topper is Adam Faith's 'What Do You Want' from 1959 at 1 minute, 38 seconds. Click to jump to reference website
The next-shortest number one would have to be the one I was looking for - 'Stay' by Maurice Williams & The Zodiacs from 1960, at 1 minute, 39 seconds.
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 12 February 2006 19:46 (nineteen years ago)
NB For live performances they've changed 'Yasser' to 'Abbas' since the song was recorded. I imagine they'll have to change 'Ariel' soon.
― daniel kevin, Sunday, 12 February 2006 21:23 (nineteen years ago)
They were threatening to make a 1000 track CD IIRC. Hope they never did. They were shite.
― Niall, Sunday, 12 February 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)
― ajlee, Sunday, 12 February 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
the b-side "cheney" is even shorter, no? 6 seconds or thereabouts?
― electric sound of jim (and why not) (electricsound), Sunday, 12 February 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Tape Store (Tape Store), Sunday, 12 February 2006 22:47 (nineteen years ago)
(Regardless of definition, "Her Majesty" is clearly one)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 12 February 2006 23:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Tokyo Ghost Stories (Tokyo Ghost Stories), Monday, 13 February 2006 01:25 (nineteen years ago)
I'm fairly sure that Elastica's "Vaseline" (b-side of "Line Up") is about ten seconds shorter than this. Bonus credit for being one of the few Elastica songs that doesn't suck.
― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Monday, 13 February 2006 01:35 (nineteen years ago)
the clear winner here, at 0:00.
inexplicably, it's been left off the cd reissue.
― Lawrence the Looter (Lawrence the Looter), Monday, 13 February 2006 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
― piscesboy, Monday, 13 February 2006 15:32 (nineteen years ago)
It segued into "Firecracker" but there you go.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 13 February 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)
― James, Monday, 13 February 2006 16:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Devin McNeil, Sunday, 30 April 2006 00:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Penis Meister, Sunday, 30 April 2006 01:27 (nineteen years ago)
― xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 30 April 2006 02:56 (nineteen years ago)
So is it possible to hate Napalm Death's "You Suffer" or any 2-second song? Say you played "You Suffer" at a comfortable volume for your Kay Kyser-lovin' great-grandmother or, I don't know, Kitaro. Could they really hate something that took up so little of their time?
― Kevin John Bozelka, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 04:55 (sixteen years ago)
I see joshua approached this question from another angle already three years ago:
what makes "good" for an under 5 seconds song?the lyrics?the chorus?the production?the gentle texture of sound?
And here's none other than The Hongro:
Define "song".
So is "You Suffer" a song or a sound? Or...?
― Kevin John Bozelka, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 05:02 (sixteen years ago)
yes
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 05:06 (sixteen years ago)
Nope that didn't help.
― Kevin John Bozelka, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 05:07 (sixteen years ago)
no?
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 05:13 (sixteen years ago)
There's a Riot Goin' On
I've never heard it but I don't see how a 0 second song is possible. Is it less than 1 second? (I've only heard the songs from this album that appear on the 2-disc greatest hits set which includes all but 1 song from this record if I'm not mistaken, so I figured I'm not missing much..)
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 05:58 (sixteen years ago)
It doesn't exist. Or rather, it exists only as text (on the lyric sheet as a title only and on the record itself as track #6 0:00). Any CD reissue should at least list it (although it would mess up the track listing).
So the idea is that there was no riot goin' on.
― Kevin John Bozelka, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 07:25 (sixteen years ago)
How about the 0 second edit of "4.33"?
― Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)
not sure about the shortest, but the longest song ever (in minutes) is Michael Jatas - Love is Hurting me (15:12 minutes)
― rio (r1o natsume), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
I'm missing something here. What does "in minutes" mean exactly?
― Kevin John Bozelka, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)
I think about 463 songs on my iTunes want to disagree with that 15 minute song being the longest.
― display names have been changed to protect the innocent (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
he might be saying it's 15 hrs 12 minutes
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)
which is still not the longest song but whatevs
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)
Hello I am Michael Jatas new to this board. I spin, produce and promote hardcore music. Industrial, darkcore, gabber and speedcore. Listen to my tracks and mixes and have fun at my site. Also sign up for my new forum and talk about speedcore and all other forms of hardcore music.
www.michaeljatas.ca
I don't think a 15 hour mix would count.
― display names have been changed to protect the innocent (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)