― Ian, Saturday, 9 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Saturday, 9 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Saturday, 9 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― fran, Saturday, 9 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Keiko, Saturday, 9 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
As for "Try Again", it is a little thin beyond the 303 novelty, but it's also the more dexterous song. Aaliyah's breathiness will always do more for me than Brandy's chug.
― Honda, Saturday, 9 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― al, Saturday, 9 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I've warmed to "What About Us" though, deciding to give Brandy the benefit of the doubt and assume that her vocals are deliberately and not accidentally dead sounding. There's some good stuff on the album, too. Two other tracks work the same machine sound; I wish there were more though, because there's not much variation and I'd like to here Rodney Jerkins work that sound in a couple of different ways. Then there's the ballad-on- speed "All In Me" which is a bit like an even more unbalanced version of Janet Jackson's "Empty" complete with a weird but intriguing 2-step interlude.
Overall though the album's a bit weak - far too many stock- standard ballads, and Brandy's new raspy voice only works as it's intended to occasionally. She's really lost the presence she had when she first came out - her ultra-vapid gaze on the cover says it all really - and in terms of actual connection the only track that does it for me is the final one "WOW", the token-good-ballad where Brandy tries to convince her ex that she much prefers her new boyfriend, over a falsely happy sparkly Tinkerbell arrangement.
― Tim, Saturday, 9 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
When "Try Again" came out, what I think stunned was its absolute coldness, its utterly total reserve, rather than anything specific sonically. As far as I can recall, it was only after people (like myself, admittedly) started placing the noises in context (eg. an increasing reliance on 303 in She'kspere and Rockwilder's productions) that they started banging on and on about the 303 line. Once that started, it was only a matter of time before the track sounded like a novelty, but listening to it at the end of the < i>Aaliyah album I still reckon there's a sense of purpose to the entire thing which is profoundly affecting.
To use a 2-step example: where The Streets' "Let's Push Things Forward" is a great track whether or not you know ska, I think Middlerow's "Right Proper Charlie" only works as if the listener * knows* it's an amalgam of 2-step, ska and musichall. The fact that "Let's Push Things Forward" transcends novelty does not disallow the ska elements from being among its best qualities. See also: the difference between bootlegs that only work as interesting or funny juxtapositions and bootlegs that work as great tracks in and of themselves.
I'm prepared to admit that a lot of people probably did like "Try Again" due to the acid house connection; if it had only been a cult thing then it could be easily dismissed as a novelty. Again though I think the key is that you can't separate the acid line from the surrounding context of the song. Surely the impressive feat is not taking a 303 to the top of the charts but taking a song that cold to no. 1 - I can't think of anything like it doing so well prior ("She's A Bitch" flopped if I recall) but it definitely opened the door for stuff like 112's "Dance With Me" and Brandy's "What About Us".
What "Try Again" really did that was impressive was not including a 303 line, but stretching the concept of the R&B song to the point where it *could* include a 303 line as the main hook (admittedly there it was only standing on the shoulders of such giants as "No Scrubs" and "Bills Bills Bills"). As such it could still be a one-trick-pony, but I don't think I'd dismiss it as a novelty track even if I disliked it.
Argument for your team: wasn't it Tom's thesis that novelties are often the inadvertant springboard for new chart trends? Maybe "Try Again" had to be a novelty in order to burst open the doors so that subsequent efforts could be more subtle or creative.
― Tim, Sunday, 10 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― OBEY*GIANT, Sunday, 10 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 10 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ian, Sunday, 10 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
i think 'chug' is a pretty good word to describe 'what about us'. i dont find that a good thing.
― ambrose, Sunday, 10 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
"It's rage and passion and hurt cooling into a lump of hard ice."
Wow, you actually hear all of that in "No Scrubs"?!?
In terms of steely emotional terrain, I always thought a lot of En Vogue's work circa Funky Divas was eerily prescient, but obviously the sonics had to catch up. I think there was always the potential for R&B to emotionally cold due to the focus on relationships + materialism + fast thrills that has been in vogue since new jack swing. The bigger swing for me is the sound of the records, which has transformed dramatically from, say, "Creep", one of the warmest pop records I can think of.
"Try Again", on the other hand, is slinky goodness. Note how Aaliyah's singing (high and sweet) doesn't exactly match the music (very low and futuristic), but it works with the general grain of it, whereas the contrast in Brandy's thing is horrible.
(And I agree with Tim that this genre starts with En Vogue - who have never been given the credit they deserve. TLC? Hardly)
― EdwardO, Sunday, 10 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― ethan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― geeta, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Robin Carmody, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I forgot, we need to add "Caught Out There" to this, too. Maybe also a Janet song, but I can't think of one that would go with the vibe... "Trust To Try"?
― Ian, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
"Bugaboo" on the other hand...
For me "No Scrubs" is like the female Jay-Z; the girls are so above these guys that getting worked up over it would be foolish. If anything they're doing the scrubs a favour, letting them know that they're just wasting their time. And cruelty for cruelty's sake is okay because these are, you know, scrubs we're dealing with here.
But I actually like your interpretation more.
― Tim, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)