We never said that file: RIAA and Fair Use

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Stop your rippin', kids. You're breaking the law whenever you make backup copies or put your music on your iPod, 'cuz we said so.

js (honestengine), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:59 (twenty years ago)

Further complications are caused by the "playing" of compact discs using speaker technology, another clear-cut case of copyright infringement. Purchase of a compact disc entitles the user solely to the digitally encoded representations of music contained on the disc surface. For years, however, copyright pirates have used player, amplifier, and speaker technology to illegally convert those digital representations into analog electrical formats, and from there into audible information, including the popular "vibrations in surrounding air" format. In many cases, criminals are illegally adapting the original material using technology such as "equalizers," creating new and subtly different performances without properly licensing the original content. In typical pirate fasion, these vibrations quickly spread beyond the original source of the infringement and are consumed by still further lawbreakers, including people in the next apartment over.

We maintain that Sony, despite RIAA membership, has knowingly and traitorously contributed to this large-scale network of copyright infringement through their production of "speakers" and "headphones," and ask that an immediate injunction be placed upon any further manufacture of same.

RIAA Spokesperson, Friday, 17 February 2006 00:19 (twenty years ago)

At least they don't have those "You wouldn't steal a ____" openers like they do on movies on cds yet.

Jeff Bess (jeffbess), Friday, 17 February 2006 01:18 (twenty years ago)

We never them.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Friday, 17 February 2006 01:24 (twenty years ago)

Not only are customers listening to these electronically processed digital representations, they are listening to them more than once.

whatever (boglogger), Friday, 17 February 2006 09:31 (twenty years ago)

If they can. I've bought too many CD's I can't even listen to in my car, because they think all their customers are criminals. I bet the next copy protection will involve the disappearance of the actual CD - go to the shop, pay for a license and a booklet, download the files, listen to them on your PC, renew license after x plays or when you get a new PC. Still go to jail because, well, your cat once heard one of the songs and your cat didn't pay.

StanM (StanM), Friday, 17 February 2006 09:48 (twenty years ago)

I understand their concerns and I do think stealing is wrong, but this isn't the right way to treat the people who pay you, is all I'm saying.

StanM (StanM), Friday, 17 February 2006 09:52 (twenty years ago)

The same filing also had this to say: "Similarly, creating a back-up copy of a music CD is not a non-infringing use...."

Morons.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Friday, 17 February 2006 10:34 (twenty years ago)

I wish there were some nice public way people could (and would) demonstrate to RIAA how ridiculous they are. All the fucking "anti-globalists" smash the windows of every frigging McDonald's they pass by, and these people only have to suffer bitching on internet forums and blogs.

Of course, they do suffer from downloading itself, but that's not neariy as effective as, saying, hundreds of people lining up outside record stores on the day the new Coldplay album finally comes out, and then demonstratively buying only, say, a blank jewel box. Let EMI's board explain THAT to their shareholders.

Mitya (mitya), Friday, 17 February 2006 14:27 (twenty years ago)

All the fucking "anti-globalists" smash the windows of every frigging McDonald's they pass by

Is this really true? I was under the impression that sort of thing only happens every so often.

StanM otm - a lot of the rhetoric around this issue seems to think the labels should just throw in the towel and stop bothering to spend money putting artists in studios, etc, since their product isn't a product at all but "information" - it's natural for people who're spending money making stuff to wanna recoup on their investment, but it's ridiculous to alienate the customer base

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 17 February 2006 14:42 (twenty years ago)

given the numbers involved concerning how many people eat at mcdonalds, how many people smash mcdonalds property in protest, and how many people buy coldplay albums, i think the equivalent action would be if just you bought a blank case instead of the cd.

Dan Gr (certain), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:36 (twenty years ago)

RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia

carson dial (carson dial), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:38 (twenty years ago)

Is this really true? I was under the impression that sort of thing only happens every so often.

No, you're right. Mostly just when there's a G8, IMF/WB, or Davos-type meeting.

My point, to the extent that I had one, is that people are willing to resort to violence (which probably creates a little bad PR for their actual targets while actually affecting many more people lower on the capitalist food chain) against the rather inchoate concept of "globalization" but when we have a handful of conglomerates that overcharge you for a non-essential product, then come up with restrictive "rules" for how you can use it, and threaten to sue if you don't comply, well... nothing.

And I guess -- hopefully wrongly -- that I associate the majority of the people on ILX with leftish political sentiment, if not necessarily of the Golden Arches-demolishing kind.

Mitya (mitya), Friday, 17 February 2006 17:18 (twenty years ago)

Hopefully wrongly?

Soultr0n, Friday, 17 February 2006 17:30 (twenty years ago)

I am making no sense at all today: ie., hopefully not of the violent kind.

Mitya (mitya), Friday, 17 February 2006 17:37 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.