pitchfork

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I can't get through to the pitchfork site. Not that it matters, really - I can't remember the last time I read a complete review there.

philT, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

INDIE FAN IN ANTI PITCHFORK SHOCKER

ethan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No,Ethan, he laments the fact he has short attention span due to overexposure to MTV. ;-)

%00, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

From blackyellowblack
: "It seems that Pitchfork got shut down by their internet provider for posting naked pictures of The Oxes in the news section of their site. The photos, which grace the cover of their upcoming oXXXes record are part of a promotional hype that also includes faux protests and LPs sealed in paper bags... "

alex in mainhattan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Does anyone have an image of the dreaded cover?

Arien, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I saw it, and take my word for it, you're not missing much.

-al, suddenly not so proud to be from Baltimore

al, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(Please note: the story as reported may well be bunk.)

Nitsuh, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I saw it, and take my word for it, you're not missing much.

But they are pretty fuckin' funny.

Brian MacDonald, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

that story isn't true, ryan just didn't pay his bills again.

ethan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

In response to what that blog had to say, PF didn't get payed jack to run that story. monitor/palace buy up ad space, and thats about it.

Brock K., Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pitchfork is back and the seemingly incriminated picture (scroll down a bit) as well. Not really shocking that anyways. So that wasn't the reason for the hiatus.

alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two months pass...
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha suckas!

super proud to be from Baltimore!-

the hype master

hype master, Monday, 20 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

five years pass...

when was the last time the "most read reviews" section was updated? as is, it seems like ricardo villalobos and jose gonazales have been dominating the review readers' interest for about a year or more...

oo, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)

there's gotta be some crazy ass google action goin' on with "senor smoke."

da croupier, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)

If you'll notice, it's anyone with diacritical marks in their name.

jaymc, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)

there's some really old, terrible reviews on that site. probably time to get rid of everything pre-99 or something.

Charlie Howard, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:24 (eighteen years ago)

I think this one kinda takes the biscuit

Just got offed, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:28 (eighteen years ago)

wrong/crap in just about every way imaginable

Just got offed, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:29 (eighteen years ago)

At least it's not 1,000 words?

fukasaku tollbooth, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:35 (eighteen years ago)

i think that wisdom guy's responsible for the 'fantastic' zaireeka review

i have a soft spot for this one:

http://pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/22068-tiny-music

Charlie Howard, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:36 (eighteen years ago)

bad reviews that are short irritate me MORE, somehow, than bad reviews that at least go into some depth.

Just got offed, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 10:41 (eighteen years ago)

This one will always have a special place in my heart.

Well, duh. Sorry to go monosyllabic, but... well, duh

Guy just blathers on about how much of a prick he is for 700 words, then reviews the album for maybe 500. Prick.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:00 (eighteen years ago)

that's the dude who gave 0 to zaireeka, actually

talk about an about face!!!!@@!!!

Charlie Howard, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:04 (eighteen years ago)

This thread is making me feel old. I feel like I'm thinking in dial-up.

fukasaku tollbooth, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:12 (eighteen years ago)

His review of Dark Magus starts out thusly: "Good old Japan. We bomb them, so they horde this Miles Davis gem, out of print for ages in the U.S." wtf?

kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 11:26 (eighteen years ago)

errr :x

sleep, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

wow

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:25 (eighteen years ago)

How on earth did nobody come to edit out the first ten-odd paragraphs of that Soft Bulletin review? When good men do nothing etc

Michael Philip Philip Philip philip Annoyman, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:29 (eighteen years ago)

Meanwhile, Idolator just posted a little story...

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 14:32 (eighteen years ago)

so much ugh

Dominique, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/22716-split-personalities

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/22719-gay

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

Hey guys, did you hear Ryan wasn't a very good writer when he was 19?

Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)

meanwhile
http://idolator.com/tunes/more-songs-about-buildings-and-traffic/brooklyn-academy-of-music-to-new-york-city-no-sufjan-no-credibility-264802.php

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)

Someone needs to give that High Strung guy a smack around the chops. Although I do like the idea of eschewing one's lips.

Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

Hey guys, did you hear Ryan wasn't a very good writer when he was 19?

fixed

da croupier, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

I'm looking forward to his eventual equivalent of Jann S. Wenner's Goddess In The Doorway review, though.

da croupier, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

I thought that's what the 12 Rods review was.

Alex in Baltimore, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)

293 Views

Yeah, maybe Idolator should hide evidence of the number of readers they're getting.

Dom Passantino, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

Paul Banks
Living In The Moment
(Interscope/Starbucks, 2029)
[9.6]

da croupier, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

I think all Gawker sites do that. And if Idolator gets significantly less hits than the other ones, that at least reinforces whole "music is by far the lowest rung on the pop culture ladder" thesis they're always hammering home. (xpost)

Alex in Baltimore, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

Paul Banks
Living In The Moment
(Interscope/Starbucks, 2029)
[9.6]

by 2029 this will be the entirety of the review

strongohulkington, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)

"Well, don't want to sound like a dick or nothin', but, ah... it says on this website that this record's fucked up. Ah, he sings like a fag, and his shit's all retarded."

Alex in Baltimore, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)

when was the last time the "most read reviews" section was updated? as is, it seems like ricardo villalobos and jose gonazales have been dominating the review readers' interest for about a year or more...

I've accidentally bought that Ricardo Villalobos album five times now because of this.

Saxby D. Elder, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

Pfork gets a lot of traffic off google searches for obscure foreign bands, like ~ (Portuguese grime), é (Geneva twee scene), č (Latvian punk underground), ö (Magyar trance), and ť (Czech psych).

nabisco, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 20:38 (eighteen years ago)

ysi

Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

(Magyar trance)

:-O

deej, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

(hi dom! all our traffic stats are public, but thanks for your concern)

maura, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

pwned

byebyepride, Wednesday, 20 June 2007 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

nine months pass...

http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/

am i the only getting a 404/nginx/0.5.17 message ?

mark e, Friday, 4 April 2008 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

Not surprised or anything, but gotta love how interviewer Brandon Stosuy = "Pitchfork."

Ascot Fitzgerald (jaymc), Friday, 24 February 2012 19:02 (fourteen years ago)

That guy pretending he's taking bong hits makes an excellent point: people do sell goods and services for money

little clouds of citrus spritz as i peel (forksclovetofu), Friday, 24 February 2012 23:45 (fourteen years ago)

one year passes...

the "let's determine the name" meeting was on a friday at 4:58 apparently

brb buying poppers w/my employee discount (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 27 April 2013 04:58 (thirteen years ago)

it was neck and neck with moviesfork

kaygee, Saturday, 27 April 2013 05:07 (thirteen years ago)

So hey, from the American Society of Magazine Editors' Ellies awards:

https://twitter.com/ASME1963/status/330116705797955584

General Excellence, Digital Media goes to @PitchforkMedia!

Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 May 2013 01:26 (thirteen years ago)

https://twitter.com/garyvee/status/332324192483680257

markers, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:42 (thirteen years ago)

What the shit, who is this guy

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:42 (thirteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Vaynerchuk

markers, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:44 (thirteen years ago)

i like him

markers, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:44 (thirteen years ago)

and an author and public speaker on the subjects of social media, brand building and e-commerce

'scuse me while i make the sky cum (k3vin k.), Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:50 (thirteen years ago)

[insert canks thumbs up emoticon here]

markers, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:51 (thirteen years ago)

Gary Vaynerchuk's 101 Wines: Guaranteed to Inspire, Delight, and Bring Thunder to Your World (2008)
Crush It!: Why NOW Is the Time to Cash In on Your Passion (2009)
The Thank You Economy (2011)
Jab, Jab, Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook (2013)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 9 May 2013 02:56 (thirteen years ago)

one month passes...

Pitchfork style:

http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2013/06/26/at-pitchfork-office-style-goes-formal-only-one-day-a-year/tab/interactive/

geeta, Wednesday, 26 June 2013 20:40 (twelve years ago)

https://twitter.com/ZombyMusic/status/351754780122693633

markers, Monday, 1 July 2013 17:44 (twelve years ago)

https://twitter.com/ZombyMusic

markers, Monday, 1 July 2013 17:48 (twelve years ago)

Michael Renaud needs to have words with whoever did the wallpapering ...

mark e, Monday, 1 July 2013 17:59 (twelve years ago)

not exactly sure what he's ranting on about, but i definitely noticed the drukqs influence on his new record

diamonddave85, Monday, 1 July 2013 18:07 (twelve years ago)

he deleted hte tweets lol

rap steve gadd (D-40), Monday, 1 July 2013 18:46 (twelve years ago)

why

markers, Monday, 1 July 2013 18:47 (twelve years ago)

two weeks pass...

if someone at pfm is reading this thread, can you get us an rss feed for "the pitch"?

markers, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:08 (twelve years ago)

wait, i think i figured it out based on yr other rss feeds

markers, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:10 (twelve years ago)

http://pitchfork.com/rss/thepitch/

markers, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:11 (twelve years ago)

jfuckinc, isn't there such a thing as too much content?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:15 (twelve years ago)

Probably so, but since I ignore a good half of what they have on offer, The Pitch seems like something they should've done and prioritized a long time ago.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Tuesday, 16 July 2013 16:16 (twelve years ago)

lol, still no comments allowed?

wk, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 18:43 (twelve years ago)

I love that every time they make a point of bringing back the mailbag feature, they do about one column of answers (maybe two) and then it goes away until the next time it's launched.

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Tuesday, 16 July 2013 18:44 (twelve years ago)

No comments is always the correct decision

Simon H., Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:05 (twelve years ago)

^^^

tight in the runs (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:18 (twelve years ago)

yup

flopson, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:20 (twelve years ago)

always

marcos, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:20 (twelve years ago)

ilx inclusive

how bad could it be to be stuck to the couch, forever... (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:21 (twelve years ago)

no comment

wk, Tuesday, 16 July 2013 19:28 (twelve years ago)

“It’s a crowd that doesn’t care. I don’t mean they don’t care in they don’t take issues of sexual violence seriously,” Neal said. “But that’s not their relationship with R. Kelly, opposed to black audiences who are conflicted about him but who have also been following him for 20 years. Pitchfork’s audience is a bunch of hipsters who have no idea who Aaliyah is.”

http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/music/21360770-421/r-kelly-believes-he-can-fly.html

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 14:08 (twelve years ago)

Pitchfork’s audience is a bunch of hipsters who have no idea who Aaliyah is.”

Them's fightin' words!

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 14:08 (twelve years ago)

maybe younger kids but i was watching "are you that somebody" on mtv in 1998 or whenever that video was on.

markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:00 (twelve years ago)

i knew who she was before i knew what pitchfork was

markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:01 (twelve years ago)

same here

marcos, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:01 (twelve years ago)

hipsters not knowing -- or caring -- who aaliyah was might have been true.... maybe 5 years ago

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:02 (twelve years ago)

How about hipsters not knowing what Pitchfork is?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:03 (twelve years ago)

Why more then than now? Shouldn't it be opposite?

xp

Evan, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:04 (twelve years ago)

DeRo is going nuts about this R. Kelly thing. Just check his blog, pretty much every recent entry is about it:

http://www.wbez.org/blogs/jim-derogatis

Position Position, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:18 (twelve years ago)

aaliyah is total hipster canon.

rap steve gadd (D-40), Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:25 (twelve years ago)

Pitchfork’s audience is a bunch of hipsters who have no idea who Aaliyah iscan't name any deep Brandy album cuts.

mimicking regular benevloent (sic) users' names (President Keyes), Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:46 (twelve years ago)

off the top of my head, the only brandy song period i can name is "that boy is mind," a song i also experienced via mtv

markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:48 (twelve years ago)

boy is mine obv

markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:48 (twelve years ago)

they played the shit out of that

markers, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 16:48 (twelve years ago)

Why more then than now? Shouldn't it be opposite?

If the majority of festival attendees in any given year are in their 20s (a reasonable assumption, I think), the 20-something Pitchfork hipsters of 2013 are likelier to have experienced Aaliyah as a childhood radio staple than the 20-something Pitchfork hipsters of 2008, the older ones of which may have already abandoned top-40 radio for less-mainstream fare by the time Aaliyah became popular. (Raises hand.)

Also, Aaliyah seems to be trendier than she was 5 years ago, with various strains of "hipster R&B" citing her as an influence and last year's Katy B/Jessie Ware song "Aaliyah" getting Pitchfork props. (Not to mention her music recently being coopted by mainstream artists such as Drake and Chris Brown in obvious bids for coolness.)

jaymc, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 17:08 (twelve years ago)

Yeah, XX all up in that.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 17:12 (twelve years ago)

Oh yeah.

jaymc, Wednesday, 17 July 2013 17:15 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.