I LOVE DRUKQS+

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
which artists do you insist make progress from one work to another? all of them? any of them? also define 'progress' (verb or noun) in an artistic sense, and give examples of bands you think have done so. is music a giant football field that artists are trying to gain yards on? please talk about drukqs as well, i adore it.

ethan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wilco. Jeff Tweedy's songwriting is so good that I want him to make it work in every conceivable genre. He's trying. Compare No Depression to Yankee Hotel Foxtrot... pretty remarkable.

Yancey, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i haven't heard the new one but summerteeth is one of my favorite pop- rock albums ever (that i don't even own heh) and doesn't deserve to be slandered as alt-country but i would hardly call it progressive!

ethan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I just wanted to say that I LOVE VESPERTINE AND CONSIDER IT BJORK'S BEST ACHIEVEMENT TO DATE before mel sees this thread.

matthew m., Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

King Crimson? They progressed from Talkin Heads-lite to unlistenable Avant-Rock.

john-paul, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Low, Flaming Lips, and Mercury Rev all seem to be getting better with each new album.

A Nairn, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've always felt that every new Depeche album is the best they've ever done, though I am not believed in some corners. ;-) The Walkabouts pretty much can't do any wrong at this point -- they're not where they were when they started and they've covered so much along the way.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, obviously "21st Century Schizoid Man" is a watered-down version of "Psycho Killer," as performed by a band which would emerge ten years later. Duh.

matthew m., Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

none of you are answering any of my questions but i just want to say NED YOU ARE INSANE.

ethan, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Jandek. Even if he did actually record his entire oeuvre in a single 36-hour period. Definite "progress" there. Just incremental progress.

We used to get his records at my old radio station every eight months or so, and somebody would always note "He's making real progress on this one!"

Douglas, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But I revel in it!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Speaking of Jandek, I've been thinking of doing bootleg remixes of his stuff.. I haven't decided whether or not to couple it with Mogwai or Whitehouse..

electric sound of jim, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i think flaming lips and mercury rev are turing into eachother with every album.

chaki, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Low is sounding more Christian with each album.

Curt, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

talking about summerteeth, i think its a HUGE progression as far as songwriting goes. If you look at Being There, its a solid alt- country album. Summerteeth delved into Beach Boy harmonies and more instrumentation. Yahnkee Hotel Foxtrot takes leaps and bounds from Summerteeth lyrically(how can that be? summer teeth had great lyrics!) and musically as well. I am in love with Wilco.

Brock K., Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Usher. 8701 is lightyears ahead of any of his other stuff (at least what I've heard). Ludacris. Cave In.

adam, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Progress is just a movement beyond an artists' previous work; changes made while conscious of past product? So progress can be good or bad. In fact, I think if a musical career lasts long enough, "bad progress" is almost inevitable, in that there's almost nowhere left to go (while retaining identity).

Dan Irons, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ethan, I think artists who stake their reputation on being ahead of the pack necessarily cop some criticism when they start to fall behind. Part of the actual enjoyment of Aphex Twin's work has been the sense in which when his records come out they sound like nothing else around. Of course I still love Selected Ambient Works 85-92, indeed probably the most of all his albums, but I nonetheless consider people criticising Drukqs for not doing anything new to be legitimate in doing so. NB: I have not heard Drukqs, so I can only assume the consensus is well-founded.

Of course with IDM it's a bit distorted because when Aphex Twin started he was competing with maybe ten others, and now he's competing with hundreds, thousands of bedroom tinkerers, so the possibility of recognisable innovation shrinks dramatically.

In comparison people aren't likely to criticise Bob Dylan for not pushing boundaries (although I get the impression that Love & Theft evidences *personal* artistic progression) because the critical model that surrounds evaluation of Dylan - and traditional songwriting generally - usually adheres to a fall-from- paradise model rather than a race-to-the-finish-line model.

Tim, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well what you/I call progress, others will call more of the same. It all depends on how you look at it. How willing are you to accept change? Personally I am easily let down. Which means I am not a completic. I usually give up after a few records. (Ned, you're NOT gonna say you like the last record???? It is a bit wishy washy to say the least. Or maybe the American version is uh.. different? hah!)

Progress also implies they are moving towards a goal, right? Positive change? This is of course subjective (to the listener).

nathalie, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Completic? Completist who can schpell roit.

Nathalie, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

MATT, YOU ARE WRONG. VESPERTINE IS BJÖRK'S WORST WORK TO DATE. And Ethan, you know how I feel about Drukqs. Blegh.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

In fairness, like them or hate them, I'm somewhere in between, Radiohead have made massive progress. Every rock band talked about "going electronic" but none of them had the balls to do it, I mean this happened all through the 90s.

Ronan, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Dylan is an interesting example Tim because he very much helped to define the artists-must-progress paradigm (acoustic Dylan to electric Dylan to sneering superstar Dylan) and his career and reputation got fucked up thanks to the expectation that he'd keep making revelatory records. The records he did actually make are the sweetest and most un-Dylanish of his career

- and hey, maybe Drukqs makes more sense if you try and put it into a Dylan template! It's Aphex's New Morning or Self-Portrait - sprawling but also cosy, perverse and domestic at the same time (all those gentle interludes, the phone call from his parents, the general resting-on-laurels-having-fun ambience that pisses progressive Aphex fans off...). I like it, anyway.

Tom, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Answer to ethan's first qn: all the ones I really care about (and there aren't many of those). At same time, however, there is also the fear that the "new direction" will be something I hate. Example: Stereolab. I see their career as one big progression and so far, they haven't let me down. But I know plenty of former fans who bailed circa Dots and Loops because they were no longer getting what they wanted from the groop. (Contrarily: people who have never much liked them think they have been ploughing the same, dusty furrow their whole career. But those people are mentalists obv.) Point is, progression is always in the beholder's eye, and that perception is at least partly down to the degree of your initial involvement.

As for Drukqs, what I like about it is the sequencing of the record. It's the one album of 2001 (and I use that term instead of my customary 'LP' deliberately) that only makes sense if you play it all the way through in the prescribed order. Not that I've had the inclination to do that very often! We probably won't know unless and until RDJ deigns to release any of his more recent noodlings if this is just a self-indulgent nod to the influence of 'classical' composers (Delius, Stockhausen, etc.) and drum and bass, or if it's the direction he really wants to go in now. Personally, while I'll always be hoping he can repeat the Windowlicker trick, I'd be equally happy with more stuff along the lines of Gwarek2.

Jeff W, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah i'm into drukqs but dont see the need for the second disc. kniow why that is? cos i havent listened to it basically. but the first one is well good. i fucking love the 7th track on the 1st cd, but its on 2.30 long! fuck that, its so lush!

oh well. that always happens to me. AND it bloody fades out, so is pretty hard to mix with.

ambrose, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i wonder if druckqs will be one of those albums that gradually gets the kudos and props that weren't there initially, until, one day, it is described as a classic (probably around the time of the next release, when people will say "man this, shit is just druckqs redux, now that was a cool lp"???

me? well, thanks for asking, i'm flattered. i thought it was, mm, ok, on release, but i've warmed to it gradually. i like it, theres a lot of it, you know, it probably takes a while to navigate your path (not discubumerate ya technique okay???). so, yeh, i'm lost now, sorry bout that. look, i'm just trying to say its a Geogaddi cousin, thats all

gareth, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ned, you're NOT gonna say you like the last record????

Not this again. ;-) Both Dan and I think it is very wonderful, thank you. Yay us!

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, drukqs is great! Not enough progress? Baloney. Just one example: the prepared-piano tracks are more of a departure than most artists attempt on a new album.

o. nate, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Drukqs is overlong, no doubt, but I do think there's a pretty fair amount of progression in it. Basically, he doesn't let beats speed off into space like on Richard D. James, sort of forcing himself to wrap all those warp-speed breaks back into the rhythm.

Andy, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"I think if a musical career lasts long enough, "bad progress" is almost inevitable" ---- What about David Bowie, super long career with all good progress.

A Nairn, Tuesday, 12 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i really wish Mogwai would progress from being one of those bands with skips full of potential to a band capable of greatness.

and, no, they do not nessecitate the same thing.

Wyndham Earl, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

four years pass...
I still love drukqs too.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

i've obviously jumped on the ilm bandwagon about 4 years late. wilco used to be revered here!

and yeah, i like drukqs too

was actually my favourite until i was told i should be liking the 'ambient' stuff more.

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

Me too, I love it.

KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)

Drukqs is kinda shitty.

jimn (jimnaseum), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

And you should be liking the "ambient" shit more.

jimn (jimnaseum), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)

It suffered from not having a coherent direction. I did dig the piano jams tho, the other stuff not so much...

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)

I wonder if people's reaction to Drukqs depends on how much of an Aphex fanboy they were when they first heard it? i.e. those who were waiting with bated breath were more likely to be disappointed.

For me, it's got plenty of good things but it's the least interesting of the "proper" studio albums, no doubt.

It's Tough to Beat Illious (noodle vague), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

I started liking it after some review pointed out that there is something coherent in there, piano things, typically followed by more typical Aphex things (or at least stuff a bit like RDJ), followed by thing that sound a bit like Japanese temple sort of stuff, like Nanou 2, for example. This isn't exact, but it did make me like it more, for whatever reason.

I pretty much thought it was shite when it came out.

KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

It's pretty exact! Noisy beats followed by short prepared piano piece and repeat. It works for me.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

yeah this cd is good it goes in headphone rotation probly every 3-4 months for the past 5 years

and what (ooo), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)

i havent heard summer teeth since i was in h.s. but it soundtracked alot of good times with friends, im sure its still pretty good

and what (ooo), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)

luff dis album (drukqs). prefer the tonality of the prprd. disklavier pieces to the prepared piano pieces of cage.

held tony (held tony), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:59 (eighteen years ago)

there is a good cohesion in the sequence of tracks, but unsure that it's not just a result of being familiar w/the album. it has a natural flow

held tony (held tony), Thursday, 8 February 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

I actually just put the ambient/treated piano tracks on my ipod when I ripped it. To me that's a fantastic album and the one he should have really released. If it'd been like some of the Analord stuff I'd have had more patience but it would've still added little to what would've been a very coherent album for him.

Treblekicker (treblekicker), Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)

"I wonder if people's reaction to Drukqs depends on how much of an Aphex fanboy they were when they first heard it? i.e. those who were waiting with bated breath were more likely to be disappointed."

I got into Aphex Twin way late and sorta heard everything all at once. Drukqs struck me as the best. It's still my favorite.

Nigel (Nigel), Thursday, 8 February 2007 22:46 (eighteen years ago)

i find drukqs to be his most listenable album.

Christopher Costello (CGC), Thursday, 8 February 2007 23:38 (eighteen years ago)

hey yeah i never got all the drukqs hate when it came out. i thought there was a lot more going on in/with the drill tracks on drukqs than on richard d. james, and the prepared stuff is fantastic. i'm kinda meh on aphex in general though--love 'i care because you do,' squelchy early stuff, SAW 85-92, don't care for SAWII or richard d. james. i might pull out drukqs right now; it's probably been five years since i've heard it.

plan b: videodrome (fauxhemian), Friday, 9 February 2007 00:00 (eighteen years ago)

i think drukqs suffered from a critical short-circuit

friday on the porch (lfam), Friday, 9 February 2007 03:10 (eighteen years ago)

Drukqs is every bit as unlistenable as Metal Machine Music.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 9 February 2007 03:16 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah I get this, I find it amazing how spacey some of it is, given how much he seems to jam into every track.

Another thing I love about Aphex Twin is how every time I want some more stuff, you just kind of Google around and he seems to have squeezed at least another LP's worth of stuff out there. Currently listening to Oslo 2 +6.1, which is an unreleased track off of Rushup Edge and it's great; in fact, it might be better than most of the stuff on the actual release.

Keith, Thursday, 11 April 2024 19:56 (one year ago)

Wow, [S770SCI 3000,powertran] beautiful Japanese people might be one of his best.

Keith, Thursday, 11 April 2024 20:30 (one year ago)

Isn't Cheetah like "Hey I made an album thar sounds like my other stuff except on a redundant piece of hardware that's really difficult to use"?

I've heard similar concept albums by VSnares and Si Begg and my reaction with all of these is "That must have taken you fucking ages, I shall waste no time in listening to it"


I have such complicated feelings about this issue.

Like, would anyone else here be surprised if all (or most?) of his tracks supposedly made with certain pieces of gear in fact weren’t? If all of his prepared piano stuff was actually sampled? Or the Analord series was all done on computers and digital gear? Or that he has never bothered to record with a Korg Minilogue? Which of course would be making its own statement about gear fetishization.

I’m not suggesting he doesn’t know how to use this gear BTW or hasn’t. His interviews, such as the Syrobonkers one, suggest exactly what you say above: that he is capable of wringing his music out of almost any piece of gear. But the guy is such an unreliable narrator par excellence that literally nothing would surprise me.

Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 22 April 2024 13:57 (one year ago)

if the piano stuff was sampled surely someone would've discovered from what by now?

I get I can see him just loading up samples of the Cheetah and making stuff that way, in fact certain bits I could swear it's like he's loading up a Syro track through a different set of sounds. I can't specify what exactly but there are bits which sound a little too familiar. That said I can definitely see RDJ getting obsessed with that equipment at a young age and pumping out an EP made on it definitely seems like the sort of thing he would do at this stage in his career, like he's got nothing to prove anymore but I think he does still want to challenge himself.

frogbs, Monday, 22 April 2024 14:03 (one year ago)

I agree with the thrust of what you're saying. To be clear tho: I don't mean sampled whole cloth from another piece of music -- but using prepared piano samples and then constructing the pieces on a computer as opposed to outfitting his MIDI Disklavier piano with bolts and the like to record those sounds himself (which is what he supposedly did).

My guess is that he is using the gear he says he is BTW -- at least most of the time. But Analord is probably the stuff that made me think about this issue the most -- because as much as I love the TR-606/808/909s, the MC sequencers and the SH-101 and TB-303, all of those sounds and programming styles can be very credibly replicated using computers.

My bigger point was that this is the guy whose 26 Mixes for Cash includes numerous tracks that have no relation whatsoever to their supposed source material. And so much of what he's done since Syro has cited the gear he used (some of which I own) that I can't help but wonder whether he's taking a bit of a piss by challenging people like me to strain to hear things in his music that literally aren't there.

Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 22 April 2024 14:55 (one year ago)

ahh I see what you mean. yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if the prepared piano stuff was actually fake. I wondered about that with that Computer Controlled Instruments EP he did, like it could easily just be samples right? though when I listen to it, it very much does sound like the product of an actual studio. something about the reverb especially sounds authentic.

the Autechre guys were talking about analog vs. digital once and while they agreed the analog stuff sounded special, they did say you can recreate all that digitally if you knew how, it's just that most people don't. I suspect RDJ is one of the guys who knows how.

frogbs, Monday, 22 April 2024 14:59 (one year ago)

the computer controlled instruments are real

https://www.logosfoundation.org/instrum_gwr/HAT.html
https://www.logosfoundation.org/instrum_gwr/snar2.html

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Monday, 22 April 2024 19:47 (one year ago)

I can only hope their instrument manufacturing is more sophisticated than their web design.

Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 22 April 2024 19:50 (one year ago)

i like their web design

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Monday, 22 April 2024 19:54 (one year ago)

It's not all that clear to me these days if he is an unreliable narrator... I mean it was easy to see why anyone would think that some years ago, but as the years have gone by it has become clear that he DID have a tank, a bank, and like ten unreleased albums' worth of stuff. It got me thinking if there was anything left that I thought he had been fibbing about, and I'm not sure I can remember any; well, I dunno if he ever bought a submarine or not.

Keith, Tuesday, 23 April 2024 14:52 (one year ago)

Great point! Just shows how much of a legend he is. Almost out of character a bit that he's gone out to the Scottish countryside and settled down.

octobeard, Tuesday, 23 April 2024 20:37 (one year ago)

they should put the audio equivalent of an epilepsy warning on 'mt saint michel + saint michaels mount', feel like i could crash my car if it came on while i was driving

flopson, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 07:00 (one year ago)

Recently, I was marvelling at some weird electronic effect on one of the Collapse EP tracks, and it turns out it's a sped up sample from a 1981 Britfunk record. Very hard to work out what he's doing... Drukqs is full of samples from 1970s records by all accounts, and I couldn't identify a single one of them despite knowing most of the records in question.

he's gone out to the Scottish countryside and settled down.

Yeah I wonder why he chose there (I think he's in Ayrshire or Kilmarnockshire; somewhere south of Glasgow). I wouldn't choose there and he's got a lot more cash than me.

Keith, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 14:56 (one year ago)

Drukqs is full of samples from 1970s records by all accounts

Is this documented somewhere(?) First I have heard of it!

rendered nugatory (morrisp), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 16:15 (one year ago)

Yeah, it's here... Of course, it might be all made up!

https://www.whosampled.com/Aphex-Twin/

e.g. these from Taking Control:

When the Levee Breaks by Led Zeppelin (1971)
King Tubby Meets Rockers Uptown by Augustus Pablo (1976)
Unwind Yourself by Marva Whitney (1967)

Keith, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 16:22 (one year ago)

Thx! Wild... "When the Levee Breaks"(!)

rendered nugatory (morrisp), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 17:45 (one year ago)

Yeah I know... They're pretty much all weird—even the idea that he has actually listened to any music from the 1970s!

Keith, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 17:47 (one year ago)

i feel like i'm taking crazy pills do you guys not know what breakbeats are

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 18:07 (one year ago)

or where they come from

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 18:08 (one year ago)

so its probably more he's sampling breakbeats that sampled these tunes not that he's perousing Marva Whitney records for samples

frogbs, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 18:11 (one year ago)

Yeah, could be. Still, I like to think he's a massive secret soul boy

Keith, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 18:18 (one year ago)

well i doubt he had to dig for it, it's a canonical b-boy break, as is basically everything he uses on the album

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 18:25 (one year ago)

i promise you guys aphex twin has listened to marva whitney unwind yourself in its entirety at least a few times in his life this is not debatable

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 18:29 (one year ago)

I guess I'm pretty uninformed, I didn't realize he used samples like that at all.

rendered nugatory (morrisp), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 19:31 (one year ago)

I can't help but wonder whether he's taking a bit of a piss by challenging people like me to strain to hear things in his music that literally aren't there.

Haha, yeah I can imagine that, but then I can imagine that I'm imagining that. It's pretty painful. I've forgotten the name of it, but there's a paradox that came up when I did AI back when no one cared about AI, including the people doing AI, where you cannot tell if someone is lying if they say they are a liar—I like to imagine him having a chuckle at that.

Re: the Cheetah stuff, I know what you mean frog, though there is a slower version of the CIRCLONT stuff from Syro available (interview tracks—goes on for ten minutes) and it does sound similar, but not sure it's quite the same.

Keith, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:25 (one year ago)

Re: b-boy breaks, yeah I found that surprising too, partly because it doesn't really sound like it at all, like all these late 80s records that did that did—I mean I can't hear Led Zep even although I'm told it's there, but also partly because I don't think he did much of it before or even since, but I may be missing it—does he use canonical breaks on all his other records?

Keith, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:36 (one year ago)

Ha, Aphex Twin definitely uses breakbeats. In the case of that Levee Breaks one, he's just using them as one-shots and using the texture, not the groove. I don't know that I would have ID'd it pitched up like that. But the Marva Whitney one is clear, ghost notes and everything.

Sometimes he doesn't use breakbeats! Often the drum sounds are pretty clearly synthetic. But, say, Come to Daddy has real drum sounds mixed in there, so he clearly took them off some record or other. Pretty sure the new stuff (Blackbox Life Recorder) has some as well.

I agree that it's surprising to hear a breakbeat longer than one hit in his music, usually the drums are so meticulously chopped up out of tiny samples (whether they originally came from breakbeats or drum machines).

Jordan s/t (Jordan), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 20:58 (one year ago)

i think the drums on most of his 90s stuff were programmed, even when he was channelling the jittery spirit of dnb on hangable auto bulb or whatever he was usually doing it with sequenced single hits, he got heavier into using classic canonical ultimate breaks and beats type loops on the later stuff - druqks, syro and the tuss - though yeah he chops and layers the hell out of them usually to the point of inscrutability

that led zep id might be absolute bullshit though i don't really hear it either

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 21:26 (one year ago)

he chops and layers the hell out of them usually to the point of inscrutability

Yes, SHIP OF THESEUS. It would be quite in character for that to be the case.

I'll need to listen again for the Marva Whitney one—can't say I had noticed, but then it's also so massively out of context.

One thing I did hear/learn recently was the bit in I think Taking Control, where his mum is saying "Would you like a blackcurrant drink?", and now I learn that many years later, as a clear fan of blackcurrant drinks, he has married a Ms. Rybena.

Keith, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 21:35 (one year ago)

poking around further on whosampled i realized he actually flipped two different breaks from the same marva lp on drukqs

https://www.whosampled.com/sample/261703/Aphex-Twin-Taking-Control-Marva-Whitney-Unwind-Yourself/
https://www.whosampled.com/sample/350772/Aphex-Twin-CockVer10-Marva-Whitney-Things-Got-to-Get-Better-(Get-Together)/

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 21:40 (one year ago)

it is probably instructive to think of drukqs as his most direct engagement with dnb/jungle production modes (vs dnb aesthetics on rdj/hab/c2d) - bringing in more breaks, doing everything in a tracker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAZo7x83it4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WeKUEL6GNE

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 21:45 (one year ago)

also i think the collapse 'britfunk' sample you mentioned is actually from a us freestyle dub
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhgmX903oh0

so much pre idm dna is buried in random '80s dance dubs

Who u? I don't kno u (noz), Wednesday, 24 April 2024 21:52 (one year ago)

No it wasn't that. It wasn't from whosampled though, it was some YouTube video I watched about Aphex samples, I think. It had some film of the original, which I think I remembered from the time, and was quite obviously just the same thing but maybe doubled in speed. When I'm in a better place to do so, I'll see if I can find the video.

Keith, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 22:00 (one year ago)

Man I loved composing with trackers back in the day. It really did feel perfect for making drum and bass and hyperactive percussion editing.

octobeard, Wednesday, 24 April 2024 22:04 (one year ago)

This isn't a Britfunk track and I certainly don't remember it from when it came out, but I think this might the sample I was referring to on the Collapse EP (video should be set to the right time)—I would have to have got most of the facts wrong though, although that is entirely possible. If I come across something more fitting, I will post it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWqRlAXGn-4

Keith, Thursday, 25 April 2024 10:32 (one year ago)

i think ilm strips the time parameters

Collapse is about 7 minutes in

koogs, Thursday, 25 April 2024 12:40 (one year ago)

Haha, you mean I stripped the time parameters! To be fair to me, I dunno if YouTube has time parameters when I wrote it.

Keith, Thursday, 25 April 2024 12:50 (one year ago)

Very polite of you though, A.

Keith, Thursday, 25 April 2024 12:50 (one year ago)

eight months pass...

It's this his best album? I didn't really get it at the time and thought it had too much filler, but I've been relistening to it these past weeks and it keeps blowing my mind. It's both very accesible and inaccesible... I think that contrast was off-pùtting to me when I was younger as it makes for a very uneven listen, but the sound design and quality in every one of these is him at the top of his game. I still find it hard to listen to it as a full album but in low doses is really cool. It slowly becoming one of my favorite albums of all time.

✖✖✖ (Moka), Thursday, 9 January 2025 04:14 (seven months ago)

otm

ivy., Thursday, 9 January 2025 13:23 (seven months ago)

I dig it a lot, very much, moreso than in the past.

brimstead, Thursday, 9 January 2025 15:43 (seven months ago)

It may actually be my favourite album of all time.

Keith, Thursday, 9 January 2025 17:28 (seven months ago)

It's aged well but not my fav still. Some great discourse above from '22-'24 about this album that's some of my favorite on this entire board.

octobeard, Thursday, 9 January 2025 17:56 (seven months ago)

its a one off. it has this stark, organic (sorry), mechanical feeling that none of his other stuff does. its like the and some kind of narrative/curve/path, too.

maelin, Thursday, 9 January 2025 18:26 (seven months ago)

I don't revisit it often but when I do my reaction is "whoa, this is way better than I remembered it"

maybe one of those where my first impression was kind of dismissive which colored my opinion of it ever since. in part because I loved the gimmicky stuff he was doing, but to be fair RDJ himself did a real lousy job promoting it, saying they were just toss-offs he never meant to release but did anyway for whatever reason, made me feel it probably wasn't worth listening more than a couple times

frogbs, Thursday, 9 January 2025 18:29 (seven months ago)

I was 16 when it was released and my music taste wasn’t as “sophisticated”

✖✖✖ (Moka), Thursday, 9 January 2025 18:43 (seven months ago)

I listen to it decades later and now I understand better what he was doing in here and feel like I missed out so many years.

Also I was a student and I had some subpar speakers and cheap headphones so that probably didn’t help. This album sounds majestic on good headphones.

✖✖✖ (Moka), Thursday, 9 January 2025 18:57 (seven months ago)

I enjoyed it very much at the time. One disc was stolen along with my CD Walkman in a break-in at our flat on Archway Road 2001. I might buy it again. I have good speakers now.

kraudive, Thursday, 9 January 2025 19:28 (seven months ago)

That was a horrible flat.

kraudive, Thursday, 9 January 2025 19:29 (seven months ago)

but to be fair RDJ himself did a real lousy job promoting it, saying they were just toss-offs he never meant to release but did anyway for whatever reason, made me feel it probably wasn't worth listening more than a couple times

Kind of amazing, in its own way—promoting your own record in such a way that would make people want to not listen to it. That combined with the many reviewers that said it was an 'LP full of Erik Satie-like piano pieces', indicating that they had not listened beyond TRACK ONE.

Keith, Thursday, 9 January 2025 19:35 (seven months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.