Heavy Metal and Electronica

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
To what extent do you think heavy metal has adapted well to digital recording and CD reproduction? Do you think that successful adventures in this area have all had something to do with the treatment of heavy metal recordings as a type of electronica? Do you think that metal/electronica crossovers (Ulver, etc.) are essentially based on the premise that metal can really only thrive in *the digital age* by becoming more like electronic music?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)

kmfdm

gear (gear), Saturday, 1 April 2006 19:37 (nineteen years ago)

though i guess they're industrial, aren't they? but they seem to be a good example of where the twain sort of meet

gear (gear), Saturday, 1 April 2006 19:37 (nineteen years ago)

It has adapted just fine. In fact, it adapted just fine 20+ years ago. Other than electronic music(and i include rap under that umbrella)and some modern pop, there is no other popular music genre that sounds as good to me sonically.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 19:51 (nineteen years ago)

I don't really see what Ulver do as "crossover". I don't enjoy their metal stuff but I love perdition city, it just sounds like electronic music to me, not really metal.

I also feel that metal doesn't really need to "adapt" anymore than any other form of guitar music.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Saturday, 1 April 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)

I ask because I think that some rock music has not adapted well. I don't see that raw garage rock works well well the digital medium, for example.

I feel like electronic and new age music are things that can work well with digital recording and reproduction and so it's interesting to see metal leaning in the electronic direction or in the new age direction (if you consider all the folk elements coming through black/Viking metal, etc. to be related to new age music).

But maybe Scott's right that metal has been able to work with digital recording and CD technology on its own terms, too.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

Is this kinda crossover still happening today, anywhere near as much as it was, I dunno, eight years ago? I wrote a couple long pieces about it back then, including one for Spin where I talked about Junkie XL, Moonspell, Course of Empire, Stabbing Westward, the Hunger, God Lives Underwater, Pitchshifter, Voivod, and Tattoo of Pain. And it wasn't new then, even; I'd written plenty about Treponem Pal, KMFDM, Bloodstar, Ministry, etc, in years before. And there's Rammstein, Prodigy...I dunno, it's an endless list. I guess it's still happening; just seems easy to take for granted nowadays. And it's hardly news, and as Jim says, it seems silly to think metal would have to adapt to a music that never really took over the world anyway. (Or okay, maybe electronica *did* take over parts of the world, but still. A more sensible point might be to say that metal evolved out of psychedelic music, and electronic sounds and beats were *always* there, all the way back to Black Sabbath.)

xhuxk, Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

And don't leave these guys out of the discussion!

http://cdbaby.com/cd/savagerocksyou2

xhuxk, Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)

use of electronics in metal is just a given.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

i really do think that the new moonspell is the best since sin/pecado, chuck.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:11 (nineteen years ago)

and as i mention in the moonspell review i just wrote, it's no mistake either. the new album was produced by the great Waldemar Sorychta, who recorded the first three (and greatest) moonspell records. he's an amazing metal producer.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

"it seems silly to think metal would have to adapt to a music that never really took over the world anyway"

Not saying that it would have to adapt to electronic music just to stay stylisitically relevant, but that its tendency to become more like electronic music maybe has to do with making the music work as product in the digital medium.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

But when *wasn't* it like electronic music?

xhuxk, Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

i would actually buy a bluegrass album if a bluegrass band ever got whoever produced the new Korpiklaani album to boost their hoedown soundz. maybe.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, I suppose yeah, Isis are more techno than Foghat were, if that's what you mean. But it wouldn't be too hard to come up with comparisons that turn that one on its head.xp

xhuxk, Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

Hardly any metal records sound great to me sonically, the guitars just eat up all the frequencies.

Jordan (Jordan), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

there are so many people who only listen to dance music and metal that it isn't even funny. they go hand and hand like potz & panz.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

jordan, you need to listen to some better metal albums!

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

And wondering the extent to which metal that is not like electronica or new age music DOES, in fact, work as product in the digital medium.

x-posts: yeah, obv. something like Ulver is more like electronic music than Black Sabbath or Blue Cheer

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

Thing is, Tim, metal has *always* been obsessed with technology. That was part of its point in the first place; pretty much anybody writing about Black Sabbath or the Stooges (who came from industrial centers etc etc etc) could have told you that way back in 1970.

xhuxk, Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

tim, i think the point someone was making up above was that Ulver have made albums that are ENTIRELY electronic. you know? no guitars, drums, etc.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

Ulver are really only still considered metal cuz metal people still want to claim them as their own. and they are still distributed by metal people.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)

"FX" and "Supernaut" were totally like electronic music. (And I just remembered that my second book has a chapter called "Technometal," so I probably have said this all before.)

xhuxk, Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:25 (nineteen years ago)

The "eating up frequencies" comment is interesting to me because the reason why I think electronica and new age music work w/ digital reproduction is that they can use the space in the digital stereo field effectively.

x-post: Scott, yeah I know, but Chuck just laid down a ton of other metal/electronic crossover examples. Chuck, not disputing that metal has always been about technology, but still wondering about people's thoughts about how well it works in the digital medium.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

you should check out the ulver remix album if you ever see it. hardly anyone on it chose to remix any of their metal stuff. i think merzbow might have. i can't remember.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:27 (nineteen years ago)

I remember when prodigy, junkie xl etc. got coverage in Kerrang (my teenage magazine of choice) with this whole electronics are the new punk?/metal? idea. I always thought of the so called interplay or crossover between them as perhaps fallacious. I think of it more as shared interests in certain extreme/unnatural sonics. Prodigy is not metal because it is abrasive, metal does not become "electronica" if it coopts new fangled digital technology.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

one of my oh so informative metal reviews for the new Dagoba album:


Dagoba
What Hell Is About
Season of Mist


Shawter on vocals and “machines.” Izakar on guitar. Werther on bass. And Franky on drums. Franky on drums? I hate to break it to France’s Dagoba, but hell ain’t about a drummer named Franky. From now on, I’m calling Franky “The Putrefactor”!

The band more than makes up for this nomenclatural oversight, however, by providing, in the song “Die Tomorrow (… What if You Should?)” what has to be my all-time favorite electronically created dinosaur sound effect EVER! Everything is moving along nicely and Dagoba are doing what Dagoba-types do: playing finely tuned industrial thrash à la Fear Factory and churning up a mosh-pittable frenzy for Anselmo-loving tough guy Shawter to rail against. Ace drummer the Putrefactor is kicking up dust with his fancy double bass footwork. And then, out of nowhere—“OOOWHAAAR!” Like an ancient clarion call from a... pterodactyl? I’m not big on dinosaurs, so I don’t have a clue. All I know is that it’s the coolest sound on earth. There is a great break toward the end of the song where all the instruments pull back and you only hear the sound of a gently plinked piano and that lil’ dino. Heartbreaking, really. Hell, I don’t know—maybe it’s not a dinosaur. Maybe it’s supposed to be a piece of futuristic machinery on the fritz. Whatever it is, it’s memorable. And the rest of the album ain’t half bad either!

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

I would rather listen to the first Van Halen album on vinyl than on CD. On the other hand, I'd probably rather hear Voivod or Morbid Angel on CD, but I'm still not sure if this amounts to a sort of cheesification of metal.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

Never heard any electronic Ulver but I really like Bergtatt. What do you guys recommend?

m[ad(a)m]an (UL®) (blastocyst), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

voivod sound great on tape.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

somewhere on the metal thread i went thru the ulver discography for someone, but it could take forever to find.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

definitely pick up the latest, blood inside, though.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

I like these electronimetal guys 'n gal this week, too:

http://cdbaby.com/cd/hollistunes

xhuxk, Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

(That's a nice review above, Scott. My wife and I were looking at Decibel at a newsstand a few weeks ago and laughing at this one review you had (can't remember band) w/ great litany of evil words in caps all over the place.)

"voivod sound great on tape."

I believe you have hit the nail on the head! Never owned Angel Rat - I should get it on tape.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)

do analog-era recordings like VH always sound better on vinyl?

do digitally recorded metal albums sound like the grand opening of the newest level of HELL?

do metalkids now listen to sonically inferior mp3s etc?

m coleman (lovebug starski), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)

(That's a nice review above, Scott. My wife and I were looking at Decibel at a newsstand a few weeks ago and laughing at this one review you had (can't remember band) w/ great litany of evil words in caps all over the place.)

-- Tim Ellison

Ahahaha I believe that one was the new album by Aborym, 'Generator'. It was an extremely funny review.

ratty, Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)

there are so many people who only listen to dance music and metal that it isn't even funny. they go hand and hand like potz & panz.

-- scott seward (skotro...), April 1st, 2006.

otm!

latebloomer: a power and finesse vocalist (latebloomer), Saturday, 1 April 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, it was a bunch of techno heads who got me into metal in the first place. Then, when I started listening to a lot of metal, I discovered that the crossover was happening in the other direction too. Anyway, here's the link to Scott's MALEFIC review in Decibel:

http://www.decibelmagazine.com/reviews/april2006/aboryum.aspx

Aborym's approach represents another healthy stab at making synthetic/electronic heavy metal.

ratty, Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

That review has totally sold me.

jimnaseum (jimnaseum), Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

I love the way this sentence - 'Check out the fierce Miami Vice techno breakdown' just appears, mid-review, like David Hasselhoff walking straight through a black mass ceremony looking for the men's toilet.

ratty, Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)

i found that ulver post on the metal thread for adam about the later less-metally stuff. the ulver thread is pretty good too for some more thoughts:


Oh, and Ulver. You heard the last album? Blood Inside? If you liked that you might want to seek out the mind-boggling *Themes From William Blake's The Marriage Of Heaven & Hell*, but it's a lot to chew on. Or pick up the more recent *A Quick Fix Of Melancholy* ep for something easy to chew on. Or buy some of their recent soundtrack work like *Lyckantropen Themes* or *Svidd Neger*. *Lyckantropen Themes* is pretty minimal and electronic, just so you know. The recent remix album is good too if you dig the electronica aspect of Ulver, as is their album *Perdition City* and their *Metamorphosis* ep. If you like really noodly prog keyboard solos, you might like Arcturus's *Sham Mirrors* album as well (features Garm of Ulver). I would say go for thr William Blake epic or maybe the *Svidd Neger* soundtrack for sheer aural whatthefuck? splendour.

-- scott seward (skotro...), March 15th, 2006. (scott seward)

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)

jordan, you need to listen to some better metal albums!

I'm sure you're right. So what are some metal records that sound great? Where the drums sound like drums (i.e. more to them than just attack, and not compressed and flattened into unrecognizability pop/nu metal-style?) and the guitars let the bass do its thing?

Jordan (Jordan), Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

Metal works perfectly in a technical sense in the digital medium. At ome time or another everyone playing has either bought or knows someone in the band who has a digital amp simulator like the POD, the V-Amp or the Adrenalinn. On recordings most people -- almost everyone -- simply can't tell the diff between them and a well-recorded actual metal amp that's moving air in front of a microphone. In fact, sequencing -- which has long been part of hard rock and metal -- has been ridiculously easy for years because of the cheap economics of digital equipment.

George 'the Animal' Steele, Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)

get the new celtic frost album when it comes out, jordan. it's phat all around, and all i have is a crappy cdr copy.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:52 (nineteen years ago)

a lot of nu-metal sounded so awful cuz everyone wanted to emulate ross robinson's horrid in the red basslessness. for some reason, extreme treble abuse equalled the kind of loudness that these people thought digital recordings were made for. but they were wrong and rightfully forgotten already.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:56 (nineteen years ago)

as far as other metal abums go, i would be here all day if i listed all the albums that i thought sounded really good to me. and not all of them were made in sweden!

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 21:58 (nineteen years ago)

"a digital amp simulator like the POD, the V-Amp or the Adrenalinn"

Are these boxes you use for putting guitar direct into a board, George?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 22:44 (nineteen years ago)

Seems that's what you're saying ("most people -- almost everyone -- simply can't tell the diff between them and a well-recorded actual metal amp that's moving air in front of a microphone"). Doesn't recording guitars directly into a board strike people as being SO NOT HEAVY METAL? How widespread is this?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 22:57 (nineteen years ago)

last berzerker album was done that way. all the guitars thru a board and onto computer. or hell, maybe straight into a computer, what the hell do i know. and they use a drum machine of course. totally metal. that's one fucked up rekkerd.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 23:08 (nineteen years ago)

you can listen to some older stuff here:

http://www.theberzerker.com/sounds.htm

nothing from the new album up though.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

i really do like the production on the new Korpiklaani album a bunch. the fiddles and accordion sound great. even the jew's harp on one track is as clear as a bell.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 1 April 2006 23:23 (nineteen years ago)

It might be metal, but I don't see how a guitar run through a board could be considered "heavy."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

Are these boxes you use for putting guitar direct into a board, George?

No, they're essentially a discrete computer -- they have a couple chips in them -- and they emulate a variety of amps. You plug your guitar in them, then they have a series of options. You can run them
into your own guitar amp -- not such a good idea, a run them straight into an unopinionated clean power amp driving speakers.

You select the amp you want, anything from small Fenders to full Marshall or Boogie stacks. The Adrenalinn, which I use frequently, has over 20 amps modelled. Then it can put on top of that around 70
more discrete effects and sequencer options.

The best way to use them though is through their digital or analog outs direct into the mixing board when tracking. I would bet that well over 50 percent of the guitar tracks in all styles that you
hear on recordings -- pro and amateur -- come out of these boxes rather than classicly miked amps.

The trend got going decades ago with Scholz's invention of the Rockman which was an analog device, using LEDs as tube substitutes.
The exponentional rise in computing power and the commensurate
drop in prices drove the invention of these devices.

The Adrenalinn's two chips, for example, cost -- at best -- thirty
dollars. One is the ROM memory for the amp software, the other is the processor that allows it to do its thing.

If you read the guitar rags, there's never an issue where some
pro isn't giving up his studio secrets, which generally include some type of emulator of this nature.

Of course, old amps are still used but the digitization of them has made it much easier to get the sound recorded because you can
always have a great sounding example of a particular model and it
will be consistant everytime you plug in.

George 'the Animal' Steele, Saturday, 1 April 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)

"The best way to use them though is through their digital or analog outs direct into the mixing board when tracking. I would bet that well over 50 percent of the guitar tracks in all styles that you hear on recordings -- pro and amateur -- come out of these boxes rather than classicly miked amps."

I had no idea. Surely indie rock (and whatever indie crosses over as popular alternative rock) is some kind of bastion of people still miking guitar amps?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 1 April 2006 23:56 (nineteen years ago)

I'm sure a band such as High on Fire mikes their amps in the studio, right? And it's a great guitar sound, but the question remains, what do you do with it in the digital sound field so it isn't just a matter of "OK you've got a good Tony Iommi type sound but I'm listening to a recording of it encoded as mere digital data on a little metal disc or as an mp3 on your myspace page?"

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 2 April 2006 00:06 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, Tim, there are purists who probably don't want to use the little boxes in the studio. They like to feel the wind but when you get right down to it, outside of the live realm, you're squeezing the tremendous power of a stick down to a microphone signal that's infinitesimal by comparison. That's the logic that sent Andrew Barta to making the SansAmp which was another of the first amp emulators. It's analog and it does basic Fender, Marshall and Boogie tone.

In terms of getting a good recording, it simply makes sense to use the more well-defined technology instead of real tube amps which are like the weather.

As for the digital aspect and electronica, the Adrenalinn basically exists to combine classic vintage heavy rock guitar tone with rhythmic sequencing. One of the first things I used it for was to make a joke tune of Arnold Schwarzenegger rapping a few words over a hard rock backing which featured a few sequences. About the only thing that didn't come from the Adrenalinn were the Arnold vocal samples which were taken from "Kindergarten Cop" I think.

George 'the Animal' Steele, Sunday, 2 April 2006 04:24 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.