T/S More important for mixes: a great tracklist or great technique?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Which wins? Be honest, I know the P.C. answer for most people who is the technique rules all. Is that really the case? You're at a packed club with friends, does anyone ever scream "I don't recognize any of this but its GREAT!" into your ear?

It seems like being a celebrity and flavors of the month, which this month would be a Villalobos-sounding edit of Crazy, go a long way toward impressing folks, getting you free drinks, etc. Never mind the fact you never once beatmatched and were actually in the booth playing tunes off your ipod shuffle! Hmm...

Sorry if this comes off as snarky, I guess I could make arguments for both sides. But what about you?

harshaw (jube), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 18:32 (twenty years ago)

i'd always prefer to hear a great tracklist over great technique but the real answer is a great tracklist AND great technique.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 18:46 (twenty years ago)

Well two weeks ago Ronan played in New York, I hadn't heard any of it before, and I essentially said exactly what you mention in your first paragraph.. he was mixing quite well, but for me it was the tracks that grabbed me even though I had no idea what they were...

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 18:47 (twenty years ago)

But yeah, not sure why you'd want to choose one over the other.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 18:47 (twenty years ago)

good tracklist with no technique beats flawless technique with shitty tracklist

(er, is that the question?)

Renard (Renard), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 18:48 (twenty years ago)

"I don't recognize any of this but its GREAT!"

also I've definitely had nights out where I thought this, and other nights out where I didn't recognize anything and was bored to deth ... just depends

Renard (Renard), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 18:51 (twenty years ago)

actually, i think i'd prefer a good beer.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 19:00 (twenty years ago)

I offered a good beer to the guys hanging out in my stairway last night and two of them said yes but the other guy was like "I got my St. Ides, son, malt liquor - and I don't like to mix. Can't mix the beers, son" and I was like alright, more for me, then.

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 19:03 (twenty years ago)

depends on what you mean by good technique

geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 19:05 (twenty years ago)

i have more respect for djs turning boring loopy techno into vibrant awesomeness than people trainwrecking a flawless selection: Live At The Liquid Room > Cute & Cult

fez, Tuesday, 4 April 2006 19:09 (twenty years ago)

they aren't mutually exclusive, of course

just asking for opinions which is more important, to you or in general

by technique i mean:
beatmatching
pitchmatching
variety
energy
listenability
etc

harshaw (jube), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 19:10 (twenty years ago)

well yeah trainwrecks is bad

by no technique I meant no beatmatching, not actively working to make good songs sound bad

xpost

Renard (Renard), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 19:27 (twenty years ago)

what IS a good tracklist?

scnnr drkly, Tuesday, 4 April 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)

good flow!

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 19:34 (twenty years ago)

definitions!

a great tracklist would be:
familiar tracks, but not too familar.
unless they are really good
but not so really good everyone's playing them out of obligation.
or familiar tracks that are remixed, VIP, whitelabel testpressed with porno samples, or mashed up with something you remember hearing on TV during the late 1970s or early 1980s.
obscure-but-excellent tunes that you have never heard, but really dig on, anyway.
classic show-stopper tunes on now defunct labels, never reissued on any format and not findable on slsk, if possible.

all packaged together into a 3-part story arc that takes your mind (and ass) on a journey to the center of planet funk and back out again. yeah.

harshaw (jube), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 20:17 (twenty years ago)

that's all completely subjective, obviously!

also:
vaguely familar tunes that you can't remember the names of, forcing you to become what you hate: those guys that stare down at the tables trying to read the vinyl labels as they spin around.

harshaw (jube), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 20:23 (twenty years ago)

You can trainwreck like a motherfucker but keep a great vibe (see Larry Levan). You can be really clean and precise but if the music sucks forget it. Advantage: tracklist.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 20:25 (twenty years ago)

Surely no one cares about technique, apart from DJs obv.?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 20:27 (twenty years ago)

And people that like to dance without wincing.

Maybe there's a difference between what different people think the DJs for: when I go out I want to hear a (techno / house / hip hop) DJ play stuff I've heard very little of (hey, I buy CDs / listen to mp3s - that DJ should be a year ahead of me...) and I want to be able to dance, without stopping or wincing, for hours on end.

If you want to get drinks / shout at friends / have a familiar time with familiar music, then I'm sure the subjective version (great tracklist - ie tracks *you* like - not tracks the DJ likes) is more important.

paulhw (paulhw), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 20:39 (twenty years ago)

more important than a great tracklist or great technique: a great crowd, and how in tune/responsive the dj is to the energy of the crowd. second most important: good sound.

perfect beatmatching is a given these days now that every dj in town seems to favor using software over vinyl. like i've said before, sometimes there's nothing more dull than watching someone do a perfectly mixed set of all newish minimal techno/house tracks, done in ableton.

geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 21:16 (twenty years ago)

and key to a great crowd --> cheap drinks. if the beer costs more than $5, forget it. i realized that this was a big reason why i had a better time in berlin clubs -- beer and even mixed drinks never costed more than they would at a normal bar. at panoramabar, a beer is like $3 and a mixed drink is around $6.

and if there is velvet rope attitude at the door, forget it. treating yr crowd like cattle or with contempt gains you a 'never again' in my book. i've been to enough venues now, in enough countries, to just say no when it comes to attitude at the door. it doesn't matter how great the dj is.

geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 21:22 (twenty years ago)

geeta OTM!

stirmonster (stirmonster), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 21:27 (twenty years ago)

perfect beatmatching is a given these days

i wish this were true around here. :(

maybe i'm not drinking enough pbr/sparks/pinot.

yours fondly, harshaw. (mrgn), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 22:16 (twenty years ago)

i have more respect for djs turning boring loopy techno into vibrant awesomeness than people trainwrecking a flawless selection: Live At The Liquid Room > Cute & Cult

-- fez (pom.po...), April 4th, 2006.

yep. But I would say that....

tylero (tylero), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 22:20 (twenty years ago)

i'm supposed to dj a private party coming up. since i've never done it before and don't have the vinyl, i've selected the tracklist and beatmixed it on software at home and was gonna play it off the ipod. what do i do the rest of the time in the booth? make sure i don't hit pause?

pinder (pinder), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 22:26 (twenty years ago)

Er, you'll probably just look like a bit of a dick, unless that's the norm at that style of party...

paulhw (paulhw), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 22:31 (twenty years ago)

yeah, maybe i'll bring my powerbook. since every cool dj has a powerbook.

a lot of djs seem to be going the ipod/burned cds route, was just curious what they do up there.

pinder (pinder), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 22:34 (twenty years ago)

check email and myspace.

be sure to look up every 128 or so bars and do a "raise the roof" motion

yours fondly, harshaw. (mrgn), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 22:36 (twenty years ago)

seriously- don't pre-record your set. it will be lifeless. there will be no interaction with the crowd, which is what good DJing is all about. I wish i could find places to pay me for perfect mixtapes while i slept at home, but until then, i'll be mixing live and having fun.

theghostrobot (theghostrobot), Tuesday, 4 April 2006 23:42 (twenty years ago)

if yr going to play a pre recorded set, leave the ipod running and join the party. pretending you are doing anything up there = dud and will be seriously boring for you. as theghostrobot points out pre recorded sets rarely work as there is no way you can judge the mood of a party beforehand. much better to play a bunch of (un mixed) cds / records live.

the absolute worst thing you can do is pretend you are actually mixing a pre recorded set live. i once went to a party and this guy was freaking out behind the decks pretending to mix records which all sounded very familiar. after about ten minutes i realised he was actually playing a mix i had done.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 00:15 (twenty years ago)

haha..that's classic....did you pull him up on it ?????

grapple (grapple), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 00:28 (twenty years ago)

The third component when it comes to tracklist and technique is sequencing: the order that you play the tracks has as much to do with the quality of the set as good beatmatching.

DJs who have "no technique" but are still really good are always very skilled at working out which record to play next.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 01:08 (twenty years ago)

David Mancuso is one of the most revered DJs and he doesn't even mix.

blunt (blunt), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 04:20 (twenty years ago)

geeta is very much OTM!

i don't think i can separate tracklist or sequencing from technique. it's all part of the package even at the club.

it is hard to underestimate the feeling of experiencing really good dj and crowd synchrony and feedback. being close to god?

breakfast pants (disco stu), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 04:43 (twenty years ago)

A solid tracklisting is essential, but I'd rather hear an entire set of nothing that I know, but like, rather than have every track be one of my favorites. If that's the case, I could have just stayed at home and had the same effect. I want to hear things I'm unfamiliar with more than anything. I often judge the tracklisting on the quality of the tracks I don't know rather than the tracks I do know. There's nothing greater than hearing a great record out for the first time amongst a highly charged crowd. I'd take that over something I adore, but could play in my bedroom, any day. If you're going to play the obvious, at least swtich it up a bit so it can be worthwhile to those who are hearing it for the first time and those who are hearing it for the four-hundredth time.

Mixing is also very important. I've noticed a lot of DJ's' completely overlook beatmatching these days and nobody seems to mind... Sometimes it's like fingernails on a chalkboard to me.

Chantilly Bass (ChantillyBass), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 07:26 (twenty years ago)

If that's the case, I could have just stayed at home and had the same effect

you must have some hi fi!

i'm probably not qualified to comment as (bar going to hear mancuso in nyc) i don't think i've been out specifically to hear a dj play in about 8 years (i'm not jaded, honest, i just spend too much of my life in nightclubs to actually enjoy the experience of clubbing very much anymore). but when i used to do it incessantly, i would definitely prefer hearing mostly music i'd never heard before. but, that can also be incredibly frustrating as i'd want to know what all these great tracks were. i'm still trying to find out what a track i heard derrick may play in '91 was.

I've noticed a lot of DJ's' completely overlook beatmatching these days and nobody seems to

weird! everyone here seems to beatmatch although quite a few of them probably shouldn't. trainwreck mixing is torture to my ears.

also, as mr. finney ponts out, how a set is sequened is vital too.

stirmonster (stirmonster), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 11:24 (twenty years ago)

yeah, sequencing might be even more crucial. depending on what you expect, bad/non-mixed sets won't ruin your night (eg if you know it's going to be amateurs), but even with great track choices poor sequencing can completely kill momentum.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 11:31 (twenty years ago)

Technique rules it for me everytime, but it is useless without a good tracklist
I've done great hour long mixes but they sound terrible because there is no build up througout the mix etc... it just sounds like a well put together random mix of songs.

So both are needed in my opinion

www.eclex.bravehost.com

E-Clex, Wednesday, 5 April 2006 11:59 (twenty years ago)

i am in the middle of making my first mix ever. this shit is difficult!

Good Dog (Good Dog), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 12:03 (twenty years ago)

"i would definitely prefer hearing mostly music i'd never heard before. but, that can also be incredibly frustrating as i'd want to know what all these great tracks were."

Haha! I've often wished that DJs had some sort of "now playing" LED display, as trying to remember what that great track sounds like so I can track it down often distracts me from the rest of a set... And if there's a lot of great stuff, forget it. I end up taking notes instead of dancing.

js (honestengine), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 15:07 (twenty years ago)

i prefer beat/time matching to none (obviously) w/ mixed stuff, but i don't like it when there are no counter beats or not much melodic stuff happening at end of song and the percussive parts are right on the beat and then you have similar song taking over that beat-any difference in drum texture becomes really noticeable and grating to me. sometimes it can be nice if there is some interest in the textures / or like it you specifically want to create a differential like that, but alot of times this drives me nuts ...and becomes a problem with enjoying techno mixes. which sucks b/c i like techno.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 16:24 (twenty years ago)

I've often wished that DJs had some sort of "now playing" LED display, as trying to remember what that great track sounds like

we bought one of these for our club for that very purpose but it was too much effort to keep typing in what every track was. so instead, our lighting guy spends half his night teliing people what tracks are when they ask (which they do, constantly).

stirmonster (stirmonster), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 16:32 (twenty years ago)

I looked into that too...I couldn't find a simple LED sign where you could just type and hit GO and it'd appear...everything had to be pre-programmed.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 17:12 (twenty years ago)

ok, some great responses so far, i guess you can't please everyone all the time. "keep the beer cheap" seems like the best strategy for people to enjoy the music and themselves.

so do any of your opinions change for buying or downloading mixes?

it seems like technique would have the edge again, since you can read the tracklist and possibly know the quality of the dj ahead of time.

yours fondly, harshaw. (mrgn), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 17:17 (twenty years ago)

our lighting guy spends half his night teliing people what tracks are when they ask (which they do, constantly)

i hate bugging the DJ when he's busy but occasionally I just have to know what the track is and so I'll ask. All of them have been nice and obliging. In fact the only DJ who refused to tell me what a track was was a friend of a friend DJing at a private party.

So any thoughts on the opening track? Should it be bold and get everyone on the floor or should it be an ambient thing which you can build on?

Good Dog (Good Dog), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 17:27 (twenty years ago)

speaking of track selection - did anybody have experience when they had doubts about a mix by looking at its tracklist but changed their minds after actually hearing it?

or: hated a track by itself but loved it in a mix?

scnnr drkly (scnnr drkly), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 17:52 (twenty years ago)

in my mind (and this is the mind of a reggae fan), a dj is a selector, and therefore it is all about the tracklist--and track order. because of the fact that all reggae is based around riddims, you need to make sure that you introduce the crowd to a new song through its relationship with older songs. the best selectors are able to do this in an innovative way.

also, when you're juggling riddims, its important to know the big tunes. if you're playing the sweet sop, for instance (big riddim right now) and you play the nanko first, you're screwed. you can't play the other versions after that--though you might be able to get away with the response tune...point is, the crowd has to know that its coming, and they'll give forwards to other versions, but if i don't (or if i don't) get to hear the tune i'm waiting for, i get all dissappointed. boo.

cybele (cybele), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 18:34 (twenty years ago)

hated a track by itself but loved it in a mix?

Grooverider was/is great at this: taking obvious, mediocre dnb anthems and blasting them in at the just perfect time during a set. He dropped this old B.C. overplayed tune planet dust at a party a few years ago and that was the only time I have ever liked it.

yours fondly, harshaw. (mrgn), Wednesday, 5 April 2006 18:59 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.