I used to think it was relatively nondescript - the most average point on the LP. Now I'm not sure.
What do you think? Can PJ Miller tell us what it's Really About, or Cookie96 tell us where Castlehill is? Why do they mix together guitar and keyboard phrases the way they do? Does anyone like the spoken word stuff? And the main question - does it have to be so bloody long?
― the pinefox, Friday, 15 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(Hey - this will put it on New Answers.)
― scott p., Friday, 15 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Why do they mix together guitar and keyboard phrases the way they do?
I dunno, but they sound great together, the keyboard slightly loopy and the guitar really tight.
It's long the way all songs like this should be long. It takes that long to feel spent, with all those pent up feelings inside.
― youn, Friday, 15 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Lyrically, I think the two halves of the songs are pretty distinct from each other and two different types of "dreams." The first seems to consider the detached propulsiveness and mundane repetitiveness of life and routine as a dream-like haze and/or Struan is having a little fantasy in order to dress up the mediocrity to this world of work, family, and little else (and does not leave room for any tangible hopes and dreams for his life?). If you allow yourself to dream about something more than you have, would you actually, y’know, go out and grasp it?
The second half is this odd revenge fantasy and he wrestles with notions of whether your thoughts must be turned into action before they become defining, and so forth. The possible connection between the two is the "local boy wants to be a hero" – lack of options lead to violence and a blurring of thought and action — an idea that boy Skinner seems to have nicked! ("Geezers need excitement / If their lives don’t provide it / They incite violence") But seriously, that’s not probably true. Erm, I’ve never thought it long, always liked it, always loved the guitar/keyboard exchange – I can’t say what the weakest point of Tigermilk would be, maybe "You’re Just a Baby" — and always did like the spoken-word bit (and, at first, liked the Sessions version spoken word better, but now I imagine it would seem dated and grating).
Gosh, I haven’t thought about these songs like this in such a long time, this probably isn't very lucid.
BTW, that "family" line is nicked from Hal Hartley, right?
I didn't mean that it *feels* long - but when you look at the timer on the CD you suddenly realize that it's something like 5:50 - no?
Yeah, I think so, but even as quotation, I think it works.
What Scott wrote about the two dreams made me think of a way the spoken word stuff could work: Stuart's la la las (which he noted turns the crime into something else altogether) fade into Isobel reading: the desire for escape overtaken. She sounds so correct and proper.
I think there is something very similar in Trust, but I couldn't say for sure.
"Electronic Renaissance" seems to be the one B&S that most irritates, according to my (very informal) experience.
― Tadeusz Suchodolski, Friday, 15 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― PM, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Phil A, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yes, that's much better.
You have to remember that I'm not a real fan.
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
"electronic renaissance" (along with "i could be dreaming") is my favorite b+s song. it's great synth-pop... the weird edit of the last line dropped in before the first verse... plastic microwave sheen of casio warmth... if your first album contains a song this memorable let me know the name of your band, kay? :-D
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 00:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 18 May 2004 05:17 (twenty-two years ago)