TS: Arthur vs. Godsmack

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.arthurmag.com/magpie/?p=1244

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 May 2006 15:41 (nineteen years ago)

(I was gonna copy and paste the whole text but taking out the line breaks was a pain)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 May 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)

i couldnt figure out if this was some elaborate joke, because it looks like a nick sylvester riff central-esque piece.

mts (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 4 May 2006 15:48 (nineteen years ago)

nah its legit. my bro says the audio should be posted later.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 May 2006 15:58 (nineteen years ago)

It's the best thing Arthur has ever done, and the magazine should have more of this attitude in it all the time.

QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Thursday, 4 May 2006 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

that's certifiable HILARITY!!!

eedd, Thursday, 4 May 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

funny, but kinda fucked up, no? Or is this the sort of thing that Arthur is known for doing?

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)

Seems like a dick move on Arthur's part. Setting the dude up like that isn't very cool. Came across as Jay Babcock taking out his frustrations on this sitting duck rock star. There are probably much more creative, subtle and useful ways to do that.

mcd (mcd), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:31 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, Arthur Magazine itself is its own form of protest, why stoop to stunts like this?

mcd (mcd), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:32 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah I couldnt read the whole thing, I was a little put off by it. And don't get me wrong, I fucking hate godsmack. And in theory fucking with them is a ok. But the way they did it just turns me off.

Period period period (Period period period), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:38 (nineteen years ago)

x-post

When your album is number one, and you sell your music to the military, and you put a frickin' helicopter shooting missles at the audience at the beginning of your show, I think you deserve someone calling you out on your mealy-mouthed BS. Way to go, Jay.

Every single "liberal" artist who dares to criticize Bush or the military ends up on the front page of the Drudge Report, and called a traitor, etc. This is just a little payback, and it's way overdue.

schwantz (schwantz), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)

I ended up defending part of this to my coworkers earlier while I was reading it until I got to the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE crap. I think that it's cool to ask people about politics if it's something they've done recently or signed off on that's relevant to the concert/album in a promo interview but Babcock kind of goes off the deep end. Godsmack dude should have just said "We did it for the money" or hung up the damn phone and claimed that it was an interview about music.

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

From the point of publicity, it's an excellent move on Arthur Mag's part... controversial interviews always help that way.

Does it "CHANGE THINGS, MAN"? No, it just helps round up the Godsmack fans all over the internet in support of the band, and gets the Godsmack haters all over the internet to discover what Arthur is, albeit through something atypical for them.

Both sides get publicity. Both sides win. Kids still dying in Iraq. Everyone's happy!

Every single "liberal" artist of the few that are doing very well today and current media gives a shit about who dares to criticize Bush or the military ends up on the front page of the Drudge Report, and called a traitor, etc. This is just a little payback, and it's way overdue.

DOQQUN (donut), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:46 (nineteen years ago)

as much as I agree with babcock's views, his approach leaves a bad
taste in my mouth. I do not know him, but it seems as if this is a
upper middle class hipster taking down a "southie"—which I believe is
an accurate description of the Boston-born and raised Erna— who,
admittedly, has never seemed like the brightest bulb and seems to have
not thought through rather a lot of things.

If i was interviewing the guy, i would not be so baldly hostile. I
would try to recognize that many of the people to whom Erna speaks to
go into the armed forces because they do not have the same
opportunities that your average Arthur reader has (most
likely)—regardless of whether they are sent off to die for the worst
foreign policy directive of my lifetime.

Which is to say— i wish I felt that babcock's interview demeanor was
animated more by the stated anti-war conviction than contempt for a
working class rock star on a major label who has never heard of Jandek
or Islands or whoevah…

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

Basically, Arthur just sent out the call to all bands that are coddled by more right-wing/military fan bases (not to equate "right wing" and "military" necessarily) and announced "You red state bands need not bother with the superior likes of publications like US. Go pander to your own right-wing propaganda sites and blogs and stay there, because that will, um, help things in this country. We need more polarization! More please! More! HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW! A washed-up rock star is born to be whipped </Criswell>"

DOQQUN (donut), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

I dare Arthur to take on Rollins next.

DOQQUN (donut), Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

I'll state that I think the debate part of the interview HAD potential to be a great piece, but the preconceived ambush as well as the "I'm speaking DOWN to you now" aspects of the interview were really quite unpleasant, shitty, and really did nothing to "help the cause" so to speak.

I wasn't asking for a banal NPR style debate or anything, but something that wasn't so fucking condescending would have been a vast improvement.

DOQQUN (donut), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

i liked it. it was funny. and godsmack was generous enough to admit their mediocrity. how refreshing.

jeremiah q. fuckface, Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

The NYTimes interviewed Rollins without really taking him on. I mean, people will pull out the standard line about supporting the military due to their role in protecting the country and other innocents, but when they let Rollins get away with that without questioning whether his appearance has an effect on recruitment and whether supporting the military at all has an inherent approval of what they're currently doing should probably be a question. The fact that these guys were in a recruiting commercial in addition to appearing in USO-type stuff gets them on both ends, especially when he blurts something about kids being stuck there (?).

mike h. (mike h.), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

well, Erna is hardly washed up— Godsmack's album is #1 this week…

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:07 (nineteen years ago)

"washed up" in Arthur's eyes was the context. I agree with you, veronica. (even though I dislike the band's music)

DOQQUN (donut), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't read all of the Rollins pieces, but the few I have read pretty much clearly state "Rollins thinks the war is bullshit, but he's not there to debate the soldiers as it's the wrong time and place for it." I think this is quite a noble stance, personally. And if there are inherent paradoxes with this stance, than sure, they should be questioned, I agree.

DOQQUN (donut), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

Rollins visits wounded soldiers in hospitals. He knows what the cost of war is. His heart is in the right place.

Washable School Paste (sexyDancer), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

Godsmack even being in Arthur should be a red flag, shouldn't it? I mean isn't it obvious how they're going to cover them?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

I had somehow gotten the impression that Godsmack have some degree of critical cred, so it seemed to me like it could've gone the other way just as easily. Not the other day, I guess, since that would've been Jay talking about how awesome it is that Godsmack supports our troops, but you know what I mean.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

Hahaha I can't believe people's sensibilities are offended by this. Poor Godsmack guy! Shilling for war is something no artist should get away with, "Southie" or otherwise.

Go Arthur!

Dr. Gene Scott (shinybeast), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

But the point is that Sully didn't even know what the hell he was getting into. Oh wait, that sounds familiar.

Stixx, Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)

"people should only be assholes when I agree with them!"

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

It actually reminds me most of when Grand Royal interviewed Ted Nugent.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

Meh, it's just a variant on the same shit we talk about here all the time: given that a certain set of artists are clearly always going to talk about degrading women or being violent or having populist-conservative values in their songs, is it really worth making a big issue of? It just comes off a bit Bill O'Reilly is all.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

Godsmack even being in Arthur should be a red flag, shouldn't it? I mean isn't it obvious how they're going to cover them?

Well, NOW it's obvious. I don't think it was that obvious until this interview, although certainly suspect.

Hahaha I can't believe people's sensibilities are offended by this. Poor Godsmack guy! Shilling for war is something no artist should get away with, "Southie" or otherwise.

Go Arthur!

Just speaking for myself, my "sensibilities" are just extremely disappointed in the manner in which the Godsmack guy got smacked, essentially.. as it really does nothing but polarize, and -- if anything -- helps the band even more.. as I hypothesized above.

DOQQUN (donut), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)

Grand Royal's Ted Nugent interview was done by Bob Mack, who liked and knew Nugent's music and who took him to task because he'd admired him once. This doesn't seem the same as that to me.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:30 (nineteen years ago)

The interview is undermined by the obnoxious self-righeousness of the interviewer. Jeez, what a dick.

everything, Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

xpost I mean for instance the helicopters-bombing-the-audience thing is pretty clearly "dude likes things blowin' up," which is a sentiment he shares with lots of people who don't necessarily support (the) war, and Jay kinda twisted it to fit his purposes. Pretty "no spin zone"-y.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

M, I didn't remember the details much beyond him saying a few lines in asking what that Damn Yankees shit was all about.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, Ned, one of Mack's questions boiled down to, "I'm a conservative and a fan of your music. Why do you keep putting out bullshit music now and gratuitously insult black people?"

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

>the helicopters-bombing-the-audience thing is pretty clearly "dude likes things blowin' up," which is a sentiment he shares with lots of people who don't necessarily support (the) war

Lemmy's probably written more antiwar songs than any other metal act, and Motorhead had a bomber hovering over them onstage for years.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

LEMMY IS GOD

Cee Bee (Cee Bee), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:37 (nineteen years ago)

(smack)

Cee Bee (Cee Bee), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:37 (nineteen years ago)

why would arthur ever say something as stupid as "corporate sponsorhip-free", especially after the whole controversy regarding their involvement in tylenol's "ouch" series?

im not doubting the relevancy of such a piece because i do feel people should be questioned about this but... taking godsmack to task for their pro-militaristic tendencies is like shooting a fish in a barrel. i dont see arthur getting on cocorosie's case for throwing around n-bombs in their songs or asking random indie rockers about their trust funds, but i guess that would be really striking a nerve if they -- god forbid -- exposed the oft-hypocritical stance of underground/alternative/independent music. i bet they'd lose a slew of ad revenue then.

owch!, Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)

I mean in fairness there's also all kinds of issues about power dynamics here too but I think the complaint here is less one of meanness and more one of "it was not a very good interview."

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)

The point is not that Godsmack deserves to be defended, just that I thought Arthur was inclusive by its very nature, that's certainly one of the reasons I like it.

mcd (mcd), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)

ugh, that is a truly vile "interview" - imagine a rock star who hasn't completely thought out every implication of every gig/promotion/song they ever did? Cuz most of them have Phds, amite?? Does Babcock actually expect anyone who isn't a hate-filled ass to applaud him, no matter how anti-war they might be? Way to sell your viewpoint, jerk.

timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 4 May 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

but it seems as if this is a upper middle class hipster taking down a "southie"

that sounds suspiciously like "the godsmack guy, being a 'southie', is therefore too stupid to defend his views/actions." sounds like yer taking down a "southie" there.

(not that babcock isn't an uppermiddleclass hipster -- but the interview isn't a class bash)

Lawrence the Looter (Lawrence the Looter), Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

Um - last time I checked, Jay is a guy living hand-to-mouth spending all his own money to put out Arthur, and Godsmack are a bunch of millionaire rock stars.

schwantz (schwantz), Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

and which of them comes across as the bigger asshole in this interview? hint: not the millionaire rock star

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)

Like I said in the ILE thread:

It's hard for me to feel sorry for a guy who pulled down at LEAST a few hundred thousand dollars from the military, and even "re-upped" (in his words) the contract, even though he seems uncomfortable with the Iraq war. In a way, it would even be different if the Godsmack fellow actually supported the war, but it seems like he doesn't, and is willing to take big bucks anyway (but not from Maybelline). If the worst thing he has to endure is Jay asking him some angry questions, I think he'll be ok.

schwantz (schwantz), Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

no, the "southie" characterization is what I sensed from JB's condescending demeanor…but I'm willing to give JB the benefit of the doubt re: class issues.

The stuff i said afterwards indicates that at least I'd try to explore other implications of SE and his relationship to his audience, and not be completely hostile from the get-go. as an interviewer, your cards should be on the table.

again, Erna has never struck me as a very bright guy, and I agree that it doesn't seem too much to ask for artists to be present professionally and be able to defend how their music is used. and it may be that JB does not reflexively dismiss mainstream rock guys. but a lot of writers do, and i think that disliking their music and the corporate means by which the music is distributed is often intermixed with "this is the kind of guy that called me a fag in high school" or "this guy may be millionaire, but i went to grad school" or suchlike…

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

"as an interviewer, your cards should be on the table."

what I mean by this is that the interview situation should be a level playing field—not that yr agenda should be transparent, in which case JB's cards were on the table.

also: Godsmack's publicist was foolish in allowing this interview to take place.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 4 May 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)

The stuff i said afterwards indicates that at least I'd try to explore other implications of SE and his relationship to his audience, and not be completely hostile from the get-go. as an interviewer, your cards should be on the table.

i don't think he was being completely hostile; he just asked se to explain the band's relationship to the military. se couldn't back up, much less explain in basic terms, his own actions and statements.

Lawrence the Looter (Lawrence the Looter), Thursday, 4 May 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

Jay, yr. pride at inducing 31 comments on a news post at metalunderground.com (where the phrase 'bloody dookhead' is apparently a meaningful English construction) is at least as off-putting as the interview itself.

Yeah, you caught a working-class guy from Lawrence, MA who happened to get lucky in a logical snare. Congrats, champ.

Sean Braudis (Sean Braudis), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 01:28 (nineteen years ago)

Sean, do you want to see the rest of the list to date?

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 01:31 (nineteen years ago)

Well don't take tons of time out of your evening or anything but actually yeah I'd love to.

Sean Braudis (Sean Braudis), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 01:34 (nineteen years ago)

Sean- Check out technorati.com and google -- do searches with "arthur magazine" and "godsmack" as discrete entries in the same search -- etc.

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 01:38 (nineteen years ago)

Now this too:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howie-klein/not-all-rock-stars-are-li_b_20648.html

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

Jay, I've spent the past 20 minutes or so scanning reels of comments from blogs on technorati, and here's what I see:

1) A fair number of people who question your technique to some degree.

2) A ton of lefty high-fiving ("Wow you kicked the singer from Godsmack's ass in an argument").

3) Lotsa "Godsmack sucks."

What I don't see much of is meaningful discussion of US Military recruitment tactics with a wider scope. I assume that's what you wanted to get at, instead I read people calling the singer from Godsmack an "uneducated fuck." Frankly, this kind of stuff makes me want to slay.

I have to ask you, what were you EXPECTING the dude to say? Is he under some sort of obligation to answer with the level of education or informedness of, I dunno, a 25-year-old law student on the east coast, or whoeverthefuck reads the blogs that are reporting this story? Was his failure in any way satisfying to you? 'Cause it was to a lot of other people.

What I actually see going on is a lot of bitterness on the part of the readership out there. People don't want to believe that an "uneducated fuck" in a shitty band has attained a level of wealth, power, and influence, while they sit around and type comments into the internet (yes I'm aware of the irony here). It hits a little close to home for me because where I'm from isn't far from where they're from, and I remember hearing on the radio in like '98 about how they were all working construction and whatnot before their first album broke.

You want to target someone? How about the PR/Advertising people that work for the military? I just don't see how the singer from Godsmack is an appropriate scapegoat, given his belief (however uninformed in your eyes) that the military is an OK institution. The guys in Godsmack were probably not too far from being recruits themselves, once.

Naturally, I'm also disappointed with the level of discussion on the internet and have my doubts that blogging can enact meaningful change on ANY topic. But that's another arugment.

Finally, I'm not really holding this against you, personally. Your passion is obvious and I agree with your position, I just think you might have shot the messenger here. The smug, self-congratualtory reactions I've been reading are far more troublesome.

Late PS: Howie Klein loses me when he acts like they're supposed to be liberal 'cause they're from Boston. First of all, they're not, they're from the Merrimack Valley and things are different there. And second, that's just a really moronic statement.

Sean Braudis (Sean Braudis), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 02:25 (nineteen years ago)

"You want to target someone? How about the PR/Advertising people that work for the military?"

Sean, we've already done that. And we're continuing to do that. Sheesh, bro.

"Naturally, I'm also disappointed with the level of discussion on the internet and have my doubts that blogging can enact meaningful change on ANY topic. But that's another arugment."

Maybe you should've said that upthread...?

Man this is getting into a tarbaby thing around here. See ya later.

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 02:37 (nineteen years ago)

Also, Sean: do the google search as well. It gets into less bloggy territory, obv.

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

OK, I will tomorrow. But yeah I will take it as telling that you did not answer the other questions I asked.

Sean Braudis (Sean Braudis), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 03:01 (nineteen years ago)

Sean-I'm out of time. Don't take it as anything other than that. No other interview I've done int he last 10 years has generated this much questioning. I can't answer every question put to me by everyone, immediately. Capiche?

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 03:03 (nineteen years ago)

Jay, you're so out of time that you defend yourself without answering ANYBODY every goddamn post!

DOQQUN (donut), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 03:21 (nineteen years ago)

I'd have better luck conversing with that preacher guy on that one college campus that reads his bible and says that all of us are doomed.

DOQQUN (donut), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 03:23 (nineteen years ago)

Somebody tell me why I should care about this

cdwill (cdwill), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 17:57 (nineteen years ago)

JAY BABCOCK U CHANGED MY WORLD AND I THANK U

Confounded (Confounded), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

i don't really dig the interview but i'll cut arthur some slack since i do think it's a pretty good mag and they cover some good music and their recipes-by-musicians section have been oft-utilized by me.

gear (gear), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

Sean, I've been corresponding by email with some of the belligerant Godsmack fan/posters to the Arthurmag.com wesbite, and the discussions is already proving fruitful -- in terms of swaying opinion, turning people onto sources for more info about the military, the war, etc. Weird but true.

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 02:04 (nineteen years ago)

TS: the importance of a terrible blogger's agenda vs. the importance of a terrible band's agenda

twix: now with more dead seals!, Wednesday, 10 May 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)

"2) A ton of lefty high-fiving ("Wow you kicked the singer from Godsmack's ass in an argument").

3) Lotsa "Godsmack sucks."

What I don't see much of is meaningful discussion of US Military recruitment tactics with a wider scope. I assume that's what you wanted to get at, instead I read people calling the singer from Godsmack an "uneducated fuck." Frankly, this kind of stuff makes me want to slay."

Yeah, well, how about this— You don't have to convert everyone with every fucking article in a small music magazine. It can be enough to occassionally just have some lefty high-fiving, and the more people saying "Godsmack sucks" the better.
Plimpton's dead. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, you whining ILM complaint-bots.

js (honestengine), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

how about the letting the skeptical being the enemy of the defensive?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 03:35 (nineteen years ago)

the more people saying "Godsmack sucks" the better.

What does this even mean? And my point is that no one seems to be capable of treating this as "an article in a small music magazine." Go read blogs, a lot of people give the interview a nonsensical David vs. Goliath interpretation.

Sean Braudis (Sean Braudis), Wednesday, 10 May 2006 05:25 (nineteen years ago)

"My magazine has done plenty in the last 3.5 years, and has more in the works."

Like the Douglas Rushkoff column in the May issue (which I just snagged last night) about ignoring Iraq because it's "their war" and there's no way to get at the truth anyway (guess dude's never heard of blogs) and it all just fux with his nice day?

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Friday, 12 May 2006 00:15 (nineteen years ago)

"their war" = "the grownups' war"

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Friday, 12 May 2006 08:38 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.collectmad.com/COLLECTIBLES/madpin7.jpg

maria and whiney's gif parade, Saturday, 13 May 2006 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

WHAT DOES ARTHUR MAGAZINE THINK OF ROCKISM VS POPISM THERE COULD BE A GOOD ARTICLE IN THAT.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 13 May 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

The real question is what the troops think of Rockism.

js (honestengine), Saturday, 13 May 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)

Speaking of the troops, I was mentioning this thread/issue to a friend of mine and he asked me, "Does he (meaning Jay) think that the soldiers joined the military because of a Godsmack song?"

Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Saturday, 13 May 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/416382p-351810c.html

Originally published on May 10, 2006 - New York Daily News

Daily Dish & Gossip by Rush & Molloy

Godsmack takes flak after Navy ads enlist band's songs

Godsmack let the Navy use its music for recruiting commercials because, well, um, er ... why not?

The rocker with the country's No. 1 album just got ambushed over selling his songs to the military.

Sully Erna, lead singer and lyricist of Godsmack, whose CD "IV" tops the Billboard charts this week, got defensive when confronted by editor Jay Babcock in the current issue of Arthur magazine. Babcock asked about the use of "Awake" and "Sick of Life" for U.S. Navy recruiting commercials.

"You're proud of recruiting your fans into the military?" Babcock asked, to which Erna replied, "Well, no. I actually sympathize with a lot of the soldiers, and the military in general, that are trained to go out and protect us." But he added, "I don't tell people to go join the military."

Babcock pressed, "You don't think using ... the power of your music has an effect on people?"

Erna, a native of working-class Lawrence, Mass., who practices the Wicca religion, countered: "Oh man, are you like one of those guys that agrees with some kid that tied a noose around his neck because Judas Priest lyrics told him to?

"It's energetic music. People feel that they get an adrenaline rush out of it. But I doubt very seriously that a kid is going to join the Marines or the U.S. Navy because he heard Godsmack in the commercial.

"They're gonna go and join the Navy because they want to jump out of helicopters and f—– shoot people! Or protect the country or whatever it is, and look at the cool infrared goggles."

Neither a Universal Records spokesman nor the Navy recruiting spokesman could tell us how much Godsmack made for the licensing of the songs.

Erna concluded: "An opportunity came up, they wanted to use some music for a recruit commercial. What are we gonna say — no?"

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Sunday, 14 May 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0605/11/sbt.01.html


CNN HEADLINE NEWS - SHOWBIZ TONIGHT

["Showbiz Tonight" is the only daily one-hour entertainment news show on TV. "Showbiz Tonight" takes on the day's biggest and most provocative issues in the entertainment industry with engaging, and often heated, in-depth segments. "Showbiz Tonight" airs on Headline News at 11 p.m. ET.]

"Godsmack" for the Navy?

Aired May 11, 2006 - 23:00:00 ET

HAMMER: Well, here we go again. Another rock group embroiled in controversy over their music and the war in Iraq. But this time, it`s not exactly what you`d expect. The band "Godsmack" is actually catching flak over the use of their music in the U.S. Navy`s recruitment ads.

The group`s songs "Awake" and "Sick of Life" have been running in television commercials for the Navy, which has some critics saying that the band`s young audience will now be influenced to join the military because of the popular tunes.

Joining me from Boston, Sully Erna, who`s the lead singer of "Godsmack." I appreciate you taking some time with us, Sully.

SULLY ERNA, LEAD SINGER, "GODSMACK": Thanks for having me.

HAMMER: You`re welcome.

Well, you and the band are catching this heat, as I said, because your music is being used by the Navy in the recruitment ad, so it`s been suggested by some that the use of that music is going to make young men and women just run off and join the military and go off to war. And it`s been suggested that the band supports the war because you lent your music. And I know you`re here on SHOWBIZ TONIGHT to set the record straight on this.

ERNA: Well, yes, what I can say is that, you know, by no means has this band ever supported any war for any country or that we support government decisions or why we`re sticking our nose in other people`s business at times. What we support is our troops. And the women and men that go over there -- or anywhere -- to fight for our country and our lives and protect our freedom and I feel that, you know, we should support those causes. Whether it`s them just aiding with food and medical supplies and water for the tsunamis or Katrina or, you know, anything that we do. And I can`t imagine any American citizen that wouldn`t want to support that.

HAMMER: Yes, for a long time people have been confusing the idea that you can support our troops without necessarily supporting the war. I want to take a moment now to play a bit of the ad in question here. Let`s take a look at this.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: If someone wrote a book about your life, would anyone want to read it? The stories of tomorrow are being written today in the U.S. Navy. If you`re ready. Check out the life accelerator at Navy.com. Navy, accelerate your life. Now, get up to a $20,000 enlistment bonus...

HAMMER: I don`t know, I`ve got to tell you, Sully, I`m hearing that music in the ad. I want to get up out of my chair and join up and join the military.

Seriously, no doubt ads have influence over people, but do you think it`s ridiculous that, you know, people are actually suggesting somebody`s going to go off and join the military because of that music? Not even the vocals. Just the music is in that commercial.

ERNA: Well, I`ll tell you this. For one, I challenge anybody in this country, or any country, to pick up any of our records that we`ve ever recorded and find one political or government lyrical content in anything. I mean, our music has always been written about me and my life situations that I`ve went through, whether it was past relationships or just a boy growing into a man and overcoming life`s obstacles and the emotions that I processed going through that time in my life. So, I challenge anybody to try to find anything that has to do with supporting war or political issues in general. We`re not that kind of band. We`re just a good old rock `n` roll band, I guess. And how insulting is that to the men and women that join the armed forces that they`re that shallow and naive to just join the military because they heard a rock `n` roll song?

I think they should be apologizing to them because that makes them look pretty shallow. I don`t believe that`s the reason why they joined at all.

HAMMER: Well, I would like to get your take on the idea that, you know, you`ve said that you and your band do support our troops. Would you be willing to say whether or not you do support our president with this war in Iraq?

ERNA: I can`t say that I support that because I, personally, am not a big fan about Bush. I`ll tell you that right out in the open. I don`t -- but again, I`m not that educated enough to talk about the politics of the government, and obviously the people who write -- or the person, I should say, that wrote about this specific article, obviously is, well, a lot more educated than we are in government issues or politics or the military, whatever it is. And if he knows something that we don`t know, then maybe you should talk to us about it so we can be a little bit more educated.

HAMMER: Well, thank you for clearing it all up tonight, Sully, and really setting the record straight and making that clear divide between what you guys are standing for and not. And I appreciate you coming on SHOWBIZ TONIGHT.

ERNA: Yes, we`re just musicians.

HAMMER: All right. Sully Erna, the lead singer of "Godsmack." Appreciate you being with us. And you can pick up "Godsmack`s" latest album. It`s called "Four," and its in stores now.

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Sunday, 14 May 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=2727493&blogID=119899408

"So 105.3 [http://www.buzzatlanta.com/main.html] plays the Arthur Magazine interview with Sully from Godsmack this morning on the radio. For all of you that have not heard it go to http://www.arthurmag.com/magpie/?p=1244
...
"Although the interview was most unfair. Sully was not as educated on the subject as this Babcock fellow, which to me only shows that the interview was done out of poor taste. The interview was done mainly for it's shock jock value, to raise sales for their magazine, then it was for journalistic purposes.

"So after the interview was over 105.3 the buzz plays Rage Aginst the Machine, Killing in the Name of. What was that about? Were they supporting this interviewer? Don't get me wrong I am a huge fan of Rage but to play that song after that interview kinda made me have mixed feelings."

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Sunday, 14 May 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

http://merkey.net/bin/img/goyou.gif

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 14 May 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.godsmack.com/news/news.asp?item=101189

Sully Holds His Own! [ 5/7/2006 ]

Jay Babcock of Arthur magazine conducted an interview with GODSMACK frontman Sully Erna on Monday, May 1. What follows is a transcript of the conversation, as posted on the Arthur web site...

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Sunday, 14 May 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

And how insulting is that to the men and women that join the armed forces that they`re that shallow and naive to just join the military because they heard a rock `n` roll song?

That's what my friend thought (see my last post here above).

Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Sunday, 14 May 2006 23:49 (nineteen years ago)

I like how he calls it a "rock 'n roll song."

Steve Goldberg (Steve Goldberg), Sunday, 14 May 2006 23:54 (nineteen years ago)

Jay, what about Rushkoff?

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Monday, 15 May 2006 08:02 (nineteen years ago)

What about Rushkoff? Not sure what you're asking here. His piece was pretty self-explanatory.

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Monday, 15 May 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

that CNN thing is really weird. super damage control.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 15 May 2006 18:37 (nineteen years ago)

Like the Douglas Rushkoff column in the May issue (which I just snagged last night) about ignoring Iraq because it's "their war"

I mean, that was the idea under consideration but at the end of the piece Rushkoff largely rejects it. I think you're misrepresenting the column.

Renard (Renard), Monday, 15 May 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

Mmm. Yeah, he kind of comes around at the end, but it still implies a surrender to the apolitical. I mean, now isn't really the time to worry about the roots of our violent tendencies, is it? It's pretty clear why the administration started this war. In one paragraph, Rushkoff decries "our surrender of agency"; in the next, he's implying that protest has no value other than making its participants feel good.

I mean, all those words just to reach the point that he thinks it's good to be nice to people . . .

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Monday, 15 May 2006 22:21 (nineteen years ago)

"protest has no value other than making its participants feel good."

making the participants feel good has value, I think. Maybe not direct political impact-style value, but value nonetheless.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 15 May 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

still implies a surrender to the apolitical

I read the Rushkoff column today because I was curious about what you dudes were talking about. I think what he's saying is that, yes, he understands what his bud Morrison is saying: to engage in the day-to-day political world (even if you are anti-war) is to adopt and accept "their" reality. And if you are Morrison then being apolitical is fine because Morrison is engaged in his own personal battle with reality and attempting to create his own reality (via magick, drugs, art, etc.) But on the other hand, if to be apolitical means nothing more than drowning the world's problems out with yer iPod then that's not cool. So even though he knows it's "their war," he's still going to sign petitions, read up on politics, and basically stay active. Basically, he seems to be saying that even to be a liberal fighting the system is to be complicit in the creation of a certain reality (and that just might be the bigger problem). Robert Anton Wilson dealt with this same issue in the Illuminatus Trilogy: protest through apolitical magical reality vs. hard-nosed activist political reality. I'm not the most intelligble writer, but that's my take.

I do take issue with Morrison's (and Rushkoff's) phrase "their war". Call me a silly Buddhist type, but I don't think it's as simple as us. vs. them. I believe we are all to blame for the current state of affairs whether through action or non-action. It's all our war.

QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Monday, 15 May 2006 22:48 (nineteen years ago)

call me crazy, but this seems related.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 18 May 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.arthurmag.com/magpie/images/dailynews.jpg

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

time to move on, mr. babcock.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Wednesday, 31 May 2006 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

Jay, I just listened to the interview on Maron's show. A good showing, sir.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 1 June 2006 14:28 (eighteen years ago)

Johnny- Thanks. Doing that show was a blast. Glad you dug it.

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Thursday, 1 June 2006 23:26 (eighteen years ago)

three months pass...

JUST IN TIME FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR:

ARTHUR MAGAZINE LAUNCHES NEW ALBUM, CURATED BY JOSEPHINE FOSTER, TO BENEFIT COUNTER-MILITARY RECRUITING CAMPAIGNS AND PROGRAMS

"So Much Fire to Roast Human Flesh"

With wars raging across the Middle East and prospects for peace dimming, the youth of America have wised up and are starting to stay away from military recruiters in droves. Said recruiters have retaliated with aggressive--and often criminal--tactics.

An eye-opening study issued this August by the Government Accountability Office reported that "allegations and service-identified incidents of recruiter wrongdoing" increased almost 50 percent between 2004 and 2005. Criminal violations more than doubled over the same period of time. Increasingly common tactics used by the nation's 20,000 military recruiters range from lying about the financial benefits of service to threatening high school students with arrest if they back out of an enlistment process already underway. Military recruiters have also been assisting recruits in the falsification of documents to cover up conditions like autism, mental illness and serious drug problems that would bar them from service if reported. [See Endnotes below for more information.]

Musician Josephine Foster is joining forces with Bastet, our publishing imprint, to help give America's kids and parents the tools they need to protect them from the depredations of the nation's many unscrupulous military recruiters.

On August 29, we released So Much Fire to Roast Human Flesh, an 18-track, multi-artist compilation CD curated by Foster featuring exclusive contributions from some of the more outspoken members of the nation's burgeoning psychedelic folk scene, including Devendra Banhart, Feathers, David Pajo and members of Espers and Spires That in the Sunset Rise. Musicians from earlier generations of the underground, such as Michael Hurley, Kath Bloom and Angels of Light, are also present.

All profits from sales of So Much Fire... will be distributed to specific counter-military recruitment and pacifist organizations and programs who effectively advise high school students and other Americans at risk of being taken advantage of by the military's recruiters and omnipresent big-budget marketing campaigns.

"All of the musicians represented on So Much Fire... are American citizens," said Josephine Foster. "Our voices join with many others across this land that freely question and openly oppose war. Hopefully we will raise a good sum of money to help fund the educational pacifist tasks these organizations do. They are dedicated to creating a positive counter to the rising tides of the war being waged. We hope to assist them in their efforts promoting peace and non-militarism in the United States."

"I am deeply grateful to everyone involved in this gesture; from every musician, to Fred Tomaselli for use of his incredible painting as the cover art, to Jay Babcock and Laris Kreslins at Arthur Magazine who so enthusiastically took up this idea and worked to realize it. In the end, all of the labor was donated, including the manufacturing."

The album's title is taken from a line by the poet Apollinaire, who died from wounds he sustained while serving in World War I.

So Much Fire... is available for order from Arthurmag.com and from record stores across North America.

Track listing:

THE CHERRY BLOSSOMS - "Dragonfly" (live)
FEATHERS - "Dust"
MICHAEL HURLEY - "A Little Bit of Love for You"
MEG BAIRD - "Western Red Lily (Nunavut Diamond Dream)"
ANDREW BAR - "Don't Trust That Man"
GOATGIRL - "President Combed His Hair"
DEVENDRA BANHART - "I Know Some Souls" (demo)
KATH BLOOM - "Baby Let It Come Down On Me"
CHARLIE NOTHING - "Fuck You and Your Stupid Wars"
DIANE CLUCK - "A Phoenix and Doves"
JOHN ALLINGHAM & ANN TILEY - "Big War"
JOSEPHINE FOSTER - "Would You Pave the Road?"
ANGELS OF LIGHT - "Destroyer"
RACHEL MASON - "The War Clerk's Lament"
PAJO - "War Is Dead"
MVEE - "Powderfinger"
KATHLEEN BAIRD - "Prayer for Silence"
LAY ALL OVER IT - "A Place"

Cover artwork by Fred Tomaselli

Available now. $12US/14Can/17World postpaid.

ENDNOTES
Read the GAO report, "Military Recruiting: DOD and Services Need Better Data to Enhance Visibility over Recruiter Irregularities" here:
http://www.gao.gov/docdblite/summary.php?rptno=GAO-06-846&accno=A58199

High school students, their parents and friends can learn more about their rights when confronted by recruiters at
http://afsc.org/youthmil/militarism-in-schools/High-school-students-rights.htm

JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 20:08 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.culturevulture.net/Theater8/spamalot.jpg

everything (everything), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

seven months pass...
Crash victim's condition upgraded; car hit by Godsmack lead singer

...

Lindsay Taylor, 25, was upgraded to serious condition yesterday, said Jerry Berger, a spokesman for Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital. Taylor was said to be in a coma and on life support after the crash Wednesday night on Interstate 93 south.

Taylor was sitting in the back seat of a Toyota Camry that was struck from behind by a Hummer H3 driven by Salvatore "Sully" Erna, 38, of Windham, N.H. Erna, a Lawrence native, is the lead singer of the rock band Godsmack. He was not injured in the accident, police said.

jaybabcock, Thursday, 19 April 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)

a Hummer, figures

marmotwolof, Thursday, 19 April 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

seriously..they're fine when you're getting one backstage but they're deadly while you're driving

latebloomer, Thursday, 19 April 2007 00:32 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.