I was surprised I couldn't find a thread on this. This article came out last month in the
New Yorker:
The Soundtrack of Your Life: Muzak in the realm of retail theatre - David Owen, April 10, 2006.
I was vaguely aware of Muzak's transition to using original songs rather than remade instrumentals in the last decade, but didn't know the extent of their new model. They have a database of 1.5 million songs. Seems kind of a waste, given that when they narrow it down to songs that couldn't possibly offend any customers ever, it's the same old 100 songs that are pounded into our skulls in restaurants and shops across the country, which ironically, offend me to no end. Or perhaps there's something more sophisticated going on.
I went through the same imaging process during my visit to Fort Mill. Steven Pilker, a twenty-five-year-old audio architect—he had worked in a record store while in school at U.N.C. Charlotte and, when he graduated, was offered a job by a Muzak executive who had been a regular customer—asked me seven or eight questions, none of which had anything to do with music. (“When you’re not working, what do you like to do?” “If you could choose an actor / actress to star in your biographical movie, who would it be and why?”) A couple of weeks later, he sent me a six-song program, which contained nothing connected to what I think of as my main musical phenotype (“classic rock”); in fact, five of the six tracks were by artists I’d never heard of. Yet I liked all six very much, and later bought CDs by two of them (Sufjan Stevens and Jamie Lidell). Pilker’s selections aren’t definitive, of course; another audio architect surely could have had another take on my “brand.” But I was struck that Pilker, after spending very little time with me, had created an appealing musical program that was based on his sense of who I was, rather than on any direct examination of the music I actually listened to if left on my own.
One might scoff at the music choices, but it's an interesting exercise. I usually make recommendations based on what people already like. But there is the possibility that they've never been exposed to anything like certain types they would like. Though I find that highly unlikely unless that person grew up in the mountains raising yaks, with little exposure to popular music. But outside the tiny world of music cognoscenti, maybe their approach does make sense.
I'd like to know what exactly their process is. Are there any moles out there willing to infiltrate and share?
― Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 15:41 (nineteen years ago)
“The Japanese think they love it, but they actually don’t,” a former Muzak executive told me. “They’ll get over it soon.”I need to use that line, for example: "You think you love the Killers, but you actually don't."
― O-Keigh (O-Keigh), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)
They have a database of 1.5 million songs. Seems kind of a waste, given that when they narrow it down to songs that couldn't possibly offend any customers ever, it's the same old 100 songs that are pounded into our skulls in restaurants and shops across the country, which ironically, offend me to no end.Well, it really kinda depends on the client, and what kind of music program is most suited to them. Muzak has something like eighty different pre-programmed "channels" for a client to choose from, and can also create custom-made programs as well. So if McDonald's want to instill in a consumer a sense of warmth, familiarity, nostalgia, etc., Muzak will program "Brown-eyed Girl"; if Urban Outfitters wants to be thought of a hipster haven, Muazak'll program something a tad more obscure.
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 16:01 (nineteen years ago)
Dude, _I_ coulda told you this guy would like Surfjan and Lidell after reading two pages of this article.
That said: 1) Fun read
2) Nice work if you can get it.
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 16:52 (nineteen years ago)
Sorry about the bold.
New Yorker writer dumbstruck by blind luck/random bullseye/blind pig finding truffle and own eagerness to please.
Hee!
So is the consensus that picking music based on weird lifestyle questions/quasi-psychological testing rather than pre-existing music preferences, a steaming load of b.s.?
I still want our mole to reveal the process in detail. Then we could do a case test with a large group. Where's our mole? Release him from the rubber cage!
― Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Tuesday, 9 May 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)