― Tom, Sunday, 17 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― keith, Sunday, 17 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Andy K, Sunday, 17 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Queen G, Sunday, 17 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 17 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ramosi, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
"Thats why I find beauty in Dylan can be difficult... I still have no time for the ugliness of time out of mind"
Im confused
― kiwi, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ronan, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
In some ways it reminded me of your Morrissey article, which I think I remember you saying you didn't care for (I enjoyed that one, too.) Maybe it was the mention of your school days.
― Mark, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― fritz, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I think you've got "Love and Theft" confused with "Good As I Been To You".
― o. nate, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
2. Tom E's Dylan is "purely personal" - like the pinefox's - Hooray! we understand each other;
3. Tom E's Dylan is "purely personal" - thus necessarily not like the pinefox's - Boo-Hoo, we pass like rolling stones in the night, gathering our own private moss.
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I'm glad people liked the piece. I like it. I think it's better than the Morrissey one. I don't think it's purely personal though Pinefox - although the themes it advances probably would seem to a Dylanologist very flimsy.
― Tom, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)