i love 12"s and i'm worried about them

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
there's so many amazing mix cds, if you're not a dj who wants the 12"s then are mix cds the best way of getting hold of techno/house stuff now? (place tunes in a narrative/tunes set-up in a way that brings the best out of them/ six or seven tunes for the price of one). are we witnessing the end of the 12" (as anything other than a practical tool? (plus obv. cd/mp3 mixers).

michael wells (michael w.), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 19:03 (nineteen years ago)

The dream is over.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)

Hasn't the 12" always been pretty much a practical tool for DJs, with a few big exceptions?

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

CD-singles usually play the part that the 12 inch used to play anyway.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 20:25 (nineteen years ago)

A message to Geir, Rudi.

I Hate You Little Girls (noodle vague), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.hetemeel.com/haha/21171.suck+a+cock,%20you+fucker!!!!.jpg

I Hate You Little Girls (noodle vague), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

I just used this Serato scratch live thing the other day and actual vinyl records are OVER.

i'm from hollywood, Wednesday, 24 May 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

Fuck that.

Most of the new technology is just ways to do the same thing you do with 12s. You can argue Ableton has superceded them but then, as I always say, at the moment most people aren't creative enough to use Ableton, they're better off without it.

I don't mind hearing Optimo re-edit a tune but my friend doing it is usually a different story. One that ends with the line "I prefer the original, why have you put that stupid "rock this party" vocal over a good tune at a pitch that makes it sound like the Bee Gees"

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 May 2006 09:56 (nineteen years ago)

CD-J 1000s plus decks is still about the best.

Also I don't think the mp3 stores are as good as the vinyl ones anyhow.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 May 2006 09:57 (nineteen years ago)

in terms of sound quality?

Konal Doddz (blueski), Thursday, 25 May 2006 10:22 (nineteen years ago)

I think I've only bought five 12"s in last three years - 1 album, 1 promo and the other three were obscure 90s dance classics i wanted.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Thursday, 25 May 2006 10:25 (nineteen years ago)

add another 3 i've just remembered (sorry, not interesting, carry on)

Konal Doddz (blueski), Thursday, 25 May 2006 10:30 (nineteen years ago)

Last Night A Poster Bummed Me Out

((((((DOPplur)))n)))u))))tttt (donut), Thursday, 25 May 2006 10:39 (nineteen years ago)

Ronan, have you tried the Serato thing? It's actually two vinyl records that map to laptop software. Any mp3 can be used like vinyl. The other night, I took over for my friend when he took a couple breaks and it was *exactly* like using actual vinyl records (because you're still controlling with actual 1200s). I was very impressed.

i'm from hollywood, Thursday, 25 May 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)

MP3 = lossy format = poor sound quality. I know some people can't tell the difference but I still find it hard to believe this is even an entertained option amongst DJs who ostensibly love music. Where are the vinyl zealots when you need them? I guess Alex in SF is OTM...

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 25 May 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)

I can tell the difference when mp3's are poorly encoded, but the main point of these digital formats with regard to djing is that they offer dj's access to tracks that have never been and likely never will be available on vinyl (which can of course physically degrade, thereby impairing sound quality etc).

i'm from hollywood, Thursday, 25 May 2006 16:35 (nineteen years ago)

don't mix CDs usually comprise... a bunch of 12"s?

Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 25 May 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

Oh yeah I've seen serrato. It's true what you say but the mp3s can equally be played from CDs using CD-Js, plus the new 1000s can play them straight as mp3 files.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 25 May 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)

I can tell the difference when mp3's are poorly encoded, but the main point of these digital formats with regard to djing is that they offer dj's access to tracks that have never been and likely never will be available on vinyl (which can of course physically degrade, thereby impairing sound quality etc).
-- i'm from hollywood (logge...), May 25th, 2006.

Yeah, I understand the argument of "let's not lose the music." It's a seductive argument, but it's one that inevitably does a disservice to listeners and music history. Digital formats in and of themselves are not the problem - the lossy nature of the ubiqitous MP3s/MP4s are. There are plenty of open source digital formats (e.g. FLAC, SHN, APE) that are lossless but don't have the file bulk of WAVs.

It would nice if DJ culture took the same attitude that tape traders have - they're real sticklers for preservation through lossless file formats. Most live trading boards won't even accept mp3s. Or check out Archive.org - sure, they offer mp3s versions, but alongside lossless FLAC versions of live shows.

Some people say, "Well, this 12" was recorded in somebody's garage in '85, it didn't sound great in the first place, so who cares if it's lossy." Think about it though - the worse the recording is, the more important it is to avoid losing MORE sound quality by converting it to a lossy format. It's like saying, "Well, the typeface on this old out-of-print book is fading, I might as well copy it using a crappy Xerox machine that's low on toner to preserve it for future generations."

Plus an mp3 conversion will smear details you might not hear on your iPod headbuds - but when you pump it through a big soundsystem you might...

Edward III (edward iii), Thursday, 25 May 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)

i always want to buy 12"s, and sometimes do, bbut the pretence that i will someday get to play them all oput to an ecstatic crowd (or failing that, one that even cocks an ear) becomes more and more absurd. so my zeal diminishes, especially when i can just get proper djs to mix cds for me.

but mix cds are juts mixes of...12"s! so i cant see 12"s disappearing any time particularly soon, and not becasue of the rise of mix cds (are mix cds necessarily more prevalent than they were 5 years ago, say?)

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 25 May 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

xpost
Again, there are certain tracks that I'm sure a DJ would love to play that s/he will never be able to find on anything "better" than an .mp3 - does that mean the song shouldn't be played; that it would not "work" in the context of a party? CD's themselves are approximations of analog, and the vinyl format certainly degrades (and is never ever "perfect" to start with). Do you take DAT decks with you down to the club or what??? I've seen parties go off despite the music being played from lossy digital files. Besides, I believe you're only disappointing dogs, especially if you're using high quality LAME VBR encodes.

i'm from hollywood, Thursday, 25 May 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

VBR encoding is teh sukc

blunt (blunt), Thursday, 25 May 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)

why so?

fandango (fandango), Thursday, 25 May 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

are mix cds the best way of getting hold of techno/house stuff now?

I think they always have been! This is the main reason I buy or listen to mix CD's. I buy vinyl to get more versions/tracks, or as many others have said, for the sound quality.

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 25 May 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)

Yes blunt, please give your reasoning.

i'm from hollywood, Thursday, 25 May 2006 21:51 (nineteen years ago)

I was being kind of lazy asking there... I think a lot of devices have troubles with VBR that they don't have with plain CBR 320 (or whatever) bitrate files...

yes yes, it's the fault of the device makers really for being half-ass & lame technically. But I guess if you ARE using mp3's to DJ with... you really have to take a lot more care about these things & head potential problems off at the pass. I'm guessing that's why VBR sucks.

fandango (fandango), Thursday, 25 May 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.