The future of small band touring

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Is there one?

Unknown bands have always been considered lucky to break even on tour, and I'd imagine even some name indie bands aren't raking it in playing 100-200 person venues.

Say you're averaging 200 miles a day. In a full size van, that could easily be 13-14 gallons a day. At $2 a galoon, that was already costing $28 a day, almost $200 a week. With gas at $3, you're talking $300 a week. If gas goes to $5, obviously that's $500 a week - a pretty significant difference.

I don't really know what a band like, say, Deerhoof brings in a week. I do know that there are bands you've probably heard and think of as up-and-coming who already considered themselves lucky to break even on a tour. A difference of $100 or $200 a week could hit bands like that fairly hard.

This is not to speak of bands you haven't heard of yet, who probably already lost money touring just to get the experience and exposure it provides.

Now take into account that as record sales continue to decrease, and/or assuming digital subscriptions are the way and don't pay bands very much per song, bands will already be increasingly dependent on touring for income.

This seems like bad news. OTOH, maybe it will just lead to even more regionalism -- for an east coast band to hit Boston/NYC/Philly/DC won't be that bad, but they'll be less likely to head out to Chicago or go down south. I'd imagine that already plays a role in some bands' touring schedules.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 1 June 2006 01:48 (nineteen years ago)

i have to admit i've wondered about just how much gas prices must seriously be impacting the indie tour scene - already bands don't tour anything remotely like the old rem/hardcore 'play alot. play everywhere.' days, it is odd when you consider that back then (for rem at least i know) touring was a good way to make some cash. in addition to how drastically the internet potentially impacts indie bands (their target demo is maybe the most likely to dl?)(plus thx to the internet you can hear just how much an indie band suxx before you get suckered into buying the record), it also makes it ALOT easier to get exposure, their name out, and achieve some of the nonfinancial ends of touring without having to incur the costs of touring.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 1 June 2006 01:56 (nineteen years ago)

So bands can also do more to make sure people show up at their gigs before they even do their first tour. You may have a point.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 1 June 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

The price of gas will not make or break any particular aspect of indie rock. Venues most certainly have enough ticket headroom to absorb $5/gallon in gas without breaking a sweat. When's the last time you declined a show because of the price? The last time I saw Deerhoof -- @ 12 Galaxies in San Francisco -- the door was $8. I would have paid 3x that without thinking twice, and I'm sure most attendees would have as well.

Shoes say, yeah, no hands clap your good bra. (goodbra), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:11 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I was going to mention ticket price -- presumably it goes up. For Deerhoof that may not matter - they'll sell out anyway, but it means two things: 1) Almost no one will pay $15 or $20 to see a new band they don't really know, and 2) It could mean the end of the "cheap tix for all" philosophy that's driven indie rock touring for so long.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:15 (nineteen years ago)

When's the last time you declined a show because of the price?

ahem - Robert Polllard played his first solo show last night to a half empty crowd in Athens, GA

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)

I often pass on shows because of the price. also, Robert Polllard played his first solo show last night to a half empty crowd in Athens, GA

jergins (jergins), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

er

jergins (jergins), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:18 (nineteen years ago)

yeah the indie bands that you can imagine might be in a bus or might not be sleeping on someone's floor that night it won't impact, it's the others ie most of them that will get impacted and longterm it definitely would have an effect. in athens at least i know yeah people will pony up for a band they definitely want to see but for a casual thing - maybe they've heard of the band but haven't heard them and are curious, maybe a friends going and you're bored, it's something to do on a tuesday night, whatever - price will have an impact, and people who might've been converted to a specific band or at least have gotten into the habit of going to see several bands a week will find other ways to spend their time and money and maybe go to a show if it's someone they really want to see - big impact: indie's already drawing from a smaller pool as is. i mean i can't tell you how many bands i've seen without having heard one note (or even read one word about) beforehand - no chance in hell i do that if it costs me twenty bucks.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:25 (nineteen years ago)

Gas is just part of the equation. There's food and lodging too.

Christ, tons of bands are lucky to make $50 to $150 on any given night. And NO ONE likes to sleep in a van.

Hats off to bands that make it all come together.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

I actually have a decent enough day job that I could afford to kick in a little more for gas, except I also don't get any paid vacation, so the two tours we've done cost me quite a bit and it's hard to see doing another one at all in the near future, let alone touring often enough that people in the cities we visit would start to recognize our name.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

future = more bike tours

o beamish nephew, Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:34 (nineteen years ago)

Course I guess there's always suburban kids whose moms and dads can kick in some dough. The NYTimes had an article the other day about how band moms are like the new soccer moms. So maybe instead of travelling teams, they'll put together, like, travelling tour packages.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 1 June 2006 02:34 (nineteen years ago)

I'd personally love to see music become more regionalized! I've lived long enough to be able to tell (true) stories about the time that an 'unknown' band like Nirvana or the Flaming Lips or Black Flag slept on the floor of my pad (and I didn't even like those bands especially, but I understood that helping out in such a way made it possible for me to see bands I liked.) I remember, earlier than that, when it was relatively unheard of for "big" regional bands like Mission of Burma to tour. A great (and now legendary) band from NYC or Boston or SF or LA might not ever leave their li'l domain. A pity for those stuck somewhere else, I suppose - but it did force bands to really tighten up and develop an original style before attempting something like a cross-continental tour. Is that a bad thing, really? I don't think so.

Dee Xtrovert (dee dee), Thursday, 1 June 2006 04:14 (nineteen years ago)

It's interesting the scale people seem to be thinking about here. For me when I think of bands going on tour, it's sweaty kids in a beat-up van playing sweaty basements, eating at Waffle House, crashing on people's floors without exception, and going into it knowing that they probably won't make money off of the whole thing. The racket is to work some pizza dough job that will let you quit for two weeks and come back with no hard feelings, make enough to get by, and the touring thing is essentially taking the place of all other hobbies in terms of your personal budget. If you make a few bucks from the donation jar, it's to buy salami for the next couple days. If you sell a few CDs, you mostly are just offsetting the costs of buying blank CDs and getting the inserts printed. Etc. In this model, I'm not sure gas prices really change the general shape of things, because the tour is a money loss already. Maybe you'll see more carpooling, I dunno.

Incidentally - "Say you're averaging 200 miles a day." If you're averaging 200 miles a day then you DO need to be cutting back to more regional touring. That makes no sense to me unless you live in central Wyoming and you have to go 200 miles to get ANYWHERE. Maybe booking basement party gigs is harder than I imagine, but it seems like you should be able to easily throw together a decent sequence of stops in the 75-100 mile a day range.

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 1 June 2006 04:54 (nineteen years ago)

Philly to Pittsburgh is 300 miles.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 1 June 2006 04:58 (nineteen years ago)

I could give you plenty of other examples, but you're correct, you can certainly do plenty of more local trips than that.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 1 June 2006 04:58 (nineteen years ago)

more & more bike tours!

o beamish nephew, Thursday, 1 June 2006 10:32 (nineteen years ago)

Dee OTM - actual regional scenes, where bands play smaller towns that're closer together, would be a great thing as one major downside of national touring is that you're less likely to see things like the mid-seventies cleveland scene or early eighties athens or l.a.: inevitable cross-pollination of exposure to scenes across the country = not necessarily homogeneity, but less time for things to do that sorta hothouse-developing thing. I used to have this totally crazy but still cool to me idea of playing every last one of the 99 counties in Iowa. I would still like to undertake, at some point, a regions-of-NC tour. Piedmont love!

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 1 June 2006 10:42 (nineteen years ago)

With regard to this:

Now take into account that as record sales continue to decrease, and/or assuming digital subscriptions are the way and don't pay bands very much per song

I don't know what kind of setup other people have, but my music is on iTunes and other digital services through CDBaby, and I make more money from that than I do from selling physical CDs. CDBaby gives me 91% of all the money made from digital downloads. So if my album has 10 songs and someone downloads the whole thing I see almost $9 from that, which is great considering there's no manufacturing cost to factor in.

Steve Goldberg (Steve Goldberg), Thursday, 1 June 2006 10:53 (nineteen years ago)

I would think 200 miles a day is pretty reasonable. Except on the Washington-Boston (maybe Richmond-Portland)corridor, where are the cities much closer than 150-200 miles apart? Anywhere between the Mississippi and California, you're lucky to drive less than 300 miles ever. And there's scheduling to consider, too. Last year, a midwestern band I know was doing an East Coast tour and wound up playing, on consecutive nights, D.C., Providence, Philly, Boston, NYC. Crazy, but that's when/where they could get the dates. D.C. and Boston are about 500 miles apart, but they probably did 1,400 miles in four days.

Prices are going up a bit for indie shows, I think.

Vornado, Thursday, 1 June 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)

As somebody who put together and played on two largely pointless (but fun) tours for my teenage punk bands, I think less continent-wide touring can only be a good thing for the American music-loving public. Regionalism sounds just fine to me.

Jason Toon (Jason Toon), Thursday, 1 June 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)

Except on the Washington-Boston (maybe Richmond-Portland)corridor, where are the cities much closer than 150-200 miles apart?

Cities maybe, but surely our "small" "indie" bands are going to play college towns, high school open-mics, and anywhere else they can get gigs, right? It always totally mystifies me for example when a band on tour plays virtually nowhere in the Southeast but Atlanta. They have to jog WAY the hell out of their way to do that one show, and they're meanwhile skipping over places like Athens, Asheville, hell, even Auburn or Knoxville (both rumored, but unproven, to have great house-show scenes at the very least). It doesn't make sense at either end of the spectrum: if you're a REAL tiny, unknown band, the only purpose of going on tour is to have fun, meet people, see bands and play shows - so play as many of them as possible for pete's sake! If you're a bigger indie "name" act - Sleater-Kinney, Built To Spill, your Pitchfork act of the month or whatever - you KNOW you'll be able to fill or even sell out a decent sized venue in any halfway-cool place....so why not do it?

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 1 June 2006 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBn5BswaB4w

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 1 June 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

Incidentally, to an extent I think we do still have a regional-band thing going on; it's just that only some bands/labels/scenes are working off that blueprint. We get a K Records band near Athens about once every leap year (barring that bizarre season where we got two Microphones shows within two months of each other - man, that was awesome).

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 1 June 2006 16:47 (nineteen years ago)

From: (hstencil works at)@m@t@dordirect.com
Subject: the future of touring
Date: May 3, 2006 2:32:24 PM EDT
To: m@t@dor and beggars people

this is my pal nick's friend:

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=1914429&page=1

as gas prices rise, this seems as good a way as any to counteract them!

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 1 June 2006 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

More t-shirts, more calendars, more art books. The Ditty Bops have it right.

Dr. Casino gets it right - the solution to this is imagination, and for bands not just to follow the circuit of Emo's, Empty Bottle, Mercury Lounge.

I co-hosted a show last month for two touring bands at an arty collective here in Chicago - we got about 35 people to show up, the bands got about $150 in donations (plus CD sales), and both the bands and the audience had an experience very different from a night out at a bar/club/coffeehouse.

Eazy (Eazy), Thursday, 1 June 2006 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know what kind of setup other people have, but my music is on iTunes and other digital services through CDBaby, and I make more money from that than I do from selling physical CDs. CDBaby gives me 91% of all the money made from digital downloads. So if my album has 10 songs and someone downloads the whole thing I see almost $9 from that, which is great considering there's no manufacturing cost to factor in.

-- Steve Goldberg (io502s...), June 1st, 2006.

We use CDBaby too. It's fine for now, but it's kind of unsexy and you obviously have to make up for any marketing a label would do with your own cash and work. It's hard to imagine we'd ever see big numbers on it without shelling out a lot for publicity and marketing (which, despite what their press releases say, is what the CYHSYs of the world usually do). 90% of 500 is still a lot less than 40% of 10,000.

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Thursday, 1 June 2006 19:55 (nineteen years ago)

Well, they'd charge more than $35 for sexier promotion. That's what managers and publicists are for. CDBaby is much more like a distributor.

I have a CD on there and am in the same situation as Steve G. - I've made more from digital sales than actual-CD sales.


Eazy (Eazy), Thursday, 1 June 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, of course that's true Abbadavid. And I think CDBaby's pricing scheme for physical CDs is pretty lame, too. I don't understand why it's a fixed rate and not a percentage - it discourages people from selling cheap EPs.

Steve Goldberg (Steve Goldberg), Thursday, 1 June 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

CDBaby is much more like a distributor.

Distributors do marketing and promotion.

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 1 June 2006 20:20 (nineteen years ago)

Any band that is staying in a hotel these days is a band with a name. Almost every single group I brought to Oberlin this year either stayed in houses or, in the case of Sleepytime Gorilla Museum, in their huge amazing bus. Only Cat Power and the Books got hotel rooms, if I remember correctly. (So that means Old Time Relijun, Wooden Wand, NNCK, Nautical Almanac, the Mae Shi, An Albatross, the Punks and Excepter all stayed in houses). Of course, not everywhere is like Oberlin, so staying in someone's house isn't always an option... but I feel like it's the better option for a lot of bands.

trees (treesessplode), Thursday, 1 June 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

my little indie band has done some regional touring in the past few yrs, gas prices are defintely an issue and this is something I have discussed w/ friends over the past few months. On our last trip last month it cost about $90 everytime we had to fill up the van. We still sleep on floors/couches/the van.

I think one thing you will see is already happening, bands going together on tour, sharing vans/equipment. We went out last yr w/ a fellow band, shared gear, shared a van (9 dudes)and if the van would have survived we would have come out ahead (and even as it was we didn't do too bad). Bands that are going to tour, even small amounts, have to accept that it will most likely be a break even type situation, at best. I mean its crazy fun, so to me, at least, its worth it.

I think the comment above about rem/black flag/touring-for-months-on-end touches on an interesting point, if you looks back at old flyers for those shows the first thing that you notice is how little the door price has increased in the intervning 20-25 yrs. In Mpls/St Paul shows are still in the $5 to $7 range, which is not a huge leap. Door prices have not risen to match inflation. Part of it is club owners don't want to charge more becuz they want people buy drinks. Part of it is fans are unwilling to pay more (becuz they want to buy drinks).

I think the future of touring is shorter tours, more bands touring together and higher door prices. This might keep certain bands from venturing very far from their hometowns, but there will always who go out longer, etc.

Touring/playing/etc is so much fun, its worth losing money on.

chris besinger (chris besinger), Thursday, 1 June 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

fourteen years pass...

posting this here too because it's a blast imo. the least likeable person interviewed is the biggest deal (albini) but he doesn't take up too much space imo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agUS6GnZr_U

John Cooper of Christian rock band Skillet (map), Tuesday, 18 May 2021 21:42 (four years ago)

i would like to watch that film ^

i am also very interested in the post-COVID future of small band touring ... in particular if there is some sort of opportunity to create an ecosystem of small, DIY-ish / collectively owned-ish concert spaces that could somehow work together to make touring the U.S. much easier / better / nicer for small bands.

i know these places existed before, but it would be nice to solidify relationships between them and sort of act like Live Nation does with its venues, but in an underground, more cooperative and less evil sort of way.

is this a pipe dream?

alpine static, Wednesday, 19 May 2021 03:09 (four years ago)

Depends on rent

Clara Lemlich stan account (silby), Wednesday, 19 May 2021 03:11 (four years ago)

Wow, what ever happened to Steve Goldberg?

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Wednesday, 19 May 2021 18:59 (four years ago)

two years pass...

Seems like a good thread to revive for this excellent story from Nina Corcoran:

https://pitchfork.com/features/article/artist-merch-cuts-venues/

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 November 2023 19:52 (one year ago)

Just brutal.

The Triumphant Return of Bernard & Stubbs (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 1 November 2023 20:10 (one year ago)

Deck is definitely stacked against working artists right now, which has been true for well over a decade, but it somehow keeps getting worse

Paul Ponzi, Thursday, 2 November 2023 21:17 (one year ago)

The “we take a cut of merch to make taxes easier for the band” quote in the article is fucking absurd.

bbq, Friday, 3 November 2023 06:46 (one year ago)

To add context, I’m playing at a venue tonight that takes 20 percent of merch sales and I can assure you that it is not helping with my taxes or any other of the reasons stated in the article

bbq, Friday, 3 November 2023 12:01 (one year ago)

IMP productions / 930 Club in Washington DC pleading they need to do it financially to survive is absurd. They run multiple venues and have had many sold out gigs post pandemic . Plus they have gotten aid from the city and pandemic money that allowed them to open another venue ( Atlantis)

curmudgeon, Friday, 3 November 2023 15:10 (one year ago)

I used to play music in a band, we weren't big or anything but we toured some and released records and basically broke even (basically) & I stopped playing in 2017 in part cuz it was time but also even then it was so apparent that how we previously operated, DIY everything basically, just wasn't going to be feasible financially any longer or was going to require so much more effort that it was just going to be as much work as my day job.

The people who are still out there doing it are fucking heroes in my book, fuck every venue that does this or if it isn't this some other underhanded scam they are always running on bands.

chr1sb3singer, Friday, 3 November 2023 16:34 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.