Bun B: SENSETIVE THUG

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

BB: Every time I see myself in print or on TV, I feel like a little white girl. I feel fat.

― jewess harvell (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

i don't honestly know if i've ever identified with a statement made in a rapper's interview more.

― jewess harvell (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

is that from the vanity fair cover?

― renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:29 (nineteen years ago)

That's pretty beautiful.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

words i never thought i'd type: bun b, in the believer.

― jewess harvell (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:31 (nineteen years ago)

BLVR: When they first heard The Southern Way, what was their response?

BB: From my parents? My parents never actually heard Southern Way. My mother didn’t really understand I was a rapper ’til probably around “Big Pimpin.’”

BLVR: Really?

BB: My parents are from a whole different culture. My parents are from small-town Louisiana. It’s like, if it walk like a duck, talk like a duck, then it’s a duck. And if you ain’t quacking, you ain’t no duck. My mom’s whole thing was, “Why ain’t you on TV? Everybody else that makes music is on TV.” So I’m like, “Well, they don’t really deal with Southern people.” And she’s like, “That’s not true, ’cause Ray Charles is from the South and James Brown is, too.”

― deej.. (deej..), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:35 (nineteen years ago)

damn. good interview!

― renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

Indeed!

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

it is.

― jewess harvell (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:39 (nineteen years ago)

yeah really great piece!

― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)

BLVR: Did you punch on “Big Pimpin,’” or was that also one shot?
BB: I wouldn’t dare punch in mixed company. Jesus.
BLVR: [Laughs] Yeah, but it was thirty-two bars.
BB: I wouldn’t dare.

BLVR: I’m just saying, thirty-two bars, you might be allowed a punch.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

cool interview. thx for posting.

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 22:00 (nineteen years ago)

I fucking hate The Believer, and I've only ever heard Bun B on "Big Pimpin'." But yeah, that's a great interview. It makes me want to go listen to the guy's music, just out of respect for him being so fucking smart, so aware of himself as a craftsman, and being willing to be smart about the nature of his craft in public in a way that, say, Ghostface is not willing to be.

― pdf (Phil Freeman), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 22:59 (nineteen years ago)

Damn good.

― It's Rodney, pimp! (R. J. Greene), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 02:12 (nineteen years ago)

What does that mean, punch in?

― Ned Beauman (NedBeauman), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

it's a "do over" - you punch the button on the tape machine right at the point where you want to re-record something

― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:04 (nineteen years ago)

it's a "do over" - you punch the button on the tape machine right at the point where you want to re-record something

Or Pro Tools, whichever. I'd been told by a fellow engineer that rappers have bragging rights as to how long they can rap without a punch-in, and that exchange confirms it for me.

― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

ie, doing the whole thing in one take, as opposed to stitching the part together through multiple takes.

totally makes me want to hear more of his music too, btw - I only know him from guest spots on various things.

― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)

in re: punch-ins, rap in rockism shocker, or not

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

It's certainly not a shocker.

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 21:43 (nineteen years ago)

people in taking pride in what they do shockah?

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 21:51 (nineteen years ago)

Matt it may surprise you to learn that people who punch in a lot also take pride in what they do!

what I mean is, there's no other aspect of a rap track that places any privilege on "liveness"- really rap was key in banging against the "you have to have live instruments" idea, really radical in this way, and it's usually at the forefront of new technologies in recording, so the "doing it live!" aspect of things is kinda discordant - it's not like there's any rap privilege on a drummer who can keep an unvarying 4/4 for three straight minutes, right? but the "no punches" thing sounds so much like Pat Travers or something, rather charming to me, just a little surprising

interview totally excellent, what a wonderful read

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

A pretty sizeable premium is placed on improvisation in hip-hop though (see: battle raps, etc.) Even though that may not be as prized in the recorded medium, it's not hard to imagine that the craft of getting something right off the cuff would be valued (esp. given the cost of recording/studio time/etc.)

― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

also I think there would be some benefit to being able to do your raps live, esp. in terms of being able to later put on a good live show....i'd imagine that a lot of people want to make sure that they can kill live as well, not just in the studio....i mean if you had to punch in a zillion times on the verse, i can't imagine later you'll be able to pull it off in a live setting...

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

"in terms of being able to later put on a good live show"

ROFLZ - is this why 99% of live rap shows are horrible and boring?! I'm kinda with J0hn on this one - its an amusing, if not altogether shocking, sidebar in hip-hop aesthetics.

― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 22:11 (nineteen years ago)

i don't know, i don't go to 99 percent of all live rap shows.

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

BDP "Breath Control" to thread.

― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

KRS was the only old-school rap guy I saw back in the day who wasn't rapping over his own vocal tracks

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:19 (nineteen years ago)

that is possibly the best hip-hop interview i've ever read (if there are others as good or better, please refer me to them).

on the punch-in thing, i would think rappers would be kind of like jazz guys on that -- it's the pride in the solo. especially in a guest spot, where you're invited in to show what you can do and to push the other guys around you.

― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 June 2006 05:54 (nineteen years ago)

i can usually hear punch-ins & most of the time it ruins a verse for me

― and what (ooo), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:53 (nineteen years ago)

ethan is a rockist!

this is stoopid. it's good to be good at what you do. that's the whole point. anti-rockism's whole faux-naive b.s. drives me nuts like "oh my oh my why is it BETTER to be able to do it all in one punch, that's looking at it through a rockist mindset" it's like fuck if you can't understand why it's cool for someone to be able to go and kill a whole verse in one take, then i don't really even know where yr coming from.....i'm not saying everything boils down to some kind of wierd guitar magazine bullshit where say, pumpkinhead is supposed to be better than too short or something, but at a certain level skills DO matter.

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)

HOW DARE YOU TAKE AWAY FROM OUR ARTIFICIALLY CONSTRUCTED PLEASURES.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:42 (nineteen years ago)

Matt as it happens on a personal/professional level I agree with you, I think anybody who knows my shit knows I'm WAY into first-take-best-take/get-it-live stuff - I'm just commenting, rather uncontroversially I'd think but evidently not, that there is some of that authenticist stance in "no punch-ins" that's coming from an interesting place, given that the music itself doesn't come from that sort of performative stance

ethan if you can hear a punch it just means it's a shitty punch, I've seen guys punch in single snare hits at 120 bpm and the end result was indistiguishable from live

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)

even major label million dollar albums have shitty obvious punches nowadays

― and what (ooo), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:54 (nineteen years ago)

true

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

haha you could really get up on some "how digital editing has ruined music" stuff on this subject if you felt so inclined

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)

Also there's plenty of rap songs where the rapper duets with himself, calls out a line in the background while rapping in the foreground, starts the next line before the last line has completely ended - so there's obviously lots of multiple takes going on.

― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

I was having just this discussion with the Earache label head yesterday, in reference to Deicide's Scars Of The Crucifix, which in its initial form was totally raw and assaultive, but then the drummer went back and put every hi-hat and snare hit perfectly in place in ProTools and all the intensity just drifted away. I mean, it's still a pretty good album (though not a patch on the new one, which features the best lead guitar on any Deicide album ever), but something was lost.

― pdf (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)

i mean, digital editing is like anything else, i'm sure it's helped some albums be great in ways they couldn't have been in years past, but Some Kind of Monster really showed me out protooling a whole album and stitching it together can really make something suck on a whole new level. before i saw the movie i wondered why they had written these two-riff songs that went on forever and ever, then in the movie you realize it's because they didn't actually sit there and play stuff all the way through....i always think, at least in my own band, you begin to sense when a certain part is going on too long or getting boring, but that instinct won't ever kick in if you are just getting one good bar then replicating it as many times as you want.

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:53 (nineteen years ago)

From Bun B: Sensetive Thug to Nerdy Protools Engineering Gripes in less than 50 posts, good job guys!

― mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:56 (nineteen years ago)

...to metathread posting. ;-)

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

god bless jon caramanica

― Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:17 (nineteen years ago)

Not punching in is a point of pride for singers, too, though I think probably a little harder to acheive for your average singer than for your average rapper. It's not really an authenticity thing (very few singers these days are actually going to hit every note perfectly on the same take) so much as a confidence thing when you're actually in there recording--"Damn, I did a perfect take, I guess I'm really hot today, let's do some more, I'm gonna kill it!" Whereas if you're in there fucking up tracks you're only gonna get worse.

Anyway, all this aside, "I wouldn't dare punch in mixed company" is a great line.

― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:19 (nineteen years ago)

Bun comes off in that interview as the most charismatic human being ever in the history of the world ever. Ever.

― Billy Pilgrim (Billy Pilgrim), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:21 (nineteen years ago)

there's no other aspect of a rap track that places any privilege on "liveness"-

if I understand correctly hip hop pretty much began as a live phenomenon --- ie a dj rockin parties and this is before the rapper was even a big part of the equation.

it doesn't have to be an old-timey instrument to play it live, anything that makes a noise works fine --- I mean when you put a beat together on an MPC you pretty much bang shit out live, albeit quantized, right?? --- what does somebody mean when they say a track sounds "live" anyway??

and CLEARLY punches are gonna attenuate the feeling of a track --- you're gonna lose some ooomph in exchange for the extra precision/control.

― reacher. (reacher), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:38 (nineteen years ago)

My worry with punching-in/redoing with pro-tools and all that is that in maybe ten years, when the available technology is that much better, aren't they just going to sound glaringly obvious? Or more obvious, in the case of people who can already hear them. Like CGI in films - I caught a bit of some late-nineties film (can't recall which) the other day and the CGI was so visible and made it look shoddy, but I remember that when it was released it seemed hugely realistic. If my eyes have already learnt to tell that ten-year-old CGI's funny-looking, surely when I come back to tracks from now in a few years' time I'll be able to hear the splices and the record could be ruined.

Like everyone else has said, that's an awesome interview.

― permanent revolution (cis), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:57 (nineteen years ago)

Does visible CGI ruin a movie for you? Do visible rubber monster suits? How about when you can tell when someone is 'acting' rather than simply being themselves?

― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)

I mean you've always been able to punch in, it's not like that's a new feature on ProTools.

― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

Bun comes off in that interview as the most charismatic human being ever in the history of the world ever. Ever.
-- Billy Pilgrim (pilgrimbill...), June 8th, 2006.

OTM. Great interview, so much so that it actually makes me feel guilty for not being familiar with the dude's work (other than "Big Pimpin'", of course).

― bernard snow (sixteen sergeants), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

It doesn't ruin, only distracts, I think? Naturally I guess you suspend disbelief if the whle thing is compelling enough. Soon I suppose it becomes 'one of those conventions of x period of films' - spaceships suspended on black thread, that thirties melodrama acting style (do I mean thirties?). But... I don't know, I think that would involve investing it with a certain amount of camp? The slight wobble of pitch on vinyl's supposed to be part of its charm, part of its realism, as opposed to cold and clear digital (nb I have few opinions about relative merits of record formats), but the click of a bad punch-in transition? one that wasn't even heard as 'bad' at the time? the tinny sound of slightly-too-precise auttuning that isn't as gloriously working-with-the-medium as Cher's 'Believe'? If I wasn't entirely immersed I think that would throw me off.

― permanent revolution (cis), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)

I'm confused I guess why you think punch-ins from today are going to sound more obvious in ten years than analogue punch-ins from 10 years ago sound today. In ProTools, there's a crossfade tool that lets you smooth out any weirdness in the transition, and this is explicitly used for clicks. This is pretty microscopic and undetectable and I have a hard time believing that our ears are going to evolve to be able to hear it. I dunno. I think you can discuss punching in as an artistic detriment (although I think "assembling" tracks in ProTools rather than punching in a note or two is really the problem here) but technically, I don't think it'll be the "gated reverb" of 2006.

― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

>I have a hard time believing that our ears are going to evolve to be able to hear it

Given the direction mastering has been moving in the past few years, I have the feeling most music fans' ears are gonna be devolving as time goes on, getting used/inured to uglier and uglier sounds. A few years from now, you'll be able to punch stuff in with all the subtlety of Captain Beefheart's "The Dust Blows Forward 'n' The Dust Blows Back" and no one will give a shit.

― pdf (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 8 June 2006 17:12 (nineteen years ago)

Hah, maybe I overstated the case a bit - I'm worried that it might happen but not sure that it necessarily will. But having not imagined that I would be able to see CG and find it fake-looking I'm getting more worried about the things I don't notice now but might in the future - it made me much more aware that things I find undetectable now might not always be so. Maybe this is from reading some of the stuff Nick Southall's been writing recently about audiophilia and loss of sound quality? I don't have highly-trained ears at all - I can recognise glaring autotune occasionally, and while I often imagine I can hear a difference between 320kbps and 192kbps mp3s but I don't know if I really can. So this is entirely outside my experience; it just worries me.
Oddly enough I don't think of punching in as much of an artistic detriment except that relying on it too much would probably lessen the energy of what you're doing. And I have no idea how ProTools works, so I don't know if/how a track assembled in ProTools is particularly different from one produced in any other way, either software-based or using whatever more analogue precursor.

― permanent revolution (cis), Thursday, 8 June 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)

Well, like I say, punching in isn't like CGI or autotune, a new technique that's just been developed and is being deployed before all the kinks are worked out--it's been around almost since the advent of recorded music. ProTools is the working-out-the-kinks stage, not the "incredible new technique" stage.

― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

four years pass...

http://hiphopwired.com/2010/10/20/bun-b-confirms-teaching-class-at-rice-university-photo/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+hiphopwired+%28HipHopWired.com%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

url says it all

― teflon dawn (uptown churl), Thursday, 21 October 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

http://hiphopwired.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/bunbid.jpg?w=479&h=640

― straight outta furnace (The Reverend), Thursday, 21 October 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

:D :D :D :D

― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 21 October 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

rmde

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:39 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.drumza.com/images/HotLicksLearnJazzGuitarWith6GreatMastersDVDStandard.jpg

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:40 (fifteen years ago)

what's your deal

― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, great that he has the respect of our national educational institutions, i guess

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)

would audit

― bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, great that he has the respect of our national educational institutions, i guess

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Thursday, October 21, 2010 6:47 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

it's just a cool thing, asshole

― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:54 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno what youre deal is with me but as someone who spent awhile playing jazz i kinda just rughghheghgh at these things
i like that hes getting deserved attention, if that makes u happy

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:58 (fifteen years ago)

idk i think it's cool that a legendary rapper is teaching a college class, it's a pretty simple thing

& what does this have to do w/ jazz?

― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

the institutionalization of cool things is not cool

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

rofl

― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

fight the power

― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

historicism isnt the same thing at all doofus

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:05 (fifteen years ago)

criticism either

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:05 (fifteen years ago)

willing to bet there's some awesome "school's not g4ngsta^" post about to happen from deej now that luriqua doesn't post here anymore

― 'wich house (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:06 (fifteen years ago)

was about to say, 'bet theres some really shitty post coming since whiney still posts here' & what do you know

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:06 (fifteen years ago)

sensitives not thug

― ice cr?m, Friday, 22 October 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

i knew my post was sub-whiney anyway

― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

lol "sub whiney"

― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

lol

― avoyoungdro's number (k3vin k.), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

drown it in olive oil

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)

thread delivers

― some droopy HOOS in makeup (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)

"when waka's brother died he said fuck school this is disrepectful to waka's brother rmde TWO QUESTION MARKS"

― 'wich house (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

institutionalization of jazz may not be "cool" but it's sort of a necessary substitute for a once-vibrant and competitive scene where the learning & teaching happened on the ground, or it can be

― bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:16 (fifteen years ago)

What does 'rmde' mean

― Princess TamTam, Friday, 22 October 2010 00:18 (fifteen years ago)

RIP hip hop

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:19 (fifteen years ago)

we still have odd future wolf gang kill em all

― 'wich house (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:22 (fifteen years ago)

& skyzoo

― J0rdan S., Friday, 22 October 2010 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

and lil b

― 'wich house (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

i think we're gonna be okay

― J0rdan S., Friday, 22 October 2010 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

what is "Hip Hop and Religious Studies" class about anyway? Like 5% Nation stuff?

― 'wich house (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

it's a class so rice's students can feel like they go to a cool college

― J0rdan S., Friday, 22 October 2010 00:30 (fifteen years ago)

also rice is a religious school so it might be some sort of lip service

― J0rdan S., Friday, 22 October 2010 00:30 (fifteen years ago)

^^^

― some droopy HOOS in makeup (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

really wanna see the syllabus tho

― some droopy HOOS in makeup (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

wow, if only bun b had you guys around to let him know what a mistake he made!

― teflon dawn (uptown churl), Friday, 22 October 2010 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

you guys?? it was just me. man up & name names next time

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 04:30 (fifteen years ago)

i dont think its a 'mistake' btw

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 04:30 (fifteen years ago)

im more of a 'too bad u couldnt respect him when he was actually making great music' type dude

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 04:30 (fifteen years ago)

fyi last time someone named your name you got all deej on em

― some droopy HOOS in makeup (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 22 October 2010 04:31 (fifteen years ago)

name display names obv

― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Friday, 22 October 2010 04:40 (fifteen years ago)

ok, i'll concede that deej was the only one being a dick. sorry, flu vaccine got my mind in a frenzy ... anyways, not like it, you know, matters at all, but fwiw rice is one of the best universities in the nation, right? not some backwater christian school.

anyways it really speaks more than anything else to your own neuroses if you think anyone who didn't already respect bun b is going to care about this. who is this strawman who only 'respects' rappers when they become faculty members at elite private universities?

― teflon dawn (uptown churl), Friday, 22 October 2010 11:44 (fifteen years ago)

i used to have trouble differentiating this guy from soulja boy, and now i respect him

― ice cr?m, Friday, 22 October 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)

bun b = a lecturer, soulja boy = the dean

― just sayin, Friday, 22 October 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)

soulja boy tellem abt the many ways in which they can help their alma mater grow and prosper

― ice cr?m, Friday, 22 October 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.