http://www.villagevoice.com/music/0623,christgau,73468,22.html
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)
All of which I find pretty exhilarating. Of course, you may not. When Murray Street came out in 2002, non-old Amy Phillips notoriously asserted in this very newspaper that since Sonic Youth hadn't made a good album since (1995's) Washing Machine, they should break up already. Who's to say her opinion isn't worth as much as mine? Me? Well, yeah. One concept the non-old have trouble getting their minds around is the difference between taste and judgment. It's fine not to like almost anything, except maybe Al Green. That's taste, yours to do with as you please, critical deployment included. By comparison, judgment requires serious psychological calisthenics. But the fact that objectivity only comes naturally in math doesn't mean it can't be approximated in art.
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:39 (nineteen years ago)
― The Boy Who Cried YSI? (Freud Junior), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)
Sonic Youth new album "Rather Ripped"
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:56 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Thursday, 8 June 2006 00:04 (nineteen years ago)
― sleeve (sleeve), Thursday, 8 June 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)
― jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Thursday, 8 June 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 June 2006 02:32 (nineteen years ago)
Sonic Youth [Neutral EP, 1982]You may not think Glenn Branca's proteges are a rock and roll band, but after all, why else would they essay a lyric like "Fucking youth/Working youth"? At their worst they sound like Polyrock mainlining metronome, at their best like one of Branca's early drafts. The best never last long enough. Not for nothing is the sonic grown-up so attached to phony grandeur. CConfusion Is Sex [Neutral, 1983]Back in 1970 I played Max Kozloff, a Cal Arts colleague of distinctly Yurrupean musical tastes, some singles I thought instructive--"Brown Eyed Girl," "California Earthquake," "Neanderthal Man," like that. The one he flipped for was "I Wanna Be Your Dog." So if you think the sonic cover here proves they're rockers at heart, you have a fine art critic on your side. The dull rock critic wants to mention that the cover doesn't rock too good. Of course, neither did King Crimson a lot of the time. C+
Kill Yr. Idols [Zensor EP, 1983]Idolization is for rock stars, even rock stars manqué like these impotent bohos--critics just want a little respect. So if it's not too hypersensitive of me, I wasn't flattered to hear my name pronounced right, not on this particular title track--not pleased to note that, though "Brother James" is a dandy Glenn Branca tribute and one of the tracks lifted directly from Confusion Is Sex is a lot niftier than the other track lifted directly from Confusion Is Sex, the title cut's most likely to appeal to suckers for rock and roll as opposed to suckers for boho posers. Boho posers just shoot off their mouths a lot. With rock-and-rollers you never know. B-
amy phillips hates their later stuff
go figurehttp://www.dogsinthenews.com/issues/0210/pictures/bowling_shrug230.jpg
― timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 8 June 2006 02:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 June 2006 03:10 (nineteen years ago)
there's some obvious truth in this -- too obvious, i mean duh -- but this kind of line is almost always trotted out defensively as a screen for subjectivity. "there is subjective truth and objective truth, and now i'm going to tell you some OBJECTIVE TRUTH." and the objective truth is that sonic youth is the best band in the universe, NO MATTER WHAT YOU OR AMY PHILLIPS THINKS. ho-hum.
it's a nice record. but since proving sonic youth's greatness doesn't mean anything to me, i don't feel compelled to give it much more than an appreciative shrug. which, obviously, is a lapse in judgment.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 June 2006 03:43 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 June 2006 03:45 (nineteen years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Thursday, 8 June 2006 05:16 (nineteen years ago)
Also, approximation of objectivity is not objectivity. Brush up on your Raymond Williams, grandad.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 06:30 (nineteen years ago)
No, a wildly successful ILM thread will likely only get to 1000 posts, it will get derailed into a semi-hilarious macro thread 1/3 of the way through it and will have the appearance of at least one irate indie-rocker who felt compelled to jump in and defend his band at some point. Then, and only then, does it earn a place alongside the other classics.
― Cunga (Cunga), Thursday, 8 June 2006 06:46 (nineteen years ago)
kill yr. idolssonic deathit's the end of the worldand confusion is sex
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 8 June 2006 09:18 (nineteen years ago)
You fucking EARN it first, you absurd Alzheimer's free pass you.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 09:38 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 10:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 10:15 (nineteen years ago)
But actually, it's not so surprising that he should harp on about God and objectivity so much to back up his subjective takes. You really can't subscribe to the idea that there are objective aesthetic judgements without making an appeal, finally, to God. And people who believe in God are subjectivists in objectivists' clothing. Who says so? God does, trust me.
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:41 (nineteen years ago)
But he never says this at all. He really loves Sonic Nurse and the new record, and according to him the band is on a hot streak; it doesn't mean they're the greatest band in the universe.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:44 (nineteen years ago)
HAHA "BORING OR NOT"
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:52 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:56 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:01 (nineteen years ago)
Basically, this dilemma was the ground of the "rockism" debate that raged through the U.K. music press in the early '80s. Rockism wasn't just liking Yes and the Allman Brothers--it was liking London Calling. It was taking the music seriously, investing any belief at all not just in its self-sufficiency, which is always worth challenging, but in its capacity to change lives or express truth. One result of this debate was that as the '80s ended, the hippest and most fruitful rockcrit fashion pumped functional pop that fetishizes its own status as aural construct over rock that just goes ahead and means. This schema was convenient in a couple of ways. For one thing, the blanker music is the more you can project on it--the more listeners, especially professional interpreters, can bend it to their own whimsies, fantasies, needs. And rarely has it been noted how blatantly the rockism debate that produced the fashion favored the growing nationalism/anti-Americanism of U.K. taste.
I mean, really--British rock has always been "pop." Irony, distance, and the pose have been its secret since the Beatles and the Stones, partly because that's the European way and partly because rock wasn't originally British music--having absorbed it secondhand, Brits who made too much of their authenticity generally looked like fools. This polarity was reversed briefly around 1976--American punk was an unbashed art pose, while the British variant carried the banner of class struggle. But when the Sex Pistols failed to usher in the millennium, lifelong skeptics who'd let their guard down for a historical moment vowed that they wouldn't get fooled again. Ergo, Rock Against Rockism.
For all the hybrids and exceptions, American rock really is more sincere, even today. Or anyway, American rockers act more sincere--they're so uncomfortable with the performer's role that they strive to minimize it. Often their modus operandi is a conscious, and rather joyless, fakery. But sometimes--and here's where the schema becomes a lie--they end up inhabiting amazing simulations of their real selves, whatever exactly those are. The early '80s proved an especially rich time for this aesthetic, especially in L.A., where singer-songwriter sincerity had been perfected a decade before. So roots-conscious postpunk Amerindies X, Los Lobos, and the Blasters, together with two Twin Cities bands, the virtuosically posthardcore Hüsker Dü and the roots/junk-inflected quasihardcore Replacements, were spearheading a U.S. rockism revival just as the New Pop was dwarfing a U.K. indie scene symbolized by Joy Division-styled gloom merchants.
Antirockism had no way of accounting for these bands, and now in effect claims that they never happened. After all, who did they reach? Sloppy American college boys and similar pretentious punters--not real people (or classy ones, either). I'm exaggerating, of course, although I do recall a U.K. Los Lobos review that took offense at their flannel-covered bellies. And certainly it's true that Amerindie garage orthodoxy, which is at least as narrow-minded as any more wittingly trendy musical ethos, seems close to the end of its rope. But Wild Gift and How Will the Wolf Survive? and Hard Line and Metal Circus and Let It Be remain. They impinged on me then, and they impinge on me now--I know, because I replayed every one while making this a book I can vouch for. For me, they hold up, stand the test of time, reveal new shades of meaning--all that stuff good art was supposed to do back in the modernist era. Rock lives.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:05 (nineteen years ago)
...
That's why the worst flatline of our president's Oval Office chat the night of the attack came when he avoided the King James version of the 23rd Psalm for one of the Business Writing 1 translations that palliate well-heeled fundamentalism all over suburbia. "The folks who did this" was mind-boggling enough. But how could even George W. have imagined that "You are with me" would get anyone's heart beating like "Thou art with me"? Just when we needed a jolt of moral certitude, the glad-handing frat boy grayed out like the policy wonk we wish he was. We vernacular fans can see the connection between "the folks who did this" and the hard-wired rootsiness that afflicts a gamut of fools from Pete Seeger to Lee Greenwood, just as we can connect "You are with me" to L.A./Stockholm megapop. And I hope we sense that in this time of unprecedented trouble the long-impacted grandeur of "Thou art with me" is the kind of vernacular we need. As a Bible-believing Christian turned convinced atheist, I never miss a chance to shout that rock and roll is secular music. But that hardly means it doesn't have religious sources or express religious feelings. I know, religious feelings got us into this hell. And I can now guarantee that there are atheists in the valley of the shadow of death. I doubt there was anyone without religious feelings last week. Death is every atheist's window on the eternal.
I hadn't yet pinned this down Tuesday when I finished retrieving my daughter from school in Queens. But I already knew I wanted to begin my next show on the Voice's fledgling Web radio station with the atheist's hymn: from "God is a concept by which we measure our pain" to "I don't believe in . . . ," John Lennon's "God" summed up a mood, and for Carola and me that was reality. Soon I figured out where I'd end, too: with Sufi shaikh and Istanbul medical professor Orüj Güvenç chanting "Bismillah ah-Rahman," one of the names of God. But though devising a playlist was the only way I could think of to pretend I had a use in the world without confronting my own inanity, finding the right songs was a lot harder than it was during the attack's geopolitical cause and CNN forerunner, the Gulf War. "What's Going On" seemed way corny, and "From a Distance," unfortunately, was no longer an apposite metaphor. This was a time for some of the rage music that I love as art and rarely need in life. Punk for sure, "Hate and War," but before I even got there I was on the only metal band I care for deep down, Motorhead.That's why the worst flatline of our president's Oval Office chat the night of the attack came when he avoided the King James version of the 23rd Psalm for one of the Business Writing 1 translations that palliate well-heeled fundamentalism all over suburbia. "The folks who did this" was mind-boggling enough. But how could even George W. have imagined that "You are with me" would get anyone's heart beating like "Thou art with me"? Just when we needed a jolt of moral certitude, the glad-handing frat boy grayed out like the policy wonk we wish he was. We vernacular fans can see the connection between "the folks who did this" and the hard-wired rootsiness that afflicts a gamut of fools from Pete Seeger to Lee Greenwood, just as we can connect "You are with me" to L.A./Stockholm megapop. And I hope we sense that in this time of unprecedented trouble the long-impacted grandeur of "Thou art with me" is the kind of vernacular we need. As a Bible-believing Christian turned convinced atheist, I never miss a chance to shout that rock and roll is secular music. But that hardly means it doesn't have religious sources or express religious feelings. I know, religious feelings got us into this hell. And I can now guarantee that there are atheists in the valley of the shadow of death. I doubt there was anyone without religious feelings last week. Death is every atheist's window on the eternal.
I hadn't yet pinned this down Tuesday when I finished retrieving my daughter from school in Queens. But I already knew I wanted to begin my next show on the Voice's fledgling Web radio station with the atheist's hymn: from "God is a concept by which we measure our pain" to "I don't believe in . . . ," John Lennon's "God" summed up a mood, and for Carola and me that was reality. Soon I figured out where I'd end, too: with Sufi shaikh and Istanbul medical professor Orüj Güvenç chanting "Bismillah ah-Rahman," one of the names of God. But though devising a playlist was the only way I could think of to pretend I had a use in the world without confronting my own inanity, finding the right songs was a lot harder than it was during the attack's geopolitical cause and CNN forerunner, the Gulf War. "What's Going On" seemed way corny, and "From a Distance," unfortunately, was no longer an apposite metaphor. This was a time for some of the rage music that I love as art and rarely need in life. Punk for sure, "Hate and War," but before I even got there I was on the only metal band I care for deep down, Motorhead.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:23 (nineteen years ago)
ugh, don't i know it. an entire country of joyless drips.
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:25 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:43 (nineteen years ago)
maybe. people love the jolly mafia and their lighthearted antics.
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:46 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:49 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:50 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:52 (nineteen years ago)
Guilt is possibly the only thing that could save America. Political guilt, I mean, not the kind that makes entertainers pretend they aren't entertainers.
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:59 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:01 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.1199seiu.org/
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:03 (nineteen years ago)
As far as the "consensus" bit goes, he's just saying that your aesthetic judgement can be sharpened if you take into account what others (in SY's case, mostly critics, cause that's who likes 'em) have said.
And the first graf--including the "spiritual detriment" bit--feels purposely over the top, like "If some kid can say SY suck, I'm entitled to say they're the most awesomest thing in existence."
I wish he'd done the whole thing a little more gracefully, but it's a pretty clear statement of how he thinks criticism can work.
― Martin Van Buren (Martin Van Buren), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:50 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)
alfred said:
christgau said:
So let me put it this way: Sonic Youth are the best band in the universe, and if you can't get behind that, that's your problem.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
and if he ain't employing the good-ol' hyperbole stick in declaring sonic youth the best band in the universe than he's just being silly, 'cuz they're not.
― Ben H (Ben H), Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)
no
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)
― thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Friday, 9 June 2006 06:34 (nineteen years ago)
― yuengling participle (rotten03), Friday, 9 June 2006 13:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 9 June 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)
― yuengling participle (rotten03), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:29 (nineteen years ago)
Search Again
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
while both maybe true, i still loves me some "Incinerate"!!!and fer the rekkid, "the Adversary" is also pretty awe inspiring...
― edde (edde), Friday, 9 June 2006 18:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
― applejack carney (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)
― applejack carney (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)
"The new Obie Trice album has a song about the time he cried when his gay uncle died, the rest is the usual bullshit...Choice Cut?" "gurgle...*lifts thumb*"
― Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)
I've never quite understood his huge hang-up w/r/t pretentiousness, self-indulgence, and art-wankery, considering he's such a big Pink Floyd fan.
Also: "the beautiful, serpentine guitar lines of 'The Empty Page' intertwined like copulating eels." Mmmm.
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Uri Frendimein (Uri Frendimein), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)