Christgau on Sonic Youth

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
100,000 posts before the end of the week?

http://www.villagevoice.com/music/0623,christgau,73468,22.html

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

(Or possibly not, if enough people will no longer talk about articles in the Village Voice.)

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:36 (nineteen years ago)

well this is interesting, at least:

All of which I find pretty exhilarating. Of course, you may not. When Murray Street came out in 2002, non-old Amy Phillips notoriously asserted in this very newspaper that since Sonic Youth hadn't made a good album since (1995's) Washing Machine, they should break up already. Who's to say her opinion isn't worth as much as mine? Me? Well, yeah. One concept the non-old have trouble getting their minds around is the difference between taste and judgment. It's fine not to like almost anything, except maybe Al Green. That's taste, yours to do with as you please, critical deployment included. By comparison, judgment requires serious psychological calisthenics. But the fact that objectivity only comes naturally in math doesn't mean it can't be approximated in art.

gear (gear), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:39 (nineteen years ago)

I will probably buy this when it comes out.

The Boy Who Cried YSI? (Freud Junior), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:39 (nineteen years ago)

He sounds like he's been reading Hume (not necessarily a bad thing).

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)

We discussed some of these issues in part here:

Sonic Youth new album "Rather Ripped"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, maybe this should be locked then. It's still early (in this thread). I just assumed someone would have started a new thread about it rather than putting discussion on that one, but that makes sense.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:56 (nineteen years ago)

perhaps these particular issues merit a closer look on their own thread than the sonic youth thread allows.

gear (gear), Thursday, 8 June 2006 00:04 (nineteen years ago)

i really don't know why i just posted that.

gear (gear), Thursday, 8 June 2006 00:04 (nineteen years ago)

Not that it counts for much (cause other people later started ones that got locked) but I started the other thread and this seems fine - it will come up differently in the search and I think it's a somewhat separate discussion from the actual album and the music therein.

sleeve (sleeve), Thursday, 8 June 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)

we should all be in favor of amy philips pwns

jinx hijinks (sanskrit), Thursday, 8 June 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

There's no such thing as a "quasi-arpeggio."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 June 2006 02:32 (nineteen years ago)

he hated their early stuff

Sonic Youth [Neutral EP, 1982]
You may not think Glenn Branca's proteges are a rock and roll band, but after all, why else would they essay a lyric like "Fucking youth/Working youth"? At their worst they sound like Polyrock mainlining metronome, at their best like one of Branca's early drafts. The best never last long enough. Not for nothing is the sonic grown-up so attached to phony grandeur. C
Confusion Is Sex [Neutral, 1983]
Back in 1970 I played Max Kozloff, a Cal Arts colleague of distinctly Yurrupean musical tastes, some singles I thought instructive--"Brown Eyed Girl," "California Earthquake," "Neanderthal Man," like that. The one he flipped for was "I Wanna Be Your Dog." So if you think the sonic cover here proves they're rockers at heart, you have a fine art critic on your side. The dull rock critic wants to mention that the cover doesn't rock too good. Of course, neither did King Crimson a lot of the time. C+

Kill Yr. Idols [Zensor EP, 1983]
Idolization is for rock stars, even rock stars manqué like these impotent bohos--critics just want a little respect. So if it's not too hypersensitive of me, I wasn't flattered to hear my name pronounced right, not on this particular title track--not pleased to note that, though "Brother James" is a dandy Glenn Branca tribute and one of the tracks lifted directly from Confusion Is Sex is a lot niftier than the other track lifted directly from Confusion Is Sex, the title cut's most likely to appeal to suckers for rock and roll as opposed to suckers for boho posers. Boho posers just shoot off their mouths a lot. With rock-and-rollers you never know. B-

amy phillips hates their later stuff

go figure
http://www.dogsinthenews.com/issues/0210/pictures/bowling_shrug230.jpg

timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 8 June 2006 02:38 (nineteen years ago)

There is so much acting as if his world is THE world here. "Ignore it to your spiritual detriment" - I'm glad that self help book authors aren't usually this forward. Also: "more good albums this decade than anyone in rock except Neil Young." Does he follow metal? Or *indie-rock-or-whatever* that isn't super high profile? Or ... ?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 June 2006 03:10 (nineteen years ago)

One concept the non-old have trouble getting their minds around is the difference between taste and judgment.

there's some obvious truth in this -- too obvious, i mean duh -- but this kind of line is almost always trotted out defensively as a screen for subjectivity. "there is subjective truth and objective truth, and now i'm going to tell you some OBJECTIVE TRUTH." and the objective truth is that sonic youth is the best band in the universe, NO MATTER WHAT YOU OR AMY PHILLIPS THINKS. ho-hum.

it's a nice record. but since proving sonic youth's greatness doesn't mean anything to me, i don't feel compelled to give it much more than an appreciative shrug. which, obviously, is a lapse in judgment.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 June 2006 03:43 (nineteen years ago)

(i mean, maybe part of what i like about christgau is that he argues like a 14-year-old. which is a skil, i'm not denigrating it. it keeps him rooted.)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 June 2006 03:45 (nineteen years ago)

'skil' being, uh, a thin skill.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 June 2006 03:45 (nineteen years ago)

i remember getting really upset when christgau called "murray street" (which i love) "the diligently realized sound of exhaustion"!

geeta (geeta), Thursday, 8 June 2006 05:16 (nineteen years ago)

Precis of article: "I know what it is to be young, but YOU don't know what it is to be OLD!" (cue Orson Welles, string section etc.).

Also, approximation of objectivity is not objectivity. Brush up on your Raymond Williams, grandad.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 06:30 (nineteen years ago)

100,000 posts before the end of the week?

No, a wildly successful ILM thread will likely only get to 1000 posts, it will get derailed into a semi-hilarious macro thread 1/3 of the way through it and will have the appearance of at least one irate indie-rocker who felt compelled to jump in and defend his band at some point. Then, and only then, does it earn a place alongside the other classics.

Cunga (Cunga), Thursday, 8 June 2006 06:46 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know why
you wann' impress Christgau
ahh let that shit die
and find out the new goal

kill yr. idols
sonic death
it's the end of the world
and confusion is sex

kill yr. idols
sonic death
it's the end of the world
and confusion is sex

m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 8 June 2006 09:18 (nineteen years ago)

critics just want a little respect

You fucking EARN it first, you absurd Alzheimer's free pass you.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 09:38 (nineteen years ago)

you ignore xgau to your spiritual detriment

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 10:12 (nineteen years ago)

Only to the extent that he'll never commission any articles or reviews from me. Huh. See if I care.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 10:15 (nineteen years ago)

This is the critic who rather bizarrely told the world that God was a nicer guy than me. (He'd like me more if I smote Sodom and Gomorrah, perhaps?)

But actually, it's not so surprising that he should harp on about God and objectivity so much to back up his subjective takes. You really can't subscribe to the idea that there are objective aesthetic judgements without making an appeal, finally, to God. And people who believe in God are subjectivists in objectivists' clothing. Who says so? God does, trust me.

Momus (Momus), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:38 (nineteen years ago)

xgau is dire, it's hilarious that he has such stature. embarrassing.

Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

Perhaps Sonic Youth have some dirt on him.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure he's an atheist.

there's some obvious truth in this -- too obvious, i mean duh -- but this kind of line is almost always trotted out defensively as a screen for subjectivity. "there is subjective truth and objective truth, and now i'm going to tell you some OBJECTIVE TRUTH." and the objective truth is that sonic youth is the best band in the universe, NO MATTER WHAT YOU OR AMY PHILLIPS THINKS. ho-hum.

But he never says this at all. He really loves Sonic Nurse and the new record, and according to him the band is on a hot streak; it doesn't mean they're the greatest band in the universe.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe Amy told him not to try it.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:44 (nineteen years ago)

Boring or not, 1998's A Thousand Leaves unquestionably marked a turn toward the quietude, ruminative structures, and general fuzz level always implicit in their unresolved tunings and Deadhead-manquéjams

HAHA "BORING OR NOT"

Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:44 (nineteen years ago)

Remind me never to use the word "quietude" in any of my reviews again.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:50 (nineteen years ago)

i don't think he used it correctly neiver.

Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:52 (nineteen years ago)

Second Toughest in the Infants [Wax Trax, 1996]
Americans enticed by talk of "rock"-dance fusion should bear in mind the cultural deprivation of our siblings across the sea. Befuddled by the useless "rock"-"pop" distinction, they believe "rock" is something that happened in the '70s. The more inquisitive among them are aware of Pearl Jam and Nirvana, but if they've ever heard of Los Lobos or Husker Du they probably think they're "pop." So check out these comparisons from admirers of this inflated trio, spawned by the famously bad new-romantic band Freur and an "art collective" others might call an advertising agency: "pre-stadium Simple Minds," "way beyond the length of a Frank Zappa guitar solo," "J.J. Cale on an ecstasy comedown," "a warm bath." Plus their proper predecessors Pink Floyd "with bigger bass sounds and better drum patterns." Here and there--eight minutes into "Kiteless," for instance--they do work up a dangerously off-kilter groove. But the lyrics of Animals were more than "insane ramblings" or "the colours of cars going past a friend's house." And Ummagumma had more purity of purpose. C+

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:56 (nineteen years ago)

Discovery [Virgin, 2001]
These guys are so French I want to force-feed them and cut out their livers. Young moderns who've made the Detroit-Berlin adjustment may find their squelchy synth sounds humanistic; young moderns whose asses sport parallel ports may dance till they crash. But Yank fun is much less spirituel, so that God bless America, "One More Time" is merely an annoying novelty stateside. The way our butts plug in, there are better beats on the damn Jadakiss CD. C+

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:57 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not a massive phillips fan but xgau comes off as creepy and fucktarded in his references to her.

Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:01 (nineteen years ago)

Nor would I swear any longer to the ultimate importance of individual artists' recording careers--of oeuvres and one-shots that as often as not emanate from safely outside the belly of the pop beast. Without doubt there's a sense in which rock criticism's subject has always been a cultural organism that doesn't generate fixed meanings--whose meanings are defined not just by artists (even collectively), but by "noncreative" workers in the distribution network and, crucially, by fans who convert product to their own uses. And while it's philistine to pretend that the music has no formal attractions of its own, that it doesn't produce works that impinge unaided upon those who know the language, it's evasive if not effete to make too much of the microcosm those works create.

Basically, this dilemma was the ground of the "rockism" debate that raged through the U.K. music press in the early '80s. Rockism wasn't just liking Yes and the Allman Brothers--it was liking London Calling. It was taking the music seriously, investing any belief at all not just in its self-sufficiency, which is always worth challenging, but in its capacity to change lives or express truth. One result of this debate was that as the '80s ended, the hippest and most fruitful rockcrit fashion pumped functional pop that fetishizes its own status as aural construct over rock that just goes ahead and means. This schema was convenient in a couple of ways. For one thing, the blanker music is the more you can project on it--the more listeners, especially professional interpreters, can bend it to their own whimsies, fantasies, needs. And rarely has it been noted how blatantly the rockism debate that produced the fashion favored the growing nationalism/anti-Americanism of U.K. taste.

I mean, really--British rock has always been "pop." Irony, distance, and the pose have been its secret since the Beatles and the Stones, partly because that's the European way and partly because rock wasn't originally British music--having absorbed it secondhand, Brits who made too much of their authenticity generally looked like fools. This polarity was reversed briefly around 1976--American punk was an unbashed art pose, while the British variant carried the banner of class struggle. But when the Sex Pistols failed to usher in the millennium, lifelong skeptics who'd let their guard down for a historical moment vowed that they wouldn't get fooled again. Ergo, Rock Against Rockism.

For all the hybrids and exceptions, American rock really is more sincere, even today. Or anyway, American rockers act more sincere--they're so uncomfortable with the performer's role that they strive to minimize it. Often their modus operandi is a conscious, and rather joyless, fakery. But sometimes--and here's where the schema becomes a lie--they end up inhabiting amazing simulations of their real selves, whatever exactly those are. The early '80s proved an especially rich time for this aesthetic, especially in L.A., where singer-songwriter sincerity had been perfected a decade before. So roots-conscious postpunk Amerindies X, Los Lobos, and the Blasters, together with two Twin Cities bands, the virtuosically posthardcore Hüsker Dü and the roots/junk-inflected quasihardcore Replacements, were spearheading a U.S. rockism revival just as the New Pop was dwarfing a U.K. indie scene symbolized by Joy Division-styled gloom merchants.

Antirockism had no way of accounting for these bands, and now in effect claims that they never happened. After all, who did they reach? Sloppy American college boys and similar pretentious punters--not real people (or classy ones, either). I'm exaggerating, of course, although I do recall a U.K. Los Lobos review that took offense at their flannel-covered bellies. And certainly it's true that Amerindie garage orthodoxy, which is at least as narrow-minded as any more wittingly trendy musical ethos, seems close to the end of its rope. But Wild Gift and How Will the Wolf Survive? and Hard Line and Metal Circus and Let It Be remain. They impinged on me then, and they impinge on me now--I know, because I replayed every one while making this a book I can vouch for. For me, they hold up, stand the test of time, reveal new shades of meaning--all that stuff good art was supposed to do back in the modernist era. Rock lives.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:04 (nineteen years ago)

At around the time of "belly of the pop beast" they had to send for Ronan Keating to come and sing me out of my coma.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:05 (nineteen years ago)

Though I'm an atheist who grew up in a born-again church in Queens, I've figured out that in some ways my religious upbringing did me good. So I don't come at gospel with lapsed bitterness, and would consider it equally simplistic to charge gospel's smattering of secular humanist (often Jewish) aficionados with indulging a naive longing for what they wouldn't want if they knew better. Musical attraction is more complicated than that. I must point out, however, that one reason a person might maintain a distance from gospel is that the words suck. I'm not qualified to weigh the positives and negatives of the cultural center Christianity's redemptive dream has provided black sufferers, and I'll vote for Calvin Butts whenever he gives me the chance. But where reggae Rastafarians, say, evoke an all-purpose universal Other, the oppressive potential of the Jesus myth is too familiar to have much power for nonbelievers, and tends to bend gospel's potentially liberating synthesis of black and King James English into escapist doggerel.

...

That's why the worst flatline of our president's Oval Office chat the night of the attack came when he avoided the King James version of the 23rd Psalm for one of the Business Writing 1 translations that palliate well-heeled fundamentalism all over suburbia. "The folks who did this" was mind-boggling enough. But how could even George W. have imagined that "You are with me" would get anyone's heart beating like "Thou art with me"? Just when we needed a jolt of moral certitude, the glad-handing frat boy grayed out like the policy wonk we wish he was. We vernacular fans can see the connection between "the folks who did this" and the hard-wired rootsiness that afflicts a gamut of fools from Pete Seeger to Lee Greenwood, just as we can connect "You are with me" to L.A./Stockholm megapop. And I hope we sense that in this time of unprecedented trouble the long-impacted grandeur of "Thou art with me" is the kind of vernacular we need. As a Bible-believing Christian turned convinced atheist, I never miss a chance to shout that rock and roll is secular music. But that hardly means it doesn't have religious sources or express religious feelings. I know, religious feelings got us into this hell. And I can now guarantee that there are atheists in the valley of the shadow of death. I doubt there was anyone without religious feelings last week. Death is every atheist's window on the eternal.

I hadn't yet pinned this down Tuesday when I finished retrieving my daughter from school in Queens. But I already knew I wanted to begin my next show on the Voice's fledgling Web radio station with the atheist's hymn: from "God is a concept by which we measure our pain" to "I don't believe in . . . ," John Lennon's "God" summed up a mood, and for Carola and me that was reality. Soon I figured out where I'd end, too: with Sufi shaikh and Istanbul medical professor Orüj Güvenç chanting "Bismillah ah-Rahman," one of the names of God. But though devising a playlist was the only way I could think of to pretend I had a use in the world without confronting my own inanity, finding the right songs was a lot harder than it was during the attack's geopolitical cause and CNN forerunner, the Gulf War. "What's Going On" seemed way corny, and "From a Distance," unfortunately, was no longer an apposite metaphor. This was a time for some of the rage music that I love as art and rarely need in life. Punk for sure, "Hate and War," but before I even got there I was on the only metal band I care for deep down, Motorhead.That's why the worst flatline of our president's Oval Office chat the night of the attack came when he avoided the King James version of the 23rd Psalm for one of the Business Writing 1 translations that palliate well-heeled fundamentalism all over suburbia. "The folks who did this" was mind-boggling enough. But how could even George W. have imagined that "You are with me" would get anyone's heart beating like "Thou art with me"? Just when we needed a jolt of moral certitude, the glad-handing frat boy grayed out like the policy wonk we wish he was. We vernacular fans can see the connection between "the folks who did this" and the hard-wired rootsiness that afflicts a gamut of fools from Pete Seeger to Lee Greenwood, just as we can connect "You are with me" to L.A./Stockholm megapop. And I hope we sense that in this time of unprecedented trouble the long-impacted grandeur of "Thou art with me" is the kind of vernacular we need. As a Bible-believing Christian turned convinced atheist, I never miss a chance to shout that rock and roll is secular music. But that hardly means it doesn't have religious sources or express religious feelings. I know, religious feelings got us into this hell. And I can now guarantee that there are atheists in the valley of the shadow of death. I doubt there was anyone without religious feelings last week. Death is every atheist's window on the eternal.

I hadn't yet pinned this down Tuesday when I finished retrieving my daughter from school in Queens. But I already knew I wanted to begin my next show on the Voice's fledgling Web radio station with the atheist's hymn: from "God is a concept by which we measure our pain" to "I don't believe in . . . ," John Lennon's "God" summed up a mood, and for Carola and me that was reality. Soon I figured out where I'd end, too: with Sufi shaikh and Istanbul medical professor Orüj Güvenç chanting "Bismillah ah-Rahman," one of the names of God. But though devising a playlist was the only way I could think of to pretend I had a use in the world without confronting my own inanity, finding the right songs was a lot harder than it was during the attack's geopolitical cause and CNN forerunner, the Gulf War. "What's Going On" seemed way corny, and "From a Distance," unfortunately, was no longer an apposite metaphor. This was a time for some of the rage music that I love as art and rarely need in life. Punk for sure, "Hate and War," but before I even got there I was on the only metal band I care for deep down, Motorhead.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)

What did he think about Fred Durst using human beings as bombs?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:23 (nineteen years ago)

"For all the hybrids and exceptions, American rock really is more sincere, even today. Or anyway, American rockers act more sincere--they're so uncomfortable with the performer's role that they strive to minimize it."

ugh, don't i know it. an entire country of joyless drips.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:25 (nineteen years ago)

people in the u.s. really do deserve dubya. they are just like him. greedy humourless murdering bastards. but not fun greedy humourless murdering bastards. really annoying and tedious greedy humourless murdering bastards.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)

So it would be OK for them to be murdering bastards if they liked fun?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)

Hi, Scott.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)

this coffee tastes bitter to me.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:43 (nineteen years ago)

oh god, no wonder. maria bought espresso and i just had 5 cups.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:43 (nineteen years ago)

"So it would be OK for them to be murdering bastards if they liked fun?"

maybe. people love the jolly mafia and their lighthearted antics.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)

Well, they is perfect gentlemen and only ever kill their own.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:46 (nineteen years ago)

plus, they make money. people love that. if you kill 5 people, you are branded insane and sentenced to death and people hate you. if you kill 50 people you are a loveable rogue and they talk about the fancy suits you wear to court.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:49 (nineteen years ago)

the dirty little secret is that most people in the mafia are dumber than dirt and meaner than mean. we won't tell hollywood though.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:50 (nineteen years ago)

a terrorism expert on cnn just used the term "evil genius". that's the level of discourse you get on the news here. don't tell hollywood.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:52 (nineteen years ago)

Scott, are you Canadian? Or just a guilty American?

Guilt is possibly the only thing that could save America. Political guilt, I mean, not the kind that makes entertainers pretend they aren't entertainers.

Momus (Momus), Thursday, 8 June 2006 12:59 (nineteen years ago)

i am from mars.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)

Tell that to Frankie Pantangeli.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:01 (nineteen years ago)

and i no longer live in the u.s. proper. i live 8 miles off its shore. i actually haven't been to america since last november. i may never go back. i am a proud member of the the United Healthcare Workers Union though:

http://www.1199seiu.org/

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:03 (nineteen years ago)

Christgau's largely just addressing a lot of the complaints about Phillips' review at the time--that it's an op-ed screed instead of a piece of criticism. Because she focused too narrowly (and not very perceptively) on her own response, he says, she ignored the actual changes in the band's music before dismissing them.

As far as the "consensus" bit goes, he's just saying that your aesthetic judgement can be sharpened if you take into account what others (in SY's case, mostly critics, cause that's who likes 'em) have said.

And the first graf--including the "spiritual detriment" bit--feels purposely over the top, like "If some kid can say SY suck, I'm entitled to say they're the most awesomest thing in existence."

I wish he'd done the whole thing a little more gracefully, but it's a pretty clear statement of how he thinks criticism can work.

Martin Van Buren (Martin Van Buren), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)

It's astonishing how people can get so worked up about a clapped-out band of relics who haven't made a decent record in eighteen years.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

The Fall, you mean?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:50 (nineteen years ago)

oh wait, we never cared about them in the first place

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)

I meant the band whom Melvyn Bragg calls Soddic Yoof.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)

i said:
"there is subjective truth and objective truth, and now i'm going to tell you some OBJECTIVE TRUTH." and the objective truth is that sonic youth is the best band in the universe, NO MATTER WHAT YOU OR AMY PHILLIPS THINKS. ho-hum.

alfred said:

But he never says this at all. He really loves Sonic Nurse and the new record, and according to him the band is on a hot streak; it doesn't mean they're the greatest band in the universe.

christgau said:

So let me put it this way: Sonic Youth are the best band in the universe, and if you can't get behind that, that's your problem.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 June 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

I think he overrates their lyrics.

Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:32 (nineteen years ago)

Also, in roughly comparable styles, I think Oneida's "Up With People" and Mogwai's "Glasgow Mega-Snake" are far more interesting than anything on Rather Ripped.

Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

burn

Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 8 June 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)

Come On Die Young [Matador, 1999]
Young Glaswegians extolled by those weary of verse-chorus-verse as "radical," "beautiful," and other things that would never occur to the rest of us, they mutate the forgettable mess of their debut into something altogether more deliberate and kempt-occasionally tuneful, invariably slow. Only on the oceanbound land mass where acid house was Beatlemania would anyone sit still for such earnest post-rock tripe. C

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, I didn't like that album either.

Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 June 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)


how many years does christgau carry over a. phillips? probably around 40. and given that he probably had to sign off on, or at least eyeball pre-press, ap's sy vv review back in the day gives his little anti amy phillip's screed a taint of big bully mean-ness. (esp. since she no longer writes for the voice)

and if he ain't employing the good-ol' hyperbole stick in declaring sonic youth the best band in the universe than he's just being silly, 'cuz they're not.

Ben H (Ben H), Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

Young critics yawning over Christgau pronouncements shockah

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

"and given that he probably had to sign off on, or at least eyeball pre-press, ap's sy vv review back in the day"

no

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 8 June 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)

Aw fer fuck's sake

thousands of tiny luminous spheres (plebian), Friday, 9 June 2006 06:34 (nineteen years ago)

he's responding to the body of criticism around the artist in question, not amy frigging phillips as a human being

yuengling participle (rotten03), Friday, 9 June 2006 13:23 (nineteen years ago)

You know that for a fact, do you?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 9 June 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)

no, he's smart enough to figure it out

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

I feel like pasting every fucking Xgau link on ILM. It's the same arguments every time.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:21 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, are you accusing Marcello of repeating himself? gasp shock horror!

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

http://clerccenter.gallaudet.edu/Literacy/images/RIFLogo2.jpg

yuengling participle (rotten03), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

(yes I know you're accusing everyone of repeating themselves, including me and you both, and you're right. humor me.)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

it's all good.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

first time THAT phrase ever appeared on an ILX Christgau thread

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

Find threads from I Love Music, subject contains 'it\'s all good christgau'.
None found

Search Again

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

"Also, in roughly comparable styles, I think Oneida's "Up With People" and Mogwai's "Glasgow Mega-Snake" are far more interesting than anything on Rather Ripped.
-- Sundar (south.side.of.the.spamblockin'.sky.200...), June 8th, 2006."


while both maybe true, i still loves me some "Incinerate"!!!
and fer the rekkid, "the Adversary" is also pretty awe inspiring...

edde (edde), Friday, 9 June 2006 18:15 (nineteen years ago)

I kinda wish he'd been meaner about the ol' Phillips review rather than just reaffirming that the reliable old NYC boho still loves reliable old NYC bohos. I don't want to have to read this article again in six years!

Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

well, he might die.

applejack carney (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:13 (nineteen years ago)

By comparison, judgment requires serious psychological calisthenics.

Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

ihttp://www.creativescreenwriting.com/csdaily/csdart/images/Kill%20Bill%20v2%20-%20Uma%20and%20sensei%20(300w).jpg

Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

not even worth fixing.

applejack carney (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

:-D

applejack carney (dubplatestyle), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)

I'm putting bets now on a 70-year-old Xgau writing a total tongue bath of a 2010 Nas release ("Save for a blood-stained rendez-vous with the previously negligible Tony Yayo, fatherhood and an enduring marriage keep Nas on point and mature, his narrative skills free of a bachelor's braggadocio...young people may not appreciate his calm wisdom...").

Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:23 (nineteen years ago)

http://webhollis.com/albums/Funny-Forum/MyBrainBroke.jpg

Eppy (Eppy), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

Miccio's even mastered the Dean's dependent clauses. He's MYSTIQUE!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe I can ghostwrite for him Dear Abby-style when he's on his sickbed.

"The new Obie Trice album has a song about the time he cried when his gay uncle died, the rest is the usual bullshit...Choice Cut?" "gurgle...*lifts thumb*"

Zwan (miccio), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:35 (nineteen years ago)

The world will tremble after some lucky fuck posts a "DeRo on Sonic Youth" thread.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

A DeRo live review of SY in 2002 (huh, I was actually at that show) miraculously does NOT use the word "pretentious" -- but does use the phrases "snobbish avant-disregard," "artistic solipsism (another word would be 'wankery')," and "vapid, meandering 'experimentation."

I've never quite understood his huge hang-up w/r/t pretentiousness, self-indulgence, and art-wankery, considering he's such a big Pink Floyd fan.

Also: "the beautiful, serpentine guitar lines of 'The Empty Page' intertwined like copulating eels." Mmmm.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)

he loves pairing adjectives, doesn't he? "The sinuous, thoughtful snap of DeRo's prose."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)

Why did that record review turn into the debate team? Is that what the internet has done to the print medium? Now writers ramble on about what they know people will skewer them for online, trying to make their arguments about taste water-tight? Terrible waste of time that was.

Uri Frendimein (Uri Frendimein), Friday, 9 June 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.