ahttp://www.hiphopdx.com/index/news/id.4217
Jay-Z has taken the first step in boycotting the popular Cristal champagne drink by removing it from his 40/40 nightclub, after the ‘racist’ comments made in The Economist magazine by Louis Roderer courtesy of Cristal’s managing director, Frederic Rouzaud.
Last week, it was revealed that Rouzaud was unimpressed that the high market champagne had become popular with hip hop stars, calling the regular name-checks ‘unwelcome attention’.
“We can’t forbid people from buying it,” told Rouzaud. “I’m sure Dom Perignon or Krug would be delighted to have their business.”
His comments infuriated the Def Jam President, who has ordered its removal from his 40/40 sports club/restaurant.
“It has come to my attention that the managing director of Cristal, Frederic Rouzaud views the ‘hip hop culture’ as ‘unwelcome attention’,” said Jay-Z.
“I view his comments as racist and will no longer support any of his products through any of my various brands including the 40/40 Club nor in my personal life.”
The likes of Jay-Z, P. Diddy, and a whole host of other rappers have been supporting the upscale beverage since the late '90s, often including the name in their lyrics.
― Confounded (Confounded), Friday, 16 June 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Bea Arthur - Lost COmic GEnius ? (dubplatestyle), Friday, 16 June 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Bea Arthur - Lost COmic GEnius ? (dubplatestyle), Friday, 16 June 2006 16:52 (nineteen years ago)
― mummy wrapped in bacon (nickalicious), Friday, 16 June 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)
― rentboy (rentboy), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)
― rentboy (rentboy), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Confounded (Confounded), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
I'll take Viktor Vaughn, "Change the Beat". Anyone got another one?
― Pessimist (Pessimist), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.economist.com/intelligentlife/luxury/displayStory.cfm?story_id=6905921
I guess the Economist.com search function just sucks.
As Dom points out, the CEO didn't actually use the term "unwelcome attention" - he was more circumspect than that - but apparently not circumspect enough.
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
To me, that reads "I wish they weren't buying our stuff" while he turns up his nose and implies the competition can have the market share that is lower-class, or criminal, or just unsophisticated. Whatever unstated opinion he has of rappers and such.
― mike h. (mike h.), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:37 (nineteen years ago)
that's because that's pretty much the only way to read that statement....
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)
― dmr (Renard), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:49 (nineteen years ago)
actually... how stupid.
― rentboy (rentboy), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:54 (nineteen years ago)
"Asked if an association between Cristal and the bling lifestyle could actually hurt the brand, he replies: “That’s a good question, but what can we do? We can’t forbid people from buying it. I’m sure Dom Pérignon or Krug would be delighted to have their business.”
This could quite easily be interpreted as a attempt to duck the leading question.
And "Racist"? Whatever.
― everything (everything), Friday, 16 June 2006 17:54 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.vh1.com/news/articles/1534435/20060615/index.jhtml?headlines=true
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:02 (nineteen years ago)
― everything (everything), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Pessimist (Pessimist), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)
― It's Rodney, pimp! (R. J. Greene), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)
― grady (grady), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 16 June 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)
― It's Rodney, pimp! (R. J. Greene), Friday, 16 June 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 June 2006 19:02 (nineteen years ago)
― cracker killer (crackerkiller), Friday, 16 June 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)
i think jay-z is as much an asshole as 'the french,' and i think he's an idiot.
― lf (lfam), Friday, 16 June 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)
when i went to paris the french were nice to me.
everything is cool.
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 16 June 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)
― It's Rodney, pimp! (R. J. Greene), Friday, 16 June 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 16 June 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)
Heh heh. I just imagine Jay-Z with a beret, spitting at tourists during his 3-month long vacation.
― trees (treesessplode), Friday, 16 June 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)
― wes fu (aWESome), Friday, 16 June 2006 22:34 (nineteen years ago)
Am I going to hell for laughing at that?
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Friday, 16 June 2006 23:26 (nineteen years ago)
― wes fu (aWESome), Saturday, 17 June 2006 00:29 (nineteen years ago)
I mean, imagine someone from Rammstein talking to someone in an article passively about their dedicated, loyal nazi fanbase, stating "We're not thrilled about racism, but we can't just tell them to stop buying our albums. I'm sure Skrewdriver would be very happy with their business, however."
Ignore the hip-hop/nazi analogy, which is not my point at all.
Just concentrate on the idea of someone who runs a business who ends up getting a client-base that he/she is not too thrilled with... you may think those reasons for not being thrilled are awful. You may think those reasons are, well, reasonable. But he/she's allowed to have these reasons, and make statements like this, and shouldn't be given the racism card -- based on the above statement alone.
Jay-Z, conversely, has just as much freedom to decide on any random-ass whim to stop supporting Cristal and support other froo-froo centers of viticulture instead, whether his reasons are reasonable or fucked up as well.
― aDOring NUTbians (donut), Saturday, 17 June 2006 05:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Saturday, 17 June 2006 06:01 (nineteen years ago)
Jay-Z should urge hip-hop to boycott The Economist. Eh? Oh.
The article basically says that Krug felt the same way about Jeffery Archer. Which is quite funny.
― Jamie T Smith (Jamie T Smith), Saturday, 17 June 2006 09:04 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Saturday, 17 June 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 17 June 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Saturday, 17 June 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Saturday, 17 June 2006 21:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 June 2006 21:49 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Saturday, 17 June 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot 4-Tay (marmotwolof), Saturday, 17 June 2006 21:59 (nineteen years ago)
― trees (treesessplode), Sunday, 18 June 2006 05:59 (nineteen years ago)
― aDOring NUTbians (donut), Sunday, 18 June 2006 06:36 (nineteen years ago)
― It's Rodney, pimp! (R. J. Greene), Sunday, 18 June 2006 07:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 18 June 2006 13:52 (nineteen years ago)
― alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Sunday, 18 June 2006 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Confounded (Confounded), Friday, 23 June 2006 10:27 (nineteen years ago)
― babysquid (babysquid), Friday, 23 June 2006 11:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 23 June 2006 11:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Friday, 23 June 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)
the best thing to come out of this story: hearing three jay-z tracks played on npr.
― grady (grady), Friday, 23 June 2006 17:34 (nineteen years ago)
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Friday, 23 June 2006 17:36 (nineteen years ago)
― max (maxreax), Friday, 23 June 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson, Rendolent Ding-Dong (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 23 June 2006 20:31 (nineteen years ago)
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Friday, 23 June 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
― babysquid (babysquid), Friday, 23 June 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)
I suspect it's mostly about brand protection. The hip hop/Cribs thing with Cristal is not within the company's control and that probably makes them nervous. I don't know how their overall sales have changed since that fad but even if they're currently booming they fear a bust. Before they could probably count on reliable, consistent sales to a particular demographic. Whether Rouzaud himself is racist the problem for him is if his core consumer is racist. Or just snobbish (want to be the select few who drink it and/or doesn't want to be associated with new buyers they view as nouveau riche) or for whatever reason turns off of the brand. Remember, high end champagne isn't a product where most of its consumers actually care that much (if at all) about the product itself but what that brand announces to others about them. This snob premium enables them to charge the ridiculous price. But the buyers are sheep and might flock to something else. What happens if the hip hop crowd moves on to something else? Their drink could become like the Lacoste shirt and no longer appeal to either its old reliable customers or the masses who read The Official Preppy Handbook.
― Carlos Keith (Buck_Wilde), Friday, 23 June 2006 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
― max (maxreax), Friday, 23 June 2006 23:57 (nineteen years ago)
I'm sorry but having tried a number of Champagnes including 'high end' products (though not as yet cristal) I'll have to say you get what you pay for. Having siad that I'd have to think very seriously about forking out the extra dough for a bottle of cristal rather than a cheaper wine, 'cos i'd be out of pocket for the rest of the month!
― babysquid (babysquid), Saturday, 24 June 2006 08:38 (nineteen years ago)