Taking Sides: Psychocandy vs. Loveless

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Have at it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, and Psychocandy, obviously.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)

They're both loud....

Ben Crazee (Ben Crazee), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:31 (nineteen years ago)

No Psychocandy, no Loveless

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:33 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.terapija.net/fotke/mjuzik/20041104_081853_3.jpg http://www.planetjesterz.com/mbv/images/027.jpg

No Psychocandy, no Loveless

Entirely correct, but which would you rather listen to?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)

'psychocandy' is a load of boring old rubbish.

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)

Psychocandy >>>>> Pyschocandy with all the candy taken out

xhuxk (xheddy), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)

I would rather listen to several individual songs on Psychocandy before any on Loveless; I would rather listen to Loveless in its entirety in one sitting rather than Psychocandy.

Ben Crazee (Ben Crazee), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:41 (nineteen years ago)

ARGH, ARGH, ARGH, ARGH, ARGH!!!!

This is like the "Daddy or chips?" of my musical world.

I think I might just have to go with Psychocandy. I have listened to that several times in the past year, while I'm not sure when was the last time I dragged out Loveless. (I think I actually probably listen to Isn't Anything more regularly.) Something about the 3 minute pop format of Psychocandy is more pleasing to me in my day to day listening. It's, to me, a more successful marriage of my twin loves of bubblegum and noise.

How does a ferret get invisible, then? (kate), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:45 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't listened to Ps for a long time, I think I'm looking forward to the remaster and hearing it again.

I often listen to Loveless, though haven't for a while.

Summary: I know I love "Loveless". I think I love "Psychocandy" more, but if I hear it again and think "ex-loved" then I'll mention it here.

So, for now, "Psychocandy". Without "Some Candy Talking" which is good, but not for this album.

xpost with Kate, funnily enough the other way round.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:46 (nineteen years ago)

Pyschocandy with all the candy taken out

How's that pronounced? Pies cho candy?

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:48 (nineteen years ago)

I have the Minidisc version of Loveless.

It is a thing of beauty.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:49 (nineteen years ago)

ysi?

Roughage Crew (Enrique), Thursday, 22 June 2006 10:51 (nineteen years ago)

Given that 'Loveless' is pretty much the pinnacle of sonic achievement since the dawn of time and rocks like a bastard, I'd have to take it over 'Psychocandy' (which is a great record, but does it have 'Only Shallow'? Or 'To Here Knows When'? Or...etctetc).

I think 'Loveless'-era live MBV vs. 'Psychocandy'-era live JAMC might be a fairer fight - one hour of feedback vs. possible rioting?

Ruairi Wirewool (Ruairi Wirewool), Thursday, 22 June 2006 11:26 (nineteen years ago)

Psychocandy, because I'm sick of hearing about Loveless in every other ILM thread. This board has turned the latter into a canonical bore.

Jim M (jmcgaw), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:05 (nineteen years ago)

Souvlaki

Baaderonixx immer wieder (baaderonixx), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:11 (nineteen years ago)

There are 21 threads with "Loveless" in the title

There are 3 threads with "Psychocandy" in the title.


Three? Only Three? And This thread is one of them!!!

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)

psychocandy, because it got slightly more very good songs (Just like honey, A taste of Cindy, Some candy talking, Cut dead, Never understand, Sowing seeds, My little underground vs. Only shallow, To here knows when, Come in alone, Blown a wish)... but all two on the top of the noisepop genre.... not to be missed...

Robert Schobesberger (jimmydean), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:16 (nineteen years ago)

JAMC, motherfucker. In a heartbeat. Loveless is boring, sexless waif+feedback wafts that are an anathema to rock and roll. Psychocandy IS rock and roll. As something is better than nothing, as my friend Pangloss says, a world with Psychocandy is the best of all possible worlds.

js (honestengine), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:17 (nineteen years ago)

The remastered CD is out 10th July, has 'extensive historical sleeve notes' by Mojo's Kieran Tyler, and no extra tracks (i.e. Some Candy Talking has been removed)

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)

That's all according to the HMV webshop.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:28 (nineteen years ago)

So what's the point of this release? "crisper" sound??

Baaderonixx immer wieder (baaderonixx), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:29 (nineteen years ago)

Both overrated, but Psychocandy has more songs I can hum (but I prefer the singles on Darklands).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:31 (nineteen years ago)

i'd take psychocandy for more or less the same reasons i take help! over the white album.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)

>This board has turned the latter into a canonical bore<

Nah, it was born one.

>rocks like a bastard, <

Wow, people really believe this?? I'm speechless.

I've got an advance of the new Psychocandy reissue in my CD changer right now, incidentally. "IS rock and roll" is somewhat stretching things by a few billion miles -- the album's not bad, but not nearly as good as I'd remembered. (If you're gonna be rock and roll, for one thing, hiring a rhythm section might be a nice touch, though I realize such things are hard to come by in England.) "Something is better than nothing," on the other hand, is right on the mark.

xhuxk (xheddy), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:34 (nineteen years ago)

"Something is better than nothing," on the other hand, is right on the mark.

b.b.but that's "Come On", from "Stoned and Dethroned"

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:40 (nineteen years ago)

(If you're gonna be rock and roll, for one thing, hiring a rhythm section might be a nice touch, though I realize such things are hard to come by in England.)

Um, please don't blame Bobby Gilespie on England, thanks.

NickB (NickB), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:47 (nineteen years ago)

Charlie Watts wasn't doing much in '84 and '85.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:49 (nineteen years ago)

Aye, he's been coasting since 1972 and could easily have squeezed in a better than half-arsed effort at Just Like Honey. Even I could have done it and I can't fucking drum.

Psychocandy still wins this one all the same.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 22 June 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)

Right...

You Made Me Realize/"Feed Me With Your Kiss" > Psychocandy > Isn't Anything > Barbed Wire Kisses > Loveless and I never heard Darklands or Honey's Dead so don't ask me where they fit in this equation.

M. Agony Von Bontee (M. Agony Von Bontee), Thursday, 22 June 2006 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

PSYCHO
candy

bkjj40a (bkjj40a), Thursday, 22 June 2006 14:04 (nineteen years ago)

xhuxk, 'Loveless' rocks VERY hard. 'Only Shallow' is ELEPHANTINE, baby.

Ruairi Wirewool (Ruairi Wirewool), Thursday, 22 June 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)

my man in queens is right that Psychocandy has no heft due to shitty bass and drumming, and is really not very good at all.

but he is wrong that its better than Loveless, which is magnifico, and I don't care if its boring to say so. that album has a riddim section that knows what its doing.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 22 June 2006 14:36 (nineteen years ago)

DUDE NEITHER LOVELESS NOR PSYCHOCANDY DOES ANYTHING REMOTELY CLOSE TO "ROCKING" CUZ THEY ARE BOTH TEXTURE ALBUMS AND MOVE ABOUT AS MUCH AS MY DISABLED GRANDMOTHER. that said i think i like psychocandy better, and Myonga is right about the relative merits of JAMC's and MBV's discographies.

you make chatting lame (teenagequiet), Thursday, 22 June 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)

no, YMCL, you are in error, whether you use all caps or not. "Come in Alone" thunders, and "Soon" grooves like a motherfukker.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 22 June 2006 14:58 (nineteen years ago)

Rapture vs. boredom. MBV wins.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 22 June 2006 15:07 (nineteen years ago)

xp - i'm not actually worked up over this, caps aside. but seriously, how can you call anything on either of these albums rocking/rock? loud guitars != rock. feedback != rock. rock = a rhythmic quality that really neither of these albums has, even "soon," which is big heavy neato guitar swells and a catchy melody on top of a pretty standard issue early 90's indie-dance loop. i mean, i love that song! but it does not rock, no way, no how.

you make chatting lame (teenagequiet), Thursday, 22 June 2006 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

I think calling 'Psychocandy' and 'Loveless' 'texture' albums is selling them short, I think they work well for people who have no interest in how a certain sound was created - and as far as 'rocking' goes, I guess we have different personal definitions of the term. I think both albums DO posess a rhythmic quality in so far as the riffs on both are incredibly propulsive.

To be fair, though, nothing on 'Psychocandy' rocks quite as hard as 'Upside Down', and nothing on earth rocks like 'You Made Me Realise'.

I've used the word 'rock' far too many times today.

Ruairi Wirewool (Ruairi Wirewool), Thursday, 22 June 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)

I also say these albums don't "rock" (as in the Faces' "Pool Hall Richard," the Stones' "Rip This Joint" or the Replacements' "I.O.U."). You can't dance to them, but they're still great. I don't think calling them "textured" is selling them short at all.

Jim M (jmcgaw), Thursday, 22 June 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)

sorry pal, Colm whathisfaceIrishname is rockin' hard on "Only Shallow" and "Come in Alone": he may have been the only dude from the British Isles at the time that snapped like that—"Screamadelica"? Dreadful…

Whichever clown it is on Psychocandy either couldn't do the trick, or wouldn't, since it wouldn't be very junkie to have any energy at all.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 22 June 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

Psychocandy over Loveless. Black Tambourine over either of 'em, not that that's the question, but Psychocandy over Loveless. Lot of things over Loveless.

Pessimist (Pessimist), Thursday, 22 June 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

"Screamadelica"? Dreadful…

Whichever clown it is on Psychocandy either couldn't do the trick, or wouldn't, since it wouldn't be very junkie to have any energy at all.

xp - haha dude you know it was gillespie drumming on psychocandy, right?

and re: colm, if the totally sterile (and sampled'n'triggered for what it's worth, though not sterile because of that) snare hits are what yr talking about as far as "rockin hard," well...uh...yeah...

you make chatting lame (teenagequiet), Thursday, 22 June 2006 18:03 (nineteen years ago)

i really like his drumming on everything up to loveless, for what it's worth

you make chatting lame (teenagequiet), Thursday, 22 June 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

no I did not know that Gillespie drooomed therein.

and samples/triggers can rock verily, IMO.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 22 June 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

no I did not know that Gillespie drooomed therein. I do know that that rekkid is wretched.

and samples/triggers can rock verily, IMO.

veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 22 June 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

Psychocandy for me. It doesn't "rock", but almost every song on it is a good 'un.

Having seen both the Psychocandy era JAMC live a couple of times and the Loveless-era MBV a few times I'd just like to weigh in and say that My Bloody Valentine could kick the Mary Chain's ass any day. They were a phenomenal live group. Always were, from the first time I saw them round about the time Sunny Sundae Smile came out.

The JAMC were pretty plodding live and were more of an "event" than a decent musical experience. Not really much of "event" either, looking back on it.

everything (everything), Thursday, 22 June 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

how on earth can loveless be called "sexless"?

unnamedroffler (xave), Friday, 23 June 2006 00:03 (nineteen years ago)

'loveless' in a heartbeat; it's not even a question. the guitar tone on 'psychocandy' is like... wool or something, all trebly and itchy and uncomfortable. i still wince when the guitar comes in on 'just like honey.' none of which is to say that 'psychocandy' isn't a totally ace album, nor to say that i don't also wince when i hear 'touched'--it might just be due to the title but the whole track fairly reeks of creepy, leery pedophilia--but merely to say that 'loveless' wins in my book by a wide margin; i've listened to it hundreds of times since the first time i ever heard it and those eight consecutive snare hits at the start of 'only shallow' still send shivers up my spine.

Adolescence Mokushiroku! (gendo ikari), Friday, 23 June 2006 01:36 (nineteen years ago)

Psychocandy.

There was a time in my life, that is probably better forgotten, but nevertheless those two albums were IT, in my musical world. For years Id reference Psychocandy as my favourite all time album, and it's definitely top 5. Loveless however is not quite top 5 for me. At least personally this is a really good taking sides, can't we just say everyone tried their best.

Thomas Mehlt (Tokyo Ghost Stories), Friday, 23 June 2006 03:19 (nineteen years ago)

Oh Loveless of course, it's so much more beautiful and wonderful to listen. It makes me glad to be alive when I can lose myself in it. Psychocandy doesn't translate very well to me, but Loveless will be a classic forever in my eyes.

Harrison Barr (Petar), Friday, 23 June 2006 03:22 (nineteen years ago)

"some of the best artists ever are dull"

or whatever that quote was...heh.

CDDB (Dan Deluca), Saturday, 24 June 2006 19:50 (nineteen years ago)

Both are great albums. Loveless, though, is better.

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Saturday, 24 June 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)

Loveless.
Because:
Noise on Psychocandy sounds detached, aloof, inscrutable
Noise on Loveless sounds rapturous, euphoric, exultant

Loveless sounds like the great paean to sex rumbling from deep within the earth--cavernous and lucious.

That said, "Just Like Honey" is a great song that I've heard far too many times.

mega machine (mattmc387), Saturday, 24 June 2006 22:02 (nineteen years ago)

"Loveless sounds like the great paean to sex rumbling from deep within the earth--cavernous and lucious."

Aww, bullshit. Loveless sounds like the most pretentious indie fuck ever, put onto the stereo to make "the first time special."

Whereas putting on Psychocandy for sex is still probably an attempt to impress the partner, but you're both too drunk to count.

js (honestengine), Saturday, 24 June 2006 23:17 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

the more I look at this thread, the less sense I can make of people who chose Loveless.

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 01:07 (eighteen years ago)

Seems like it comes down to whether one thinks "More Rock'n'Roll" = "Better Album". Psychocandy is certainly more rock'n'roll.

Mark Rich@rdson, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:08 (eighteen years ago)

TS: if you had a time machine would you kill Hitler or prevent Loveless from being recorded

J0hn D., Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:10 (eighteen years ago)

The Loveless lovers on ILM are otherwise so often in sync with my own tastes that I've never been able to understand why I still don't fully "get" that album, and believe me I've tried. So Psychocandy, then, but for some reason this saddens me.

Lostandfound, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:43 (eighteen years ago)

(Ha, Loveless guilt!)

Lostandfound, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:44 (eighteen years ago)

Aww, bullshit. Loveless sounds like the most pretentious indie fuck ever, put onto the stereo to make "the first time special."

Whereas putting on Psychocandy for sex is still probably an attempt to impress the partner, but you're both too drunk to count.

----so so OTM. Psychocandy for me ta

President Evil, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:52 (eighteen years ago)

Luckily, I don't have to choose. These are two of the best albums ever. One is actually the best! The other one is top 10. It doesn't really matter which.

Spencer Chow, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:54 (eighteen years ago)

Seems like it comes down to whether one thinks "More Rock'n'Roll" = "Better Album". Psychocandy is certainly more rock'n'roll.

Psychocandy is more rock 'n' roll, and it's also the album I prefer, but I don't think "More Rock'n'Roll" = "Better Album." I just think Psychocandy is better.

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 02:58 (eighteen years ago)

Psychocandy's more pop if anything, it barely rocks at all

President Evil, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 03:02 (eighteen years ago)

it is more rock AND more pop

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 03:08 (eighteen years ago)

Can somebody please explain what MBV did that Hawkwind hadn't already been doing better for decades?

?! I have listened to some Hawkwind records, but apparently not the right ones. Seriously, I've only heard a couple and it was a while ago, but does Hawkwind really sound like Loveless?

Mark Rich@rdson, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 03:10 (eighteen years ago)

If you're of the opinion that anything by Hawkwind sounds like 'Loveless' then it's definitely time to put the crack pipe down.

SeekAltRoute, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 03:30 (eighteen years ago)

I'd rather compare Psychocandy to Isnt Anything anyway, this is like saying "what is better, apples or concrete?"

Trayce, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 04:57 (eighteen years ago)

Isn't Anything's better than Loveless too. Way better comparison tho, true. Psychocandy has higher highs but Isn't Anything's a better album, more than one production idea etc, and it rocks harder than any of the three.

President Evil, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 05:02 (eighteen years ago)

Aye, I was listening to it last night, awesome.

Trayce, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 05:18 (eighteen years ago)

loveless, ffs.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 06:27 (eighteen years ago)

psychocandy is good though.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 06:31 (eighteen years ago)

"Psychocandy" has songs, and they aren't buried completely by the wall of guitars either (only almost).

So, "Psychocandy".

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 09:11 (eighteen years ago)

hiring a rhythm section might be a nice touch, though I realize such things are hard to come by in England

lol

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 09:17 (eighteen years ago)

loveless, ffs.

-- latebloomer, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 06:27 (2 hours ago) Link

Just got offed, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 09:23 (eighteen years ago)

Psychocandy for me, though I like both, but Loveless is a bit too blurred or so.

zeus, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 10:37 (eighteen years ago)

'psychocandy' is boring-er.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 10:53 (eighteen years ago)

there is nothing more entertaining than watching grown men and grown women attempting to negate the inescapable truth that is loveless' brilliance. "a bit too blurred or so" = well done, you understood the album! I suppose Monet is "a bit too blurred" as well!

Just got offed, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 11:48 (eighteen years ago)

The new song-by-song cover album of Loveless by Japancakes is scary. Sounds like it should have come out on Vitamin.

zaxxon25, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 12:12 (eighteen years ago)

i like the one with more bass

electricsound, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 12:15 (eighteen years ago)

xxp - you can "understand" something and still think it's not that great, dude

pretzel walrus, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)

HAs the Japancakes album been released? I'm really looking forward to hear that. I loved the "Only Shallow" leak.

baaderonixx, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

Loveless for me, although I'd take Isn't Anything over either - it's a nice midway point between the two.

Gavin in Leeds, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

i might take souvlaki over either of these two ...

that said, i vote loveless.

Eisbaer, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

also, JAMC is a good example of "the law of diminishing returns" wr2 their record output -- they started out on a very high note w/ psychocandy and followed up w/ a very good sophomore album (darklands) -- but then after those 2, i only like them in fits and spurts as they got rid of more of the distortion (which was the whole POINT of their sound) and got more boring as they went. while MBV was exactly the opposite in terms of progression -- they started off sounding like a cheesy birthday party-knockoff (not to mention that jettisoning dave conway was a GREAT move -- dude was the midge ure of buzzpop wr2 cheesiness) and got better as they went along.

Eisbaer, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

Can somebody please explain what MBV did that Hawkwind hadn't already been doing better for decades?

lol chuck eddy, always a treat

sleep, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)

i've played psychocandy a lot more in the past year or two, but i'll still go with loveless. they're both great.

sleep, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

xxp - you can "understand" something and still think it's not that great, dude

Yeah, but if your criticism is that the album is 'a bit too blurred or so', you've shown a remarkable lack of understanding as to the album's ends.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

he just doesn't like it much, man, let him be.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

I still like Loveless fwiw

Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

naw louis, i didn't say that my criticism of the album was that it was "a bit too blurred"; i just said that it's possible to understand and appreciate loveless' aesthetic aims without thinking it's all that kickass.

i like loveless just fine. i still definitely dig psychocandy more, and isn't anything/ymmr are better than either of them, especially ymmr.

pretzel walrus, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)

naw louis, i didn't say that my criticism of the album was that it was "a bit too blurred"

It was Zeus', not yours. I'm not attacking your viewpoint, which is sympathetic and understandable.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)

Reverence is still the only JAMC album I ever want to listen to.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 19:14 (eighteen years ago)

ARGH I mean Honey's Dead, oops.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 19:14 (eighteen years ago)

I agree with you, Ned.

"Soon" was my moment too.

-- mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 23 June 2006 13:02 (1 year ago) Link

Same for me.

Spencer Chow, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

The new song-by-song cover album of Loveless by Japancakes is scary. Sounds like it should have come out on Vitamin.

-- zaxxon25, Tuesday, October 9, 2007 12:12 PM

I really really wanna hear it.

"scary" = good?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 19:59 (eighteen years ago)

Loveless sounds like the most pretentious indie fuck ever

Surely that better describes artless piffle like, say, fuckin' Pavement, no?

Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 01:37 (eighteen years ago)

I would not fuck to Pavement if I was being offered money to. Well obv I would but man, it'd be a mission. Re; Loveless moment, mine was To Here Knows When. Always amazed so many people love Soon so much, it's good (and part of the half the Lp I really like) but not all that MBVish, to me...

President Evil, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 01:56 (eighteen years ago)

mine was To Here Knows When

^^^

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 01:59 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

Luckily, I don't have to choose. These are two of the best albums ever. One is actually the best! The other one is top 10. It doesn't really matter which.

― Spencer Chow, Tuesday, October 9, 2007 10:54 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark

I absolutely adore the logic in this post, think this is going to be my default position in whatever impossible T/S I come across next

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile (dayo), Sunday, 3 October 2010 13:42 (fifteen years ago)

schrodinger's best album ever

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile (dayo), Sunday, 3 October 2010 13:42 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.