― pj (Henry), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:16 (nineteen years ago)
― pj (Henry), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:19 (nineteen years ago)
hip-hop to thread
― marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:27 (nineteen years ago)
Add "Spies like us" and smile again.
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Toad Roundgrin (noodle vague), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:28 (nineteen years ago)
― i am not a nugget (stevie), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)
― pj (Henry), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)
Erm, setting certain implications of that post aside, what about the marketing reasons why Sir Macca might've done a duet with MJ? These days the only way for an aging rocker to get equivalent demographic crossover cred would be enlisting a guest rapper. But many fans of aging rockers don't like rap, ergo, fewer male/male duets.
― marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)
Also didn't the MJ/Macca dueting happen after MJ bought all those Beatles songs? I've always considered it sort've one of Paul's "no hard feelings, mate" gestures.
― choinklate (nickalicious), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Chairman Doinel (Charles McCain), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:49 (nineteen years ago)
Also didn't the MJ/Macca dueting happen after MJ bought all those Beatles songs?
No way. Jackson and Macca never spoke again (although, presumably, their lawyers did) when the latter heard the news.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:54 (nineteen years ago)
― DAVE's secret to fortu-Oh look! Shiny! (dave225.3), Friday, 7 July 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)
― hank (hank s), Friday, 7 July 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)
xpost
― DAVE's secret to fortu-Oh look! Shiny! (dave225.3), Friday, 7 July 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)
― pj (Henry), Friday, 7 July 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)
-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn
I thought PMc lent MJ "moral support" during his (first) trial?
― M. Agony Von Bontee (M. Agony Von Bontee), Friday, 7 July 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
― braveclub (braveclub), Friday, 7 July 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)
I hate when people say "pya-noh".
― pj (Henry), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 7 July 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)
Currently, it's the life of the author plus 75 years in the U.S. That's unless they're not renewed properly, in which case they become "orphaned works." I'm guessing the Beatles and their estates have sharp attorneys who won't let that happen. Assuming Congress doesn't pass another copyright extension - and I'm guessing they will if and when Disney revists the issue - then the following happens:
* Lennon solo tracks become PD on 1/1/2056.* Harrison's Beatles and solo compositions become PD on 1/1/2007.* McCartney's compositions, and hence anything credited to Lennon/McCartney, becomes PD 75 years after he dies. Which means the Beatles may be protected by copyright until the 22nd century.
― mike a (mike a), Friday, 7 July 2006 16:35 (nineteen years ago)
― mike a (mike a), Friday, 7 July 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Friday, 7 July 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)
― mike a (mike a), Friday, 7 July 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)
― musically (musically), Saturday, 8 July 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Saturday, 8 July 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Saturday, 8 July 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Monty Von Byonga (Monty Von Byonga), Sunday, 9 July 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)