Kill Your Idols movie: anyone seen it? I did, and it sucks

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
No Mars? No Rhys? No James Chance (well, hardly any)? And why did the director think he needed to split the movie between No Wave and the heinous "New York" bands of a few years ago, e.g. Yeah Yeah Yeahs, ARE Weapons (who have what must be the lamest singer/frontman ever, braggin' about "baggin' pussy", so cringeworthy), etc...

douglas eklund (skolle), Sunday, 9 July 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)

Weird timing, I watched that last night too. I know what you mean that there's a kind of "wha?" factor that kicks in when it suddenly switches 1/3 of the way in from the O.G. no wave bands to trendy bands of now-ish- I felt the same feeling of "why bother?" at first. But . . . I thought the final 1/3, when the pioneers starting capping on the new bands and the new bands started capping on each other, and the whole thing seems kind of embarassing (i.e. no wave becomes another source of nostalgic cultural capital used to deligitimize others, but the new school is portrayed as sorta repellent with the exception of Black Dice)- that I found kind of weirdly compelling. The film is described as a history of no-wave, but it seems more thought-provoking as a calibration of the HUGE difference between then and now vis-a-vis the ever-reaching tentacles of the media spectacle. Young bands, at least of the trendy in NYC variety, now have publishing deals and publicists from day one. The movie kind of started out as if it was going to be celebratory but it's actually pretty ambivalent, and uncomfortable to watch.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

Er, to continue to blather- the other thing that seemed to stick with me was that you could cash out the difference between one camp and the other as "people who have confidently entered history" vs. "band that's stuck in the middle of a hype whirlwind and has no idea how kind (or not) history is going to be". If the newer bands seem less clear about what they are doing and what it means, that might have more to do with the fact that they are still in the middle of doing it.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Monday, 10 July 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

so does the movie suck because you don't like the bands in it or because it sucks as a movie? (and is there really any way to separate the two?)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 10 July 2006 17:23 (nineteen years ago)

better yet: would someone with absolutely no baggage (knowledge of "the scene" or scenes or whatever) coming to this movie enjoy it or not?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 10 July 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

movie and enjoy it, sorry

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 10 July 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

Sucks as a movie, specifically--seems like the director isn't quite sure what he wants to say, or if all it is, is that avant-gardes tend to get co-opted, it's just not enough for a movie...also, the conceit of having older musicians knock the new crop of imitators just makes everyone look bad all around. I had the same feeling watching the documentary about the photographer William Eggleston, actually, directed by another young'un.

douglas eklund (skolle), Monday, 10 July 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

Argh! Don't tell me this -- I'm SO looking forward to it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 10 July 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry to be a wet blanket -- still great stuff in it but the clips are too brief...

douglas eklund (skolle), Tuesday, 11 July 2006 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

(and is there really any way to separate the two?)

Sure: Some Kind Of Monster.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 11 July 2006 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

I dj'd the NY Underground Film Festival premiere of this movie a few years ago, with Nick Zinner. Still haven't seen the film though. Considering my vested interest in things "no wave", I definitely had some interesting discussions around that time when the term was used to describe literally every band that existed between 2000 and 2002. There are connections through the city, personally, I associate Nick Zinner with what I call the post-Nick Caves, all the skinny swank dudes that have been running around NYC forever(and probably other towns...) with people like Jim Sclavanus and that band Bellmer Dolls. Nick knows his shit, Brian really knows his shit and Keren is some kind of great performer, I don't know what he or they say in the movie about No Wave, probably responding to some leading questions, but I can't imagine they think what they were or are doing have much to do with Mars or whomever.

There was definitely a tangible excitement in NYC around that time, trust me, the years just before were relatively dull. The Strokes got big (hype) in the UK, every band in america moved here except the 6 that moved to San Francisco and everyone was waiting to see who'd be next. And nobody, I mean nobody, thought it'd be Interpol. It's no suprise that everyone was working every possible connection. But I won't comment any more on the movie, again, as I haven't seen it.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 11 July 2006 01:40 (nineteen years ago)

Spot on Douglas re. the older musicians knocking the young crowd making everyone look bad. Surely the late 1970s no wavers that appeared in the film cannot begrudge ANY musician making or attempting to make music, however they go about it.

badg (badg), Tuesday, 11 July 2006 05:41 (nineteen years ago)

Huh. I had been wondering "What the fuck are the Yeah Yeah Yeahs even doing in this anyway? I mean, seriously, why are they in this?" I can't hear any connection between them and, for example, DNA. It seems like the connection starts and ends with New York. I dunno. It's stupid to use them as a punching bag if that's what the 70s people are doing.

Is Ut in it?

I'll probably see it anyway.

xero (xero), Tuesday, 11 July 2006 05:59 (nineteen years ago)

(late reply) Thanks for clarifying, Douglas--I think I misread your original post a bit, so it helps.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 12 July 2006 13:16 (nineteen years ago)

I'd like to see a doc that takes off from the New York Noise comps: not just No Wave, and one that went back to, say, Silver Apples (Simeon's been great in some interviews), thence through 70s (if you get Ornette Coleman and Tom Verlaine at the right moments, they're good in interviews too), and so on, to the present day. Or using the Disco No Disco albums as a starting point,for that matter. But more music than talk, pleeeese (so rare)

don (dow), Thursday, 13 July 2006 05:17 (nineteen years ago)

Saw it last weekend, too. I think it really holds up as a film, maybe not as a MUSIC documentary in particular. It manages to transcend its subject and is rather knowingly disguised as a discourse on commercialism, artistic purity, and nostalgia. I read the film was made for a few hundred bucks, so not suprised that its not brimming with footage. It's not one for no-wave/post punk fetishist. I think it mocks that over obsession with musical history. More a film about a concept, than a thing, I think. It understood No-Wave's ultimate goal was to destroy No-Wave. It helps do that. Don't see it if you want a history lesson. It ain't one. Don't know if the director is speaking at every screening, he did on Saturday and was quite eloquent, if young and shy. He made the interesting point that he intended to use the no wave bands and their distance from or disregard for history as an opposing symbol to "his generation" with its oversaturation of history with ipods and internet and cd libraries and cable tv, etc. He also said that the film was commentary on the forced connections between the old/new scenes by the media then. Which I think is pretty apparent from the film. Don't know how anyone could think that's the aim of the film. Or that the brutality is aimed at the new bands. It think its appropriately impartial. It's a small art film commenting on media manipulation and hype and its threat to real innovation. If you go in expecting that, you'll be bowled over. If you go in wanting a love letter to past or present, you won't get one.

Michael Hayden (mhayden), Friday, 14 July 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

It didn't have to be a fetishist's mash note to No Wave to be good, I'm just saying he chewed more than he bit off with one rather ho-hum pedestrian idea, and I'm sorry, but that "art film" isn't going to bowl anyone over...

douglas eklund (skolle), Friday, 14 July 2006 13:37 (nineteen years ago)

Well, it did for me. And I saw several young kids debating the film excitedly as I left, so it's serving its purpose. Must have bowled someone over--it won awards at major festivals and got a release with a respectable studio. If the film took the side of the old timers, I'd agree that it's a pedestrian thesis. But it doesn't. It preserves the contradiction that you can't criticize an entire generation for being too nostalgic (as they do) without being nostalgic yourself and admitting that, yes, it was so much better back then. I think it reveals that post modern wall nicely. Really don't think there's 'one idea' in the film. It's layers of paradoxes subtly stated. One note: the director did say last weekend that he originally intended it as a video art piece that would show at the Whitney Biennial or something. Makes sense. I liked it.

Michael Hayden (mhayden), Friday, 14 July 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)

OK, peace, bro

douglas eklund (skolle), Friday, 14 July 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

This made me want to snap my Yeah Yeah Yeahs and A.R.E. Weapons discs in half, actually -- fuck that, they're now not even worth the energy expended to execute that effort. WHY MUST KAREN O PUNCTUATE EVER STATEMENT WITH "LIKE" AND "Y'KNOW"?? WHY?

Depressingly idiotic.

The film did re-affirm my undying love for Lydia Lunch's unrelentingly fierce outlook on life.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 17 July 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

Oh -- and no Pussy Galore? No Cop Shoot Cop? UNFORGIVABLE!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 17 July 2006 01:07 (nineteen years ago)

WHY MUST KAREN O PUNCTUATE EVER STATEMENT WITH "LIKE" AND "Y'KNOW"??

She's going after that half-Korean valley girl market. That's a good market.

Marmot 4-Tay: what those guyz make music 4. (marmotwolof), Monday, 17 July 2006 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

Watched this again recently. Dire. And to think how much better it should've been!

Alex in NYC, Sunday, 4 November 2007 23:53 (seventeen years ago)

By the way, fuck the Liars.

Alex in NYC, Sunday, 4 November 2007 23:53 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

dude the liars are gods compared to that coked up douche in A.R.E. Weapons. god remember them?

yeah anyway outside of some rad vintage footage this was such a fucking bad documentary...unreal how bad it was and even more LOL now in 2009 when they are trying to manufacture some imaginary "scene" that includes somehow gogol bordello AND black dice lol

actually at least the liars and black dice have at least a tenuous connection to the no wave stuff.

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)

and even the old stuff was done pretty poorly and really cliched.

they really could have talked to more people.

it's like they complain that No New York distorted ppl's view of No Wave, boiling it down to a handful of bands, then they do the same thing

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)

One big gripe I have with it, is that the musical connections (between then and "now") seemed pretty tenuous, and they devoted more time to exposing the Yeah Yeah Yeah's girl's vacuity than presenting the music, especially the old stuff. I don't think any of the vintage clips were over a minute and a half. Apparently, they were using crappy third/fourth-generation footage, and didn't bother making the effort to get anything closer to the original.

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)

I have to be honest and say that the obvious device of cutting together Yeah Yeah Yeah's girl's vacuity and old people bitterness works pretty well. I remember a similar critique leveled at that King of Kong documentary, how it made Billy Mitchell more of a jerk purely for hacky dramatic purposes, but I didn't mind it at all.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 24 August 2009 19:36 (sixteen years ago)

It certainly didn't do YYY girl any favors in terms of intelligence or articulateness, as compared to Lydia Lunch and Glenn Branca. Most of the new generation came across as dumb-asses.

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)

how it made Billy Mitchell more of a jerk purely for hacky dramatic purposes

as someone who has met billy, i suspect that movie was edited just fine.

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 19:44 (sixteen years ago)

ha! is there a story here?...

Philip Nunez, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:05 (sixteen years ago)

we were both making appearances at this video game thing in the mall of america, i didn't like hang out w/him for a long period of time but anyway put it this way, the way he came off in the movie was very much how he came off IRL (and i had met him years before king of kong)....(and yes he was wearing The USA Tie and a denim shirt)

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:21 (sixteen years ago)

anyone with similar story re: karen O?

Philip Nunez, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

lol not me

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

I met one guy that was part of the current "scene" they were trying to construct that was kinda douchey, but he wasn't in the film.

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)

the guy from ARE weapons was mindblowing in that dept

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)

god i love him

da croupier, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)

definitely -- it just exacerbated what I felt was the incoherence of the movie. It doesn't make a very good case for musical similarity; it doesn't make a good case for similarity of sensibility/personalities; it doesn't bring in any outside evidence of a comparison. To me, it was like 1/3 entertaining rants from Glenn and Lydia with not enough No Wave music footage, and the rest was a bunch of inarticulate idiots and their slightly less idiotic music.

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

the part where he goes off on this tirade about people like ESG was priceless

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

Glenn Branca was pretty awesome, too. It made me want to be his drinking buddy.

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

if i saw this movie again i'd probably only watch the ARE parts, maybe a few of the less whiny old people

da croupier, Monday, 24 August 2009 20:43 (sixteen years ago)

The "whiny old people" were the best part as far as I'm concerned ...

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

who's the scene douche?

Fox Force Five Punchline (sexyDancer), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

he has a solo project called S0ft C1rcle. Honestly, I was only in his presence for one evening ... I got a douchey impression from him, but it could have been totally circumstantial.

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

lee renaldo always seems like a very nice guy

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)

circumstantial douchieness!

Fox Force Five Punchline (sexyDancer), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

xp Yeah ... he and Arto Lindsay came across as good guys, as did Thurston Moore, who seemed like the Ron Howard of No Wave.

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)

gira and branca seem like they would be hard to hang out with. lydia seems like she has never stopped talking once for like 25 years.

my favorite part was when lydia was going on and on about how "we all played music not because we wanted to because we HAD to...we had to exorcise this filth in our souls, this pain and torture" blah blah blah

and then cut to arto lindsay saying in a very nerdy and sincere way "well i thought i could sort of distill rock to its very base elements...i thought we could be unique and the more unique we were the faster we would be rich and famous" like it was a science project to him

cheddar burress (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 24 August 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)

lydia seems like she has never stopped talking once for like 25 years.

serious lol.

free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

Upcoming Teenage Jesus & the Jerks dates

Oct 2 2009 8:00P Le National (Pop Montreal Festival) Montreal, Quebec
Oct 3 2009 8:00P Music Hall of Williamsburg Brooklyn, New York
Oct 5 2009 8:00P The Empty Bottle Chicago, Illinois
Oct 7 2009 8:00P The El Rey Theater Los Angeles, California
Oct 8 2009 8:00P Slim’s San Francisco, California
Oct 10 2009 8:00P Showbox Lounge @ Pike Place Seattle, Washington

Anyone else going or have seen them recently?

I ♠ my display name (sarahel), Monday, 28 September 2009 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

Wha? Really? More?

Alex in NYC, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

do they have a habit of saying "last ever shows"? These are being promoted as such to some extent.

I ♠ my display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

no sightings in this? i did not see all of it though.

lacipetersonskid, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 01:47 (fifteen years ago)

in the movie? No.

I ♠ my display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 01:49 (fifteen years ago)

lydia seems like she has never stopped talking once for like 25 years.

serious lol.

― free jazz and mumia (sarahel), Monday, 24 August 2009 21:03 (1 month ago)

I think I laughed at this for the wrong reason.

bamcquern, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 02:00 (fifteen years ago)

because i posted it?

I ♠ my display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 02:01 (fifteen years ago)

No, the comment you're laughing at. Because I thought of a notable moment on record when Lydia Lunch stopped talking.

bamcquern, Tuesday, 29 September 2009 02:14 (fifteen years ago)

ha! My friend who wrote a fan letter to her when he was 15 is in one of the bands opening the SF show next week, which I think is totally cute and awesome.

I ♠ my display name (sarahel), Tuesday, 29 September 2009 02:16 (fifteen years ago)

three years pass...

this is fucking terrible, and everyone in this is annoying as fuck

Poliopolice, Thursday, 28 February 2013 04:39 (twelve years ago)

this is one of my most favorite thread titles

sarahell, Thursday, 28 February 2013 04:42 (twelve years ago)

I still regret not talking to lydia lunch that time I saw her sitting by herself and looking a little forlorn at a butthole surfers show in 88

unprepared guitar (Edward III), Thursday, 28 February 2013 05:18 (twelve years ago)

i met her and talked to her a few months ago - she did most of the talking.

sarahell, Thursday, 28 February 2013 07:15 (twelve years ago)

B

Johnny Too Borad (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 28 February 2013 18:31 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.