two one-time masters of irony drop their guard when confronted with folks that they consider to be lazy losers, thereby revealing for all to see an inner heartless bitch that their prior works had only hinted at! with overbearing instrumental backing by the best technology that their great wealth could buy -- as if their overbearing blockbusting beats would REALLY drive the point home (if the callous lyrics weren't enough).
i vote for bjork, because the beats are better ... not to mention that during the clinton years if you were a loser then you really WERE a loser and deserved all the scorn you got (as opposed to jagger's distillation of the reagan/thatcher ethos that prevailed when "let's work" was recorded).
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)
― fandango (fandango), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:08 (nineteen years ago)
You Clinton Democrats are so endearing.
― Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 6 August 2006 19:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Son of Spam (noodle vague), Sunday, 6 August 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)
― lAUrEl ANNE dOWNS (GoDdAMN GOrGEOUS), Monday, 7 August 2006 02:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 7 August 2006 10:22 (nineteen years ago)
(i vote bjork)
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 7 August 2006 10:23 (nineteen years ago)
He added: "It's probably Americans who are running it, not Jagger".
ah, the naivety, or stupidity, of youth.
― fandango (fandango), Monday, 7 August 2006 11:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 7 August 2006 11:51 (nineteen years ago)