"Bob Dylan is set to release an 800 track career spanning digital album to coincide with the release of his new long player.
The album will cost £169.99 and is available from iTunes on August 28, the same day ‘Modern Times’ is released."
Doubtless there'll be a few "Hard-To-Find" tracks on there that'll have us Bobcats wringing our hands trying to decide if it's worth robbing a bank to buy the thing....
― musicjohn73 (musicjohn73), Monday, 21 August 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)
― morris pavilion (samjeff), Monday, 21 August 2006 22:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 01:30 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 08:24 (nineteen years ago)
Surely you'll just be able to buy the songs that don't have rather than shelling out for the whole thing
― Robin Goad (rgoad), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 09:16 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 09:24 (nineteen years ago)
― musicjohn73 (musicjohn73), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 11:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan Heilman (The Deacon), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Jim M (jmcgaw), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 19:51 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)
― wrapped up like a DOUche in the middle of the NUT (donut), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)
"You listen to these modern records, they're atrocious, they have sound all over them," he added. "There's no definition of nothing, no vocal, no nothing, just like ... static."
― wrapped up like a DOUche in the middle of the NUT (donut), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)
800? Wow. I knew he was prolific, but wow. How many of thosesongs are good? 100? 150? Even that's impressive. >"You listen to these modern records, they're atrocious, they have >sound all over them," he added. "There's no definition of nothing, >no vocal, no nothing, just like ... static."
Archaic or bluntly true? Charting rock IS in a dire state (pop is doing fine, though)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 20:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 22 August 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)
― tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 09:46 (nineteen years ago)
― tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 09:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 11:46 (nineteen years ago)
But it really is, if you remember that most singer-songwritersnever write a good song in their entire life.
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 23 August 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)
* 39 are absolute stone classics by any standard* 185 are better than what 95 percent of his colleagues were doing at the time* 343 are solid craftwork by one of the true masters* 190 are to be enjoyed by fans only* 43 are irredeemable shite
You're welcome.
― Dan Heilman (The Deacon), Thursday, 24 August 2006 13:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 24 August 2006 13:31 (nineteen years ago)
― graf cycliz (graf cycliz), Saturday, 26 August 2006 23:55 (nineteen years ago)
Another nugget from this era is the version of "Grand Coulee Dam" he recorded with The Band at a Woody Guthrie tribute show in Jan. 1968.
The one I can't believe hasn't been on CD yet is the slower (without The Hawks) version of "Can You Please..." released by mistake (and mislabeled) and quickly withdrawn in the fall of '65.
― Dan Heilman (The Deacon), Sunday, 27 August 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)