― Aditya (dan138zig), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 00:38 (nineteen years ago)
i'd also like to add diane cluck
― ()()()---()()() (internet), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)
― oh, wrinklepaws! (Wrinklepaws), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 00:44 (nineteen years ago)
― electric sound of jim [and why not] (electricsound), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 00:47 (nineteen years ago)
― bernard snow (sixteen sergeants), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 00:48 (nineteen years ago)
― robert anderson (venimdenim), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 01:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Lynco (lync0), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 01:25 (nineteen years ago)
not overlooked - panned!
― Erroneous Botch (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 01:25 (nineteen years ago)
― less-than three's Christiane F. (drowned in milk), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 01:25 (nineteen years ago)
― pinder (pinder), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 01:27 (nineteen years ago)
― el juan (el juan), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 08:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Pier Paolo Semolina (noodle vague), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 08:31 (nineteen years ago)
― ng-unit (ng-unit), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 11:55 (nineteen years ago)
― ()()()---()()() (internet), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 12:02 (nineteen years ago)
― xave (xave), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Obvious Ninja (Haberdager), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 21:20 (nineteen years ago)
― PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)
― GLC (ZakAce), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 22:41 (nineteen years ago)
― cosmo vitelli (cosmo vitelli), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 23:17 (nineteen years ago)
I'd be interested to know how Pitchfork (or indeed other websites) decide on what to review. It surely can't just be a case of who so ever sends a promo copy and some lube? I understand that's how newspaper sections function. Is it strictly music with American distribution or does that matter to them in the net-age.
― Major Alfonso (Major Alfonso), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 23:25 (nineteen years ago)
― edger stewert (edger), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 23:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Major Alfonso (Major Alfonso), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
Definitely not. I'm pretty sure "Silent Shout" had no American distribution at the time of its review, among others. Obviously the goal is to break new artists, and to squeeze in as many indie bands as possible, with a few token mainstrean (Tool, RHCP) and rap (Clipse) acts thrown in. It would be refreshing to see non-indie music gain representation (like that dirrty girl, obviously) instead of some She Wants Revenge knockoff.
― cosmo vitelli (cosmo vitelli), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 23:44 (nineteen years ago)
some of it is assigned by the editorial staff, some of it's pitched by the writers
― Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 29 August 2006 23:57 (nineteen years ago)
Haha, when was the last time this happened?
― regular roundups (Dave M), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 00:47 (nineteen years ago)
― brightscreamer (brightscreamer), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 02:53 (nineteen years ago)
Going back to 03 or so (I wasn't paying close enough attention prior to that), Cut Copy is probably the oddest omission-- hell, I think every editor on staff likes them! I can't recall how that slipped through the cracks. Gerling...I dunno. If something as great as "Dust Me Selecta" had come out the past few years, we'd have reviewed that. I don't think P4k 2001 noticed it at the time. (and I guess I should check them out again? Maybe they are still releasing music that good.)
I wish I'd have pushed more for Rachel Stevens and Sugababes to have LP reviews, so I guess that's my thread contriubution, although they've been covered in tracks-- especially Stevens. Back to Basics...I can't say there are plans to review that and there has been plenty of back and forth on that. (Perhaps oddly then, Kelis will be reviewed tomorrow, and Beyonce and Timberlake will be eventually-- all by Tim Finney, btw. Timberlake's never had an LP review before, the others have-- tasty and a d's child comp. I don't think Dangerously in Love was reviewed)
― scott pl. (scott pl.), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 03:10 (nineteen years ago)
― aaron d.g. (aaron d.g.), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)
― aaron d.g. (aaron d.g.), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 03:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Aditya (dan138zig), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
― oh, wrinklepaws! (Wrinklepaws), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)
I love the first disc (minus the most perversely egotistical final track to ever grace an album). Otherwise, it' solid throughout with no filler. Haven't listened to the second disc very much yet. It sounds like more of a grab-bag.
― cosmo vitelli (cosmo vitelli), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 22:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Erroneous Botch (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 30 August 2006 23:00 (nineteen years ago)
― brightscreamer (brightscreamer), Sunday, 3 September 2006 01:24 (nineteen years ago)
-- GLC (Lady_ZakAce_I...), August 30th, 2006
that is a Killing Joke.
― micarl (micarl), Sunday, 3 September 2006 10:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Monday, 4 September 2006 04:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Jena (JenaP), Monday, 4 September 2006 05:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Jena (JenaP), Monday, 4 September 2006 05:48 (nineteen years ago)