― Tracer Hand, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
i'll say it before and i'll say it again: if you like this sort of thing, buy the newest human league record. it's fucking great. respect where respect is due.
― jess, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tracer hand, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm not sure if I'd like the original stuff......er which is interesting, however I can't get enough of the new stuff. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think it's the slickness of it all that appeals to me. Felix is more dancefloor than most of it though, in fairness, and there's some great remixes of his stuff too.
― Frank Kogan, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― M Matos, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
At the moment I'm really enjoying DJ Hell's "Fuse Presents Hell" mix cd from 2000, which is like a greatly expanded set of source material for what has become a very precisely located sound in the hands of the International Deejay Gigolos roster. So you get "I Feel Love" and Maurizio and Sparks, Frankie Goes To Hollywood's "Two Tribes" and sweet vocal house and Phuture's (amazing) "Rise From Your Grave". Trying to work out what the common link is - apart from quality - and it occurred to me that Hell is a cocaine producer. It's all treble sounds and big personalities. (I might pillage this for the blog so maybe expect an expanded version). And I really think that IDG are trying to engage with that... a certain experience of dancing as a culture that was *all about* elitism and snootiness and music as fashion versus music as music (of course "Silver Screen (Shower Scene)" has been picked up for a Levi's commercial. That means it's doing its job). They're obviously not serious or unselfconscious about it but I don't think their approach is ironic, or at least not just ironic.
Their relationship to the source material is perhaps more like drill & bass's relationship to jungle. A parasitic use of the source material that attempts to "take it further" to the point of ridiculousness; a collective hallucination of what the music *should* have been (notice how really the *only* eighties track all this stuff unequivocally takes its cues from is Visage's "Fade To Gray"). Which doesn't make it better, but it gives it enough stylistic breathing space that I want to give it a chance.
Personally I'm looking forward to Felix Da Housecat's remix of Brandy's "What About Us" (forthcoming, apparently) - not only because stylistically they'll fit hand in glove, but because it's the union of the two most empty, vapid pop styles on the planet. Yay!
― Tim, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
however, i think the cream of the crop is truly invigorating. artists such as adult obviously have a deep love of 80's electronics and as more producers who grew up in that era start producing, it is inevitable that they are going to revisit their early influences. thankfully they aren't shamelessly rehashing the past but using it as a template and enhancing it with more up to date production techniques. i agree that some of it veers towards bad trance but my main gripe is in the rhythm dept. artists such as throbbing gristle had primitive beats as they were limited by the machines of the day. i'd like to hear the sounds in these records fused with slightly more innovative rhythms.
ha, as i type this there is a tv advert playing for 'electric' - a comp of new wave electropop from the 80's and earlier one was on for soft cells greatest hits. truly mainstream.
― stirmonster, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― patrick, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andy K, Monday, 1 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Clarke B., Tuesday, 2 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Btw Tim: is 'Fuse presents Hell' a mix-cd? I need it. :)
― Omar, Tuesday, 2 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
(plus what would be the point of her performing live? Couldn't they just use a mannequin and play her pre-recorded vocals through the speakers for the same effect?)
Yeah Omar, 'Fuse Presents Hell' is a mix-cd and it's great. And for people like Clarke who want proper pop songs, maybe try Luke Slater's new cd 'Alright On Top', which basically bolsters huge Numanesque synth basslines, tough 4/4 beats and the occasional quasi-industrial breakbeat onto gloomy New Order-ish pop songs written and sung by Ricky Barrow. It's not quite as good as Barrow's best stuff with The Aloof ('Sinking' - a much more intriguing mixture of post-punk pop, dub and techno) but it's a lot of fun.
― Tim, Tuesday, 2 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Honda, Tuesday, 2 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
But I agree Green Velvet is as much an integral part of this as anyone else; being a bit quick off the starting blocks should not be a barrier to inclusion.
But.... how different is it to the kind of electro that people like Anthony Rother, Le Car and Ectomorph were producing throughout the late 90s? Because for a while it seemed like that stuff had the potential to really take off (although as a dance genre scene, and without the kind of style media attention Miss Kittin gets).
But the problem was always once you heard the stuff in a club - a dj playing electro is fantastically fun, interesting and danceable for 2 hours. But not for 4, and definitely not for 6. I don't think it has anything to do with 'trendy hijackers' or 'irony' but much more to do with the fact that the stylistic boundaries of electro are so rigid and fossilised that it is simply impossible to keep it interesting for long periods of time. In order to qualify as electro music has to use sharp, exaggerated breakbeats without a heavy kick and have a cold sci-fi feel - how much room for manoeuvre is there? It's just about the only style I can think of that prescribes both mood and structure, which is a recipe for tedium. All the most interesting genre music prescribes either one or the other of mood and structure, allowing more variety.
― jacob, Tuesday, 2 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Maybe the difference though between Kittin and Velvet is that Velvet really *makes* his songs
Shocking Tim, this would be the least interesting aspect of comparing the two ("she doens't write her own songs youknow" ;)) Now Peaches vs Miss Kittin vs Green Velvet as a difference of American vs European vs Alien view on sex in electronica, that's another story.
Tracer, the reason you think this stuff is shite is because it is shite. This is what happens to electronic music when it stops being weirdo fringe music, and starts being cool. Dj Hell and IGD are trying to make this stuff cool and market it to hipsters. Those hipsters are going to make electro as boring and souless as the sweater-wearing post-rock ship they just sunk.
Electronic music is supposed to be weird and ignorable, that is why it is so great. You can do anything you want because nobody is watching. When you try and take ideas that come from this underground and try to market them as the next trend, it will always fail. It simply cannot translate. All these trendy electroclash groups will fade because they are trying to take real electro and bastardize it with all the boring rockist conventions that are necessary to make this stuff accessable and populist.
If you want to hear hot electro, buy Viewlexx records, Ersatz Audio, Interdimesional Transmissions, Direct Beat, and anything Drexciya related. If you see a record that has been licensed by Emporer Norton, run like hell. I still cannot figure out what all these Felix Da Housecat people are on about. It is like saying that Stone Temple Pilots were the best Seattle band.
― mt, Tuesday, 2 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Omar, you *know* I don't give two, um, figs about who writes the songs. I mean that Green Velvet dominates his work to an extent that it's difficult to imagine the music and the vocals separate. In comparison Kittin's whole MO makes her seem like an elaborate foil for the discretely created music. It's irrelevant whether she writes the lyrics, music, both or neither - all I mean is that her performance is less integral than Velvet's.
Your question is the more interesting one, though.
― Tim, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Tim, would you say the same thing about, say, Dana Siciliano and Matthew Herbert? Her soulfulness and jazziness are a foil for Herbert's super-complex bed of glitchy, splurty house? I think her voice and style is much more integrated into Herbert's songs, but maybe the comparison holds up at least to some extent.
― Clarke B., Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
yawn. Jeez I once thought Reynolds was a bit over the top when he called Detroit pietists fascists but now I'm not so sure with all this talk of cultural purity, realness and ignorant masses. Talk about nazi logic.
and anything Drexciya related.
you mean those fashionable Japanese Telecom and Dopplereffekt records released on IDG? Or do those records lose their worth once they're not released in the People's Republic of Detroit?
Tim, I was pulling your leg a bit. I wonder though why Miss Kittin is singled out as a target by the electro boys. Is this some subconscious ethos that has been sublimated by listening to Kraftwerk's 'The Model'? "Nein, thees iz out ov zee question. Zee ladies will not touch zee keyboards."
― Omar, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Clarke - the Herbert comparison is interesting. I'm not really sure actually... it's a good question though as I've been listening to Herbert's new cd of remixes Secondhand Sounds and allowing himself to work with pre-recorded vocals - cutting them up, looping them, doing typical remixer stuff - sounds almost liberating in the context of the (usually) straight vocal peformances on his albums. I guess maybe Herbert's music and Dano's vocals are much more interdependent. Whereas you could imagine Miss Kittin and The Hacker recording in separate countries and swapping tapes. There's nothing to say that their tracks *aren't* already bootlegs, if you know what I mean.
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Here is something from the 313 list that breaks down exactly what I was trying to say. Please let me know if this this makes any sense to you, or if it makes you feel the need to call more names.
(snip) This entire 'electroclash' revival seems like an older person's version of being a raver. Though the electroclash style doesn't require the baggy pants and glowsticks, the electro version does require a wardrobe, haircut and certain attitude. It doesn't surprise me that this is booming in NYC. A city that is a revolving door for fads,fashions and anything seeming European.
I'll never find the 'look' or the superficial things that go with this music sexy. Sue me for not liking mohawks or a good line o coke. I guess my discussion is, why does an entire 'look' have to be tied in with this music? In most of the press coverage I've seen of this music, the clothes and seemingly snotty social circles ala Less Than Zero etc., are covered right along with it.
Underneath, is the music that boring that it needs a pretty wrapper or is it just finally a music style combining the art/fashion world that has run parellel with music for so long?
I always liked Adult. but IMHO many of the other acts at the Electroclash party stunk. I much prefer the 'electro' of Clear than women who need show me their boobs and be in mini-skirts while they sing a cover of 80's ballads (yes, W.I.T.). They're like an electronic Brittany Spears trio. If Adult. and such were the bricklayers of this movement (which shouldn't even be put near the world 'electro' IMHO) it seems like many others are going in a completely different direction talent wise (like W.I.T.-who also completely demise what women have gone through to get respect in the music industry btw). Or perhaps I'm just taking it all too seriously.
/rant ended. diana
dianalynn80@yahoo.com
(Snip)
mt
― mt, Wednesday, 3 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
The thing is (on that 313 quote) who cares about how other people consume music? I give a shit about some assholes in New York and what they think electro is about. Jesus, clubs have been overflowing with people like that for ages, when did Diana wake up?
This thing about electro requiring a wardrobe is bollocks too (probalby a joke by DJ Hell taken way too serious by some folks). You'll find a certain crowd of so-called fashionable people in every city trying to hijack certain forms of dance music and then protect their little new clique with this wardrobe ethic and door policies. Well let them have their little club, that whole mechanism of club elitism is worthless, a pathetic social game that should have stayed in the 80s.
[can't post long messages for some reason, on to part II]
― Omar, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I distrust all attempts to call this music anything else then electro, again typical boring social behaviour: "your music is not real electro", "our music is something new not the boring old electro", etc.etc. But as electro it must have a will to diversify, get infected and be changed. I find purity very boring (A.Rother is a good example btw with his carbon-copies of Kraftwerk).
As for European. That's interesting. Do these people really have an obsession with anything European? It does fit, since let's face it electro is European folk music (UR admitted as much with 'Afrogermanic', Felix da Housecat instinctively knows this), has been that way for more than 20 years.
So Michael a humble retort without any name-calling. Interested to know what you think.
1) the moment people start complaining that a certain music betrays the "true spirit" of its (actual or alleged) ancestry, I become interested. The music isn't necessarily better, but it's usually more interesting than any equivalent conservation/ preservation projects occurring in opposition. (interestingly though I don't hear any real opposition between, say, Adult and Jake Mandell on one hand and IDG on the other... I can very well imagine Ersatz Audio getting the whippin' that IDG gets if it had a similar-sized profile).
2) taking the uglinesses of a culture or scene surrounding a musical style into account when assessing that music is a legitimate method, but applying it as a matter of course potentially isolates the listener from some great music (eg. uk garage). I don't need to come to grips with the reality of the cocaine'n'fashion culture to enjoy IDG and associated artists; I can quite easily imagine its shallowness, and I can derive a perverse enjoyment from that shallowness in my head that would be impossible to do in real life.
And anyway, the idea that the majority of IDG's audience genuinely identify with that culture is as likely as the idea that Peaches' audience is primarily made up of guys who want to have sex with her.
― Tim, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Totally oblivious to this "scene" until now, really.
― Ronan, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ben Williams, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Answer: Elvendrums
― jacob, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Let's not forgot that the first Detroit techno record was entitled Charivari and inspired by Italian disco. Or that Derrick May and co got their start DJing Detroit yuppie parties with dress codes.
Let's also not forget that Felix Da Housekatt has been making house music for God, must be 15 years now. He is Mr. Authentic. I know Chicago is outside the 313 area code, but really... Comparing him to the Stone Temple Pilots is way off-base.
Mind you, I don't like much of this nu-electro shit either.
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Andy K, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― DJ Martian, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Thursday, 4 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Omar, Friday, 5 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)