Here's a couple that haven't let their taste for sound slip:BjorkThe Breeders
Who else?
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)
Unlike BAD to BAD2.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Marty Innerlogic (marty innerlogic), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)
― got yourself a fish biscuit! (nickalicious), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
Never released an album, but hey!
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)
And are these too new to evaluate? The Hold Steady. The New Pornographers. The Decemberists. I figure your question requires a minimum of three albums to qualify, but that's my purely arbitrary feeling.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 9 October 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)
;P
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)
the stoogesthe velvet underground (exluding post-lou reed years)the beatles
― Ben H (Ben H), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)
― got yourself a fish biscuit! (nickalicious), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)
― chris plus plus (chris++), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― The Bearnaise-Stain Bears (Rock Hardy), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)
― derrick (derrick), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)
― 0xDOX0RNUTX0RX0RSDABITFIELDXOR^0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF00001 (donut), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt #2 (Matt #2), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)
― emekars (emekars), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt #2 (Matt #2), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Matthew OMalley (Matt-O), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
― You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)
"Strangeways Here We Come" is a strike against The Smiths.
REM? Get real.
― Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)
i shouldn't comment, i'm not the biggest REM fan to begin with. did see them in concert though...
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:16 (nineteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)
thirteen.
can they really all be good?
yep.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)
throwing muses
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)
― kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
Well, if you want to look at it that way, sure - certainly you're right about the assumption unless stated otherwise of straight white male-ness; but a singer who speaks in universalities makes me think of bad songwriting more than normative subject positions. I think people tend to write songs that way because songs like that have been successful in the past/they aren't particularly talented lyricists.
― Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Thursday, 12 October 2006 03:43 (nineteen years ago)
Within the context of "emo dudes are still jerks DO YOU SEE?" she has a point. But it's not exactly a groundbreaking revelation to point out that carraba-types who ask for pity (or punishment) for their bad behavior are self-absorbed cockfarmers.
Beyond that, it's pretty woeful. Accusation != critique.
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 12 October 2006 03:52 (nineteen years ago)
In the USA that may not be the case too often (the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking), but in the UK, indie rock musicians are a lot more likely to come from a working class background. Which makes the generalization of college rock, or all "white" rock all over the place, to be even more weird coming from someone based in Britan like Marcello.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 12 October 2006 07:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 11:06 (nineteen years ago)
Geir, do you actually know anything at all about the UK?
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 12 October 2006 13:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 October 2006 13:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
Liars
Pavement
Spoon
― Chris Grasinger (gman59), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Friday, 13 October 2006 00:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 13 October 2006 00:54 (nineteen years ago)
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:05 (nineteen years ago)
tim, that sentence kind of ended before i got to the point. too many qualifiers, i guess. i was calling for attention to be paid to one's (dominant) speaking position when purporting to speak from a position of neutrality, generally about universal experiences. i.e. the everyman is a white guy, no?
i should clarify. it's not that many bands outrightly claim to speak for or to some universal human condition but, rather, that there is a curious double-bind inherent in most forms of artistic expression. on the one hand, you have the singularity of the artist, which is often not a "nobody knows my pain" but more a "no one can properly express this pain but me." (substitute "pain" variously with love/anger/any other kind of feeling.) even the "no one has ever felt this sad" claim is proleptic; it contains within it the desire for its audience to understand the pain, to share in the experience. therein lies the claim to the universal, that we can transcontextually share experiences ("that ella fitzgerald song totally expresses how i felt after my breakup") irregardless of class, race, gender, sexuality, time, space, etc.
wait i thought you were dissing the pixies??!
ramzi, i meant "monkey gone to heaven" as an example of a claim to a universal experience. so far as i know, there is no such thing as a universal experience. death maybe, but, having not died and having not spoken with anyone after they have died, i don't know.
I mean are you criticizing songwriters for not writing songs explicitly spelling out what position they're singing from?
no.
― Godfrzej Ljang (godfrzej), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:33 (nineteen years ago)
Are you suggesting that we can't? (With an appropriate discount for projection, of course.) Or that we can, but only as middle-class white men?
irregardless
Less theory, more vocab.
― hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:54 (nineteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 13 October 2006 04:05 (nineteen years ago)
pwned?
but i'm suggesting that any experience we think we share with a pop song is an imaginary one. the problem with this, as i have said, is that this shared experience is too often grounded on a normative class position that is not actually normative. i.e. who can participate in this imaginary sharing of experience? who is excluded and, thus, interpellated as an Other by this?
― Godfrzej Ljang (godfrzej), Friday, 13 October 2006 04:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 13 October 2006 05:29 (nineteen years ago)
also, kultur shock, dead kennedys, and, as far as I can tell, acid mothers temple. although they have released 900 albums, so there could be a few hundred duds out there I'm not aware of (ditto fushitsusha/keiji haino).
― mister the guanoman (mister the guanoman), Friday, 13 October 2006 06:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 October 2006 06:43 (nineteen years ago)
i agree with you. the gendering of guitar riffs as somehow essentially masculine is stupid. if dean wareham intended for his songs to do what they do for me, he'd agree with you too. but, stupid or not, i won't pretend that guitar riffs aren't coded as masculine. in the same way, it's stupid to gender the slowness of galaxie 500's riffs, the way they made loud distorted guitars sound soft and pretty, as feminine. but they are nonetheless coded as such. i can't speak to the simon reynolds book because i haven't read it, but what galaxie 500 does, i think, is precisely call into question the arbitrariness and stupidity of what you call "gender stereotypes," the conventionality of these assumption, as well as the subject positions that underlie these assumption.
another way of thinking about it might be jackson pollock's painting. is that kind of painting essentially masculine? of course not. it perhaps allegorises painting as an act of male dominance and virility, but how can any painterly practice be essentially masculine or feminine? but that doesn't mean that artists like shigeko kubota, nam june paik, duchamp, lichtenstein, and, to a degree, yves klein should have ignored the masculine coding of pollock's painting instead of problematizing the grounds of this encoding, exposing the stupidity instead of saying, "that's stupid. i'm above engaging with or even considering it."
― Godfrzej Ljang (godfrzej), Friday, 13 October 2006 06:44 (nineteen years ago)
― These Robust Cookies (Robust Cookies), Friday, 13 October 2006 06:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 October 2006 07:56 (nineteen years ago)
I think Henry Cow is pushing it a bit too
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 October 2006 08:09 (nineteen years ago)
There are a few Henry Cow duds, it must be admitted.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 October 2006 08:11 (nineteen years ago)
― hank (hank s), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:06 (nineteen years ago)
The Necks
― hank (hank s), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)
Basically, all popular musicians with some level of popularity are all very wealthy, which, economically, puts them not only into the middle class, but as a matter of a fact into the upper class, and indeed makes them rather privileged. This goes regardless of race, social background, Nationality, gender, education or whatever, so I guess they should all write lyrics like that then?
The most important difference between a middle class or working class background will thus be more about culture than about economics, and I would say people like Damon Albarn, Green Gartside and Paddy McAlloon have all written lyrics that could not have been written by anyone who doesn't share their middle class background. I mean, imagine someone with a working class background namechecking Jacques Derrida or Balsaz in their lyrics. I think not!
Also note that skin colour doesn't necessarily matter here. Fro instance, Disposable Heroes of Hiphoprisy's middle class background comes through very obviously in their lyrics.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)
Shut up, you dick
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:35 (nineteen years ago)
SHUT THE FUCK UP *CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP* SHUT THE FUCK UP *CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP*SHUT THE FUCK UP *CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP*
xp!
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:37 (nineteen years ago)
The Necks are a strong candidate--the only duds I've heard from them have been live. Haven't heard every studio album, though.
Another possibility is Cluster, but I can't remember if I've heard all their albums.
― These Robust Cookies (Robust Cookies), Friday, 13 October 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
later!
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 14 October 2006 03:18 (nineteen years ago)
katatonia
agalloch
isis [ep's and remixes don't count,do they?]
monolake
― drone/a/sore (drone/a/sore), Saturday, 14 October 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)
Really, we clearly not supposed to interpret Mick Jager as human being.
Of course, maybe that's the root of your problem with the music of the Pixies, since they come out of a punk tradition that sometimes rejected that kind of cartoon deification, self objectification. Frank Black does seem to be identifying as a person despite being a white guy.
Still he clearly engages with privilege in the song. The exaggerated white New York diction and accent at the beginning placing his identify, and later “I’ll get mine too” acts as a reference to being the kind of thing at the top of the food chain though at the same time the physical limitations of privilege, mortality/extinction. The pixies don’t assume that their own position in society is neutral/normative, rather they assert that despite their advantaged position in the matrix of domination they have as much access to universal human experience, so far as it exists, as anyone else.
Let’s also not pretend that the question of the humanity of whites isn’t on the table. Some of the cleverer of the punk and "collage" rock acts do defend their claim to humanity rather than surrendering it on a platter like say David Bowie.
Oh man, I just noticed that he specifically avoids saying the devil is six three times, but of course puts the notion in our heads by saying 5 and 7 three times. Cleverness is universal no?
― Adam S S (Zephery), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 02:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 October 2009 03:05 (sixteen years ago)
Tones on TailGeraldine FibbersOpethEnslaved
― Nate Carson, Friday, 9 October 2009 04:18 (sixteen years ago)
Unwound
Daniel, how does the new Califone compare to Roots & Crowns?
― Still kshighway. (Guess who's back?) (kshighway1), Friday, 9 October 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)
Geraldine Fibbers 1 million% otm!
i would say
Mr. BungleSleepytime Gorilla Museum
but, you know, of course i would
― FCK R VWLS (jjjusten), Friday, 9 October 2009 04:36 (sixteen years ago)
Only including artists with at least three studio albums:Otis ReddingPossibly Sam & Dave, though I've never heard their reunion album from '76.Mississippi John HurtThe CoupTLCKanye WestIf we exclude posthumous releases (hell, even if we include most of them), then Jimi HendrixAgain discounting posthumous releases, Bob Marley, though there's some early stuff I've never heardHound Dog TaylorThere's a lot by him I still haven't heard, but maybe Eric DolphyClifford BrownI've never heard his '90 comeback, but Allmusic likes it pretty well, so perhaps James CarrI really want to say Al Green, but I've yet to venture into his gospel periodI also want to say Neu!, but apparently there's a studio album from the 90s that everyone agrees sucksThe DictatorsI missed his Christmas album, and a couple other recent releases, but I can't imagine a Bootsy Collins album that's not at least listenableNobody in the world agrees with me, but I think every studio album released by the Jam has its significant merits (even The Gift)Ditto for Eric B. & Rakim (even Don't Sweat the Technique)Ditto again for Rilo Kiley (especially Under the Blacklights, which is actually my favorite album from them)the Policethe Undertonesthe Feeliesthe English Beatthe New York Dollsthe AuteursMaybe Ghostface Killah, but I haven't heard the new album yetMaybe Grandaddy, though they released an album before Under the Western Freeway that I've never heard
― MumblestheRevelator, Friday, 9 October 2009 06:23 (sixteen years ago)
― FCK R VWLS (jjjusten), Friday, October 9, 2009 4:36 AM
and you'd be 100% correct.
although SGM, bafflingly, did release one of the worst live albums of all time.
tempted to add melvins to this list. there are certainly less good albums (stoner witch, bootlicker), but no bad ones as such. ditto cardiacs.
― m the g, Friday, 9 October 2009 07:45 (sixteen years ago)
Kyuss
― Bill Magill, Friday, 9 October 2009 13:48 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe Ghostface Killah, but I haven't heard the new album yet
The new one totally killed this possibility for me.
― & other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 9 October 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)
Slowdive
― Turangalila, Friday, 9 October 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)