Artists that never released a bad studio album

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
You could put out the 4 most amazing albums in the world, and I'd still expect the next one to suck. Just because it always seems to go that way - no matter how terrific the artist, there's always a 1 to 2 crappy albums expectation.

Here's a couple that haven't let their taste for sound slip:
Bjork
The Breeders

Who else?

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

Baha Men

Konal Doddz (blueski), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:08 (nineteen years ago)

The Clash

Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:11 (nineteen years ago)

...but not the Clash mk. II

Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

But they never changed their name.

Unlike BAD to BAD2.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:20 (nineteen years ago)

True but they should have, "This is England" aside...

Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

low

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

Motorpsycho

Marty Innerlogic (marty innerlogic), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)

Marissa Marchant

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)

Morphine

got yourself a fish biscuit! (nickalicious), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:44 (nineteen years ago)

Pixies

Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

Me.

Never released an album, but hey!

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:48 (nineteen years ago)

was gonna say pixies! hehe - well in that case, me too!

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)

The Smiths.

And are these too new to evaluate? The Hold Steady. The New Pornographers. The Decemberists. I figure your question requires a minimum of three albums to qualify, but that's my purely arbitrary feeling.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 9 October 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)

R.E.M.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

Joy Division

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

tori amos - JUST KIDDING!!!

;P

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)


obvious answers

the stooges
the velvet underground (exluding post-lou reed years)
the beatles

Ben H (Ben H), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

michael jackson

tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

If he stopped with Dangerous.

got yourself a fish biscuit! (nickalicious), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:16 (nineteen years ago)

GOTCHA

tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

Beck (not yet, that is)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:27 (nineteen years ago)

In the case of Michael Jackson, I wouldn't categorize "Forever, Michael" as particularly good, I mean, in spite of "One Day In Your Life" being a great song and all....

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

fugazi comes to mind, as does sonic youth.

chris plus plus (chris++), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

Do you like Stereopathic Soul Manure, Geir?

Mark (MarkR), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)

who doesn't?

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

"R.E.M.
-- Tim Ellison (thefriendlyfriendlybubbl...), October 9th, 2006."
I think maybe if they had stopped with the I.R.S. years but a lot of the Warner Bros. stuff is patchy...

Radio Free Albemuth (DocMartensBoots), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)

i dunno about beck's latest - kinda going through the motions, no?

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:56 (nineteen years ago)

i don't know it very well.

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)

Zep

The Bearnaise-Stain Bears (Rock Hardy), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)

steely dan
saint etienne

derrick (derrick), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

Scott Walker

0xDOX0RNUTX0RX0RSDABITFIELDXOR^0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF00001 (donut), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

Kinda going through through the motions every so often, but I wouldn't say Tom Waits has ever released a really bad album.

Matt #2 (Matt #2), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

New Pornographers

emekars (emekars), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

derrick reads my mind : P

gear (gear), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:17 (nineteen years ago)

Merzbow? I mean, name me a bad one. You either like them all or hate them all. Or maybe feel indifferent about them all.

Matt #2 (Matt #2), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

The freaking Cure

Matthew OMalley (Matt-O), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)

wild mood swings, you rogue

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Monday, 9 October 2006 21:50 (nineteen years ago)

Whoa, Scott Walker put out several shitty albums inbetween "Til The Band Comes In" and "Climate Of Hunter".

"Strangeways Here We Come" is a strike against The Smiths.

REM? Get real.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

ooh zep's a good one. i don't know REM's stuff at all, but haven't they come out with like eighteen albums? can they really all be good?

i shouldn't comment, i'm not the biggest REM fan to begin with. did see them in concert though...

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

Mission Of Burma
Gillian Welch

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

Jimi Hendrix Experience (not counting posthumous releases)

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:16 (nineteen years ago)

REM have released nothing but bad albums for some time now

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

ha

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

haven't they come out with like eighteen albums?

thirteen.

can they really all be good?

yep.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

this is probably not the smartest thing to say cuz i haven't heard like two of their albums, but i can't imagine they're anything less than interesting -

throwing muses

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)

Arc Angels

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

nirvana
the minutemen
jay-z

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

Sleater-Kinney
Yo La Tengo
Pavement

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

David & David

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Monday, 9 October 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

Well, if you want to look at it that way, sure - certainly you're right about the assumption unless stated otherwise of straight white male-ness; but a singer who speaks in universalities makes me think of bad songwriting more than normative subject positions. I think people tend to write songs that way because songs like that have been successful in the past/they aren't particularly talented lyricists.

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Thursday, 12 October 2006 03:43 (nineteen years ago)

i can't put it better than jessica hopper did, so read article

Within the context of "emo dudes are still jerks DO YOU SEE?" she has a point. But it's not exactly a groundbreaking revelation to point out that carraba-types who ask for pity (or punishment) for their bad behavior are self-absorbed cockfarmers.

Beyond that, it's pretty woeful. Accusation != critique.

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 12 October 2006 03:52 (nineteen years ago)

"middle class," "middle class," "middle class" - no indie rock musicians come from working class backgrounds?

In the USA that may not be the case too often (the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking), but in the UK, indie rock musicians are a lot more likely to come from a working class background. Which makes the generalization of college rock, or all "white" rock all over the place, to be even more weird coming from someone based in Britan like Marcello.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 12 October 2006 07:09 (nineteen years ago)

marcello, i'll buy everything waits puts out simply because i'm always curious as to what the man's doing, and it's his catalogue of interesting work that keeps me engaged

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 11:06 (nineteen years ago)

but in the UK, indie rock musicians are a lot more likely to come from a working class background

Geir, do you actually know anything at all about the UK?

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 12 October 2006 13:27 (nineteen years ago)

More urgent and key, what does he know about this "Britan" in which I am supposedly based?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 October 2006 13:42 (nineteen years ago)

london bridge, the queen, the tems river, harry and prince phillip, big ben (no bigger than thom yorke)

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 13:46 (nineteen years ago)

Oh yes, Yorke Minister, up North, near Blackpole.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

haha

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

broken social scene

Liars

Pavement

Spoon

Chris Grasinger (gman59), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.necps.org/images/20050312-NECPS-Program-Wild%20Bill-wrong%20way%20to%20feed%20VFTs.jpg

Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)

LOL at Jessica Hopper ref

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

"the point is that many straight white guys aren't singing about specific experiences but, rather, about abstract ones. of course, gay black women do that too. but no one takes those songs to be normative or universal, so it's not problematic." = it's the listener's fault for making assumptions/projecting the position of the artist (ie, why DON'T listeners take songs by gay black women as being normative or universal? who's fault is that?) But anyway relying on aesthetic criteria that hinge on artistic intent invariably = bullshit.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

I mean are you criticizing songwriters for not writing songs explicitly spelling out what position they're singing from? what kind of boring shit would that be to listen to? ("I am a white male/I am priveleged/I know this is not fair"... *yawnz*)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 October 2006 21:44 (nineteen years ago)

Me'shell Ndegeocello

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Friday, 13 October 2006 00:29 (nineteen years ago)

the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking
the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking
the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking
the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking
the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking
the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking
the American working class - in terms of level of education - tends to be either black or kind of stuck in a traditional white Christian fundamentalist/far right thinking

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 13 October 2006 00:54 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/n3/n17446.jpg

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:05 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, I'm not sure I understood your last sentence. "More attention needs to be paid" to what?

tim, that sentence kind of ended before i got to the point. too many qualifiers, i guess. i was calling for attention to be paid to one's (dominant) speaking position when purporting to speak from a position of neutrality, generally about universal experiences. i.e. the everyman is a white guy, no?

i should clarify. it's not that many bands outrightly claim to speak for or to some universal human condition but, rather, that there is a curious double-bind inherent in most forms of artistic expression. on the one hand, you have the singularity of the artist, which is often not a "nobody knows my pain" but more a "no one can properly express this pain but me." (substitute "pain" variously with love/anger/any other kind of feeling.) even the "no one has ever felt this sad" claim is proleptic; it contains within it the desire for its audience to understand the pain, to share in the experience. therein lies the claim to the universal, that we can transcontextually share experiences ("that ella fitzgerald song totally expresses how i felt after my breakup") irregardless of class, race, gender, sexuality, time, space, etc.

wait i thought you were dissing the pixies??!

ramzi, i meant "monkey gone to heaven" as an example of a claim to a universal experience. so far as i know, there is no such thing as a universal experience. death maybe, but, having not died and having not spoken with anyone after they have died, i don't know.

I mean are you criticizing songwriters for not writing songs explicitly spelling out what position they're singing from?

no.

Godfrzej Ljang (godfrzej), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:33 (nineteen years ago)

therein lies the claim to the universal, that we can transcontextually share experiences ("that ella fitzgerald song totally expresses how i felt after my breakup") irregardless of class, race, gender, sexuality, time, space, etc.

Are you suggesting that we can't? (With an appropriate discount for projection, of course.) Or that we can, but only as middle-class white men?

irregardless

Less theory, more vocab.

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)

OK, you say that you're "calling for attention to be paid to one's (dominant) speaking position." I'm not sure that you have identified the specific problems you see in artists (presumably white male) whom you find to not be paying enough attention to this matter, though. And how would more attention to the matter be noticeable and manifest in their music?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:54 (nineteen years ago)

basic channel and progeny

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 13 October 2006 04:05 (nineteen years ago)

tim, the problems i see are in the supposed neutrality or normativity of the singer-songwriter, rock guitarist, etc. i can't put this any less abstractly because it's ideological and if it were concrete, it wouldn't be ideology. and it underlies so much of popular music that pointing to a particular artist or song as an exemplar seems pointless (in that it wouldn't elucidate anything because i'm not sure it can be seen more clearly in any one artist or song). as for how this attention might be manifest, two examples i can point to are destroyer and galaxie 500. in dan bejar's quotation of other people's lyrics, there isn't one unified voice; it's a multitude of voices which, in turn, are exposed as multitudes of other voices, all without stable origins. the slowness of dean wareham's guitar playing estranges guitar riffs and, in doing so, calls the conventionality of the guitar riff into question. it makes the listener ask why the guitar riff is coded as masculine and, because his slow riffs feminize a masculine rock trope (the virility of the guitar hero), they bring to the listener's attention the conventional subject position of the rock and roll guitarist. i don't mean to suggest that these are the only two ways to call attention to this problem in the singer-songwriter and guitar rock traditions and, certainly, i don't want to lay down proscriptive rules on how to be a responsible pop musician, but i do think this problem has been underrepresented in pop music, at least to my knowledge.

irregardless

Less theory, more vocab.

pwned?

but i'm suggesting that any experience we think we share with a pop song is an imaginary one. the problem with this, as i have said, is that this shared experience is too often grounded on a normative class position that is not actually normative. i.e. who can participate in this imaginary sharing of experience? who is excluded and, thus, interpellated as an Other by this?

Godfrzej Ljang (godfrzej), Friday, 13 October 2006 04:42 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I've never bought into the gender stereotypes I think you are espousing - "the guitar riff is coded as masculine," etc. One thing I thought was interesting and perhaps ironic about the Simon Reynolds/Joy Press book The Sex Revolts was that it was coming from a feminist point of view but was not only stereotyping maculinity but also femininity in the same way I think you are doing here ("Slow riffs feminize a masculine rock trope").

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 13 October 2006 05:29 (nineteen years ago)

I'd suggest there's never been a bad album by faith no more, fantomas or mr bungle, although that's probably too much patton to handle for some.

also, kultur shock, dead kennedys, and, as far as I can tell, acid mothers temple. although they have released 900 albums, so there could be a few hundred duds out there I'm not aware of (ditto fushitsusha/keiji haino).

mister the guanoman (mister the guanoman), Friday, 13 October 2006 06:41 (nineteen years ago)

Anyway, the correct answer is Robert Wyatt.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 October 2006 06:43 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I've never bought into the gender stereotypes I think you are espousing - "the guitar riff is coded as masculine," etc. One thing I thought was interesting and perhaps ironic about the Simon Reynolds/Joy Press book The Sex Revolts was that it was coming from a feminist point of view but was not only stereotyping maculinity but also femininity in the same way I think you are doing here ("Slow riffs feminize a masculine rock trope").
-- Tim Ellison (thefriendlyfriendlybubbl...), October 13th, 2006 2:29 AM. (later)

i agree with you. the gendering of guitar riffs as somehow essentially masculine is stupid. if dean wareham intended for his songs to do what they do for me, he'd agree with you too. but, stupid or not, i won't pretend that guitar riffs aren't coded as masculine. in the same way, it's stupid to gender the slowness of galaxie 500's riffs, the way they made loud distorted guitars sound soft and pretty, as feminine. but they are nonetheless coded as such. i can't speak to the simon reynolds book because i haven't read it, but what galaxie 500 does, i think, is precisely call into question the arbitrariness and stupidity of what you call "gender stereotypes," the conventionality of these assumption, as well as the subject positions that underlie these assumption.

another way of thinking about it might be jackson pollock's painting. is that kind of painting essentially masculine? of course not. it perhaps allegorises painting as an act of male dominance and virility, but how can any painterly practice be essentially masculine or feminine? but that doesn't mean that artists like shigeko kubota, nam june paik, duchamp, lichtenstein, and, to a degree, yves klein should have ignored the masculine coding of pollock's painting instead of problematizing the grounds of this encoding, exposing the stupidity instead of saying, "that's stupid. i'm above engaging with or even considering it."

Godfrzej Ljang (godfrzej), Friday, 13 October 2006 06:44 (nineteen years ago)

This Heat (only 2 albums, but Joy Division keeps getting mentioned so...)
Crass?
Henry Cow
thought about Robert Wyatt but then I thought there was a dud in there somewhere... End of an Ear? not sure I've heard that one actually.

These Robust Cookies (Robust Cookies), Friday, 13 October 2006 06:52 (nineteen years ago)

End Of An Ear is more experimental and improv-y and not for neophytes, but I've always liked it.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 October 2006 07:56 (nineteen years ago)

End of an Ear = bit of a dud

I think Henry Cow is pushing it a bit too

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 October 2006 08:09 (nineteen years ago)

Hey, I liked side one of Soft Machine 5, what do I know?

There are a few Henry Cow duds, it must be admitted.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 13 October 2006 08:11 (nineteen years ago)

here's me arguing (rather effectively, I might add) that Lucinda Williams has released nary a dud, and several gems...

hank (hank s), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:06 (nineteen years ago)

that last post was the set-up...here's the spike:

The Necks

hank (hank s), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)

I mean are you criticizing songwriters for not writing songs explicitly spelling out what position they're singing from? what kind of boring shit would that be to listen to? ("I am a white male/I am priveleged/I know this is not fair"... *yawnz*)

Basically, all popular musicians with some level of popularity are all very wealthy, which, economically, puts them not only into the middle class, but as a matter of a fact into the upper class, and indeed makes them rather privileged. This goes regardless of race, social background, Nationality, gender, education or whatever, so I guess they should all write lyrics like that then?

The most important difference between a middle class or working class background will thus be more about culture than about economics, and I would say people like Damon Albarn, Green Gartside and Paddy McAlloon have all written lyrics that could not have been written by anyone who doesn't share their middle class background. I mean, imagine someone with a working class background namechecking Jacques Derrida or Balsaz in their lyrics. I think not!

Also note that skin colour doesn't necessarily matter here. Fro instance, Disposable Heroes of Hiphoprisy's middle class background comes through very obviously in their lyrics.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, imagine someone with a working class background namechecking Jacques Derrida or Balsaz in their lyrics. I think not!

Shut up, you dick

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:35 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.hack-man.com/PIX/PHOTOS/ECW/2000-05-06/Mvc-892s-Sandman.jpg

SHUT THE FUCK UP *CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP*
SHUT THE FUCK UP *CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP*
SHUT THE FUCK UP *CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP*

xp!

Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:36 (nineteen years ago)

I think I prefer you when you're just racist (xxpost)

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 October 2006 12:37 (nineteen years ago)

If I'm not mistaken, Henry Cow had three proper studio albums: Leg End, Unrest, & Western Culture. Then there were the two Slapp Happy collabs, In Praise of Learning and Desperate Straights. Are you calling any of these duds? Western Culture's a bit maximalist, but still good stuff to me at least.

The Necks are a strong candidate--the only duds I've heard from them have been live. Haven't heard every studio album, though.

Another possibility is Cluster, but I can't remember if I've heard all their albums.

These Robust Cookies (Robust Cookies), Friday, 13 October 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)

oh just stoppin by

later!

Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 14 October 2006 03:18 (nineteen years ago)

swallow the sun [only two albums in....]

katatonia

agalloch

isis [ep's and remixes don't count,do they?]

monolake

drone/a/sore (drone/a/sore), Saturday, 14 October 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

The ugliness and self-conscious degeneracy of rock and roll reflects the rocker's discomfort with his dominant (W-M-M) position though. It problematizes the privileged position as cartoonish and grotesque rather than normative and neutral.

Really, we clearly not supposed to interpret Mick Jager as human being.

Of course, maybe that's the root of your problem with the music of the Pixies, since they come out of a punk tradition that sometimes rejected that kind of cartoon deification, self objectification. Frank Black does seem to be identifying as a person despite being a white guy.

Still he clearly engages with privilege in the song. The exaggerated white New York diction and accent at the beginning placing his identify, and later “I’ll get mine too” acts as a reference to being the kind of thing at the top of the food chain though at the same time the physical limitations of privilege, mortality/extinction. The pixies don’t assume that their own position in society is neutral/normative, rather they assert that despite their advantaged position in the matrix of domination they have as much access to universal human experience, so far as it exists, as anyone else.

Let’s also not pretend that the question of the humanity of whites isn’t on the table. Some of the cleverer of the punk and "collage" rock acts do defend their claim to humanity rather than surrendering it on a platter like say David Bowie.


Oh man, I just noticed that he specifically avoids saying the devil is six three times, but of course puts the notion in our heads by saying 5 and 7 three times. Cleverness is universal no?

Adam S S (Zephery), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 02:56 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

  • Califone
  • The Clientele
Really digging the new discs from both acts, BTW.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 October 2009 03:05 (sixteen years ago)

Tones on Tail
Geraldine Fibbers
Opeth
Enslaved

Nate Carson, Friday, 9 October 2009 04:18 (sixteen years ago)

Unwound

Nate Carson, Friday, 9 October 2009 04:18 (sixteen years ago)

Daniel, how does the new Califone compare to Roots & Crowns?

Still kshighway. (Guess who's back?) (kshighway1), Friday, 9 October 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)

Geraldine Fibbers 1 million% otm!

i would say

Mr. Bungle
Sleepytime Gorilla Museum

but, you know, of course i would

FCK R VWLS (jjjusten), Friday, 9 October 2009 04:36 (sixteen years ago)

Only including artists with at least three studio albums:
Otis Redding
Possibly Sam & Dave, though I've never heard their reunion album from '76.
Mississippi John Hurt
The Coup
TLC
Kanye West
If we exclude posthumous releases (hell, even if we include most of them), then Jimi Hendrix
Again discounting posthumous releases, Bob Marley, though there's some early stuff I've never heard
Hound Dog Taylor
There's a lot by him I still haven't heard, but maybe Eric Dolphy
Clifford Brown
I've never heard his '90 comeback, but Allmusic likes it pretty well, so perhaps James Carr
I really want to say Al Green, but I've yet to venture into his gospel period
I also want to say Neu!, but apparently there's a studio album from the 90s that everyone agrees sucks
The Dictators
I missed his Christmas album, and a couple other recent releases, but I can't imagine a Bootsy Collins album that's not at least listenable
Nobody in the world agrees with me, but I think every studio album released by the Jam has its significant merits (even The Gift)
Ditto for Eric B. & Rakim (even Don't Sweat the Technique)
Ditto again for Rilo Kiley (especially Under the Blacklights, which is actually my favorite album from them)
the Police
the Undertones
the Feelies
the English Beat
the New York Dolls
the Auteurs
Maybe Ghostface Killah, but I haven't heard the new album yet
Maybe Grandaddy, though they released an album before Under the Western Freeway that I've never heard

MumblestheRevelator, Friday, 9 October 2009 06:23 (sixteen years ago)

i would say

Mr. Bungle
Sleepytime Gorilla Museum

but, you know, of course i would

― FCK R VWLS (jjjusten), Friday, October 9, 2009 4:36 AM

and you'd be 100% correct.

although SGM, bafflingly, did release one of the worst live albums of all time.

tempted to add melvins to this list. there are certainly less good albums (stoner witch, bootlicker), but no bad ones as such. ditto cardiacs.

m the g, Friday, 9 October 2009 07:45 (sixteen years ago)

Kyuss

Bill Magill, Friday, 9 October 2009 13:48 (sixteen years ago)

Maybe Ghostface Killah, but I haven't heard the new album yet

The new one totally killed this possibility for me.

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 9 October 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)

Slowdive

Turangalila, Friday, 9 October 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.