Shins' "Wincing the Night Away"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Yikes. Apt title, unfortunately.

M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 20 October 2006 04:17 (nineteen years ago)

if you can stay awake, i suppose

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Friday, 20 October 2006 04:19 (nineteen years ago)

The leaked live tracks that I've heard sound OK.

darin (darin), Friday, 20 October 2006 05:39 (nineteen years ago)

Does the uproarious keyboardist do any comedy sketches between songs?

Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Friday, 20 October 2006 07:45 (nineteen years ago)

No, but always remember, the Shins will ______ your ____.

cosmo vitelli (cosmo vitelli), Friday, 20 October 2006 08:54 (nineteen years ago)

My take is unusual, if not unique. I'd say that both Shin-haters and those who like this album as much as the earlier stuff have aesthetic sensibilities different from mine.

M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 20 October 2006 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

Do the leaked songs sound like The Cure? I read that the band says the album -- terrible title, by the way -- is heavily influenced by 80s Cure.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 20 October 2006 13:20 (nineteen years ago)

I think "Australia" is on par with anything off of their last two albums.

darin (darin), Friday, 20 October 2006 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

"Do the leaked songs sound like The Cure"

sometimes yes.i'm not sure thats a good thing, though.
also reminds me of the decemberists.

emekars (emekars), Friday, 20 October 2006 19:02 (nineteen years ago)

this band has some of the worst lyrics/titles ever. I haven't been able to bring myself to pay attention to anything since the first record, and even that I only like a handful of songs from.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 20 October 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)

I've listened to it twice now and not once did The Cure come to mind as I heard any of these songs. I'm just happy they're not writing as "cute" as they have in the past.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 20 October 2006 19:33 (nineteen years ago)

I think Mercer enunciates certain words and phrases a bit like Robert Smith, but I don't hear a any Cure influence in the actual music.

darin (darin), Friday, 20 October 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)

No dynamics. Wan melodies. Sleepy, droning vocals. Embarrassing and half-assed faux-electronic arrangements. A huge disappointment.

M. V. (M.V.), Saturday, 21 October 2006 00:31 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, the electronics threw me for a loop too. I do like Australia though, and Mercer still surprises me with his little melodic embellishments. The lyrics have gotten a bit worse though I'd say. Also--did anyone notice all the yelping way in the backround on some of the songs? Sounded like Animal Collective...

Devin King (Devin King), Saturday, 21 October 2006 03:54 (nineteen years ago)

But god, that first album...

Dugga Dugga Dugga (Bimble...), Sunday, 22 October 2006 09:30 (nineteen years ago)

i really like the last two, but this one is terrible

Alexei (alexei), Sunday, 22 October 2006 14:54 (nineteen years ago)

"Wincing the Night Away"

Tape Store (Tape Store), Sunday, 22 October 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

I bet Pitchfork has already started their 5.9 review

If they start it now, they can get it perfectly pretentious by January

Erock Lazron (Erock Zombie), Sunday, 22 October 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Brilliant!

I am not bloody David Byrne (Bimble...), Sunday, 22 October 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

this band has some of the worst lyrics/titles ever.

lol, this makes me remember when me and my friend were just hating on the shins and their ridiculous lyrics. there was this group around us enamored with them and we couldn't understand what the hell was so great about this band.


In terms of ratings, except, it should get like a 3.9.
Maybe i need to let it grow on me, but ughh I don't even want to listen to this again, the cd sounds so awful. Contrived? half like, they've got this G State weight on their shoulders to alter some lives, so they're going to experiment a little and sound different, but also they've got new fans to account for and keep, so they're going to stick to what they know as well with familiar melodies.
And the half-assedness of their musical approach shows fully here, too, as someone remarked upthread.
Embarrassing arrangments, I agree with that.

Thumbs down.
Yeah, and the Shivvers keep coming right after each song when I put them in my itunes, which oddly matches the sound of the Shins a bit, except i'd rather hear "Teen Line" 11 times over than go through Wincing again.

mox twelve (Mox twleve), Monday, 23 October 2006 01:58 (nineteen years ago)

Suddenly... feel... like... Christopher... Hitchens.

M. V. (M.V.), Monday, 23 October 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)

I liked the first half of this album a lot with the song "Sea Legs" being a stand out. Second half didn't do as much for me but will wait until I get a good rip to listen again.

BeeOK (boo radley), Monday, 23 October 2006 02:30 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
has it changed YOUR life yet?

the table is the table (treesessplode), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:05 (nineteen years ago)

I wish people would stop acting like its the band's fault someone wrote that line into a shitty movie.

jonviachicago (jonviachicago), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:16 (nineteen years ago)

OTM

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

They seem to have made the entire album listenable on myspace:

http://myspace.com/theshins

On first listen it's not amazing, not terrible. "Phantom Limb" sure sounds like the one they wrote with indie film sleeper hit in mind.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:21 (nineteen years ago)

oh cmon, they suck.

the table is the table (treesessplode), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

I wish people would stop acting like its the band's fault someone wrote that line into a shitty movie.

If they hadn't've existed they never would have found themselves in this predicament. I blame rock and roll in general.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think they suck. I would not pay money to listen to them, but I think they're fine.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

I think Pitchfork's review is a good one now, I agree with that. Not bad, just not as good as the first two were.

zeus (zeus), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:57 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.fiftiesweb.com/chuck-berry-1.jpg

"New slang when you notice the stripes
the dirt in your fries
hope it's right when you die"

M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

First half great (up to "Red Rabbits"), second half boring.

Simon H. (Simon H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:25 (nineteen years ago)

http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r292/adamrsbeales/DuckVision3.jpg

french for cane break (Pye Poudre), Monday, 22 January 2007 23:24 (nineteen years ago)

I wish people would stop acting like its the band's fault someone wrote that line into a shitty movie.

They played "New Slang" on SNL instead of another new song. They're not exactly ducking the Garden State thing.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 22 January 2007 23:47 (nineteen years ago)

That song was their most popular / signature hit well before Garden State.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 22 January 2007 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

(I mean, you might as well "they're not exactly ducking the McDonald's-commercial thing" -- it's a nice song and an obvious crossover pick, and it's been getting placement in one thing or another since the moment their first LP was released.) (The McDonald's one was funny, what with the line about "dirt in your fries" and the other bit about the bleeding bakers.)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 22 January 2007 23:58 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, you're right. Garden State has nothing to do with anything.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 00:08 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, you're right. Garden State has nothing to do with anything. How silly of me.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 00:12 (nineteen years ago)

Haha oops, ok I'm not wanting to get into an argument or anything, but would the Shins even be on SNL if it weren't for Garden State? I'm trying to think of another band that would get on there today on the strength of a couple Sub Pop albums and a McDonald's commercial.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 00:15 (nineteen years ago)

(NB I don't hate the Shins or anything)

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 00:15 (nineteen years ago)

But do the bands even choose what songs they do on SNL? I mean, isn't it totally standard to do the big single? It seems weird to fault them for not choosing a more obscure song when every act does their most famous/most recent one.

max (maxreax), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 00:17 (nineteen years ago)

Bands used to always play their current single and either whatever the next single was going to be or something from their current album. New Slang is five years old now.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 00:21 (nineteen years ago)

xpost -- umm, yeah

Umm, Marmot, nobody argued with you about that movie boosting their profile a bit! I just thought it was off-base for you to say that playing "New Slang" on SNL somehow equates to Garden State wagon-riding, or something: it very clearly been their big successful crossover song from the get-go, and I imagine they'd have played it on SNL any given week since the moment they wrote it. (Similarly, for a Burger King equivalent, if Modern English were mysteriously asked to be on SNL, I'm betting they would play "I Melt with You.")

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 00:22 (nineteen years ago)

That song was their most popular / signature hit well before that Burger King commercial.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 00:30 (nineteen years ago)

Marmot are you hard of thinking or just deliberately being weird?

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:08 (nineteen years ago)

If I'm disagreeing with you I must be one or the other!

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

Haha but Marmot you're not disagreeing with me, just talking in weird tangents! I.e. if it wasn't obvious the King there was just a burger joke -- the point is that any non-major band that gets to play two songs on TV will probably drag out the closest thing they have to a hit.

(The problem with "New Slang" isn't that it's not a nice song, it's that people who follow this kind of music have spent 5/6 years watching various attempts to product-place and remarket it into the big crossover hit it had some vague potential to be.)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:14 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I don't see what's so risible about a pop-ish band making typical commercial moves in order to achieve success. It's not like they fucking made a promotional album for Nike or anything.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:24 (nineteen years ago)

x=post
I know it was a joke! I never said that the Shins shouldn't have played New Slang on SNL.

I was replying to jonviachicago that if the band were really sick of being associated with that movie (which is really the first thing people think of by now, not the McD ad or any other shows it was used in the background of) they might not have played that song.

(The problem with "New Slang" isn't that it's not a nice song, it's that people who follow this kind of music have spent 5/6 years watching various attempts to product-place and remarket it into the big crossover hit it had some vague potential to be.)

Exactly! I'm not faulting them for playing the song, just saying that all that stuff must not bother them that much.
"Would the Shins even be on SNL if it weren't for Garden State?", wasn't a weird tangent to me, because there are a lot of bands with an indie following and songs in commercials and TV shows that won't be playing on SNL any time soon.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:25 (nineteen years ago)

there are a lot of bands with an indie following and songs in commercials and TV shows that won't be playing on SNL any time soon.

Which also suggests that there must be more reasons for The Shins being on SNL than just having been in a movie. Probably a combination of good marketing and, like them or not, catchy songs with a very recognizable and unique sound.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:27 (nineteen years ago)

Ok, we could pretend that there aren't thousands of people who actually like Garden State and got into the band because of it, but there's a certain audience that ate that "this band will change your life" shit up and shouldn't be underestimated. It's more than "just having been in a movie" when this weird pop culture thing happens around that particular scene in the movie, whether it's youtube parodies or people just thinking it was a cool scene or whatever.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:39 (nineteen years ago)

Well, it'd be an interesting experiment in, uh, cultural messaging or something, if we could set up an alternate universe where all else was equal, except that that line wasn't in the movie.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:43 (nineteen years ago)

Or even if Natalie Portman just said "It's this band called The Shins. They're aight."

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:43 (nineteen years ago)

Well, for one thing, I guess I'm not sure why we'd expect the Shins to be "bothered" by one of their songs being successful, or try to distance themselves from something that most people either don't know about or aren't bugged by -- they're exactly going to spend their few minutes on national television pandering to the tiny subset of bloggers and rockers for whom having a song in a Zach Braff movie is some kind of crime against humanity.

For another thing, I think what people are saying here is that playing "New Slang" does not exactly scream "GARDEN STATE" to anyone. Once again, it's been their most broadly popular song from the day they released an LP. The vast majority of people watching SNL have probably never heard the Shins and never seen Garden State. There's just kind of no question that you'd play your pseudo-hit, especially if the show is asking you to! (Which they probably were!) So it seems weird to connect that too much to the movie.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:44 (nineteen years ago)

IT'S ALSO A GREAT FUCKING SONG, I think.

max (maxreax), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:44 (nineteen years ago)

there's a certain audience that ate that "this band will change your life" shit up and shouldn't be underestimated

Maybe The Shins changed their lives? And yeah, New Slang is a great song.

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:45 (nineteen years ago)

I do think it's a good song. I caught myself whistling it today.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:45 (nineteen years ago)

Corrections: (a) "NOT exactly" and (b) "the vast majority of people watching SNL have probably never heard the Shins (outside of that McDonalds commercial, in which case they might go "oh, I think I've heard this before? it's nice," or possibly in Garden State, in which case they might go "oh, is this that band that was in that movie? I liked that song okay")." I think the echo chamber of the internet may be leading to an overestimation of the number of kids who carry copies of the Garden State soundtrack in their breast pockets. ("Frou Frou will change your life!")

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:47 (nineteen years ago)

And yeah, it has crossover potential because it's a nice song -- amiable, nice whistlable tune, well-constructed, not insisting on anything.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:50 (nineteen years ago)

I'm sure there are also a fair number of people who have gone vehemently anti-Shins because of that film who might otherwise at least think they were sorta okay.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:50 (nineteen years ago)

ZERO 7 CHANGED ME LIFE

max (maxreax), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 01:50 (nineteen years ago)

My wife noted a similarity to "Love Is Blue" in the SNL performance of "New Slang." (Possibly because Mercer de-syncopated it so drastically? Or am I imagining that?)

M. V. (M.V.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 02:51 (nineteen years ago)

playing "New Slang" does not exactly scream "GARDEN STATE" to anyone

I certainly don't expect it would to anyone on this board, but there is a middle ground between indie rock obsessives who knew all about the Shins from the beginning and people who don't pay that much attention to music in movies/commercials. The latter may be in the majority but the people in the middle still outnumber the former, and I think that those people would associate that song with that movie more than anything else, for better or worse. And there's nothing wrong with that.

The vast majority of people watching SNL have probably never heard the Shins and never seen Garden State.

I think that a not negligible amount of people who watch SNL are Natalie Portman fans judging by how popular her Andy Samberg rap video was. There's got to be a crossover with Scrubs fans who'd pay to see a movie with Zach Braff and her in it.

None of this even matters either way, because I completely agree that New Slang would be the key song for them to play on SNL regardless.

I think the echo chamber of the internet may be leading to an overestimation of the number of kids who carry copies of the Garden State soundtrack in their breast pockets.

Right, but the soundtrack is currently ranked #202 in Amazon music. There's an awful lot of people in this echo chamber still buying the damn thing.

Well, it'd be an interesting experiment in, uh, cultural messaging or something, if we could set up an alternate universe where all else was equal, except that that line wasn't in the movie.

That's all I've been trying to say! Would they be popular enough for SNL without that scene? I don't see it. It's not a value judgment regarding their music in any way. Like you, I wouldn't pay money to listen to them or anything, but they're ok.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 03:01 (nineteen years ago)

BTW, Marmot, sorry for being snippy there!

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 05:34 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

I am weirdly liking this album. Not hearing the Cure comparisons, but, vocally, stuff like 'Sea Legs' (which is pretty amazing btw) is pure Moz

baaderonixx, Monday, 17 November 2008 11:13 (seventeen years ago)

I agree. 'Sea Legs' does justice to their name.

Shin Oliva Suzuki, Tuesday, 18 November 2008 00:50 (seventeen years ago)

three years pass...

the new shins song is very good imo!

where the h is markers

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 10 January 2012 19:11 (fourteen years ago)

Agreed. I wasn't interested in them when the hype broke but their last album is really quite different. Looking forward to "Port Of Morrow".

Gerald McBoing-Boing, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 19:25 (fourteen years ago)

two months pass...

Well Port Of Morrow is a triumphant return. I find myself in agreement with a Pitchfork review as well. I have listened to it about 7 times now and consider at least the equal of Chutes Too Narrow. Its a very warm and uplifting album with ten perfect tracks. Brilliant.

Damo Suzuki's Parrot, Monday, 19 March 2012 17:48 (thirteen years ago)

I'll need to hear the rest. "Simple Song" struck me as hysterically overproduced; it's like Mercer auditioned for a part in How to Dismantle an Atom Bomb.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 March 2012 18:15 (thirteen years ago)

I think most of its tracks wouldn't sound out of place on BBC radio 2 to be honest. Its just one of them albums I instantly love and play end to end. If you didn't like Simple Song I'd guess you probably wont dig the album.

Damo Suzuki's Parrot, Monday, 19 March 2012 19:30 (thirteen years ago)

Not necessarily.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 March 2012 19:33 (thirteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ij7l-bf7lk

Damo Suzuki's Parrot, Monday, 19 March 2012 22:59 (thirteen years ago)

Wrote a little thing on "Simple Song," which I LOVE and do not think was overproduced.

timellison, Monday, 19 March 2012 23:09 (thirteen years ago)

I like it now I've read the Pitchfokr review

Morrissey & Clunes: The Severed Alliance (PaulTMA), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 00:31 (thirteen years ago)

How the fuck can you like anything until the arbiters of taste have wanked themselves off over something?

Damo Suzuki's Parrot, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 01:32 (thirteen years ago)

fuck knows, i'm a severed head

Morrissey & Clunes: The Severed Alliance (PaulTMA), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 01:51 (thirteen years ago)

At least you have still got your ears.

Damo Suzuki's Parrot, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 02:00 (thirteen years ago)

:(

Morrissey & Clunes: The Severed Alliance (PaulTMA), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 02:46 (thirteen years ago)

this has been talked about here also: The Shins

good luck Peeta Mellark (Bee OK), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 03:18 (thirteen years ago)

Live web concert on Late Show with David Letterman starts in about 40 minutes.

timellison, Wednesday, 21 March 2012 00:20 (thirteen years ago)

I mean on the show's web site!

timellison, Wednesday, 21 March 2012 00:26 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.