2. The AutomaticMonster (Culprit One Mix)
3. SugababesI Bet You Look Good On The Dancefloor
4. Girls AloudLove Machine (demo)
5. AnnieMe Plus One
6. AleshaLipstick
7. LadytronDestroy Everything You Touch
8. Franz FerdinandDo You Want To
9. Justice V SimianWe Are Your Friends
10. ClientLights Go Out
11. The SimilouAll This Love (The Drill Mix)
12. The Pussycat DollsHot Stuff (I Want You Back)
13. StefyChelsea
14. Pet Shop BoysIt's A Sin (Barfly Version)
15. Rachel StevensSome Girls
16. Britney SpearsDo Somethin'
17. Kelly ClarksonSince You Been Gone (Jason Nevins Radio Edit)
18. Scissor SistersMary (Junkie XL Radio Edit)
19. Nelly FurtadoManeater
20. The KillersMr. Brightside (Thin White Duke Radio Edit)
21. Sophie Ellis-BextorDear Jimmy
22. Girls AloudBiology (Radio Edit / Tony Lamezma Mix)
DIE COOL POP MUSIC DIE
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:49 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 13:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)
:-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)
it just makes me think a bit less of the sugababes :(
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)
oh plz!
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:06 (nineteen years ago)
i find this compilation very depressing, like rereading an ilm thread from two or three years ago. it feels so stale.
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:10 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:11 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)
nice cover tho
OK, this officially sucks.
― wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:16 (nineteen years ago)
The CD tracklisting is quite disappointing for what PJ stands for, most of the stuff you can already get on other pop albums anyway.
― jellybean (jellybean), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)
― wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)
― wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)
what is this brand all about?
the email is just a press release only with slightly amusing wording a la smash hits.
he never seems to write about music. is the album the pop record for OMM readers we've all been waiting for?
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:29 (nineteen years ago)
― wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)
probably coming soon the 90s popstar style fanclub
― jellybean (jellybean), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)
I am of course aware that no one outside of ILM or Popjustice will even consider buying this.
Nice cover though :)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:35 (nineteen years ago)
errrr, really? rihanna, girls allowed, sugababes?
what are the books?
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)
thank you :)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)
2. The AutomaticMonster (Culprit One Mix)WELL KNOWN
3. SugababesI Bet You Look Good On The DancefloorWELL KNOWN
4. Girls AloudLove Machine (demo) WELL KNOWN
5. AnnieMe Plus One ILM PASSIM
6. AleshaLipstick ;_;
7. LadytronDestroy Everything You Touch NOT FAMOUS
8. Franz FerdinandDo You Want To WELL KNOWN
9. Justice V SimianWe Are Your Friends WELL KNOWN
10. ClientLights Go Out NEVER HEARD OF
11. The SimilouAll This Love (The Drill Mix) NEVER HEARD OF
12. The Pussycat DollsHot Stuff (I Want You Back) WELL KNOWN
13. StefyChelsea NEVER HEARD OF
14. Pet Shop BoysIt's A Sin (Barfly Version) QUITE FAMOUS
15. Rachel StevensSome Girls WELL KNOWN
16. Britney SpearsDo Somethin' WELL KNOWN
17. Kelly ClarksonSince You Been Gone (Jason Nevins Radio Edit) WELL KNOWN (PROBABLY SHIT)
18. Scissor SistersMary (Junkie XL Radio Edit) SEE ABOVE
19. Nelly FurtadoManeater WELL KNOWN
20. The KillersMr. Brightside (Thin White Duke Radio Edit) WELL KNOWN
21. Sophie Ellis-BextorDear Jimmy IS THIS NEW?
22. Girls AloudBiology (Radio Edit / Tony Lamezma Mix) WELL KNOWN
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)
Blimey.
― wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.popjustice.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=104&Itemid=79
― jellybean (jellybean), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:44 (nineteen years ago)
*altho this makes me wonder how difficult it is to clear tracks for these and other mixes of this type - given the wealth of them these days
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:44 (nineteen years ago)
Sorry, I can't fathom that!
― wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:44 (nineteen years ago)
THE RIHANNA CANON IN ORDER:
unfaithfulpon de replaybreak it offif it's loving that you wantsoswe ride
― The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
I shall probably buy this, even though there are at least 3 tracks on it I actively dislike. Sounded like a fun party mix to me when I sampled it on a listening post t'other week.
― Jeff W (zebedee), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)
xpost
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)
there was a bit about "anti-rockism" i read in plan b (in borders, quickly) it made no sense whatsoever.
― pscott (elwisty), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)
-- pscott (kowalski9...), November 16th, 2006.
i honestly wonder if its readers know what the fuck its writers are on about.
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)
this sentence from the review nrq linked to nails it.
psb good. forming an entire aesthetic based on trying vainly to recapture what psb were like = REALLY REALLY BAD AND AWFUL.
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)
x-post!
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)
there are objections to the music! the music is either old and overplayed, or crap!
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)
"there are objections to the music! the music is either old and overplayed, or crap!"
I guess it's harder for me to see the first half of your objection because the only Australian hit in the tracklisting is "S.O.S."
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
surely the idea is that it takes pop as close to the edge as you can whilst still retaining some semblance of pop 'attitude' or aesthetic, AND remaining popular.
you can scoff at that but nobody is actually making anything actually as aloof yet keenly pop as a '06 version of 'Close To The Edge' or 'West End Girls' - are they?
forming an entire aesthetic based on trying vainly to recapture what psb were like = REALLY REALLY BAD AND AWFUL.
why so bad? if someone was actually capable of doing it really well surely this would be good? bearing in mind the past will always be revisited/recycled.
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
its presence reveals that this is a cd for people who believe the arrant nonsense that 'sos' is rihanna's best single.
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:33 (nineteen years ago)
i mean 'Edit' sorry. emulating Yes should be avoided in this situation (OR SHOULD IT?)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:33 (nineteen years ago)
I guess it DOES express the Pop Justice aesthetic quite well, but I think some are saying, this aesthetic is dying or becoming stale.
When I first began posting here it was quite shocking and interesting and occasionally infuriating to read people talking about manufactured pop being good.
But that was say, 4 years ago. Now a lot of the music on that comp doesn't feel very different from the sort of middlebrow that it seems (seemed?) to rail against. Just as contrived, just as caught up in notions of authenticity.
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)
in the meantime we are not so desperate for fantastic pop that we have to pay any attention whatsoever to the legions of idiots who are doing it really badly!
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)
1. It isn't Lex's personal playlist2. Saying that you like the music on this album won't get people's jaws dropping in shock, irregardless of whether you like the music or not.
― dommy p is alright WHICH IS A LOT MORE THAN I CAN SAY ABOUT A LOT OF PEOPLE (Dom, Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
If you take all the tracks on this comp together what is actually LEFT to rail against in Pop? Or is it just railing against (the popularity/media bias towards) guitar-based MOR (thom, blunt, razorlight, coldplay)? If the latter this seems reasonable (i hate that stuff and think this stuff is better) - but this comp could be played at a party whereas a comp ft. those bands presumably isn't. So that comparison and setting up a rivalry between them only goes so far I guess.
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:44 (nineteen years ago)
4 years ago lots of people were complaining the Destiny's Child et. al. were too much accepted by the critical establishment... But those people were perhaps people whose own shock and infuriation occurred circa 1998/1999?
I sometimes wonder if the solidification of a Popjustice aesthetic at this point (c. 2002) was almost a reaction to the way in which, around about that time, "pop" was critically acceptable as long as it was futuristic R&B.
Lex can correct me if I'm wrong but I get the impression that part of his issue with Popjustice is the way it presents the shoe as now being on the other foot: Xenomania are the standard-bearers for pop, R&B is sidelined.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:52 (nineteen years ago)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:52 (nineteen years ago)
the difference is that the PJ aesthetic is by definition about very well-known bits of music, and failed versions of same.
grime comps are more justified in that the music was barely heard at all when new.
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 16 November 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)
Well...in this case the decline of its aesthetic kinda equals said aesthetics acceptance doesn't it? I mean once we know what that aesthetic is is it not kind of over?
I don't think Pop Justice are necessarily to blame, but when I see comps like this, in whatever genre, I think, possibly due to the fact I used to work in a shop, "ugh I am going to get asked for this comp for the next 5 years", I don't like these kind of alternative populist compilations, it's like if half the people who bought them made any effort to check out new music they would have all these tracks already.
That might sound snobby or whatever but why apologise for people not bothering with stuff until it is spammed into their brains.
(Oh yes I forgot to say earlier, I love Chamillionaire)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:03 (nineteen years ago)
why should EVERYONE make the effort anyway? how did people manage before the internet? they looked to tv, radio and press and they'd go into music stores and buy blind more (actually this may be a constant altho there is more to choose from now so it's probably more overwhelming). what does 'making the effort' entail now anyway? esp. re Pop.
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
Okay I can imagine how that would be very annoying. I can't really imagine that happening, but again, Popjustice and the kind of pop it profiles both have such a low profile over here that maybe my perspective is totally skewed. For me it almost is like grime - you can't get copies of What Will The Neighbours Say or Come & Get It for less than about $45! (that's almost 20 pounds)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:08 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:12 (nineteen years ago)
Steve...it's very little effort, read some music sites, take an interest, take control of what you are buying. I mean I'm not saying I don't just "consume" with stuff I buy, I do plenty, but with books/music at least you can try and control your own course even a little.
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
HMV has some explaining to do then. Lex send me some copies and I will hawk them for $20 Australian dollars and send you half back!
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:19 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
x-post - there is no such thing as "r stevens deals" in Oz.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:27 (nineteen years ago)
― brr (fandango), Thursday, 16 November 2006 15:29 (nineteen years ago)
i don't think this is completely at odds with the idea of someone buying this sort of compilation. i probably wouldn't have bought this compilation either and obv. i do read music sites and take an interest but i don't mind this comp being out there at all and i still want a Now That's What I Call Edgy Pop in the meantime.
my Wu-Tang greatest hits CD came in the post today. why did i buy this only now (or indeed at all)? and why did i buy the Electric Boutique compilation?
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Thursday, 16 November 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)
I guess that also, as a long-time reader of Popjustice, I wanted a physical souvenir of the experience. I say "souvenir" because I'm taking less interest in the site now than I used to, and so maybe there's a touch of instant nostalgia about some of the older choices.
― mike t-diva (mike t-diva), Thursday, 16 November 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)
*deploys handily-situated calculator*
about a dozen, then...
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 16 November 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)
you're so rockist! the PopJustice compilation is awesome. I would never have heard of Justice without it.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Monday, 13 August 2007 12:06 (eighteen years ago)
The Automatic are rubbish, though.