I use to feel like why would I listen to that when I can listen to the real deal instead. But now, it seems much more significant. It strikes me as quite self-sufficient, and cunning. To take a vocal track and make it sound like a pad or a guitar, for instance.
Medulla is too obvious an example, and I'm not familiar with much else. Any thoughts?
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Dominique (dleone), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)
1. Instrumental music
2. Music where the lyrics are totally unintelligible (i.e. death metal grunting)
3. Music in a language I don't speak
― pdf (Phil Freeman), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)
well, instruments are divine tools.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Sundar (sundar), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)
Haven't heard of Sainkho Namtchylak tho
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)
actually, bimble started a thread for me once (i think it was bimble?) about monk. sounds like really interesting work - i have to give it a shot soon.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:29 (nineteen years ago)
i am very unfamiliar with her, but i worry that she won't have enough of that for me. could be way off.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)
i mean, imagine taking a really beautiful and intricate choral piece and layering it with some synths and beats. i know that is different from my original post, but wouldn't that be neat??
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)
i know this might seem ridiculous, but i would love to take that piece, layer it with some synths, beats and like a new mother's cooing voice
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)
BUT, like you said, it depends. a more tasteful interpretation of that could be really great.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)
"the principle of lust... is hard to understand"
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:44 (nineteen years ago)
it might be time to dig through my cassettes
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)
I've got a nice album of a mass by Arvo Part round here somewhere. I think that's all choral too.
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:49 (nineteen years ago)
i do think Enigma's beats undermine the grandeur of the chants. but maybe some slight percussion, or very subtle synth work
might enhance them. maybe. but there is something about that kind of vocal work that demands the sensuality of a silent canvas.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Saturday, 18 November 2006 22:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 23:23 (nineteen years ago)
as for people who orchestrate using overdubs to build something that sounds like more like an ensemble than just a chorus, here's a short list:
luciano berio / cathy berberian - omaggio a joycejoan labarbra - voice is the original instrumentphil minton - a doughnut in both handsdavid moss - my favorite thingsfatima miranda - concierto en cantodemetrio stratos - cantare la vocemaja ratkje - voiceami yoshida - tiger thrushdokaka - online mp3s
apart from dokaka, who covers pop songs & replicates every drum fill & guitar part using his voice, most of those people are exploring explicitly vocal techniques, not emulative, they're taking the voice further out.
― milton parker (Jon L), Saturday, 18 November 2006 23:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Brian Emo (noodle vague), Saturday, 18 November 2006 23:34 (nineteen years ago)
― R_S (RSLaRue), Saturday, 18 November 2006 23:51 (nineteen years ago)
lately, my fave vocals records are just straight vocals: eva quartet, suden aika, gesualdo choral stuff, varttina vocal stuff, charming hostess vocal stuff
― Dominique (dleone), Sunday, 19 November 2006 00:30 (nineteen years ago)
y'know what's super, super good --- paul van nevel's recording of brumel: http://www.amazon.com/Brumel-terrae-Sequentia-Huelgas-Ensemble/dp/B00006GO7C
― milton parker (Jon L), Sunday, 19 November 2006 00:40 (nineteen years ago)
― milton parker (Jon L), Sunday, 19 November 2006 00:47 (nineteen years ago)
― ledge (ledge), Sunday, 19 November 2006 00:53 (nineteen years ago)
― ledge (ledge), Sunday, 19 November 2006 00:54 (nineteen years ago)
― ledge (ledge), Sunday, 19 November 2006 00:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Sundar (sundar), Sunday, 19 November 2006 01:20 (nineteen years ago)
there's this really beautiful imogen heap song, i don't know what it's called - it starts, "what the hell is going on." all vocal, all harmonies - really, really beautiful. i don't know anything else by her, but that song sold me right away.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Sunday, 19 November 2006 01:32 (nineteen years ago)
I've wanted to get this for a while now, but 24 bucks is a bit much for something I've not heard a single note of.
― Good-Time Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great 'Frisco Freak-Out (sixteen sergeants, Sunday, 19 November 2006 15:03 (nineteen years ago)
rather, i'm interested in songs that make use of the voice, and only the voice, in whatever way - digital included, perhaps even especially. i love special effects on vocals, it just seems so resourceful to me.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Paul Eater (eater), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)
yes.
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)
― It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)
'hide and seek' is indeed amazing but sadly the rest of heap's songs are mostly rather mediocre trip-hop which makes her voice sound a lot more insipid than it actually is.
― The Lex (The Lex), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
milton, do you know the Five Men Singing album?
― Sundar (sundar), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 19 November 2006 19:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 19 November 2006 19:19 (nineteen years ago)
i wonder when i'll figure out how to post images.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)
I just mean the kind of chants that have synthesizers all over them. Yeah.
By the way, to post images, just type in IMG="linktoimagehere.jpg", with a less-than sign to the left, and a greater-than sign to the right.
― Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
again it all depends though. subtle synths underlining chant *could* be nice, if done tastefully.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
IMG SRC="linktoimagehere.jpg", with the less-than and greater-than signs on the ends.
― Zachary Scott (Zach S), Sunday, 19 November 2006 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
― mister the guanoman (mister the guanoman), Sunday, 19 November 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)
a question: why is some vocal manipulation considered respectable and experimental (ie what's already been mentioned) and other vocal manipulation disdained (eg...protools! britney!)?
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 20 November 2006 00:01 (nineteen years ago)
LOL britney... you mean like on "stronger"? i think it's just cuz the compositions are godawful
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 20 November 2006 03:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Good-Time Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great 'Frisco Freak-Out (sixteen sergeants, Monday, 20 November 2006 05:31 (nineteen years ago)
Sainkho Namtchylak, some doo-wop stuff, Cage's Sixty-Two Mesostics Re Merce Cunningham, Pigmeat Markham, Jaap Blonk, stuff from the Hollerin' comp, the Beach Boys "Their Hearts Were Full of Spring", a Gregory Whitehead radio play, Inuit field recordings, Ligeti's vocal works, Mike Patton, Bobby McFerrin, Masonna, Kurt Schwitters, Hugo Ball, stuff from Alan Lomax's Sounds of the South comp ... probably my fave radio show of any I ever did...
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:46 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:50 (nineteen years ago)
in that case, I think the issue would be over manipulating Britney's vocals to be in tune *because she can't otherwise do it herself* -- an argument being that were she a better singer, they wouldn't have to "correct" her. alternatively, manipulating someone's voice because the sound you want is fundamentally *not* the natural singing voice is different; not a matter of covering one's tracks, but of forging completely different ones as a matter of concept
but then again, a lot of it is a matter of taste -- and better to hear a bad singer sing in tune than not, right?
― Dominique (dleone), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 20 November 2006 06:01 (nineteen years ago)
britney's recorded voice is hardly a natural singing voice! it's in tune, and it's a radio-friendly sound, but it doesn't sound particularly human.
this is bullshit! you mention medúlla in your first post, and i really like medúlla, but if you're going to big up an album which has three strong compositions max on it, you can't slate 'stronger' which is a pretty massive tune.
― The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:33 (nineteen years ago)
the synths in it sound like R2D2 on ecstasy.
when i say composition, i don't mean just the melody. there's also the instrumentation, the lyrics, bla bla bla. i'd rather hear bjork moan than britney yelp about how much stronger she is
ANY day. and don't get me wrong, i'm not a pop hater. i love pop music. i do love christina aguilera, mariah carey, madonna. and i have to tell you, i just bought britney spears' first album because it kinda rocks. sad truth is, she plummeted downhill from there.
oh and plus? she doesn't write *crap*. even if all bjork can come up with is her and her friends making puke noises, at least it's hers.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)
is not even that great. i mean it's like catchy, and it sounds kinda empowered and all that. but she should have left it to cher in the '80s. nothing innovative.
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:39 (nineteen years ago)
if this is your idea of a bad thing...
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:42 (nineteen years ago)
i could easily call a massive tune. and video. hehe
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Monday, 20 November 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)
in my mind, the opposite is true: someone who likes Medulla probably won't like Stronger too much
― Ramzi Awn (rra123), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Hideous Lump (Hideous Lump), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 03:24 (nineteen years ago)
yes also to Diamanda! Do you actually like/listen to any of her work, Lex?
I think we are hardwired to respond to voice stimuli to a certain degree. The overtones have power.
― sleeve version 2.0 (sleeve testing), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 03:29 (nineteen years ago)
had never heard of it -- it looks promising, those are good vocalists
would love to hear that radio show of yours, stormy
― milton parker (Jon L), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 03:38 (nineteen years ago)
and Tim, I actually can't remember if FFJ recorded an a capella piece or not ... I grabbed that from my list of notes and not the final playlist..
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 05:35 (nineteen years ago)
Did Scatman Crowthers ever Scat? I only know him from his safe presence in the Shining...
― paizuri-san (davidcorp), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 11:23 (nineteen years ago)