Runners up:
Kerrang!Metal HammerTerrorizerBlender (Actually, I hate the magazine but it it does have one of the better record review sections.)
Worst magazine: Spin
sw
― Steven Ward (rockcrit88), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:32 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Steven Ward (rockcrit88), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:37 (eighteen years ago)
The Wire covers most of the heavy bands I like anyway, so it's no big loss, though I am missing my grindcore fix. Anybody have any good recommendations?
― MacDara Conroy (MacDara), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)
I don't really read anything else (print-wise), its all crap.
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:51 (eighteen years ago)
― Steven Ward (rockcrit88), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:52 (eighteen years ago)
― Cameron Octigan (Cameron Octigan), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:54 (eighteen years ago)
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Steven Ward (rockcrit88), Monday, 8 January 2007 22:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Monday, 8 January 2007 23:00 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 8 January 2007 23:03 (eighteen years ago)
― Cameron Octigan (Cameron Octigan), Monday, 8 January 2007 23:05 (eighteen years ago)
Wow I can only come up with two. Granted I've never read The Wire (I hear it's essential despite its supposed pretensions, but what do I know.)
Shakey I've only read one issue of Arthur (the one with Brightblack on the cover) and it seemed to me more of an anarchist propagandist's manual with a Brightblack interview thrown in. Did I read the same magazine?
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Monday, 8 January 2007 23:18 (eighteen years ago)
I've read every issue.
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 8 January 2007 23:25 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 8 January 2007 23:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Monday, 8 January 2007 23:38 (eighteen years ago)
― mark e (mark e), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 08:24 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael J McGonigal (mike mcgonigal), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 08:43 (eighteen years ago)
Opinions please - the state of "music magazines"
Magazine I like (well some of it)
The Beat (Los Angeles based publication covering reggae, afropop, Caribbean and Brazilian sounds) . It's not pop enough for some...
― curmudgeon (DC Steve), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
― GLC (ZakAce), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 18:16 (eighteen years ago)
― Make a Beck Song #1 (M Matos), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 19:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Tuesday, 9 January 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)
― JayBabcock (jabbercocky), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 01:26 (eighteen years ago)
(wish I had the time and the money to also read):
3. Terrorizer4. Plan B* 5. Decibel6. Fact
*Used to love Plan B but, although it hasn’t really changed, I grew tired of it. Maybe it’s because you read it and it sounds like it’s controlled by some hairy, sweaty, hippie-punk-maoist-diy brigade. Maybe it was always like that and I never actually bothered to pay attention. Maybe it’s because I came to realize I don’t really care about most of the music it writes about. Maybe it’s because I now realize that, although it covers great mainstream pop & commercial hip-hop & r&b & dance music, and does have great writers writing about all that stuff (and about non-musical stuff too), none of that stuff will ever take the place of hairy noise makers/ freak folkies/ shambling indie starlets on the cover and at the heart of the magazine. Maybe it’s because the articles are usually wonderful but, as I finally noticed when they began giving away covermount CDs, lots of what they write about and pay special attention to is, well, boring/ awful/ uneventful/ zzzzzz. Maybe I’ll change my mind in six months. Maybe not.
― Jorge Manuel Lopes (JML), Thursday, 11 January 2007 16:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, 11 January 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
― 69 (plsmith), Thursday, 11 January 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)
― be home by 11 (orion), Thursday, 11 January 2007 16:32 (eighteen years ago)
I think that's it, actually. My subscriptions to Blender and SPIN haven't expired yet, but I'm not all that interested in renewing either one.
At this point I read alt-weeklies and music review sites more than anything else in the regard.
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 11 January 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 11 January 2007 16:58 (eighteen years ago)
used to read scratch. murder dog is good, because of how little of it (unlike most rap mags) is centered around gossip+badly written reviews
― deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 11 January 2007 17:00 (eighteen years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Thursday, 11 January 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
Haven't bought anything else.
― Harpal (harpal), Thursday, 11 January 2007 23:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 11 January 2007 23:13 (eighteen years ago)
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Thursday, 11 January 2007 23:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Expell (HGULTRUILLUM), Friday, 12 January 2007 02:46 (eighteen years ago)
― Xpell (HGULTRUILLUM), Friday, 12 January 2007 02:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Emily Bjurnhjam (Emily Bjurnhjam), Friday, 12 January 2007 04:16 (eighteen years ago)
― be home by 11 (orion), Friday, 12 January 2007 04:17 (eighteen years ago)
my faves are mostly the same ol' same ol':
decibel, terrorizer, sod, ugly things, brave words & bloody knuckles. and arthur! i like arthur. i love the c&d(?) review thing in arthur. probably my fave review thing to read in a magazine even if i never end up hearing 95% of what they are talking about. i used to say mojo, but they don't sell it here and i'm too cheap to subscribe. i'm sure it's the same though, so mojo too!
and speaking of upswings of sorts, rolling stone is actually readable these days. and not just for the usual ace killer kidz/true stories stuff or the you have been lied to political expose stuff. but other stuff. and i do like taibbi even though most here probably hate on him. i still don't understand how x-ian hoard writes 400 reviews every month. what do they feed that guy?!
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 12 January 2007 04:53 (eighteen years ago)
― raging against the bull (HGULTRUILLUM), Friday, 12 January 2007 05:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Friday, 12 January 2007 09:35 (eighteen years ago)