Has the rise of the mixtape negatively impacted the quality of hip-hop albums?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I was thinking abt this recently...mostly cuz I was sort of disappointed w/the Lupe Fiasco record...i'd really enjoyed the Chi-Town Guevera mixtap a lot.

But yeah it got me thinking (i thought this was esp. true in the case of 50 cent too), that lately I find myself more satified with hip hop mixtapes than actual albums.

It makes me wonder if a lot of rap "classic albums" from back then would have even existed in today's climate...like would Nas have released a mixtape with like Halftime and It Ain't Hard to Tell and a bunch of freestyles over other tracks right after his verse on "Live at the BBQ" got him some attention, then parceled out half the tracks that were on Illmatic on mixtapes and not even put them on the album?

I guess, i was thinking about it in my own term, the band i'm in, and i was imagining how hard it would've been to make the record if we'd already "blown our load" by putting out half of the best songs out already...

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, this is something that really demands to be thought about these days, when there's like this mixtape- and internet-driven insatiable hunger for new hip hop all the time while album sales plummet and people seem more and more dissatisfied with the albums they do buy. And you're totally right that a lot of artists blow their load on mixtape and early leaks. I hate buying an album and realizing all the really good songs are the ones I'd heard already. 10 years ago I would've only known the single and maybe the street single before buying the CD, and the rest would've been ripe for discovery. It really deflates the whole listening experience in an insidious way.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:08 (nineteen years ago)

well, the album is dead! this isn't even internet-boom-era hypemongering or hyperbole at this point. we're the last generation, dudes, and the sooner we own up to this the better. sales stats don't lie, etc etc.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:10 (nineteen years ago)

http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/9431/hooray3jl.jpg

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:12 (nineteen years ago)

we were talking about this on another board and miccio said something to the effect that he felt an affection (i may be misquoting) for any act that goes diamond at this point considering most acts that do a mil these days are partying like it's 1999. if you can shift a couple hundred thousand copies of a mixtape via the indie route, what's the point of dealing with lyor cohen and eating easy mac every night, etc etc.

now more than ever, we need EPs.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:13 (nineteen years ago)

i'm really wondering how long hip-hop acts are going to continue putting out albums because it's "what you do," considering the embarassment (i would assume) of doing rick ross numbers when you claimed you were gonna do jay numbers outweighs the SLIM chance that you MIGHT actually do jay numbers.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:16 (nineteen years ago)

yeah major label hip hop at this point is basically a big lottery and there's less and less winners but more and more people lining up to take the gamble.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:17 (nineteen years ago)

"getting signed" is still the carrot that gets dangled in front of every rapper in the world, as if even half of the people that get signed ever come out, let alone get a plaque

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:18 (nineteen years ago)

we're the last generation, dudes, and the sooner we own up to this the better.

Quite right. There are lots of interesting relics around but that's all they'll be.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:20 (nineteen years ago)

Am I alone in thinking that one of the reason why mixtapes tend to be better than albums is that they tend to be shorter and better sequenced?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:23 (nineteen years ago)

That's probably the key reason!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:25 (nineteen years ago)

are we just going to start filling up giant landfills with CDs at some point in the next 10 years? or are guys like me going to keep the stacks of jewel cases all over our houses like old ladies with tchotchkes piled to the ceiling?

(xpost are you serious? most mixtapes are stuffed to the 75-minute brim even more than the average rap album now, and a lot of them are frontloaded and otherwise sequenced completely chaotically. granted, that's part of the appeal, but u still nuts)

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:25 (nineteen years ago)

Which mixtapes are shorter? Most of the mixtapes I own are as long if not longer than the same artists' albums.

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:26 (nineteen years ago)

xposts

are they really shorter? they're usually like 23 tracks long and i end up skipping through half of them.

and yeah al, i know it's kind of what we "do" (trying to boost local artists), but i always feel a weird twinge of sadness when these guys are so amped for getting signed and then it's like, "you do know you're gonna be in development hell for two years and your album has a very good chance of never, ever coming out, right?"

i've already unloaded most of my jewel cases! even my non-cd-r's are basically in case logics at this point.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:27 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think it's that mixtapes are "better," just that they're more cost-effective, and you're willing to forgive a lot more when it's "just a mixtape."

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

yeah i'll actually take a chance on something that's $5. especially if the cover is really garish.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

oh miami kaos, your weird alex ross-esque machine guns and stripper asses make the world a better place

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:29 (nineteen years ago)

or are guys like me going to keep the stacks of jewel cases all over our houses like old ladies with tchotchkes piled to the ceiling?

Why do you think I've been selling off my collection bit by bit over the years? Anybody pack-ratting these days is nuts, and even the occasional indulgence at things like the Tower sale is just and only that, occasional and (luckily) paid for itself.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:30 (nineteen years ago)

"I don't think it's that mixtapes are "better," just that they're more cost-effective, and you're willing to forgive a lot more when it's "just a mixtape.""

Haha okay that probably is what it is. The $2 CDs from Tower I got all sound much better to me than their $13-14 brethren.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:30 (nineteen years ago)

Alex and I know what we're talking about. ;-) (Store credit at Amoeba plus $1 clearance items that are actually good = wave of the future!)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:31 (nineteen years ago)

ned do you even buy hip-hop mixtapes?!

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:31 (nineteen years ago)

haha the last mixtape i bought was a dj lt. dan mix of blends of michael jackson songs with hip-hop beats.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

it's worth it for the simpsons samples

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

ned do you even buy hip-hop mixtapes?!

There's this thing called 'downloading.'

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:33 (nineteen years ago)

"ed bella?? wait, i got another call. michael jackson??"

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:33 (nineteen years ago)

yeah this scene needs a serious reality check but that's basically the story for all underground-that-isn't-trying-to-be-underground-on-purpose hip hop. (xpost)

actually I wish I knew a good all-purpose mixtape spot around here, I probably would buy the big name DJ Drama type stuff a lot more but I'm loathe to log onto mixunit or whatever and pay for shipping.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:33 (nineteen years ago)

"Anybody pack-ratting these days is nuts"

Me = nuts.

I hate case logics and I never sell anything back these days.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:34 (nineteen years ago)

Mixunit shipping is like a $1?!?!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:34 (nineteen years ago)

yeah i actually do order online every now and again, but most of the time i'm picking up random shit i find in random places.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:35 (nineteen years ago)

And their prices are lower than most street places so it balances!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:35 (nineteen years ago)

I never sell anything back these days.

?!?! Okay, anything you haven't listened to in, say, two years or so? Why is it sitting around and if you're not going to miss it all that much, why not sell it back?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

well some of us dont buy that much, either.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

Just rip the damn thing and be done with it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

bricking thread pt.2 ?

al check cdepot

am0n (am0n), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

"Why is it sitting around and if you're not going to miss it all that much, why not sell it back?"

Because I'm fickle haha.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:37 (nineteen years ago)

LOOK SOME OF US DONT OWN AN IPOD, DONT WANT A DAMN IPOD, AND WANT TO BE ABLE TO LISTEN TO MUSIC AWAY FROM OUR COMPUTERS, WHICH DONT EVEN HAVE A GODDAMN SOUNDCARD THAT WORKS, DESPITE BEING A FRIGGIN MUSIC EDITOR AT A PAPER THAT YOU KNOW DAMN WELL CAN AFFORD A BETTER COMPUTER THAN THIS WINDOWS 98 DOORSTOP

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

i mean, uh, i still kinda like the cd format

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

Oh it's nice, don't get me wrong.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

Ha I was about to tell everyone to go digital but I've been cowed into silence.

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

Why is having 100s of CDs you don't listen worse than 1000s of LPs/12"s? Or should all those guys be selling their stuff too?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, Alex in _______ unity over here, I still buy CDs a lot and until I unloaded a few dozen albums I genuinely dislike last year when I was strapped for cash, I could've counted the CDs I've sold back on one hand. i'm a dinosaur and i know it.

(which cdepot? I go to the one on Loch Raven Blvd. all the time and they have a pretty wide selection of rap/go-go/club but I haven't noticed a whole lot of current mixtapes)

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

now more than ever, we need EPs.

tru dat.

i guess i didn't mean for this to turn into yet another THE CD IS DEAD discussion, altho the points are well taken

i'm more interested in how the mixtape is affecting hip hop though...one thing that i think has made the mixtape more exciting for me than albums lately is the sort of "casual" vibe of it allows people to be okay with just saying "hey, man, that beat is awesome, i'm going to rhyme over that" and not be concerned with having an original beat..

in way, this might be like a super "old school" thing, like back to the old days when everyone rapped over the same bongo rock and billy squier beats and it didn't MATTER, that's kinda cool for me...

also, the "grey area" of legality in which mixtapes exist gives people the freedom to act like it's in the old days of sampling or just jacking a beat (pre biz markie lawsuit), which is cool

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

haha well a local club music DJ of some renown just dumped his entire collection of about 7,000+ LPs and 12"s at a local store, so there you go.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

i don't know if al buys vinyl but amon it's the tru3 v1n3 and i think i'm gonna be broooooooke over the next few months.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

Hahaha when Afrika Bambatta sells everything, I will too.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

as if even half of the people that get signed ever come out, let alone get a plaque

Isn't that the big reason behind the mixtape phenomenon to begin with? That record labels put people in limbo for years while they pretended to be finding just the right slot for them, just as soon as they finish promoting Jadakiss etc?

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

do actual record labels ever put out rap comps. of singles and stuff? cuz i would probably buy them if i did. like a now that's what i call rap music series? i'm always really happy to get those tvt crunk/hyphy comps in the mail. they are so handy. they catch me up and stuff.

i don't really dig trolling blogs and stuff for MP3s. although last fm and pandora are handy.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

does the source still do their annual cd? they're never ideal but it's usually, for better or worse, a snapshot of what's going on at the time.

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:44 (nineteen years ago)

I actually can't believe that there aren't more rap "Greatest Hits" collections out there.

max (maxreax), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:44 (nineteen years ago)

if murder dog came with a cd in every issue, i would totally subscribe. they don't sell it here.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

he's a shopaholic, not a collector!

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

http://schools.tdsb.on.ca/albertcampbell/ES/shopaholic.jpg

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

Hehehe.

As mentioned, though, Slocki, it paid for itself. I spent about $800 or so on it all, I think, and I made all that back through reviewing in a month. And it *very* much was the kind of obsessive record-store trawling I stopped doing years back -- I limit it now to the occasional trip to Amoeba and on visits elsewhere, like Seattle or SF, and almost always aim at spending as little as possible via store credit or flipping through clearance. What few CDs I purchase full price are almost always limited edition runs through something like, say, Time-Lag. I'm not saying I'm a perfect role model or anything, but I made a goal some time back to constantly reduce my collection, and even after all those purchases, it's still been shrinking as I go.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:55 (nineteen years ago)

i don't know if al buys vinyl but amon it's the tru3 v1n3 and i think i'm gonna be broooooooke over the next few months.

I don't really buy vinyl (I still haven't plugged in my turntable since I moved over a year ago) but I keep stumbling onto good finds anyway, like freebies from my friend who used to work in radio and getting a couple crates of old club and hip hop 12"s that another friend found in the basement of a house he bought on 28th St. I can't turn that shit down! that's a compulsion I'm actually kind of ashamed of as opposed to being unapologetic for my CD habit. so thanks for the tip. and maybe e-mail me who the actual DJ is who dumped all those records.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

i never buy vinyl anymore and no longer have a record player.

cdepot loch raven has drama mixtapes, don't know about others. maybe something around lexington market, inner city records or dimensions in music. plus there's that big flea market just south of the city on weekends

am0n (am0n), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

yeah i try to get to most of those now and then but mostly i'm lazy and go to the Sound Garden because it's the closest. and their idea of mixtapes is giving Hollertronix their own file in the hip hop section.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 17:50 (nineteen years ago)

i saw they have a club section now for rod lee and k-swift. actually tru3 v1n3 had some club mix cds by some unheard-of djs last time i was there

am0n (am0n), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

yeah those have been there forever though

acid waffle house (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

yeah they added that section a couple months ago, which is kinda nice, saves me the trouble of getting to Downtown Locker Room or whatever to get K-Swift mixes

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:29 (nineteen years ago)

weird timing that this thread started today, given that dj drama just got arrested for distributing illegal CDS:

" On January 16 Police raided the downtown Atlanta offices of the Aphilliates Music Group, and arrested Tyree Simmons aka "DJ Drama" and Donald Cannon, also known as DJ Don Cannon. Police left the offices with 50,000 supposedly illegal CDs and took the 17 employees into custody for more questions."

http://www.hiphopgalaxy.com/DJ-Drama-accused-of-selling-illegal-CDs-hip-hop-4779.html

nicenick (nicenick), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:57 (nineteen years ago)

dj drama arrested for 'illegal cds'

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 18:59 (nineteen years ago)

Yes it was that thread that prompted this one, I believe.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

sorry -- i'm apparently blind this afternoon. looked for a drama thread but didn't see it so thought this was some weird zeitgeist thing....

nicenick (nicenick), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 20:01 (nineteen years ago)

I object to the use of "impact" as a verb.

I still buy lots of albums, regret how they diminish my condo space, and am still wary of mp3's. Then again, I'm a Luddite who's bit by bit eliminating the number of albums he owns anyway.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 20:44 (nineteen years ago)

Main Entry: 1im·pact
Pronunciation: im-'pakt
Function: verb
Etymology: Latin impactus, past participle of impingere to push against -- more at IMPINGE
transitive verb
1 a : to fix firmly by or as if by packing or wedging b : to press together
2 a : to have a direct effect or impact on : impinge on b : to strike forcefully; also : to cause to strike forcefully
intransitive verb
1 : to have an impact -- often used with on
2 : to impinge or make contact especially forcefully
- im·pact·ful /im-'pakt-f&l, 'im-"pakt-f&l/ adjective
- im·pac·tive /im-'pak-tiv/ adjective
- im·pac·tor also im·pact·er /-t&r/ noun

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

Jeff Chang's take on his blog:

http://www.cantstopwontstop.com/blog/

This is an excerpt (he mentioned the RIAA earlier and their quest to protect what they consider their money)

"The RIAA had to move on someone making mixtape money. DJ Drama has become the first casualty of the new hip-hop distribution game.

It will be interesting to see in the coming months how the major labels try to move on:

1) the big mixtape distributors to either shut them down or cut a deal, and
2) their own artists to enforce the exclusivity and copyright clauses in their contracts...

Mixtapes won't die. But 2007 may be the year that the mixtape begins to really be absorbed into the machine, which may be a kind of a slower death."


curmudgeon (DC Steve), Thursday, 18 January 2007 06:14 (nineteen years ago)

Mixtapes have been around for fucking ever though. There's a reason they're called "tapes" - cassette era, people. Maybe it's just that their popularity has more recently spread widely beyond the "street" audience they were once aimed at.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 18 January 2007 06:22 (nineteen years ago)

does the source still do their annual cd? they're never ideal but it's usually, for better or worse, a snapshot of what's going on at the time.

-- acid waffle house (wt...), January 17th, 2007 4:44 PM.
i think its main reason to exist was to give a snapshot of what benzino was doing at the time.


same way xxl gives a snapshot of what aftermath is doing at the time


Also, I agree w/ A-ron

deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 18 January 2007 06:29 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not trying to claim any "down-way-back-when" status, but I remember kids I knew talking about buying mixtapes at least as far back as 9th grade or so - which would be like '94.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 18 January 2007 06:31 (nineteen years ago)

And a quick trip to Wikipedia reveals it goes back plenty further than that:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixtapes

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 18 January 2007 06:38 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, A-Ron beat me too it.

Thread should be "Has the rise of blogger nerds and indie-rock fans finally listening to mixtapes after 30 years negatively impacted the quality of hip-hop albums?"

Answer: LOL

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 January 2007 06:40 (nineteen years ago)

well i wouldn't go that far, mixtape DJs only really rose as superstars or whatever with those clue tapes and shit, they definitely rose in profile in the late 90s to the point where Drama could be considered a 'kingmaker' in time for Jeezy

deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 18 January 2007 07:08 (nineteen years ago)

right, mixtapes have been around for awhile, but they have never been as prominent or available for sale and purchase as easily as they are now.

K. Sanneh weighs in on the DJ Drama arrest in the NY Times today.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/18/arts/music/18dram.html?ref=arts

curmudgeon (DC Steve), Thursday, 18 January 2007 14:13 (nineteen years ago)

Wow, that's surprising. I thought it was pretty much understood that the hip-hop industry turns a blind eye to mixtapes because it relies on them for promotion and cred.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 18 January 2007 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

uh dudes, noone's saying mixtapes are a new phenomenon. but it's pretty hard to deny that in the past few years, particularly after 50 blew up off mixtape hype (= the "rise" referred to in the subject line), they're much more big business than they were before.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, 18 January 2007 14:28 (nineteen years ago)

Hi dere internet.

I'm just saying that in the mid 90s I already remember mixtapes being a pretty big deal among hip-hop heads - they were already a way for a new artist to gather steam and cred in the "street" before breaking big. I guess the difference is just that now the mixtapes can immediately and directly reach the mass audience that was only supposed to hear about the artist after the cred was gathered.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 18 January 2007 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, that's true. I think the market moved a lot slower back then, too, pre-internet, and artists were making a lot less music exclusively for mixtapes. if you look at the tracklist of some old classic DJ Clue tape from 10 years ago, a lot of the songs are album tracks, albeit from albums that might not've been out til 6 months later. nowadays artists are practically doing mixtapes as mini-albums to prequel the 'real' album.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, 18 January 2007 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

An obvious point, but it needs to be said : mixtapes are usually better than official albums because the rappers aren't restricted by sample clearance, licensing laws and the need to have shitty songs for different demographics.

For example, Joe Budden is a bum. His first album was more or less garbage and if Def Jam ever release his second effort that'll end up mostly horrible/being butchered by him not being able to clear a bunch of songs but his two "mood musik" mixtapes are excellent, especially the 2nd.

Dimehitter Dwayne Hosey (dwaynehosey), Thursday, 18 January 2007 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

yeah i think everyone on here knows mixtapes didn't start in 2004.

i have all sorts of old clue mixtapes and shit. i had just pulled out an old DJ Absolute with some wierd old cam and chi-ali shit before he went to jail.

but back then they weren't overshadowing actual proper CDs like they do now...I mean arguably like Dedication 2 and We Got it 4 Cheap were "bigger deals" than the real CDs...that's a new thing.

I guess what I was trying to bring out is that back then it was sort of casual, like do the mixtape but save your "A game" for the record, now it almost feels like the better verses come out on the mixtapes instead BEFORE the record.

But i guess it makes sense since they prolly make a lot more per unit sold on the mixtape than the real album.

M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 18 January 2007 15:24 (nineteen years ago)

Dedication 2 and We Got It For Cheap are "big deals" only among internet geeks because that's the ONLY place you're gonna find that shit unless you live in New York or Atlanta.

Has the rise of Belle And Sebastian fans putting Dedication 2 on their year end list negatively impacted the quality of hip-hop albums?

Plus, the artist makes NOTHING from a mixtape. The dude with the carpet on Canal Street makes money from a mixtape

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:06 (nineteen years ago)

so, basically, yr saying the mixtape isn't any bigger of a deal than it was 10 yrs ago?

M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:09 (nineteen years ago)

that's the ONLY place you're gonna find that shit unless you live in New York or Atlanta.

?¿?

am0n (am0n), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:38 (nineteen years ago)

"Plus, the artist makes NOTHING from a mixtape. The dude with the carpet on Canal Street makes money from a mixtape"

I'm not even sure this is true.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:43 (nineteen years ago)

so, basically, yr saying the mixtape isn't any bigger of a deal than it was 10 yrs ago?

Not all that much more than it was 4 or 5 years ago. I think I'm just having a negative reaction to this thread because it's the second time I've heard the phrase "rise of the mixtape" about 2006 and really I just don't see it.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

Dedication 2 and We Got It For Cheap are "big deals" only among internet geeks because that's the ONLY place you're gonna find that shit unless you live in New York or Atlanta.

you're right about the Clipse but the Lil Wayne mixtape was very muhc considered the biggest thing to hit the mixtape community in the past year, on the internet and in whatever definition of "the streets" still exists that has nothing to do with the internet

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

Not all that much more than it was 4 or 5 years ago. I think I'm just having a negative reaction to this thread because it's the second time I've heard the phrase "rise of the mixtape" about 2006 and really I just don't see it.

i'd agree w/4 or 5 yrs, i didn't say in 2006, i was bringing up Nas in the orig. post, i think a lot's changed since back then...

M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:50 (nineteen years ago)

I never find any mixtape that I see hyped on a non-hip-hop internet music site on the streets. I've never seen a physical copy of Dedication 2 in my life and I like in New York!

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:50 (nineteen years ago)

live in New York

(tho i like it too)

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:51 (nineteen years ago)

"Plus, the artist makes NOTHING from a mixtape. The dude with the carpet on Canal Street makes money from a mixtape"

I'm not even sure this is true.

I mean maybe mixunit sends a couple bucks back, but when the chain of command goes:

Artist and DJ -> Bootlegger

How is that money going to get back to anyone?

I mean even the DJs who make them use them as "promo" items. DJ X makes mixtape with Artist Y. They give them to bootleggers and make nothing off them, but Artist Y gets street appeal and a record deal and DJ X gets asked to DJ the X-Games for $40,000

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:51 (nineteen years ago)

wtf dude artists get money from mixtapes all the time, from getting paid to drop a verse or make a beat to going in like a partnership like jeezy & drama - jeezy personally got like half a mil from trap or die

and what (ooo), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:51 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, once shit gets out & you got the flimsy xeroxed cover with the sharpie on the cd-r the artist didnt get shit from that but when its offical mixtapes with the glossy insert & printed cds thats just a underground album - j-love & tapemasters inc even do shit with actual booklets

and what (ooo), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

New York mixtape market still caring about Jae Millz and Papoose more than platinum selling Southern rappers /= Lil Wayne's popularity on the mixtape circuit being a figment of Pitchfork's imagination

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:53 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, then yeah, artists do get money. I thought we were just talking from sales.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:53 (nineteen years ago)

i mean yeah any industry where shit gets heavily bootlegged, the artists dont make as much as they COULD, but youre basically saying louis vuitton dont make any $$$ off purses

and what (ooo), Thursday, 18 January 2007 17:54 (nineteen years ago)

I'm saying it's a game where you can make a lot of money, but PRACTICALLY NONE of your income comes from actual sales. It's all selling your self. Pretty neat, actually.

Indie rock bands should figure out how to do this before the internet destroys them all.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 18 January 2007 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

isn't a big part of the 'downloading is killing indie rock sales' debate that some people rationalize DLing the album if they go to the show and buy a shirt, and that they choose to support bands via non-CD merchandise? I always thought that was kind of nutty, maybe because i stopped buying band shirts after high school, but hey, maybe it is a valid economical model.

Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, 18 January 2007 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

(xpost)Maybe not directly, but actual sales determine how much money you can ask for that next exclusive! It's very similar to dancehall deejays voicing on riddims! Most don't collect a % off the sales, but they collect a one time for the vocal.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 18 January 2007 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

Jeff Chang linked this, it's really good, from Davey D: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=15116190&blogID=218978997&MyToken=f04fd110-fd28-4528-af40-0cd9e124f2c2

Make a Beck Song #1 (M Matos), Thursday, 18 January 2007 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

wow dj dramas sister knows whats up

and what (ooo), Thursday, 18 January 2007 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

Both articles are excellent and I agree with both. We as people of color are dealing with a sho-nuff natural enemy and it will never get any better until the enemy is taken off the planet. That's as plain as it gets. We have been at war in this country since our arrival and nothing has changed. DJ's are doing for self which is essential and also means the end of the enemy(slavemaster mentality). If you want to pray for your enemies, pray for the death of your enemies.

Posted by Brother on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 10:28 AM

UH
wonder what this dude thinks of dj dramas ma then

and what (ooo), Thursday, 18 January 2007 18:52 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.