― M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:30 (nineteen years ago)
BOUNCE COME ON BOUNCE
BOUNCE COME ON BOUNCE
I SLAM THE DOOR (BOOM)
WHEN I COME INTO THE BEDROOM (WHAM BAM)
'CAUSE I'M THE KING OF THE CASTLE (NA NA NA)
TURN ME ON TURN ME LOOSE
(COME ON COME ON)
TRY TO HIT IT
IT'S A HASSLE
COME AND GET SOME OF THIS
DON'T FORGET INNUENDO
PLAY ME LIKE NINTENDO
NEVER LET GO
SCREAMING SO LOUD
YOU'LL BE HITTING THE CRESCENDO
DOH RAY ME FA SOL LA TE DOH
CHORUS:
COME BABY COME
BABY BABY COME COME
COME BABY COME
BABY BABY COME COME
WELL YOU GOTTA GIVE ME LOVIN'
AND YOU GOTTA GIVE ME SOME
YOU GOTTA GIVE ME LOVIN'
AND YOU GOTTA GIVE ME SOME
WELL I CAN HEAR THE (RING RING RING)
THE TELEPHONE GOES RING (HELLO HELLO)
BUT WE'RE STILL GETTING BUSY
(PUMP PUMP PUMP HUH)
NOW YOU'RE GETTING DIZZY
I CAN SLOW IT DOWN
SO YOU CAN PUMP IT (PUMP IT)
THEN I CAN MOVE IT FAST
SO YOU CAN PUMP IT (PUMP IT)
TWO BALLS AND A BAT
THE PITCHERS WEARS A HAT
SLIDING INTO HOME BASE
TRYING TO HIT A HOME RUN
SWING BATTA BATTA BATTA
BATTA BATTA SWING
CHORUS
BOUNCE COME ON BOUNCE
BOUNCE COME ON BOUNCE
TELL ME DO YOU IT LIKE THAT (YEAH YEAH)
DO YOU WANT A LITTLE MORE (YEAH YEAH)
NOW TELL ME DO YOU LOVE ME (YEAH YEAH)
COME ON (DO YOU LOVE ME)
STRAIGHT UP NOW TELL ME
BOUNCE COME ON BOUNCE
BOUNCE COME ON BOUNCE
BOUNCE COME ON BOUNCE
BOUNCE
COME BABY COME
BABY BABY COME COME
COME BABY COME BABY BABY
COME COME
YOU GOTTA GIVE ME LOVIN'
AND YOU GOTTA GIVE ME SOME
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:34 (nineteen years ago)
DON'T FORGET INNUENDO
PLAY ME LIKE NINTENDO
NEVER LET GO
SCREAMING SO LOUD
YOU'LL BE HITTING THE CRESCENDO
DOH RAY ME FA SOL LA TE DOH
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:36 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:38 (nineteen years ago)
http://static.flickr.com/31/57555953_9800c3d7cf_m.jpg
― M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:39 (nineteen years ago)
i think this is about how horrible the conditions in industrial cattle farms are.
― Emily Bjurnhjam (Emily Bjurnhjam), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 21:40 (nineteen years ago)
― A knife to his wife Eve and his credibility. (goodbra), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:38 (nineteen years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:52 (nineteen years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Hell Hath No Furry (DJ Mencap), Thursday, 25 January 2007 16:22 (nineteen years ago)
― joygoat (joygoat), Thursday, 25 January 2007 18:19 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 25 January 2007 18:23 (nineteen years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Thursday, 25 January 2007 18:25 (nineteen years ago)
This is the most OTFM thing ever
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 25 January 2007 20:02 (nineteen years ago)
― the new sincerity (Pye Poudre), Thursday, 25 January 2007 20:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Thursday, 25 January 2007 20:15 (nineteen years ago)
Orangey-Tasting Felched Matter = the new OTFM
― A knife to his wife Eve and his credibility. (goodbra), Saturday, 27 January 2007 04:24 (eighteen years ago)
Are you serious? this subject is addressed in about half of the fifty or so vegetarian cookbooks I own
Then again, I don't think I've ever met a vegan who didn't also drink and smoke a ton. It's all about balance I guess?
Really! this sounds like a gross overgeneralization, or else you've encountered a remarkably consistent sample
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Saturday, 27 January 2007 05:06 (eighteen years ago)
HAHAHAHAH
― White Dopes on Punk (Bimble...), Saturday, 27 January 2007 05:07 (eighteen years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 27 January 2007 05:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Saturday, 27 January 2007 05:30 (eighteen years ago)
― be home by 11 (orion), Saturday, 27 January 2007 05:31 (eighteen years ago)
― be home by 11 (orion), Saturday, 27 January 2007 05:34 (eighteen years ago)
― chad (chad), Saturday, 27 January 2007 07:28 (eighteen years ago)
― be home by 11 (orion), Saturday, 27 January 2007 07:39 (eighteen years ago)
Why? How is it worse than owning fifty meat-based cookbooks? If anything, vegetarian cookbooks tend to contain a more diverse set of recipes, since they don't all revolve around dressing up only the 4 meats that comprise the bulk of the American diet.
― richard wood johnson (rwj), Saturday, 27 January 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Saturday, 27 January 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
article that promotes the cook book by proclaiming:
"veganism: it's like being gay"
priceless
― Uncle Tom (Uncle Tom), Sunday, 28 January 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)
if
owning 50 punk rock records = pathetic
― the new sincerity (Pye Poudre), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
owning 50 punk rock records = pathetic
there aren't 50 punk records WORTH owning.
― edde (edde), Monday, 29 January 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
― richard wood johnson (rwj), Monday, 29 January 2007 19:21 (eighteen years ago)
True, true. All you really need is Dig That Groove Baby.
― the new sincerity (Pye Poudre), Monday, 29 January 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)
mmm, yes.
― edde (edde), Monday, 29 January 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
that is such horsehit. there's at least 51
― latebloomer: crapness 2 the Nth degree (latebloomer), Monday, 29 January 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)
and don't deviate into 'hardcore' and do not include SOnic Youth or the Butthole Surfers, as i can't think of anyone who considers them punk.
― edde (edde), Monday, 29 January 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)
― UART variations (ex machina), Monday, 29 January 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)
why the fuck not?
― latebloomer: crapness 2 the Nth degree (latebloomer), Monday, 29 January 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
guh? also the no hardcore rule is particularly wierd?, considering the thread.
― M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 29 January 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 29 January 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
but either way there are i'm sure there are 50 cookbooks worth owning, if that yr thing.
― M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 29 January 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
― M@tt He1g3s0n: oh u mad cuz im stylin on u (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 29 January 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
― edde (edde), Monday, 29 January 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
it's silly and pedantic to argue about this i guess, but saying something like 'there aren't 50 punk records WORTH owning' is even sillier!
― latebloomer: crapness 2 the Nth degree (latebloomer), Monday, 29 January 2007 22:00 (eighteen years ago)
― latebloomer: crapness 2 the Nth degree (latebloomer), Monday, 29 January 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)
Someone mentioned above something about how all the vegans he knows drink and smoke a lot. Well, for the most part, vegans are about non-violence to animals, not health concerns. While it sometimes bothers me that many vegans rely on heavily processed foods and junk to manage their diets, I don't think this runs fundamentally contrary to vegan ideals. These foods might not be healthy, but the health aspect is an ideal placed on them by people who aren't vegan, and don't understand the ideology-- a straw man, essentially.
― richard wood johnson (rwj), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 00:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 01:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 02:34 (eighteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 02:35 (eighteen years ago)
In my experience, most people who think of cooking as some sort of "learn the basics, then improvise!" deal turn out to be shitty cooks who couldn't make sourdough worth eating from a natural starter if there was a gun to their fucking heads. They make real good outraged internet dudes though.
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 02:55 (eighteen years ago)
And people who slavishly follow recipes are sort of crippled by that, in my experience. Bound by rules, freaked out about things that aren't exactly right, and, most importantly, unable to understand what elements do what in a dish and how they can be modified, substituted, or otherwise improvised. Just freestyling everything is bad too - there's a happy medium. I was totally with you up until your last paragraph, though.
I own more cookbooks than I do novels, by far. Not even close.
― joygoat (joygoat), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 09:15 (eighteen years ago)
― joygoat (joygoat), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 09:16 (eighteen years ago)
also as an ex-Catholic I do enjoy following me some directions to the letter when I can
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 12:16 (eighteen years ago)
I think veganism in its purest form really is a punk concept
I really disagree with this: I think you can become vegan for 'punk'-type reasons, as a rejection of mainstream food culture etc, but to call that the 'purest form' is seriously undervaluing veganism, like it can't exist unless it's shackled to an ideology, and a reactive one at that.
― ampersand, spades, semicolon (cis), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)
― the new sincerity (Pye Poudre), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
I suppose you're right in the sense that veganism can and should be able to stand on its own (i.e. existing in the absense of a contrary position). But on a practical level, I just don't think there are many vegans out there who don't have a moral agenda or ideological stance. As ampersand mentioned above, unless you were born into it and adopted it without the benefit of a conscious process, it seems that rejecting meat/dairy as food requires a value judgement (or at least a moral observation) being placed on the action, unless it is veganism for health reasons. Maybe it doesn't need to be reactive to meat-eating as such, but for all practical purposes, anyone who is vegan in the modern world will be forced or pigeonholed into a political role as a spokesperson for that lifestyle, even if they don't want to be (again, unless for health reasons). And frankly the demands of that lifestyle in the face of the modern diet, and the changes one would have to implement just to accomodate it will result in so much energy being expended into maintaining it that it will almost certainly begin to cause the person to define their own behavior in a way that necessarily references and rejects mainstream thought on the issue. Maybe this is not necessarily the case, but I would venture to say that it probably represents the situation of most vegans.
― richard wood johnson (rwj), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)