14 songs and 103 minutes long, spread over two discs, "How to Measure a Planet?" remains the Gathering's best, and one of the best albums of the 90's. Its charms are many but I will single out a few; Anneke van Giersbergen's talents far exceed that of similarly positioned female metal/hard rock vocalists, and she's at the top of her game on this album. Even her lyrics are above average: there's a certain poetic weight to her turns of phrase ("I feed you balance / I do need redemption / whenever I don't know") that may very well result from a tenuous grasp of English grammar.
But it's really the epic scope of the music that lends the album the lasting power it has. I pulled it out just a few days ago and was shocked by how well it has aged compared to the two albums that came before it, from the creashing climax of "Rescue Me", to the crunchy, fun "Liberty Bell", the dreamy, synth-driven "Big Sleep" and second-disc highlight "Probably Built In the Fifties".
The real highlight of my last few listens, though, has been the track I paid the least attention to when I first bought it, the 28-minute closing title track, on which they perhaps unknowingly trounce nearly every post-rock band in existence, managing to swell and recede without ever descending into "rocking out" mode. The last eight or so minutes are blissful and transcendent.
Anyone else care to pipe in about this record?
― Simon H. (Simon H.), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)
'how to measure...' was the first record where they shed the confines which had them pigeonhold. it was less about doom-laiden, plodding riffs and more about exploring different avenues creatively.
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 09:46 (eighteen years ago)
A very brave album, too, as they abandoned the female gothic doom formula they'd created in favour of more challenging directions, leaving the cookie cutter stuff to the Within Temptations of the world.
― a. begrand (a begrand), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)
nice play on words incidentaly, scott! sleepy buildings was another solid release
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:12 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.villagevoice.com/music/9931,seward,7409,22.html
(it's kind of a sucky review in retrospect. but what are ya gonna do.)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:12 (eighteen years ago)
well, it was a metal band making a "rock" album. that's the difference. and it sure as hell wasn't indie rock. or what i think of as indie rock. way too bold & beautiful for it to be that.
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
― Simon H. (Simon H.), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 1 February 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)
― xhuxk (xhuck), Thursday, 1 February 2007 13:08 (eighteen years ago)
― xhuxk (xhuck), Thursday, 1 February 2007 13:15 (eighteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 1 February 2007 13:21 (eighteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 1 February 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)