*In each case, the entry was a stub, very basic 75 words created as a starting point so that other fans could add to it.
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:48 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:57 (nineteen years ago)
That said, the fact that there's a Grey Daturas entry (and has been for months) and the Y3ll0w Sw@ns page I keep putting up keeps getting shafted is curious. In my (possibly useless) experience, the latter's better known than the former.
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 16:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 16:07 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 16:18 (nineteen years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:23 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:24 (nineteen years ago)
Delete. Allmusic has a track listing of one cd, but no bio or other info. So they're real, but I see no evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC criteria. Friday (talk) 01:27, 12 September 2005 (UTC) Delete nn. Barely even a claim of notability. --rob 02:53, 12 September 2005 (UTC) Weak Keep I don't hold with "vanity self-insertion" but Goggle suggests they do it in public. And please edit it to stop shouting Dlyons493 05:37, 12 September 2005 (UTC) Delete. Andrew pmk | Talk 22:55, 12 September 2005 (UTC) Delete as per Friday. -- Kjkolb 07:59, 13 September 2005 (UTC) "'Keep'" They released a 4CD box-set on Narnack records, and vinyl on Matador, which is one of the biggest and most important indie labels that I know of. I cant verify that the information on the page is true, but they are a real band, a pretty good band, and an important enough band to merit inclusion here. Weak Delete as per Friday, but might become a decent article if left as a stub. Nihiltres 16:13, 17 September 2005 (UTC) Keep The band more than meets WP:MUSIC criteria as has released multiple albums on multiple important indie labels (Narnack, Matador, etc). Epheron 04:27, 19 September 2005 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page. "
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:30 (nineteen years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:32 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:35 (nineteen years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
― UART variations (ex machina), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:51 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:57 (nineteen years ago)
there's a rule on Wikipedia about not making entries about yourself. wikipedia is not a self-promotion tool.
― richard wood johnson (rwj), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
Now let's try to find the most obscure band on Wikipedia. Here's my vote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swarm_of_Angels
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 20:07 (nineteen years ago)
-- richard wood johnson (rw...), Today 6:47 AM. (rwj) (later)
i assumed a fan made it!
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 20:44 (nineteen years ago)
― 31g (31g), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 21:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
I've obviously sold out to Wikipedia.
― Rombald (rombald), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
Oh. The tone of the article sounded like those bios on music promotional literature that constantly refer to the musician in the third person but was clearly written by the guy himself. Anyway, I didn't know this guy was famous enough to have a following (or is he?). According to the article history, it was mostly written by someone named J. Allen.
― richard wood johnson (rwj), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:33 (nineteen years ago)
In 2005 Gary Knight started a new project which after some different ideas for names became Deja Vue. This should have in fact been Deja Vu, as in the "already seen" phenomena, but due to inacurrate research Deja Vue was used and the name stayed. In December 2006 it was reported Deja Vue would be producing three tracks on the new Ashanti album.
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 31 January 2007 05:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 15:44 (nineteen years ago)