― dave q, Monday, 8 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth, Monday, 8 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
If by the above statement, you mean that Ian Brown's solo albums are better than the two Stone Roses studio albums, then you, sir, are quite high.
Always hoped they'd release a compilation of Robert Plant's solo stuff...as I'd hate to have to buy each of the albums in order to get the one or two listenable tracks on each. "Little By Little," "Heaven Knows," "In the Mood," "Big Log" (never thought it was that bad, actually). At least Plant tried to do something different from the fare he managed with Zep (unlike, say, Ozzy, who continued to mine the same territory in his solo incarnation as the Sabs).
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 8 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kris, Monday, 8 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Yeah, but it's still heavy, guitar-driven 'metal,' ala Sabbath.
".....and I think it's pretty good."
I didn't say it was bad.
"Plant's solo stuff is ridiculous"
Some of it assuredly is ("Tall Cool One" springs to mind), but some of it's fine. Lots -- if not most -- of Ozzy's stuff is ridiculous too.
"....and I don't know who Ian Brown is."
The former lead singer of the Stone Roses.
― sundar subramanian, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)