Blender.com Electronic Feature

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Hey Folks --
I just penned a piece on 14 essential electronica albums for Blender. It serves as a guide and is broken down by genre. For instance, if you like Indie Rock, we suggest Matthew Dear's "Leave Luck To Heaven" etc. There's youtube links and all sorts of interactive goodness. So check it out -- maybe you'll agree with me, maybe you won't. And yes, while this does smack of shameless self promotion, heck, I'm just trying to drive some traffic.

http://www.blender.com/guide/articles.aspx?ID=2467

James Jung (James Jung), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

I guess the 90s revival is here already.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)

Tokens.

Steev (Steev), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)

if you like kung pao chicken you might like...fried eggplant.

racist illustrator for hire (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)

has the minimal joke been pre-assigned?

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

tut tut electronica as 'British import' (i know you have to pander to noobs here but still). but Prodigy outsold the Chems in the US on the back of the 'electronica (even tho it's half full of guitar) craze' anyway i thought (DYOH is a better album then TFOTL tho so no matter)

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

Why is it so Eurocentric? Add an extra bit for If you like...The Authentic All American Emotionally Resonant Real Deal:

Landcruising
Alien
Innovator
Neptune's Lair
Purpose Maker
Deep Space
LBH-6251876
Alone In The Dark

I guess they're too obscure (and old) to mention in such an article (catch 22) but they're genuinely good albums in their own right (as good as the ones mentioned in the article if perhaps in different ways/for different reasons)

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)

No Autechre?

I 2nd Deep Space.

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

So if I like Dabrye (hip hop), I'll like Dabrye (electronic)?!

This is truly mind blowing.

MaGoGo (FirstBass), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:36 (eighteen years ago)

how about if you like electronic music? I mean, I realize Blender doesn't like the idea that anyone reading it might possibly actually like electronic music or anything, but still.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.eastlondonsa.com/ddcal/gifs/2003.gif

jaxon (jaxon), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)

more like 1993, sorry, just copy pasted from jt thread.

jaxon (jaxon), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

I trust this will remain online and never sully the pages of the magazine itself, then.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

B-b-but then how will Blender readers ever find out about the Chemical Brothers?!?!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)

I trust this will remain online and never sully the pages of the magazine itself, then.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

damn it, that was supposed to be followed by [/Marcello]

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

it is called "remedial electronica", matos; there's little call to be a jerk here

cn (Cozen), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 23:22 (eighteen years ago)

Oh I thought it was "essential electronica". Yeah it really works as a primer for remedial electronica fans.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 23:54 (eighteen years ago)

god forbid anyone make fun of Blender

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

i wanna start a thread asking how students or whoever these days tend to get into electronica (still no problem with this term ha ha) to the extent where it becomes their favourite area. inspired by how i noticed a lot of younger people on ILM be all into current European techno/minimal, doing the research on italo, 80s acid, UR etc. but seemingly not going beyond '93 (probably just to do with mid-late 90s stuff being the least vogue at present)

but it would probably suck

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:00 (eighteen years ago)

that's a good question, actually.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:03 (eighteen years ago)

Do US students get into electronica these days?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:04 (eighteen years ago)

no one even uses the term electronica anymore

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)

no one used it to begin with!

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)

Haha okay do US students get into dance music (techno, house, whatever) these days?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:08 (eighteen years ago)

i would have to venture and say, yes?

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:08 (eighteen years ago)

speaking of US students, i think this article would be good for 3rd graders

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:12 (eighteen years ago)

If you like tittyfucking:

http://www.ghostly.com/1.0/img/covers/spc33-400.gif

M. Biondi (M. Biondi), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)

if you like musique concrete

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:20 (eighteen years ago)

no one even uses the term electronica anymore

The Wire still has an electronica review section. In addition to critical beats, at that.

M. Biondi (M. Biondi), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:20 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, I knew someone would bring up The Wire

maybe I'm wrong about this, but wasn't "electronica" initially a term for melodic stay-at-home synthy stuff, not necessarily IDM but in that realm? (before it became more of a blanket term for all house-diaspora stuff.)

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

and to be honest, I don't see anything wrong with "electronica" as a blanket term. it fits well enough.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

agreed

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:23 (eighteen years ago)

but it's still funny that when it's used it tends to make people think of the guitar-heavy semi big-beat british stuff from ten years ago (which many students loved at the time)

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:25 (eighteen years ago)

Isn't Insides the archetypal "electronica" album?

gaseous (gaseous), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:26 (eighteen years ago)

electronic music >>>> IDM >>>>> electronica

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:26 (eighteen years ago)

saying "electronic music" in a conversation about what you listen to sounds so tightassed, though. granted, that's probably precisely what's appealing for some people about it as a term.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:28 (eighteen years ago)

the -ica suffix has a certain quasi-deleterious 1990s-ness about it, but otherwise it seems like a handy enough way to file Boards of Canada in a different section than say Villalobos.

M. Biondi (M. Biondi), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:28 (eighteen years ago)

I guess I don't see how "electronica" per se is any more deleteriously '90s than "techno" itself, whatever the decade of the latter's origins. that's probably just my deficiency, though.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)

there was a never a good catch all. you need something quick and snappy like 'rock', punk', 'rap' and 'pop'.

'techno' SHOULD'VE been the catch-all (there's another thread about this) but too many sniffy purists said nooooo.

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)

if i was having a conversation, i'd be sure to say "electronic shit"

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:31 (eighteen years ago)

some tech-house, some minimal, some beardo, some electrosoul

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:32 (eighteen years ago)

haha fair enough (xpost), that's about what I'd say too

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:32 (eighteen years ago)

I always liked that there was never a good catch all. It made it easy to find the records you really wanted here at shops.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:32 (eighteen years ago)

this is a loose reply to steve's comment about american students getting into techno music (i am one) and not going past '93 or so in their back-listening.

i think the villalobos / isolee axis is a pretty common in for a lot of people in my situation. it grabbed my attention in a way that the progressive trance / tribal house i had been exposed to growing up never did. it also turned a ton of my friends on to techno music. i think the reason for the early 90s switch to europe is:

detroit 3 >
ur, hood, mills, bell, hawtin >
basic channel / perlon >
villalobos

friday on the porch (lfam), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)

i may be projecting

friday on the porch (lfam), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:43 (eighteen years ago)

xpost x2: but it was for the stuff that didn't really slot into the established pigeonholes really, by relatively high-profile artists (so yeah 'In Sides'). what section was that album under at the time (if you bought in a specialist store as opposed to chart shelves of Tower/HMV etc.)?

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:44 (eighteen years ago)

yeah that makes sense lfam

it ties in a little with me thinking about how i always (or at least as i was growing up and up til early 20s and ILM) liked dance/electronic stuff that was 'neither too clever nor too stupid' if that makes sense.

these days i feel that there is no longer any middle ground in that respect. if this is true it would explain why students might pick up on Isolee, Villalobos and the hip Euro labels via webzines because they're interested in it from technical/sonic/musical perspectives as much if not more than 'great to dance to/lose yourself in' without turning your brain off. the same could be said of much 80s and early 90s stuff which sounds fresh again and revitalised in the current climate.

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:52 (eighteen years ago)

I think the reason American students are turned onto "Isolee, Villalobos and the hip Euro labels" (Kompakt & Get Physical?) is because that's the only dance music hip American webzines cover, isn't it?

Good Dog (Good Dog), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:59 (eighteen years ago)

the big shift perhaps is that now there's less difference between how US and UK kids get into it. part of this may be to do with the real dea(r)th of decent techno-based pop (aka 'album dance') in the UK this decade. ten years ago Orbital (and Aphex) were probably the #1 act getting indie kids into dance unless they were spliffing enough to go via jungle route. there's nothing really like that now so i'm guessing 18yr olds drift into it via the Europe-led minimal and electro styles. And American college kids would presumably do the same, the internet making it all easier in this respect and allowing for greater parity.

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:04 (eighteen years ago)

I think the reason American students are turned onto "Isolee, Villalobos and the hip Euro labels" (Kompakt & Get Physical?) is because that's the only dance music hip American webzines cover, isn't it?

OTM

M. Biondi (M. Biondi), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:10 (eighteen years ago)

but aren't they referencing May/Atkins/Craig every now and then? maybe not! i'm not even sure who people should be talking about re mid-late 90s stuff anyway i.e. dudes who made good albums that weren't Brit-dance, alternatives to that but still operating in the same basic realm. probably Motorbass and DP, maybe Garnier, maybe Ken Ishii...nothing German springs to mind weirdly! then again all that stuff (as well as Drexciya and co. and US House and Garage) seems quite distant from Brit-dance - I guess it always was. The point is I liked it all and zines catered for such relative dilletantism very well. Do they/can they still?

side question: what is the best American techno-based album of the 00s?

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:32 (eighteen years ago)

The only reason i know about them is ILM xp

deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:33 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, its no longer my sole source for information by any means, but my awareness of recent european dance music (er 'electronica') was negligable prior to reading people discuss it here, and writers who are here discussing it elsewhere (in print etc)

deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)

i always say im into house music or electro or acid house or hardcore depending on what kinda dance music im talking about or if i really really had to just break it down id say dance music

and what (ooo), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)

if i wanna talk about idm i say im into 'warp records shit'

and what (ooo), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:36 (eighteen years ago)

but what do you call 'Dig Your Own Hole' dude? (don't say garbage!)

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:38 (eighteen years ago)

yeah i mean i prefer 'dance' to 'electronica' because the house i tend to listen to is closer to Chic than it is to Autechre. generally.

deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:39 (eighteen years ago)

And when I think about house/electro/microhouse whatever i'm thinking "i would dance to this ergo dance music" not "this has electronic beeps in it ergo electronica"

deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:40 (eighteen years ago)

But this debate has been done before, right? With xhuxk 3ddy and everything

deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:43 (eighteen years ago)

it's not a debate here so much though.

Matos W.K. (M Matos), Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:24 (eighteen years ago)

I think the reason American students are turned onto "Isolee, Villalobos and the hip Euro labels" (Kompakt & Get Physical?) is because that's the only dance music hip American webzines cover, isn't it?

Honestly -- and I realize I'm probably implicated in more than a few "hip American webzines" -- I think that generalization is off the mark, especially when you consider the recent rise of Justice et al, and also the Switch/Sinden UK axis. Also, where are these webzines that are somehow better because less hip?

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:29 (eighteen years ago)

electroclash elephant in the room again!

about:coffee (fandango), Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:31 (eighteen years ago)

as a friend of lfam-- he told me about ilx and got me interested in this shit in the first place-- i think he got it pretty much right. for a while when i was in 9th grade or so i was really into Digweed and shit like that (from those movies about raves that came out b/w 98-2001), but that ended quickly.

i always liked disco, depeche mode and new order from middle school or so, but for the most part was intimidated by electronic music and dance music simply because it is such a large world unto itself-- for the uninitiated (especially one who rarely gets the chance to listen to such music until college), it is overwhelming.

the reasons behind it? i heard Deep Cuts, i got sick of the endless noise musics i was accumulating, and finally felt like i could dive into dance/electronic music without hesitation and learn about it at my own speed. especially with help from these boards.

also see: http://ilx.thehold.net/thread.php?msgid=60648

the table is the table (treesessplode), Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:34 (eighteen years ago)

additionally, it seems like a lot of people are getting into it by way of isolee, villalobos and whatnot, but i also think that there's an element that's getting into it through american stuff, especially b/c of teh DFA. i knew kids who were into shitty indie poop in spring 06 who heard Relevee over the summer and came back to school asking me to school them.

the table is the table (treesessplode), Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:37 (eighteen years ago)

I buy techno completely based upon the dictates of "hip american webzines." Well, except for the last Skatebard record, which I suppose is more "electronica" anyways. Hell, I almost bought that Kalabrese 12" over at the kompakt mp3 site. I need to get somebody power of attorney over my credit card.

M. Biondi (M. Biondi), Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:38 (eighteen years ago)

I think the reason American students are turned onto "Isolee, Villalobos and the hip Euro labels" (Kompakt & Get Physical?) is because that's the only dance music hip American webzines cover, isn't it?

this has some truth to it, but as a whole, i disagree. you might change "american webzine" to "philip sherburne" and then you would be a little more accurate. he hipped me to villalobos AND alex under. but really, from my point of view, the hip euro labels are perlon, playhouse/ongaku/klang. maybe kompakt a tad, but not so much. the view is probably different from over there in those hip european continents.

friday on the porch (lfam), Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:43 (eighteen years ago)

Perlon, Playhouse, Kompakt, and a slew of smaller labels.

because that's the only dance music hip American webzines cover, isn't it?

uh, no. try again.

the table is the table (treesessplode), Thursday, 8 February 2007 02:47 (eighteen years ago)

Also, where are these webzines that are somehow better because less hip?

Surely there are none. What American indie-centric magazines cover dance music in general and not just minimal stuff? I'd like to know. Besides, Blender of course :)

Good Dog (Good Dog), Thursday, 8 February 2007 03:30 (eighteen years ago)

damn. I messed up diss with a stray comma

Good Dog (Good Dog), Thursday, 8 February 2007 03:32 (eighteen years ago)

okay, maybe someone could answer my questions. If hip magazines cover a bit of the hippest electronic music, and people get into it that way, do less hip magazines cover less hip electronic stuff? I mean does Spin cover Digweed? Does it correlate all the way down to the trashy mags covering the trance stars? Or is dance music and mainstream rock/pop a thoroughly divided beast?

Because from a Euro perspective, I would imagine hardly anyone would get into dance music from a magazine or a movie. You grow to like it by going out into clubs.

Good Dog (Good Dog), Thursday, 8 February 2007 03:47 (eighteen years ago)

in answer to yr first question...i think that *maybe* XLR8R has its hands in stuff that is dancey and not minimal. that 'berlin wasted youth' issue had quite a number of articles and profiles that had nothing to do with minimal.

otherwise, very divided beast.

the table is the table (treesessplode), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:06 (eighteen years ago)

Because from a Euro perspective, I would imagine hardly anyone would get into dance music from a magazine or a movie. You grow to like it by going out into clubs.

you have to have a functioning club scene in order for this to happen. The difference between the US and Europe is that the club industry in the EU is on a scale where you can get your bullshit club music *and* your arty dance music too. I cannot speak for the bigger cities in the US, but from what I've seen you have the *club* scene with bad music and too much cologne and the underground dance scene with marginal venues with hard focus on music. In the US it's either one or the other, and in Europe it is both or one or the other to varing degrees. You cannot grow into good music anymore in the US via the club scene.

In the US, club music isn't percieved as real music, it is just the soundtrack to your party experience and that is where it stays. It is something you hear during your late teens and early 20's and then you outgrow it for Eagles greatest hits comps.

Also, there hasn't been a strong US touring circuit since rave died. I mean you still have NYC, maybe Detroit, Chicago, LA, and San Fran tours, but that it about it. The south and midwest are dead for the most part.

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)

a decently clever concept for an article (that's the editor in me talking). Although funk soul should really be pointed to Jamie Lidell.

On the 'student' question (that's such a brit phrase) i find a surprising amount of average (ie- sportsbar attending, abercrombie wearing) college age people who are into jungle. the funny thing is, they don't know how to reference even the big name DJ/producers (bukem, goldie, hype, whoever) from the rave era, and seem to just own a few generic Jungle CD. This is strictly from personal experience, and i've not quite figured how to qualify it. It certainly has failed to form a cohesive 'scene' and the clubs still remain very empty. it just seems that as casual music consumers, they hit upon jungle and like it more than say minimal house or techno.

if anyone here has a similar experiemce and more structured take on this phenomenon, i'd love to hear what you know.

Joshua Glazer (matthewcampari), Thursday, 8 February 2007 09:19 (eighteen years ago)

Listening to a DJ mix CD can be a lot like getting freaky with a rando on the dance floor — it feels good in the dark, but do you really want to wake up next to it?

whaaaaat? i wouldn't trust any article on dance music (sorry "electronica") with assertions so...bizarrely unaligned to how dance music works in them

antidote against poisoning (lex pretend), Thursday, 8 February 2007 09:27 (eighteen years ago)

What American indie-centric magazines cover dance music in general and not just minimal stuff? I'd like to know.

For the past year, I've run the weekly dance column over at Stylus Magazine, and I can say it's tough getting people interested in writing about new 12 inches, especially if its outside the vogueish minimal stuff. In many ways I've framed the mini-essays and reviews in the column to be as inviting as possible to neophytes, since Americans do seem to have a hard time understanding why people love this kind of music so much. There are times where I wonder if it all goes on deaf ears though.

I do agree with Mike (Disco Nihilist,) the U.S. club scene doesn't seem to "function" well and attract new listeners into dance music. And if people do get into trance/funky house or the cologne stuff, I'm not sure it imbues the listener with a lot of respect for the music. I say this as a person who sort of stumbled into dance music by reading about it, and then after a year or so of home listening and reading, found that it adapted to my personal temperament better than any other music I had heard before.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:46 (eighteen years ago)

Americans do seem to have a hard time understanding why people love this kind of music so much

this is true, but brits seem to be equally obtuse when it comes to hip-hop and r&b outside of a couple of big hits per year. i can understand this with, y'know, normal people, but i don't understand ilm types being so obdurate about it. it's music! just cos it's not in your cultural sphere doesn't mean it should be incomprehensible to you.

antidote against poisoning (lex pretend), Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:50 (eighteen years ago)

joshua, i noticed something similar in the early part of this decade, especially following the halcyon days of south florida d'n'b. i was definitely on the outside of the phenomenon but i had a number of friends rocking cassette tapes that said only 'jungle' on the outside. i remember thinking they were pretty dope.

friday on the porch (lfam), Thursday, 8 February 2007 13:40 (eighteen years ago)

Call me old fashioned but I thought most people who are heavily into this kind of music just got into it through drugs.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 8 February 2007 13:51 (eighteen years ago)

i won't call you old-fashioned, matt, but i will call you misled.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)

bad music and too much cologne

Just to clear up any misunderstandings; I meant the stuff you wear, not the place where Mike Ink lives...

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)

well, from a personal example, I'm a student, in Canada, that listens to techno and house more than anything else really. For the longest time I was very weary of club scenes, because of my personal impression of being cluttered with the too much cologne big trance dj ambiance. Somewhat past that, I still remain dominantly a home-listener. I think it was just a transition from being really into early 90's warp stuff and IDM, as I was somewhat a danceaphobe, and just never being able to resist the sound of most techno and whatnot, which generally started on an isolee/villalobos step. But I think I personally probably take the music more seriously from learning about it from reading about it here and wherever, then going out and listening to it, even if it is in proper context. And no drugs were involved.

Thomas Mehlt (Tokyo Ghost Stories), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:16 (eighteen years ago)

No clue how, but about five years ago I started listening to Trance. It just happened one day. I think drugs were involved. Over the course of the past five years I've become fascinated by Four Tet, Boards of Canada, Autechre, etc etc.

Electronica blows. Long live IDM (the most pretentious title for a musical genre ev-ar).

MaGoGo (FirstBass), Friday, 9 February 2007 04:59 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.masterzdm.com/val-jienandchen.jpg

lol

the table is the table (treesessplode), Friday, 9 February 2007 05:10 (eighteen years ago)

As regards Kompakt and Get Physical in "hip magazines", isn't this just because they are the two most successful labels with the biggest crossover potential anyhow? I mean, ok you can say the magazines make this the case and go all Chomsky on this but these labels are selling lots of records hence they are given coverage.

If I was trying to get someone into current dance music I'd probably give them the Booka Shade album.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 9 February 2007 09:52 (eighteen years ago)

okay, we're talking about a few years back and not 2005-now, but um DJ Mag is not that 'hip' really. Nor Judge Jules

Hmmm, I'd like to put some Booka Shade on a compilation of "l@@k, dahnce is good again" not the album though. Been meaning to make that comp. for ages, The friends it'd be intended for are probably lost causes so... careometer.jpg :P

about:coffee (fandango), Friday, 9 February 2007 12:04 (eighteen years ago)

I don't understand the prog/jam connection to the RD James album. Every song on it is two minutes long! It should have been the metal/hardcore choice (I'm surprised that Atari Teenage Riot weren't picked here, even though they suck).

I'm making these comments despite believing that the premise of the article is completely lame (no offense, James).

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Friday, 9 February 2007 13:22 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.