everything is wrong

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
an album by pop-techno artist moby that was released in nineteen ninety-five. i purchased it used spring of nineteen ninety-nine and have gradually warmed to it to what one could call an almost complete adoration of it. critically it was recieved rather well for bringing a 'human' face to techno and i do like the piano-y tracks a lot (ha ha), but the monotone keyboardy whale-song tracks and diva disco orchestra stab stuff have always been the high points for me. why can't moby's records be taken seriously just because he's some sort of m2 rockist 'electronica' politician with dumb collaborations, prodigy despite them eventually turned into the retarded gothy teenager-child of oasis and icp and everyone still loves them. is it considered somehow wrong to make really good rave anthems and pretty piano-synth stuff at the same time? if, as tom suggests, only novelty records can have 'huge seismic pop consequences' (or whatever his wording was), what about a musician who has built an entire career of fantastic novelty records, and is possibly the most constant artist in pop to be more often described by gimmick he's currently in love with than any other factor? i mean the pop stuff is good, the pretty melancholy stuff is good and even pop enough to work as popular melancholy (my favorite kind of melancholy!) and he's going to keep releasing these fantastic singles that only barnes&noble middle-brow types will enjoy (or admit to enjoying, sorry for stooping to that canard but at this point i can imagine few artists a 'serious' music fan would admit to liking less than moby ), and this lack of a critical forum outside of 'he's a bald twat that makes music for adverts' depresses me for an artist i like so much.

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Matos to thread - paging Mr.Matos!

Paul, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I said that novelty records could have seismic pop consequences and still be novelty records - didnt say that only novelty records could have such consequences.

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Moby hasn't made a "really good rave anthem" for years but he did before then so thumbs up for that. Never heard the album you're talking about. He's hated on now - and only in isolated pockets like ILM, he did with the Pazz and Jopp remember - for making techno's Rattle And Hum.

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(Should be said that Moby hasn't TRIED to make a "really good rave anthem" for years either)

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oh uh sorry for misquoting you tom, i didn't even read all of that before i posted it. (although isn't having it only be novelty records better or at least more fun?)

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

and who is making really good rave anthems now anyway?

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

God knows, but not Moby anyway. Ronan to thread! The thing that struck me about even the tracks I liked on Play was how infernally slow they were - mind you I suppose he's making chill-out anthems instead.

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This was the first 'electronic' album I ever bought (along with Tricky's "Maxinquaye" and Skylab's #1, all based on reviews I'd read). In time I tired of the rave anthems, because they're so over- exuberant that they can be grating. Of course, that's what makes them great as well -- I had a friend who mostly listened to punk and obscure rock stuff tell me he really loved all the energy. Since then I've come back towards liking them a little more.

But the ambient pieces are definitely key, from the flawless bassline groove of "First Cool Hive" to the soaring yet sterile "Into the Blue." "Play" wasn't the first time he'd been licensed, of course ... a version of "God Moving Over the Face of the Waters" was used in the climax scene of the film Heat. I think it's one of those albums that was considered the peak of its genre when it first came out, but since then has fallen from favor in the eyes of a lot of fans. I still contend his best album is "Ambient," for its consistency. It's just track after track of ambient house, kind of numbing overall but also very warm and fuzzy.

Dare, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Aside from his personality, people hate Moby because he's been the anointed electronica crossover artist for years. He's always written about (by the US press, anyway) as if he invented electronic music (see most recently a New York Times magazine cover story). This isn't really his fault, but he doesn't discourage the idea and he benefits from it a lot. I wouldn't really call him gimmicky, just mediocre.

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oh come on you'll have to do better than that! anyway it's much better to have moby be considered a 'forefather of electronica' than crap like throbbing gristle or neu! or something.

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

and who is making really good rave anthems now anyway?

APOPTYGMA BERZERK!

A lot of the Moby criticism has been really unfair, I think, especially calling _Play_ the techno _Rattle And Hum_. Then again I would say this because I love _Play_ and think that _Rattle And Hum_ is one of the worst records I've ever heard. I think the difference for me lies largely in approach; any/all blues appropriation that Moby did was applied towards doing something different with the source material, whereas U2 seemed to be to intent on wanking over the material they were covering to remember to do something interesting with it.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think there's a big transatlantic divide on this question - Moby was never big news here until Play, barring the odd single. People knew who he was but nobody saw him as the pinnacle or godfather of anything, he was just, you know, oh isn't he the bald one? the Christian? yeah he's alright. So the "anointed crossover act" thing was irrelevant here too, it would just have been laughable if anyone had tried it so people didn't.

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

depends on the forum you speak of, Ethan. one interesting thing I find on ILM is that a lot of folks tend to regard it as the sole repository of informed (or, in some cases, gleefully uninformed) opinion, when in fact it's pretty anomalous as far as critical forums go--aggressively, sometimes almost bullyingly pro-pop and generally dismissive of music that, in fact, quite a lot of critics and "serious fans" like (U2, Moldy Peaches, Moby).

(was going to follow that with a pusillanimous "but that's OK, I really love you guys" kind of thing, but fuck it, it stands.)

I think a lot of dismissal comes from having an easily (and cripplingly) identifiable sonic style--you can spot a Moby track a mile off, same four-chord sequence, same piano style (ravey or trancey), same faux-naive orgasmic rush--and instead of toughening or altering it to dancefloor/mainstream standards, he's never strayed from it. ("Bodyrock" was obviously "Moby doing Fatboy Slim" without actually getting near FBS's sonic crunch, for instance; the beats don't kick as hard, the sonix don't bite as hard.) In a sense, he makes the dance audience come to him rather than the other way around (the mainstream is another thing). also, having been proferred as "techno's face" for so long had a serious backlash effect: he was so outspoken for so long (especially when he became vocally dismissive of rave culture around '94-6, a period when it was busy consolidating its gains) that folks dismissed him as a jerk the way they do with Bono.

anyway, I love him, unabashedly--or have loved him, anyway--and still think he was the best artist of the '90s. certainly he made as many if not more good-to-great singles than anyone else that decade. EIW is a record I was obsessed with for about a year after it came out. let us not forget the EIW: DJ Mix Album disc that followed it, two mostly terrific discs of DJ'ed remixed of EIW and Move trax. the new one's not so good, but eh....

M Matos, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Here's an excerpt from Moby's online diary:

"Next: cranberry jjuice. When you are really in the mood for it, cranberry juice is great."

Not coincidentally, it's the same abject cutesy-pandering and total lack of quality control that renders his music such garbage, too.

Then, of course, there's also the whole "selling out" thing, which is probably for another time and another place (ie. 1999). Without re- opening the thread, let me just say that *every* track on his forthcoming album immediately conjures up images of potential car commercials, life insurance adverts, and nike hoedowns. Suffice to say, the little gaffer'll be rolling in it come album release!

Mark, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"it's much better to have moby be considered a 'forefather of electronica' than crap like throbbing gristle or neu! or something."

How about Marshall Jefferson and Robert Owens? Moby was hardly the first to drop a soul vocal over a beat, but everyone acted like those tracks on Play were a brilliant act of detournement.

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Doing something different = whacking a backbeat behind it, which makes Play the blues Night On Disco Mountain i.e. potentially loads better BUT I'm not sure you're right Dan. On Rattle And Hum there were two ideas being put forward - the blues is the holy source of emotion in music; we, U2, are carrying its torch. Play dropped the latter idea but kept the former - the settings work as tasteful little velvet cases for the nuggets of 'emotion' Mobe has mined and polished.

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

shows what happens when you craft lengthy answers to just-asked questions: lots of other (quite well-written) answers pop up and say what you said. oh well, cheers

M Matos, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, and since noone mentioned it: the Christ complex. Although he seems to have dropped that, thankfully.

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

tom are you saying moby is bad because he took the 'soul' out of the blues with his evil polished beats?!?!

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

On Rattle And Hum there were two ideas being put forward - the blues is the holy source of emotion in music; we, U2, are carrying its torch. Play dropped the latter idea but kept the former - the settings work as tasteful little velvet cases for the nuggets of 'emotion' Mobe has mined and polished.

what about all those previous uses of mooning goth-divas, screaming gospel singers and ragamuffin toasters as the holy source of emotion in music, Tom? was he just kidding then or were you just not paying attention?

M Matos, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No not at all, I'm saying the soul wasnt there in the first place ha. (Or if it was then Moby is photocopying it not showing me anything new about it.)

I am soul is where you find it anyway, if you get something out of "Why Does My Heart Feel So Bad?" then great and there's no gainsaying that but it does fuck all for me.

(Some of the blues tracks are the best on Play - "Honey" and "Run On" cos they do the recontextualisation thing a lot better, but damn how much better would they be if Moby would come up with more compelling beats!)

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

APOPTYGMA BERZERK!

Yes, my friend.

Everything Is Wrong was actually the last Moby I actually actively sought out -- nothing has compelled me since then, a track record he is now maintaining excellently. It is worthy for two things in particular, "Feel So Real," which is just ridiculously over the top and wonderful, and "When It's Cold I Want to Die," though I admit that's more for Mimi Goese than anything else. "God Moving..." is overblown, attractive enough at the time but now totally ham-handed tosh at this stage for me -- In the Nursery work this vein eight million times more effectively.

Forget U2 (and how I wish we all could). Moby is more accurately the Marc Bolan of his time -- an initially cult-level appreciated figure who made some notable records in an underground scene after earlier attempts at musical success elsewhere. When he went overground, a fair amount of the original fans dismissed him as idiocy multiplied, the worst kind of sellout etc. Though the difference between Bolan and Moby is that, as was cannily noted regarding his need to find every new trend, Moby's Bolan thinking he's Bowie, ergo reinventing with the verve and need of Madonna (who is so obviously a candidate for a vocal appearance on a Moby song that I'm figuring they're waiting for her next movie so she can get another Oscar).

It's an amusing enough game but the problem with me is that I don't like the results as of late. Because otherwise the game is pretty nutty, even if the stitches show. "Moby! He rocks! Er, wait, no. Moby! He uses old blues recordings! Um, let me think again. Moby! He collaborates with everyone on the goddamn planet!" Etc. etc.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I wasn't paying attention MM cos there seemed to be nothing to pay attention to - ravey dancey stuff all around me and Moby's stuff just didn't stand out. The gospel singers and divas and toasters were much more usual vocal styles in dance music, and Moby treated them as such - but the fact that he muted the beats and slowed them down when bluesmen were the sources made me suspect something bogus was going on.

This is kind of what I mean by transatlantic perspective - the trippy melodic trancey rave thing held on a lot longer in the States, and the same media urges to find an 'artist' in the morass of great music applied, so America got Moby much better.

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I should also note that the general comparison aside, Bolan pisses all over Moby like a stumbling drunk on a 4 am sidewalk, but then again Marc does that over most anybody.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i know i'm the last person who should be saying this but the 'ilm pop mafia' seem to tolerate cheesy synth and 4/4 beats as emotional beauty a lot more when they're in hiphop and not cod-dance.

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

true enough, and where was Steve Gurley when he needed to be interviewed by Spin? I agree, but I still find a lot to like in Moby's records. sue me, I want it all.

M Matos, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Whether serious or not, Dan Perry's kind of on-the-mark re: Apoptygma Berzerk making today's best rave anthems. As much as I dislike a lot of the recent crop of EBM (their "Kathy's Song," Covenant's "Dead Stars"), there are also some really good dancefloor anthems like Apoptygma's "Starsign," Wumpscut's, "Thorns," Funker Vogt's "Gunman." I don't think industrial really needs to be watered down to synthpop with a harder beat, but as always every once in a while a classic is born.

Dare, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

that last was to Tom, FYI.

Ned: Yeah, for about two songs. Bolan = most overrated pop figure evah, surely?

M Matos, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Go" = cheesy synth, 4/4 beats, emotional beauty. There Ethan, happy now?

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

tom you are sounding like the techno version of the anti-philip glass guy!

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Bolan = most overrated pop figure evah, surely?

Heh heh heh. I'm going to let Sean read this and explode. As it is, Prince owes his career to T. Rex as much as Funkadelic.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

people who only like moby for 'go' = goths.

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

let me amend that, then: most overrated pop musician evah? (should've known better: as a figure he's unassailable. duh)

M Matos, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ethan have you actually heard "Go"?

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it is his gothiest rave anthem!

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

People who look for "emotional beauty" in dance instrumentals = new agers (eg P.Glass!)

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I remember when people were sampling Angelo Badalamenti left, right and center. Bastard ripped that off too ;o)

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

They sample Tones on Tail = they are not necessarily goths but they know their Bauhaus side projects.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

most overrated pop musician evah?

As in performing ability or songwriter or...? Because he wasn't a great guitarist per se, he just worked with what he had, bless 'im.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I was completely serious about AB. They rule right now.

Which album was "Bring Back My Happiness" on? That's another older Moby track that's just sheer bloody brilliance.

I'm trying to think of how to adequately defend _Play_ here. It seems that a lot is being made of how Moby used old blues/soul records as a shortcut to inject emotion into the album (ignoring for the moment that people in his genre have been using old blues/soul records in the manner for decades and it's kind of unfair to single Moby out for it if you show some sort of appreciation for everyone else doing it), but A) he doesn't do it on every track, and many of the tracks where he doesn't are really stunning ("Southside", "Machete", "Down Slow"); B) the tracks where he gets it right he really gets right ("Honey", "Run On", "Natural Blues", and I don't care what anyone else says, "Bodyrock" is flat-out fun).

I'm sure all of this can be easily countered by anyone who's listened to the album recently, but I still think that there's some criticism going on here that addresses Moby's persona more than his music.

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

in the lrb this recent issue, there's a (great) piece by the (great) lesbian critic terry castle [who notoriously outed jane austen as having had a lesb pash on her sister cassandra, except actually tc wrote something difft and everyone overreacted, ANYWAY] about her obsession with world war one and dying in the trenches, and collecting wwi memorabilia all her life, and recently driving all across that bit of france and frlanders, and looking at the weird little museums and monuments...

anyway, in the middle of this quite hardcore emotional-political stuff (inc, TC being v. self-searching about HOW WEIRD IS IT THAT DYKEY ME WANTS TO DIE A BRAVE MALE SOLDIER 90 YEARS AGO IN MISERABLE TERROR AND SQUALOR blah blah), she justs taps in the scene-setting descriptive that she and her driving companion were playing moby on the car tapedeck... for this reader, it was like an ilm decompression chamber, stepping outside this doxa into, well, i couldn't work out what (in academic terms, TC = cool chiXoR, not least because she presents herself as flailing doofus in weird waters)

mark s, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Next: cranberry jjuice. When you are really in the mood for it, cranberry juice is great."

Not coincidentally, it's the same abject cutesy-pandering and total lack of quality control that renders his music such garbage, too.

I'm not going to mention what I think about his music (he's due up for more listening), but why does he get flak about his personality?! Moby has a great personality. He's cute and quiet and unassuming, yet not afraid to show you his dick. He's too naive to be pretentious. I just want to rub his cute little pate all over! (Is it really inappropriate for a hetero male like me to be having paroxysms of cuteness overdose over another guy like this? The way I think of it, kitties are mind-bogglingly cute too, but I don't want to fuck them)

Dan I., Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, but I really didn't mean to use the word four times. Still, I would like to rub his head. Did anyone else see the show he had on MTV? It was called like "Senor Moby's video show" or something. He showed some pretty good videos (not his own videos but ones that he liked, and some he showed were REALLY good) and for the intro/segue things it would be him with like a camcorder walking around NYC showing the viewer little sculptures and places that he likes while having difficulty being heard over traffic.

Dan I., Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

critics are just scared of another elvis costello accusation so now they can only safely like the personalities of so solid crew and andrew wk.

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

why does he get flak about his personality?!

Well, since this did start with Everything Is Wrong, when was the last time you read the liner notes -- even if you agreed with just about all he said -- and thought, "Gosh, what a fun person to be around"?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the liner notes just read like nitsuh on political ile threads, do you not like nitsuh?!

ethan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

only for fisting.

jess, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(this is probably a joke.)

jess, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Inner City-Good Life-Basement Jaxx remix.

DJ Icey-Smokebelch II-David Holmes mix.

Fatboy Slims remix of X-Press 2 Lazy is a bit old skooley and ravey.

I will think of more once you all remember that Holmers mix of the DJ Icey track is ESSENTIAL LISTENING.

Ronan, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

DJ Icey is pure unmitigated evil. Nothing could make him good, not even Dave Holmes. (NOTE: I haven't heard the track in question yet.)

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the liner notes just read like nitsuh on political ile threads, do you not like nitsuh?!

Is it not nifty?

Saying Nitsuh's posts read like a Moby screed is an insult to Nitsuh and I won't countenance it.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

why does he get flak about his personality?!
hes a liar and a hypocrite. people are just calling him on his bullshit.

chaki, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Tom wrote:
"Go" = cheesy synth

Doesn't "Go" heavily sample the synths from Angelo Badalamenti's "Laura Palmer's Theme" off of the very choice Twin Peaks soundtrack?

Cheesy = defending ultra-marketed pop on an internet forum.

http://gygax.pitas.com, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

isn't Smokebelch II by Sabres of Paradise?

Tracer hand, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

NOTHING CAN STOP US NOW
WE ARE ALL MADE OF STARS

moby's celebrity army, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

1) keyboardy whale-song tracks and diva disco orchestra stab stuff have always been the high points for me.
this is clearly a divisive point. this might be what kills us about moby. it has nothing to do with rock. almost every other style, ever sure, the guy is educated, but where's the RAWK? I mean, the fucker was in Flipper, yknow?
2) why can't moby's records be taken seriously just because he's some sort of m2 rockist 'electronica' politician with dumb collaborations
well, mtv really is lame, and you have to keep yr face off of there if you want to be taken seriously. would ANYONE take advice from Gideon Yago?
3) is it considered somehow wrong to make really good rave anthems and pretty piano-synth stuff at the same time?
no. i don't think so. i like when people are all over the map. but is this moby's entire map? i think so. where's the funk. i mean, body rock just proved that moby really isn't effective at that. subjective, but could anyone put that on a mixtape next to red hot car? windowlicker?
4) and this lack of a critical forum outside of 'he's a bald twat that makes music for adverts' depresses me for an artist i like so much.
OK, how about this. he talks like an activist and walks like a capitalist. that's GREAT that you have so many casues that you stand for. well, you're obviously making CHEESE because you license your music everywhere. So why don't I ever hear of Moby donating proceeds to, say PETA instead of just paying lip service. I hate when people act revolutionary but act entirely within the establishment. Like, even the Simpsons make fun of Butterfinger in the show, a big source of ad cash BECAUSE THEY CAN. So Moby is a pussy. Not to mention that Mr. Earth Friendly licenses music to oil companies, which we've discussed.
More: It was a good idea to match blues records with electronic beats. But did he do THAT good of a job? I don't know. Great source material clearly, but was enough done with it? And replicating it with a live band? Kind of tacky. Seems weird to me. If that was the idea, have those singers do the parts in the studio vs. sampling maybe? That's just a pet peeve. I don't like Play. I think Moby is smart. I think he has good taste. I think he abuses his cuteness and I think he is Wonder Bread electronica. But he deserves his fame, and for every electronic kid that hates him, there's 3 indie kids who think they're hot shit for being so cutting edge and owning his album.

chaki, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Moby = Beastie Boys. Discuss.

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

old beasties or new beasties? "brass monkey that funky monkey" beasties or respectful tibetan monk beasties? spacesuit wearing tokyo train jumping beasties or red furry teletubbie outfit beasties? 70s new york city cop film slick gangsta beasties or jumping up and down in an oversaturated b&w forest in slow motion beasties?

geeta, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, how about this. he talks like an activist and walks like a capitalist. that's GREAT that you have so many casues that you stand for. well, you're obviously making CHEESE because you license your music everywhere.

I knew we had to address all those commercials eventually. I used to really have a problem with artists lending their music to commercials, but then I realized that what's wrong with capitalism is exploitation, and who's being (directly) exploited here? I'm liberal enough that it gives me a funny little (bad) feeling in the pit of my tummy whenever anyone makes money off of anything in any way, but I like the idea of Moby having lots of money (didn't someone mention that his episode of Cribs showed his apartment as really spartan?)a lot better than fuckin' Ford, or whoever else made those commercials still having that money. And (and this is another great thing about ILM), I'm not so sure I believe in such a thing as "selling out" anymore. Like, at all.

Dan I., Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

All Beasties, Geeta!

Re. adverts - really the only thing you can judge an ad-track on is how good it sounds in the advert and after, in this Moby is not a very smart operator as he flogs his sounds to some pretty annoying adverts (that awful Ford one!).

Tom, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The standard line about EIW is that critics liked it because, as Ethan put it, it gave "a 'human' face to techno." Now that I think on it, my suspicion is that a lot of critics allowed themselves to like stuff they wouldn't trust with Meatloaf or Jean Michel Jarre because unlike them, it had the new-thing veneer of techno. (Not a complaint, really -- I'm almost jealous.) With its pushing of harder/faster/louder into operatic histrionics on some tracks, and "the monotone keyboardy whale-song tracks and diva disco orchestra stab stuff" on others, it's maybe the schlockiest critical favorite I can think of. It's the kind of schlock, like metal or Broadway, I don't really hate but just can't decode. It all sounds just a little clumsy and samey and hyped up in non-spcific way that makes my head twitch in irritation. I can't connect and I can never figure out why.

A caveat: Moby's a FANTASTIC live act. Another caveat: the videos for "Porcelain" and "We Are All Made of Stars" are VILE.

Michael Daddino, Tuesday, 9 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i love how dan i cut my quote in half thereby totally taking it out of context.

chaki, Wednesday, 10 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i second ned raggetts recommendation: 'iiiiiiiiiiiii feeell so reeeeeeeeeeeallll"

everythinmg is wrong is a pretty cool album.

ambrose, Wednesday, 10 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Moby = Beastie Boys. Discuss.

sounds great to me. sorry--I'm not going along with your logic here, Moby and the Beasties are both great.

People who look for "emotional beauty" in dance instrumentals = new agers (eg P.Glass!)

so what was Discovery doing at the top of your 2001 list, then, Tom? you got some sort of emotional beauty out of that, right? or are your standards (once again) flip-flopping around on us?

M Matos, Thursday, 11 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So why don't I ever hear of Moby donating proceeds to, say PETA instead of just paying lip service.

Given that it's Moby, I would be surprised to learn that he didn't donate some money to PETA.

Dan Perry, Thursday, 11 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Most dance music has some emotional beauty in fairness, unless we're talking techno or glitch. But even techno can. And with tech house yes again. Emotional beauty is a bit of a scarlet pimpernel anyway isn't it.

Ronan, Thursday, 11 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I never said in that post that I wasn't a new ager.

OK what I was annoyed about was that "emotional beauty" is a bit of a thread-killer, it's a very easy claim to make about a piece of music and generally when it gets made there's little examination of what actual emotions are being conjured/played with, it just sits there, a dead phrase suggesting that if you don't like the music there's something about you that's spiritually awry.

Moby and the Beastie Boys? Again I didn't say the Beasties are bad, I'm drawing a comparison based on their places in their respective styles of music. Actually I think both artists have a similar career arc of vital and entertaining initial work and then increasingly blah later music but that wasn't exactly what I was getting at.

Tom, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

For what it's worth "I'm Feelin' So Real" is far more emotional with seemingly far less effort than what he's doing now. Although clearly there's a bigger market for the Play type stuff.

Ronan, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm... Dunno about Moby. Didn't mind him having an attitude as such, it's just that a lot of his music is by comparision extremely well-mannered and polite, and has got more so through the 90s. "Play" sounded to me in places like a mid-90s "Deep Forest" album. Not actually bad, but it was like "What's the big deal?".

Old Fart!!!, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Compare/Contrast: "All That I Need Is To Be Loved" on Move< /i> with "All That I Need Is To Be Loved" on Everything Is Wrong.

What Moby got right: at one stage, shocking openness to practically every emotional and sonic palette available within dance music at the time.

What Moby then got wrong and continues to get wrong: the strange decision that rater than continue to use these sonic and emotional palettes he would swap them for the pre-existing palettes that these dance variants were modeled on or closest to.

"All That I Need Is To Be Loved" on Move is an awesome rush of a record, a dance via punk via industrial stomper whose presaging of The Prodigy was the least of its achievements. More impressive was how it captured something of the desperate urgency, the auto-erotic incompleteness of techno's harder-faster aesthetic, and made a pop song out of it. Likewise was there ever a diva's wail as all-encompassing as that in "You Make Me Feel So Good"? Hectic breabeats as overdriven and apocalyptic as on "Unloved Symphony"?

It's been a depressing slide down from that peak however, as Moby has consistently sought to "go back to the classics", reinterpreting punk, blues, chill-out etc. for their emotional thrills'n'spills... which would be fine if he ever placed any of the emotional import into what he brings to the table rather than the source material he's aiming to recontextualise (whether sampled or just resurrected). On the Everything Is Wrong version of "All That I Need Is To Be Loved", the evocation of punk is replaced by a reproduction of punk, as if Moby doesn't trust dance music to provide a suitable substitute for the "feeling" of punk. In fact the rock version sounds weaker, less compulsive, less alien, a novelty rather than an innovation.

If Moby's gift is for "emotional beauty" (I'd argue that it's rather for "emotional intensity), he has had serious trouble these last few years in creating it rather than merely researching it. As Tom said earlier, what annoys about Play is how disinterestedly it's produced. Yeah, lovely melodies, yeah, resonant samples, but Moby's renunciation of his own abilities as a dance producer mark him as one of the more wasted talents of the nineties.

Tim, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

damn.

Tim, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've come to realize that I will never understand why "Bodyrock", "Natural Blues" and "Why Does My Heart Feel So Bad?" represents a backwards step in Moby's career. From this point forward, I will content myself with knowing that I enjoy the album and stop trying to figure out why others don't.

Dan Perry, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've always thought Mobes was "out of phase" with pop culture, in that what he does is usually lauded at exactly the point least suited to what he does. this is where the hate comes from, it's destructive interference.

Alan Trewartha, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

New song sounds like Heroes by that Bowie fellow.

Ronan, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Bolan = most overrated pop figure evah, surely?
let me amend that, then: most overrated pop musician evah?


hmmm.... hafta think twice before invoking the Matos-to-thread shazam ring next time...

Paul, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Moby is insouciant.

Prude, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ten months pass...
Have you people never heard the Instinct compilations??? Anyone who considers Moby and Early Underground anything less than classic will BURN!

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 3 March 2003 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)

it's interesting this came up again since my opinion of 18 was so low and since to some degree the Moby-hate (on the boards and elsewhere) has gotten to me to the degree that I'm a little embarrassed at how much I've loved his music in the past. since I've been super busy listening to lots of things for professional reasons I haven't had much of a chance to revisit the earlier stuff (having all my CDs out of order doesn't help much either), and I'm not renouncing having loved the fuck out of him once, but Tim's points about him replicating-not-bringing what he has to the table are certainly valid, and Moby's obvious interest in staying successful rather than trying to do something interesting is pretty disheartening to me. the stuff I like on 18--"In My Heart," "In This World," "The Rafters"--is the stuff that has the easeful feel of the Instinct/Move/EIW era even if he's mostly doing Play-style song-workings. I miss his emotional intensity, a lot, and at the time I thought of him as my artist of the '90s. I'm not sure I still feel that way anymore, and I'd really appreciate some real, non-"haha I hate his guts cause of that Gwen Stefani song/one too many movie previews using one of his songs" answers here as to whether this should bother me.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 3 March 2003 08:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I should note that I actually do like Everything Is Wrong - however it's a case where my distaste for his subsequent work has implicated an album that I once really enjoyed.

"Distaste" is too strong though; I think it's hard to hate Play as an album in and of itself, but very very easy to be frustrated by its ubiquity, and what that means for Moby as an artist, for dance music, for society in general. Which is maybe a tad unfair on the music itself (eg. I can't give Norah Jones a free pass because I don't care about the status of jazz and then turn around and be ultra-nasty to Moby, esp. when I like Moby more than Norah Jones).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 00:24 (twenty-two years ago)

it's much better to have moby be considered a 'forefather of electronica' than crap like throbbing gristle or neu! or something
i Really wish i was blind to this sentence!

rex jr., Wednesday, 5 March 2003 17:32 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.