Punk evolution into indie music?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Arguing a topic, dont know which direction/s to approach it from.

Would you consider punk the father of, or basically the evolution to, indie music? Any examples you could give?

And Im on the fence about indie music as a genre, hard to plow I know, or indie music as a reference to the independant recording aspects of it all.

Research papers suck ass.


Third, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 01:51 (eighteen years ago)

Theres always been Indie labels around, but it wasnt until the late 70s/early80s that technology allowed for real DIY labels to be a reality to just about anyone who took the effort to start one. This was happening at the same time as American punk and then American hardcore were happening. In the 80s college radio would play tunes from Indie labels and the Indie sensation grew from that. Many indy bands started signing to majors, Sonic Youth, REM, Butthole Surfers, etc.
In short I would say that punk was a part of the Indie scene but certainly not the foundation for it.

yoko0no, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 01:59 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, not that people weren't making independent / underground guitar music all along, but it seems to me like the codification of "indie" as a genre came along when ... well, "punk" as a style passed its flashpoint, and people went on using the same model, aesthetics, and philosophy to make various other sorts of pop/rock music. The first widespread use of the word "indie" in this way = UK pop bands we now vaguely call post-punk, right? (E.g., all those Scottish and London labels that probably thought of themselves as punk, even as the bands on them moved back toward making a wider range of just general guitar music.)

nabisco, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 03:37 (eighteen years ago)

That explanation also kind of covers how "indie" becomes a musical genre and sound, as opposed to just a means or philosophy of production -- indie-as-sound would just be the long winding path traced by, yeah, people whose story mostly starts with punk and moves from there. Obviously a whole lot of influences and ideas have come moving in and out over the course of 30 years, but it's surely fair to say that the sounds and aesthetics of early-80s after-punk indie bands are still largely in line with the sounds and aesthetics of indie today.

nabisco, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 03:43 (eighteen years ago)

(Plus even the way modern-day indie acts work with sounds outside of that lineage, or the general rock lineage, is pretty similar to the way post-punk bands dealt with the influences they'd take from, say, dub or reggae!)

nabisco, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 03:45 (eighteen years ago)

..I don't really know much about this kind of thing, but what about (that horrible word) twee? Was it not a conscious movement away from the agression of punk?

Drooone, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 03:49 (eighteen years ago)

aggression

Drooone, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.ilxor.com:8080/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=41&threadid=55064

that's the "politics of twee" thread.

you folks know about the search function, yeah?

sleeve, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 04:22 (eighteen years ago)

by "folks" i mean "other than nabisco".

sleeve, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 04:23 (eighteen years ago)

you folks know about the search function, yeah?

..yeah, good one. I was merely mentioning it as surely "twee" has had some influence on the "genre" of "indie" down the years and that "twee" has its roots in punk. No?

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """" "" """""

Drooone, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 04:29 (eighteen years ago)

anyone else notice a similarity between jay reatard and arcade fire?

noizez duk, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 04:40 (eighteen years ago)

everything you want to know about the birth of "indie" music can be found in the song The Jewels of the Madonna by the Red Krayola.

dan selzer, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 06:37 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.shavedneck.com/edarnaudphotography/Black%20Flag/images/GREG2.jpg

Mike McGooney-gal, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 08:30 (eighteen years ago)

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/7/75/220px-Henry_Rollins_of_Black_Flag.jpg

Drooone, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 08:55 (eighteen years ago)

HA!

Drooone, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 08:55 (eighteen years ago)

Punk then new wave then college rock then alternative rock then indie rock. Although Sun records and Chess and other 50s labels were indies so Little Richard, Chuck Berry, and Elvis and more were the faddas.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 09:14 (eighteen years ago)

the real question: does Rollins' member actually resemble a soup can.

circa1916, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 11:15 (eighteen years ago)

i think there been a billion threads on this all with less inane titles. w/what you are talking about i'd point you to the replacements hootnenany maybe. and that this band could be your life thread was just bumped (cooincidence?). sometimes i'll be listening to something from the late 70s or something and i think "thats so indie", but i don't know if you are purely talking about sound or what. some people probably think punk -> indie is a devolution, but then indie is a pretty big catchall if you are using it that way. good luck with your research paper!

artdamages, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)

Wow, Greg Ginn was hotttt back in the day.

Masonic Boom, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

"Would you consider punk the father of, or basically the evolution to, indie music? Any examples you could give?"

YES. Absolutely. While "indie" was never exactly = to punk, it arose directly from punk. (Given the caveat that I'm talking about the American "independent rock movement"...)

The phrase "independent rock" came into common use in the United States in the mid-to-late 1980s, seeming at first like a variation on "college rock". But where "college rock" described a sound and an audience, "independent rock" described a unifying set of aesthetic principles. Still, both described a grassroots, independently-produced, intentionally anticommercial, often lo-fi and ramshackle brand of post-inflected rock music.

First generation "independent" rock bands usually retained punk signifiers and tended to self-identify as punk. Not to put too find a point on it, indie rock began life as an aspect of the slow-blooming, widely-varied American punk rock movement. A nonconformist, offshoot branch, but joined to and not entirely separable from the punk mainstream.

Punk in England is said to have occurred in a very brief period of time, metastasized almost instantaneously into a national pop phenomenon, and just as quickly fragmented into a million "post-punk" strains that could not be accurately labeled punk itself. In America, however, punk didn't come on as suddenly, and since it was never tied to a specific pop moment, it took much longer to ossify or mutate past the point of identification with punk-qua-punk. Viewed in this context, the independent rock movement is simply one of many forms American punk took as it spread and mutated. Independent rock music, as an ideal, arrived just after the birth of hardcore, and just as hardcore sharpened punk's formal characteristics into a killing tool, independent rock tore away the superficial structure to see what other effects a core punk intent might generate.

It’s certainly true that some of the bands associated with independent rock in 1980s America had only a tenuous connection to punk, but these were exceptions, not the rule. Most of the movement's first-generation leaders were punk rock bands, at least in their own minds: The Minutemen, The Wipers, Husker Du, The Meat Puppets, The Replacements, Sonic Youth, the Butthole Surfers, Pussy Galore, The Flaming Lips, Big Black, Squirrel Bait, Beat Happening, the Lemonheads, the Melvins. And the line between this new "independent rock" and the orthodox punk of the era was blurry, given the fact that these bands often called themselves punks, played what sounded like punk rock music, and were on the same labels and played the same shows as their purist punk peers.

Of course, other canonical indie forefathers were post-punk, or even non-punk. Perhaps influenced to some degree by the politics, sounds and/or aestheitics of punk, but not beholden to punk as a self-definition: Mission of Burma, Pylon, the Feelies, Big Dipper, The Embarassment, the Dream Syndicate, R.E.M., Dinosaur Jr. and Sebadoh, Unrest, the Pixies, the Throwing Muses. And the independent rock bands of the era were influenced by sources distinct from England’s ’77 "punk moment": arty post-punk bands like Joy Division and the Cure, jangly dreamy pop a la Aztec Camera and Felt, C86, punk-contemporaneous retro rock and new wave on labels like Beserkley and Bomp, the New York no wave movement, oddballs like Chrome, and the punk-associated non-punk rock of bands like Television and Talking Heads.

But at the same time, many of the era’s most influential bands weren't what we now think of as "indie" at all. They were just PUNK. The Dead Kennedys, Black Flag, the Avengers, and Minor Threat were as important to the American independent rock movement as any of the bands listed above. Among the American independent labels that spearheaded indie rock as a subcultural movement were Homestead Records, SST, Touch & Go, Restless & Enigma Records, Twin/Tone and Merge. Most of them began life releasing "punk rock records". It's important to remember that first and foremost this was independent rock music. The whole identity of the movement was tied to an inflexible set of rejectionist, anticapitalist, D.I.Y. principles. Major labels were BAD. Bands on major labels were suspect at best (exceptions made for the infallibly cool; e.g., X).

In light of this deliberate "outsider" stance, we can look at the 80s independent rock movement as the crystallization of an outsider strain that had been present in American rock music for quite some time: The Sonics and Hasil Adkins, The Stooges and the Velvet Underground, The Modern Lovers, Devo, The Electric Eels, Rocket From the Tombs, punk and no wave as movements. Punk and no wave helped identify "outsider-ness" as a distinct and desirable cultural commodity, and the independent rock movement finally made deliberate outsiderness the whole point. But once outsiderness could be identified as an end in itself, the aesthetics and principles that held it together began to unravel. Independent rock became "indie". And with that name came followers. And with the followers came a new orthodoxy of sound.

In the 90s, "indie" music became increasingly defined by the sound of a few successful bands, some of them major label acts: R.E.M. and the Smiths; English shoegaze bands; the records that Husker Du and the Replacements made as they moved away from punk; Beat Happening and the Vaselines; Sonic Youth, Dinosaur Jr., Sebadoh and Unrest's most ear-friendly recordings. This was a commodity sound. Defined at times by an anti-commercial stance and punk spirit -- but perhaps moreso by lyrics that traded in sometimes sarcastic or ironic sentimentality, distorted yet gentle rock guitars, and buckets of bookish, nerdy charm. (After all, it's a lot easier to sell brainy, pop-inflected rock music than deliberate weirdness built around the idea that selling things is categorically evil.)

At the same time, the 90s brought us much of what we now think of as definitive indie rock: Pavement, Sugar, later records by Sebadoh and the Flaming Lips, Guided By Voices, Liz Phair, early Beck, Tortoise, Built to Spill and Modest Mouse, Elliott Smith. Bands like Fugazi, Superchunk and Sleater Kinney carried the torch for the movement's oppositional principles and punk identification, but even they presented a fairly accessible sound and image.

With a sideways glance at the way "grunge" and "alternative rock" finally stripped all traces of punk from indie by funneling it off into dead-end pop cul-de-sacs, we finally arrive at the current era: Spoon, Death Cab for Cutie, the Arcade Fire, Destroyer, Bright Eyes, Wolf Parade, Sufjan Stevens, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, and The Shins. Throw in the lingering echoes of a few non-American stalwarts like Stereolab and Belle & Sebastian, and you have today's "indie".

By now, of course, the relationship between indie and punk is pretty much nonexistent. And the experimental, outsider spirit of the "movement" has become occasional decoration on a durable pop genre's fringe (the torch has mostly passed to metalheads, “new weird” hippies and noize freaks -- less explicitly pop-oriented genres that occasionally overlap with the indie mainstream).

While indie rock is still closely associated with smaller record labels, you don't see those corny "corporate rock still sucks" bumper stickers on cars anymore. So, maybe it's easy to think of indie and punk as being wholly separate from one another. Then again, we're an awfully long way from the summer of 1985...

Pye Poudre, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)

Cut and paste and Third has got a paper.

Mark Rich@rdson, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)

"post-inflected" = "punk-inflected", obv.

too many notes.

Pye Poudre, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)

I would want to use that in it's entirety

Third, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

The institutionalizaton of Indie music is pretty well documented in Azerrad'sOur Band Could Be Your Life. Today 'Indie' is sortof a dirty word, especially by people who remember that several of the American Indie Underground bands that are seen as the founders of Indie were totally against institutionalization. Others of those bands feigned to be against it, yet later sold out. Then some bands just didnt give a shit one way or the other.
Punk is also a term that has lost 99% of its original meaning. So, I dont want to complicate matters for Third (original question asker) but I think its important to take the evolutions of these terms to task before you jump into such a question that this thread is asking.

yoko0no, Thursday, 8 March 2007 02:28 (eighteen years ago)

Pye - your dissertation goes a long way towards helping me understand how I've arrived at this malaise in my musical life. Indie rock has become so damn boring to me that I keep returning to my post-punk roots in all their variations. I can't stop playing things like the Flying Nun box, the Aussie _Can't Stop It_ compilations, and today I realized how great John Foxx's work has been and bought the first Specials album. I still listen to college radio and check out new bands that are getting talked up but I just don't find them compelling. It must be that final dissolution of the punk and post-punk roots that has left indie rock feeling so uninspiring to me. That and I feel like I've heard all these sounds before, even amongst the post-punk revivalists.

Mr. Odd, Thursday, 8 March 2007 04:06 (eighteen years ago)

I agree, Mr. Odd.

Drooone, Thursday, 8 March 2007 04:13 (eighteen years ago)

thirteen years pass...

LOL @ Mark Perry's outrage at the Buzzcocks charging £2.50 for a gig.

#OTD 1978: The Mekons, Sham 69, ATV, The Slits and the UK Subs discussed the complex relationship between punk, publicity and profit pic.twitter.com/FuIAT6Ke1f

— BBC Archive (@BBCArchive) October 12, 2017

Eggbreak Hotel (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 December 2020 15:41 (five years ago)

Punk was dying until Sham 69 came along.

Whamagideon Time (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 24 December 2020 16:41 (five years ago)

And guess what label the Slits ended up signing to!

Eggbreak Hotel (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 December 2020 16:58 (five years ago)

Think I remember.

Whamagideon Time (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 24 December 2020 17:01 (five years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.