― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 07:24 (eighteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 07:27 (eighteen years ago)
― jabba hands, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 09:25 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 13:33 (eighteen years ago)
― matt2, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)
― fies, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
― gbx, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)
― 31g, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 23:09 (eighteen years ago)
― The Brainwasher, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 23:09 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Wednesday, 7 March 2007 23:18 (eighteen years ago)
― 31g, Thursday, 8 March 2007 01:18 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Thursday, 8 March 2007 02:18 (eighteen years ago)
― the table is the table, Thursday, 8 March 2007 02:19 (eighteen years ago)
― good dog, Thursday, 8 March 2007 02:22 (eighteen years ago)
― good dog, Thursday, 8 March 2007 02:23 (eighteen years ago)
― good dog, Thursday, 8 March 2007 02:24 (eighteen years ago)
― artdamages, Thursday, 8 March 2007 13:24 (eighteen years ago)
― braveclub, Thursday, 8 March 2007 13:32 (eighteen years ago)
― artdamages, Thursday, 8 March 2007 13:45 (eighteen years ago)
― braveclub, Thursday, 8 March 2007 13:50 (eighteen years ago)
― Ronan, Thursday, 8 March 2007 13:59 (eighteen years ago)
― artdamages, Thursday, 8 March 2007 14:47 (eighteen years ago)
― good dog, Thursday, 8 March 2007 17:20 (eighteen years ago)
― J@cob, Thursday, 8 March 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
― Ronan, Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)
― good dog, Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)
― good dog, Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)
― artdamages, Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
― Ronan, Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
― Ronan, Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)
― artdamages, Thursday, 8 March 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)
― good dog, Thursday, 8 March 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
― Ronan, Thursday, 8 March 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)
― good dog, Thursday, 8 March 2007 20:33 (eighteen years ago)
― braveclub, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 12 April 2007 00:44 (eighteen years ago)
― gbx, Thursday, 12 April 2007 00:49 (eighteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 12 April 2007 00:55 (eighteen years ago)
― gbx, Thursday, 12 April 2007 00:56 (eighteen years ago)
― gbx, Thursday, 12 April 2007 00:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Telephone thing, Thursday, 12 April 2007 03:34 (eighteen years ago)
― haitch, Thursday, 12 April 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim F, Thursday, 12 April 2007 05:20 (eighteen years ago)
― 31g, Thursday, 12 April 2007 05:47 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim F, Thursday, 12 April 2007 06:31 (eighteen years ago)
― haitch, Thursday, 12 April 2007 06:51 (eighteen years ago)
― Ronan, Thursday, 12 April 2007 09:33 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim F, Thursday, 12 April 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 12 April 2007 10:09 (eighteen years ago)
i gave the barker mix a listen thanks to this revive - nice write-ups tim - and it's good and all but i don't think it's nearly as exciting as his recorded output lately. it's a lot more four-to-the-floor and otherwise standard than i was expecting, whereas the new album and the unfixed ep are almost approaching ae levels of dynamism with the off-kilter almost-falling-apart drum programming (although very tonal and major-key otherwise).
― five six seven, eight nine ten, begin (map), Monday, 19 May 2025 21:43 (seven months ago)
funny, I listened to and enjoyed the RA mix before the new album as well and the record still hasn't fully clicked for me. I don't dislike it or anything but it isn't quite what the mix got me hyped up for! (this is one of those "me problems"...)
― (⊙_⊙?) (original bgm), Monday, 19 May 2025 21:54 (seven months ago)
yeah mine is also a "me problem" i'm pretty sure haha
― five six seven, eight nine ten, begin (map), Monday, 19 May 2025 21:55 (seven months ago)
map your description made me dive into the album again and I'm liking it a lot more now
― rainbow calx (lukas), Monday, 19 May 2025 23:59 (seven months ago)
The bigger names like Theo Parrish, DJ Sprinkles, Frankie Knuckles, Andrew Weatherall are ofc deservedly getting posted about but don’t sleep on the Sama’ Abdulhadi mix
― Murgatroid, Friday, 15 August 2025 12:23 (four months ago)
parrish mix is madness
― flopson, Friday, 15 August 2025 14:20 (four months ago)
don’t sleep on the Sama’ Abdulhadi mix
was raving about this in some other thread!!! the RA mixes have been such a highlight of my week
― ivy., Friday, 15 August 2025 14:26 (four months ago)
This is fantastic
― Tim F, Saturday, 16 August 2025 04:10 (four months ago)
The Laurel Halo podcast from a few months ago is (unsurprisingly) fantastic also
― Tim F, Monday, 18 August 2025 04:11 (four months ago)
This Sama' Abdulhadi mix is massive
― Indexed, Monday, 18 August 2025 14:38 (four months ago)
Also recommended this in the amapiano thread but the Mark Ernestus (Basic Channel, Hard Wax) mix is excellent as well
― Indexed, Monday, 18 August 2025 14:40 (four months ago)
Also this 7 hour + Tim Reaper set, my god
― Tim F, Tuesday, 19 August 2025 04:06 (four months ago)
― Tim F, Monday, August 18, 2025 12:11 AM (one week ago) bookmarkflaglink
wow!!! i mean i am biased bc she is the most brilliant musician alive but wow!!! this mix!!!!
― ivy., Tuesday, 26 August 2025 02:57 (three months ago)
I thought the Laurel Halo one was fine but not exceptional and paled in comparison to her amazing Nowadays mix from a few years back.
― boxedjoy, Tuesday, 26 August 2025 07:54 (three months ago)
idk i mean the nowadays set is actively a banger but the ra one is really good for walking around after midnight with headphones on
― ivy., Tuesday, 26 August 2025 13:01 (three months ago)
I love LH but wasn't vibing with the RA mix, could have been the wrong context though (I was driving in daylight, so clearly the opposite of what I should have been doing).
― Jordan s/t (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 August 2025 14:11 (three months ago)
idk it's a set that prioritizes mood and narrative in such a way that it really enhanced reality last night when i listened to it. the darks seemed darker and to ulcerate with something beneath them
― ivy., Tuesday, 26 August 2025 14:47 (three months ago)
published today: there is a lot to absorb
RA: The Best Electronic Tracks of 2000-25https://ra.co/features/4481
It's impossible to know how many songs exist in the world, though estimations place it between 100 and 230 million. Humans have produced more recorded music since the year 2000 than in any other period in history, a digital tsunami that has continued to mutate and expand in 2025. It would take multiple lifetimes to listen to all the new electronic music in a single year, let alone the past 25.
So, how to get arms around the most enduring tracks of the quarter-century? We listened. And polled, and talked, and listened a lot more. Our picks travel the globe, make pit stops in dingy Chicago basements, dusty bush doofs and bailes de favela. They're weighted toward the productions that sparked sub-genres or movements, electrified clubs or stood out for their sheer uniqueness.
Where else will you find the freakiest acid next to the soulful timbre of deep house, or laser-focused techno sitting alongside hauntological drone? This is the place. Welcome to Resident Advisor's best electronic tracks of the 21st century so far.
200 tracks
YouTube playlist:http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnZOad80R4noXzWGj1Lkhun6oWjIPW9av
Spotify playlist:https://open.spotify.com/playlist/2GdGoF0fy6U5DNlQ4KANS6?si=a2b7c610671b47c9&pt_success=1&nd=1&dlsi=cb5339b525d04eae
I will look out for a summarized list.
― djmartian, Wednesday, 10 December 2025 19:18 (one week ago)
I was scrolling the list, expecting to see this
38Girl UnitWut
― djmartian, Wednesday, 10 December 2025 19:25 (one week ago)
at Number 1
1The Other People PlaceLet Me Be Me
― djmartian, Wednesday, 10 December 2025 19:27 (one week ago)
the only 2025 track
93Tracey & Riko DanSex Life
― djmartian, Wednesday, 10 December 2025 19:30 (one week ago)
have a sneaking suspicion this list was created just to be able to canonize OAR003-B
― disco stabbing horror (lukas), Wednesday, 10 December 2025 21:50 (one week ago)
A quick skim suggests this is all stuff covered in their previous EOY lists and decade round-ups - it doesn't seem like a particularly new direction or creation of an alternative to the established canon and narrative of this century's dance and electronic music.
Which would be fine, except it seems to have come at the expense of covering new music at the same rate as previously done, which seems a waste when the experience of clubbing and dance music is so often about new sounds, new tracks, new ways of making people move their bodies.
― boxedjoy, Thursday, 11 December 2025 08:41 (one week ago)
'let's do a landmark feature that reflects our awkward politics as much as possible'
― LocalGarda, Thursday, 11 December 2025 08:50 (one week ago)
imo this looks nothing like their lists, at least pre-2020, when their editorial focus shifted - after they got called out for excluding non-white club music scenes.
The list struck me as kind of weird, lots of stuff I’d never heard of, despite following RA for the last 19 years. I also have no idea how you make a list like this make sense on a broad scale, though.
I’m also waaaay more interested in features like this than coverage of new sounds, but that’s me: old, out of the loop, and it’s a stage where I’m shifting my attention to reflecting on the history of music I love through my lifetime, over pursuing the new and different.
― ed.b, Thursday, 11 December 2025 12:40 (one week ago)
i think that awkwardness is very present in the list, like rui da silva at #6 and other people place at #1. also, while i love that track it feels a sort of arbitrary and very safe choice.
probably the only way to really do this would be split it into genres but that would have its own problems. as it is it just feels very loose and doesn't tell any real story of the last 25 years, which while difficult is not impossible.
i mean maybe it does tell a story, of a prog house almost classic dance music magazine type website that now contorts itself into academia-adjacent political takes wherever it can.
― LocalGarda, Thursday, 11 December 2025 13:21 (one week ago)
like that journey is interesting but not one they want to discuss obviously
I think the list is also more of a collage of tracks that stand in for different scenes and sub-genres, and more often than not avoids going for the obvious representative hits, which is pretty incongruous with the idea of “here are the 200 best tracks in ranked order.” Which maybe is just there for the clicks.
I’m sympathetic to expanding the canon and reflecting that in coverage, even if the cost is that for me, personally, I won’t care about half of what’s on here. But yeah, it would help to start by acknowledging the awkwardness of this list, what they’re actually doing in reviewing this period that covers a lot of editorial turns. And leaving behind anything like a coherent arc or history.
Also kind of puzzled at the idea that they would suddenly change course from previous lists for this one. If you’ve been charting music monthly and yearly for decades, shaking things up for the sake of shaking things up seems kind of… pointless?
― ed.b, Thursday, 11 December 2025 13:57 (one week ago)
It is weird. I genuinely can't imagine scrolling through it and reading each set. The top 20 is terrible imo, even the tracks I like that feature in it are just part of quite a grim, careful, studious whole.
― LocalGarda, Thursday, 11 December 2025 14:37 (one week ago)
I thought it was made of really predictable selections for the most part. "Oh look here's Snooze 4 Love, there's Coma Cat, some Villalobos, some tasteful dubstep, ooh a curveball in token r&b that's already critically respectable"
― boxedjoy, Thursday, 11 December 2025 15:00 (one week ago)
Not sure what to tell you, those were huge, popular, defining tracks. Would be kinda weird to exclude them from a list of top tracks of that time. I'm not sure these lists are finding about deep cuts or discovering new things.
― ed.b, Thursday, 11 December 2025 17:25 (one week ago)
Well yeah, that's why it feels like a pointless exercise. There's so much new and exciting music out there, it takes a real effort to keep up if you want to keep up. There's lots of interesting stuff happening in all kinds of pockets and scenes, and I think it's a shame that the new editorial team would rather publish retrospective pieces agreeing with their own canon and explorations of how boring Keinemusik is.
I remember the FACT days when their lists were not always good or even well-written but at least they felt individualistic and idiosyncratic. I would always find something interesting reading them.
There's probably value in this if you're half my age, and complaining "oh no all this wonderful music being celebrated" is not really a valid complaint, but I'd love to just see more risks and character in this. I'd be more inclined to go beyond a skim if I didn't recognise most of these tracks and artists already.
― boxedjoy, Thursday, 11 December 2025 17:51 (one week ago)
I mean if you wanted to shake up your canon you could look to garage, bassline, UK funky, hard house and donk. You could attempt to pretend r&b didn't exist solely when Aaliyah was alive or white men from London produced it. You could do so much more than write about drugged-out Villalobos epics once again, and I say this as someone who loves drugged Villalobos epics. It just feels like a really wasted opportunity.
― boxedjoy, Thursday, 11 December 2025 17:55 (one week ago)
This list might be a little nerdier but it's fun (I agree that it's pretty silly to try and reduce such a wide time span to a list though)
https://thequietus.com/tq-charts/here-are-the-25-best-dancefloor-bangers-of-the-21st-century-so-far/
― Jordan s/t (Jordan), Thursday, 11 December 2025 17:57 (one week ago)
and now this...
The Best Electronic Records of 2000-25https://ra.co/features/4482
Historically, electronic music struggled with the album format. The sheer volume of club-ready genres that exploded after the late '80s helped project the sense of a golden age—but when it comes to LPs, you'll find it's actually a bit of a mirage. Many were narrow, padded with filler for CD runtimes, or generally a little undercooked. That, perhaps, is why electronic music has been given such short thrift in all-genre critics lists so far.
This side of the year 2000, the format lies transformed. Democratisation of production tools and 24/7 connectivity have given rise to records that resonate just as strongly on the big, bad internet as they would rattling through a sub or on a pair of high-end headphones. The floodgates opened as curious virtuosos had more to say and more modes of expression.
One key trend has been the absorption of musicians who traditionally work outside of electronic music. This inspired cross-pollination, but also for us, a quandary: if everyone uses hardware and modern production, can they all get in? On balance, we decided that if the record was majority electronic or couldn't have existed without a digital pulse, it was good to go, but a rock act working within a pop music structure with a layered bank of synths probably wasn't. Is it arbitrary? Sure. But isn't everything?
(For more information on how we made the lists, including what did or didn't make the cut, head to the Editors' Letter here and full contributors at the foot of the page.)
What binds the artists on this list together is the simple fact that they wanted to push themselves and the culture forward. Whatever the medium, they've been able to telegraph their intent, conjure and perfect a sound that didn't exist before, lay the groundwork for an underground movement to be built on top—or sometimes all three. These are the 100 records that stayed with us.
1 BurialUntrue
― djmartian, Thursday, 11 December 2025 19:09 (one week ago)
The quietus one is funny to me, so much post dubstep bleh
― ok (D-40), Thursday, 11 December 2025 19:10 (one week ago)
Pretty amazed the 200 songs didn’t have a single kompakt release. Someone is a hater!!
― ok (D-40), Thursday, 11 December 2025 19:11 (one week ago)
then total 3 is on the albums list behind Jane remover haha. Ok man
― ok (D-40), Thursday, 11 December 2025 19:12 (one week ago)
Dizzee Rascal in the top 5?
― Murgatroid, Thursday, 11 December 2025 19:17 (one week ago)
xpost: Aha, I kind of hated FACT’s lists, which to me felt like they were trying to flex a kind of underground cred, or were enamoured with how cool and cutting edge they were.
But a not disagreeing - I think this boils down to different tastes in editorial approaches. I think it sucks RA isn’t promoting new releases like it used to, but I also imagine coverage of niche new music has largely departed from traditional mid/long form journalism. Like, where do 20-something DJs find new music? Tiktok? IG? RA features and reviews???? I honestly don’t know because I’ve stopped trying to keep up, which is also why I appreciate seeing these features.
― ed.b, Thursday, 11 December 2025 19:22 (one week ago)
As someone mentioned on X mentioned, why is this on the list:
Grouper – Dragging A Dead Deer Up A Hill (2008)
I can't imagine that be played down FABRIC ! ever
― djmartian, Thursday, 11 December 2025 19:28 (one week ago)
RA decolonising its past obviously.
― LocalGarda, Thursday, 11 December 2025 19:32 (one week ago)
It seems like the new music RA is promoting is the same new music every other pub is so what’s the point to
― ok (D-40), Thursday, 11 December 2025 20:29 (one week ago)
Dead Deer is a guitar record!
― Indexed, Thursday, 11 December 2025 22:34 (one week ago)
FTR Dead Deer is one of my favorite albums of all time.
Very happy to see Skee Mask at #13!
― Indexed, Thursday, 11 December 2025 22:41 (one week ago)
D40 otm. It's just this monolith now, like the Vatican City of bland "respect" criticism. A smaller more nimble publication even if it had a specific or myopic focus on one or two genres would have so much more energy.
― LocalGarda, Thursday, 11 December 2025 23:52 (one week ago)
Had not heard the Powder mix they put at number 1. Really cool mix that I got lost in this afternoon.
― Indexed, Friday, 12 December 2025 23:57 (one week ago)
Tbh if decolonizing their past was really the point the albums list wouldn’t be one two three white people and a larry heard 12” at the number for spot from his 3rd decade in music.
Burial is almost on the nose emblematic at number one — ghostly memories of hearing black dance music from ten years earlier on the radio. Also curious if they think ball’r (Madonna free zone) was actually about poptimism or what
― ok (D-40), Saturday, 13 December 2025 00:42 (one week ago)
*number four
― ok (D-40), Saturday, 13 December 2025 00:43 (one week ago)
The editors letter does go into a bit more detail about how the lists were pulled together (and there is a list of contributors) - Michaelangelo Matos has published his submissions here: https://michaelangelo.substack.com/p/bc151-michaelangelo-matoss-ra-2000 - it'd be interesting to see other peoples lists too...
― Ant1973, Monday, 15 December 2025 11:31 (six days ago)