― Zeno, Saturday, 17 March 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)
― Johnny Fever, Saturday, 17 March 2007 22:30 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Saturday, 17 March 2007 22:35 (eighteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 18 March 2007 00:04 (eighteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 18 March 2007 00:06 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Sunday, 18 March 2007 08:33 (eighteen years ago)
― Keith, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 17:34 (eighteen years ago)
― Keith, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)
― molly mummenschanz, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)
― molly mummenschanz, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)
― certain, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)
― zeus, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
― certain, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)
― Mr.Gripper, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)
― molly mummenschanz, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 22:04 (eighteen years ago)
― dlp9001, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 02:04 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 04:46 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 04:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:16 (eighteen years ago)
― zeus, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:59 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 12:18 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 12:29 (eighteen years ago)
― Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 12:33 (eighteen years ago)
― Mark Rich@rdson, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 12:35 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:10 (eighteen years ago)
― zeus, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)
― tylerw, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 14:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 14:43 (eighteen years ago)
― cw, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Keith, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)
― Dandy Don Weiner, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)
― tornup_andhurt, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
― Keith, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)
― sean gramophone, Thursday, 26 April 2007 11:42 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Thursday, 26 April 2007 12:18 (eighteen years ago)
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 26 April 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)
― PublicRadio, Friday, 27 April 2007 06:49 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Friday, 27 April 2007 06:52 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Friday, 27 April 2007 08:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Scik Mouthy, Friday, 27 April 2007 08:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Friday, 27 April 2007 09:01 (eighteen years ago)
― cw, Friday, 27 April 2007 09:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Monday, 7 May 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)
― Billy Pilgrim, Monday, 7 May 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Monday, 7 May 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Monday, 7 May 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Billy Pilgrim, Monday, 7 May 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
― whisperineddhurt, Monday, 7 May 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 04:29 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 07:02 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 08:47 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 09:15 (eighteen years ago)
― Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)
― Keith, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)
― cw, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:20 (eighteen years ago)
― cw, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:25 (eighteen years ago)
― cw, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:28 (eighteen years ago)
― cw, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:32 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:38 (eighteen years ago)
― cw, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:59 (eighteen years ago)
― zeus, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 11:17 (eighteen years ago)
― cw, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 13:25 (eighteen years ago)
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 13:26 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 02:36 (eighteen years ago)
― zaxxon25, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Keith, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Zeno, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 22:54 (eighteen years ago)
― f. hazel, Wednesday, 9 May 2007 23:13 (eighteen years ago)
Revive!
Great album, but I'm having trouble with some of the lyrics.
Can anyone figure out the begginning to "Somebody Changed"
Back on the streets Everyday is the same Girls and trees (???), ???? ???? ????
― Go, GO, GO, Sunday, 3 June 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)
the girls in the trees have the faces of angels
― f. hazel, Sunday, 3 June 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
OMG! Thanks!
― Go, GO, GO, Sunday, 3 June 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)
There's no mystery in this new one, it's all laid out too perfectly, the songs sound too similiar to each other, the lyrics are cringe-worthy.
― calstars, Sunday, 3 June 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)
I like the record OK but think it would have been better if it were shorter; maybe 9 songs instead of 14.
― kwhitehead, Monday, 4 June 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)
There's certainly less mystery on the new disc, and that's a little disappointing. But the tradeoff is that the production is cleaner and better. And the songs -- which are melodic and sometimes surprisingly bouncy -- get more of a chance to stand on their own, instead of being hidden under a fog of hazy atmospheric effects.
And I think the charge that "the songs sound too similar to each other" is more appropriately leveled at The Clientele's earlier discs, not this one (To be clear, I loved the band's earlier discs; I just think this new one is a nice, and necessary, step forward for them).
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 4 June 2007 02:23 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not sure the production is 'better', although obviously that's not really something that one can objectively state unless you get into clipped vs not-clipped or something. I think my favourite 'sounding' Clientele record is still The Violet Hour; that slightly faded photograph sound I find remarkable. The new one is only OK to me so far, but their records generally take a while to sink in on me, and I'm prepared to give this one time.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 4 June 2007 08:08 (eighteen years ago)
That's fair. I guess cleaner, not necessarily better, production is the right description. Still, I think it's hard for The Clientele to catch a break in some respects: If they don't change -- e.g., cleaner production -- they're at risk of being criticized as a one-trick pony; if they do change -- e.g., cleaner production -- they're at risk of being criticized for losing the mystery of their earlier work. I suppose lots of bands can make the same complaint.
I prefer The Clientele's "slightly faded photograph sound," too, but I see why they'd want to move toward something else. And the progression from The Violet Hour to Strange Geometry to God Save seems very natural (adding new instruments, like violins; cleaner production; and so forth). Thankfully, I think the band's songs stand up nicely even without hazy atmospheric production.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 4 June 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
I like all the songs except for the Queen of Seville. Haven't been in the mood for the Clientele the past couple of albums but now I am returning to the fold.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 00:32 (eighteen years ago)