C/D: Deftones' "White Pony"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:32 (nineteen years ago)

What the fuck?

Revolver calls it an "art-metal milestone" and an "instant classic." I dismissed it back inna day because I was immature and thought anything with the "nu" tag deserved to be ignored. I've been listening to it again recently and have kinda come to like it despite its sameyness. Possible classic on our hands here, people. Are you ready to declare frat metal classic? Cause I'm not. But I might have to.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

i've always dug the deftones.

their b-sides comp is pretty good too. not many bands do smiths, jawbox, and skynyrd covers on the same disc, but it kinda makes sense for them.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 22 March 2007 15:41 (nineteen years ago)

Comparisons of Deftones to the mook metallers does a disservice to the band. It's also fucking wrong. Those of you still doing this, please stop. It's embarassing to all concerned.

NYCNative, Thursday, 22 March 2007 20:11 (nineteen years ago)

the deftones were ALWAYS the creme of the nu-metal crop. so much so that, at times back in the day, i was more partial to comparing them to the likes of swervedriver than to papa roach, korn, or the rest of that lot.

Eisbaer, Thursday, 22 March 2007 20:23 (nineteen years ago)

amazing record

cutty, Thursday, 22 March 2007 21:06 (nineteen years ago)

Solid fuc*ing record! They got lumped together with a lot of garbage bands early on, but I think that's pretty much run its course by now. They can be quite fierce, but underneath it all, are a bunch of great songs, which is why I like some of their acoustic versions.

j-rock, Monday, 26 March 2007 07:29 (nineteen years ago)

Comparisons of Deftones to the mook metallers does a disservice to the band. It's also fucking wrong.

They toured with taproot, linkin park, korn, limp bizkit etc. and had the same fan base. Not exactly strange that people compare them with those bands.

jim, Monday, 26 March 2007 08:56 (nineteen years ago)

Toured with <> sounds like

NYCNative, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:02 (nineteen years ago)

"Toured with <> sounds like"

Yeah, but actually does sound like, at least some of the time. Much more atmospheric/experimental than Korn or Limp Bizkit, minimal "hip-hop influence", and they don't go in for the bark-singing often, but songs like "Ihabia" and "Rickets" (both off Around the Fur) are pretty much textbook nu-metal. Same goes for White Pony's "Elite", though by way of Nine Inch Nails. Different influences and ambitions than most of their peers, but that doesn't mean they weren't playing in a similar ballpark.

Guitars (tone, effects, riffs) are in keeping with nu-metal, as are the rhythm section and the overall production approach. Vocals, dreamy softness and experimental reach are the big differences.

Pye Poudre, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:37 (nineteen years ago)

Love White Pony. The shoegaze songs on Boris's Pink are exactly like some of the soupier stuff on WP.

Deftones career arc is totally mystifying to me

Crap record
Crap record
CLASSIC
Crap record
Crap record

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:49 (nineteen years ago)

Great record

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Monday, 26 March 2007 15:50 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
You know, even the hard bits of White Pony remind me as much or more of something like Siamese Dream as of Bizkit or whoever.

If Timi Yuro would be still alive, most other singers could shut up, Sunday, 13 May 2007 21:19 (nineteen years ago)

Crap record
Crap record
CLASSIC
Crap record
CLASSIC
Crap record CLASSIC

, Sunday, 13 May 2007 21:31 (nineteen years ago)

The 1st 2 aint crap. Around The Fur is good.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy, Sunday, 13 May 2007 21:36 (nineteen years ago)

The first two are the only ones worth bothering with even though they veer dangerously close to the awful at many junctures, e.g. - the chorus of 7 words, Chino's verses on Headup :/

jim, Sunday, 13 May 2007 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

ten months pass...

really fucking great record, this.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 24 March 2008 07:47 (eighteen years ago)

i like all their albums

latebloomer, Monday, 24 March 2008 07:57 (eighteen years ago)

i don't like that song with keenan maynard james or whatever his name is

Charlie Howard, Monday, 24 March 2008 08:01 (eighteen years ago)

their best album was their first, but the second two were nice as well. i havent even bothered to check any newer ones.

pipecock, Monday, 24 March 2008 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

Is "neither" an acceptable answer? Some of the individual tracks on White Pony are absolute classics, but as a whole, I can't entirely backup this album.. This is a band that would totally benefit from some kind of 2-disc retrospective that includes about half of each record.

billstevejim, Monday, 24 March 2008 16:49 (eighteen years ago)

i kind of love everything this band has done from white pony forward. the last record, saturday night wrist was both really good and totally ignored.

smash your phonograph in half, Monday, 24 March 2008 17:08 (eighteen years ago)

This album's influence on emo: discuss.

Bodrick III, Monday, 24 March 2008 17:37 (eighteen years ago)

This album's influence on emo: not widespread enough (unless we're talking about Thursday & their ilk, and in that case, urf).

Is there another Team Sleep album coming soonish?

I'm sorta of a mind w/ billstevejim: the last two records are better albums, but White Pony has higher highs, and it's the one I give the most love of the three. I wish "Back To School" was around when I was younger.

David R., Monday, 24 March 2008 17:44 (eighteen years ago)

lol i hated back to school when i was in high school

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

back to school is their worst single...the record company tacked it on in a re-issue or some shit

latebloomer, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:18 (eighteen years ago)

Well, I guess I can't like it anymore then.

David R., Monday, 24 March 2008 20:23 (eighteen years ago)

damn straight

latebloomer, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

j/k

latebloomer, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

FREEDOM

David R., Monday, 24 March 2008 20:33 (eighteen years ago)

http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/images/braveheart.jpg

latebloomer, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:34 (eighteen years ago)

i like back to school

M@tt He1ges0n, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:35 (eighteen years ago)

i like the original version, "pink maggit"

latebloomer, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:37 (eighteen years ago)

Did this CD have "Change" on it?

youcangoyourownway, Monday, 24 March 2008 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

yes

latebloomer, Monday, 24 March 2008 21:40 (eighteen years ago)

Why the hell this fantastic band was lumped in with the soul sucking genre that was 'Nu - Metal'. Cheers to all you lazy journos, once more.

Reminds me of the idiots that tarred Swervedriver with the Shoe Tattoo

Fer Ark, Monday, 24 March 2008 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

They toured with taproot, linkin park, korn, limp bizkit etc. and had the same fan base. Not exactly strange that people compare them with those bands.
-- jim, Monday, March 26, 2007 8:56 AM (11 months ago) Bookmark Link

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Toured with <> sounds like
-- NYCNative, Monday, March 26, 2007 3:02 PM (11 months ago) Bookmark Link

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Toured with <> sounds like"

Yeah, but actually does sound like, at least some of the time. Much more atmospheric/experimental than Korn or Limp Bizkit, minimal "hip-hop influence", and they don't go in for the bark-singing often, but songs like "Ihabia" and "Rickets" (both off Around the Fur) are pretty much textbook nu-metal. Same goes for White Pony's "Elite", though by way of Nine Inch Nails. Different influences and ambitions than most of their peers, but that doesn't mean they weren't playing in a similar ballpark.

Guitars (tone, effects, riffs) are in keeping with nu-metal, as are the rhythm section and the overall production approach. Vocals, dreamy softness and experimental reach are the big differences.

-- Pye Poudre, Monday, March 26, 2007 3:37 PM (

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:27 (eighteen years ago)

They were the Limp Bizkit it's OK to like.

Bodrick III, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:30 (eighteen years ago)

wrong

pipecock, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:39 (eighteen years ago)

they didn't really rap very much

M@tt He1ges0n, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:42 (eighteen years ago)

the little 12-15 sec interludes where he kinda rhythmically talks totally make me wince tho

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:43 (eighteen years ago)

There is quite a lot of rap if I remember correctly. Definitely one or two songs on the first album, most memorably and horribly on the Max Cavalera colab. on the second album and are the verses of "back to school" not rapping?

jim, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:45 (eighteen years ago)

I like the band but they are totally herby and embarassing.

jim, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:45 (eighteen years ago)

i haven't heard much else, i'm just referring to what i've heard on white pony. and yeah i would hesitate to call them verses or rapping
but he does not sing for a certain period of time on 'back to school'

xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:46 (eighteen years ago)

http://myspeech.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/dino-moreno.jpg

image otm, choripán = yum.

jim, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:47 (eighteen years ago)

yeah i saw some old pics in a mag the other day and was o_O

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:52 (eighteen years ago)

why the hell this fantastic band was lumped in with the soul sucking genre that was 'Nu - Metal'. Cheers to all you lazy journos, once more.

Gee, why would a band called the DEFtones be lumped in with rap-metal?

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:53 (eighteen years ago)

Also

First Korn album > First two Deftones albums

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:53 (eighteen years ago)

"Also

First Korn album > First two Deftones albums

-- Whiney G. Weingarten"

the first Korn album was pretty great (i saw them pre-hiphop along with marilyn manson opening for Danzig in 95, a great show) but that first Deftones is the shit.

pipecock, Monday, 24 March 2008 23:58 (eighteen years ago)

What got me into Deftones was Around the Fur. It's nu-metal I guess but it's nu-metal done right.

Deftones were one of the first bands to be saddled with the tag along with Korn but they were starting to move on already as the genre started to crystalize and become a commercial force.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 05:30 (eighteen years ago)

korn's 1st album WAS kinda OK -- i mean, i guess rage against the machine kinda beat them to the punch re the whole rap-rock thing, but korn WAS kind of interesting at first. the problem is, though, that every damn record that korn put out after it sounded THE SAME (same thing with RATM, too). and to get rockist here, then the record companies and the second-rate knock-off nu-metal crap acts jumped in.

Eisbaer, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 05:38 (eighteen years ago)

yeah i will rep for the first korn album and possibly also 'follow the leader'

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 05:42 (eighteen years ago)

didn't chino moreno (or whatever his name is) do some sort of atrocious rap on a song from korn's 'life of peachy'. seems all pretty straightforward to lump deftones in with the nu-metal camp on that basis.

Charlie Howard, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 06:37 (eighteen years ago)

yes he did.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 07:33 (eighteen years ago)

Before any of this had crystallized as "nu-metal" (which IIRC was coined by an article in Spin), most of this stuff was being lumped together with stuff like Tool or Helmet or Prong or White Zombie as "alternative metal". Nu-Metal qua Nu-Metal definitely starts with Deftones amd Korn, though.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 07:41 (eighteen years ago)

lol nu-metal qua nu-metal a++

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 07:42 (eighteen years ago)

hoos qua hoos

latebloomer, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 08:15 (eighteen years ago)

i've just never really understood how people seem mystified that the deaf tones are bunched in that same category as korn, and whatever other godawful acts were part of that fold. sure they may have a different sound, be much better, and have different influences, but they were obviously all cronies, toured together, guested on each others records and generally rode on that metal-sounding mid-nineties wave together. and the nu-metal kiddies always loved the tones. when they weren't singing along with the rage-filled choruses of 'faget' and 'daddy', they were lapping up the vibes of 'dai the flu' and 'seven words'

Charlie Howard, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 08:23 (eighteen years ago)

I guess the mystification comes from just how better they were.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 08:41 (eighteen years ago)

that's pretty feasible :)

Charlie Howard, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 08:42 (eighteen years ago)

a smaller, less stinky turd....... is *still* a turd.............

stephen, Thursday, 27 March 2008 05:57 (eighteen years ago)

fuck off

latebloomer, Thursday, 27 March 2008 06:08 (eighteen years ago)

yeah this album still holds up, the singing is what makes it so different than every other band in this 'genre'
it's pretty awesome

rizzx, Thursday, 27 March 2008 08:42 (eighteen years ago)

Yep, Chino is a great vocalist, especially starting with this album.

I have a soft spot for the self-titled. Saturday Night Wrist had some huge duds on it.

Simon H., Thursday, 27 March 2008 11:11 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.