― lukas, Saturday, 24 March 2007 02:21 (eighteen years ago)
― lukas, Saturday, 24 March 2007 02:23 (eighteen years ago)
― jim, Saturday, 24 March 2007 02:23 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 24 March 2007 02:23 (eighteen years ago)
― Bimble, Saturday, 24 March 2007 02:25 (eighteen years ago)
― s1ocki, Saturday, 24 March 2007 02:38 (eighteen years ago)
― ^@^, Saturday, 24 March 2007 14:01 (eighteen years ago)
― jackl, Saturday, 24 March 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
― unfished business, Saturday, 24 March 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)
― 7seasjim, Saturday, 24 March 2007 16:28 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 24 March 2007 16:30 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Saturday, 24 March 2007 17:25 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 24 March 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 24 March 2007 18:47 (eighteen years ago)
― jim, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:18 (eighteen years ago)
― jim, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:23 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)
― jim, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)
― lex pretend, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)
― lex pretend, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
― lex pretend, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:36 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
― lex pretend, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim F, Sunday, 25 March 2007 00:27 (eighteen years ago)
Touted by many as Kompakt's answer to the relative crossover success enjoyed by the likes of James Holden and Trentemoller [...] Willner taps into the same tempered-euphoria that made Ulrich Schnauss so popular
― fandango, Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)
― fandango, Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:44 (eighteen years ago)
― Andy K, Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:52 (eighteen years ago)
― tricky, Sunday, 25 March 2007 01:59 (eighteen years ago)
― fandango, Sunday, 25 March 2007 02:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim F, Sunday, 25 March 2007 02:31 (eighteen years ago)
― tricky, Sunday, 25 March 2007 02:50 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim F, Sunday, 25 March 2007 02:56 (eighteen years ago)
― tricky, Sunday, 25 March 2007 03:19 (eighteen years ago)
― tricky, Sunday, 25 March 2007 03:21 (eighteen years ago)
― micarl, Sunday, 25 March 2007 03:29 (eighteen years ago)
― aaron d.g., Sunday, 25 March 2007 08:37 (eighteen years ago)
― aaron d.g., Sunday, 25 March 2007 08:41 (eighteen years ago)
― Bimble, Sunday, 25 March 2007 09:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Matos W.K., Sunday, 25 March 2007 10:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Mark Rich@rdson, Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)
― strongohulkington, Sunday, 25 March 2007 14:20 (eighteen years ago)
― lfam, Sunday, 25 March 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
Comments section of the Field review is interesting. It kind of lays out the challenge for writers, in trying to describe why this album is good. Convince the people with the red numbers next to their comments, tell them what is special about this album and why they should care. It ain't easy!
― Mark Rich@rdson, Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:17 (seventeen years ago)
Maybe I just don't understand it but in my opinion it should defiantly not be #1 let alone the top 10
i feel like this is probably the general feeling of 95% of metacritic's general readership.
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 21 November 2007 21:27 (seventeen years ago)
iTunes (UK) has the "sound of light" EP for 79p a track right now (they've got it as a "partial album" -- don't think they realise what it is). that's an hour of music for £3.16, which strikes me as the kind of thing they'll bump upwards as soon as they realise.
just saying, like. just saying.
― grimly fiendish, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 14:58 (seventeen years ago)
one of those albums i bought, liked the first track a hell of a lot, couldn't get into the rest. have just put it on again, skipping first track and am enjoying a paw in my face a hell of a lot. think this dude should make an album without beats.
― Crackle Box, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 15:09 (seventeen years ago)
i bought "sound of light" on itunes(us) for $3.95 yesterday. "morning" and "night" are super super nice.
― the leglo, Thursday, 17 January 2008 21:52 (seventeen years ago)
"morning" is awesome; wasn't so sure about "night", actually. like "day" a lot, too.
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 17 January 2008 22:22 (seventeen years ago)
iTunes just freaked out playing Chris Brown and it sounded exactly like this album!
― I know, right?, Friday, 22 August 2008 11:32 (seventeen years ago)
haha that sounds incredible
― J0rdan S., Friday, 22 August 2008 15:15 (seventeen years ago)
this album is like the end of a.i., but more fun
― :) Mrs Edward Cullen XD (max), Sunday, 30 November 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago)
So upon hearing some of his remix work done after 'from here we go sublime' I couldnt help but notice how homogenic and limited his sound palette is. Rumours has it that he'll be making a comeback this year. Is The Field a one-trick pony about to encounter the inevitable backlash? Or will he be able to hold up to the amount of sheer excitement provoked by this album?
― Moka, Saturday, 31 January 2009 08:37 (sixteen years ago)
I still rock this occasionally (good record to fall asleep to, oddly enough, and I mean that in a positive way), but I don't think I'd have much tolerance for more of the same.
― The Reverend, Saturday, 31 January 2009 08:48 (sixteen years ago)
do people still listen to this album? because in my ears this is the type of album that wow-ed you at first listen only to get tiring quickly.
― dan138zig (Durrr Durrr Durrrrrr), Saturday, 31 January 2009 08:58 (sixteen years ago)
Really? For me, the first time I heard it, it bored me. On repeat listens, I was caught by the subtleties.
― The Reverend, Saturday, 31 January 2009 09:33 (sixteen years ago)
The Reverend OTM -- this is exactly the kind of record that gets better with repeat listens. Same goes for the Gas records, the Kompakt kompilations, that last Gui Boratto one... basically, anything on Kompakt that holds water is better over time.
― ilxor, Saturday, 31 January 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)
Still play this all the time.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 31 January 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
this is really starting to grow on me, like what...2 years later? 3 years?
― dyao, Saturday, 7 August 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
great record
that being said, being an indie kid, this is the only minimal techno record I've ever heard
― markers, Saturday, 7 August 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)
best use of a lionel richie sample ever?
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 7 August 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
only use of a lionel richie sample ever?
it's definitely the best use of a lionel richie sample in minimal techo
― markers, Saturday, 7 August 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
uh, this is the only minimal techno record you've heard, remember?
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 7 August 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
unless you've heard many more minimal techno records in the one-hour between those two posts.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 7 August 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
eminem told me nobody listens to techno, so i feel like listening to this one record has given me the authority to say whatever i want about the genre since theres nobody else around who even listens to it, thus arguably making my thoughts slightly more valuable than silence
― markers, Saturday, 7 August 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
actually, his comments were addressed to moby, but lets not get pedantic
― markers, Saturday, 7 August 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe you could try Efdemin, Pantha Du Prince or Michael Mayer's Immer
― du mein bestie (micarl), Saturday, 7 August 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
thanks! i really should. i know pretty much nothing about electronic music, as ive said before, but i thought this record was fantastic. i think i bought whatever pantha record came out in 2007 but didnt listen to it much. anyway, thanks -- i def need to investigate the genre more
― markers, Saturday, 7 August 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)
"electronic" covers a lot of ground. it includes four-tet, i guess. his lastest is a fantastic, pulsating disc.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 7 August 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)
i've got the follow-up from the field. the songs are so long tho (iirc), and less memorable.
yeah, i know nothing about the various dance/electronic subgenres
i liked the first field record & most of the burial songs ive heard but thats about all that i can think of unless you count, like, thom yorkes solo record and thats really really pushing it
― markers, Saturday, 7 August 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)
pretty sure i bought the second field record, not sure how much of it i listened to, but i didnt really give it much of a chance
was going to suggest burial's untrue, actually. my favorite disc of last decade, still.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 7 August 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
favorite record of the 2000s? wow. that's high praise. not sure if i ever made it through all of untrue, but i loved archangel. listened to all of his first record, though, im pretty sure
― markers, Saturday, 7 August 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)
the last song on the second field record is the best thing he has ever done or will do
― Dad Can Dance (LOLK), Sunday, 8 August 2010 04:39 (fifteen years ago)
Aye, Sequenced knocks everything on ...Sublime into a cocked hat.
― Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 8 August 2010 05:09 (fifteen years ago)
Still don't get Burial.
― Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 8 August 2010 05:10 (fifteen years ago)
I was into IDM in college (Aphex Twin, Boards of Canada, etc.) but hadn't really heard much electronic music beyond that until a few years ago.
If I were to recommend one electronic album from the past decade (and I guess I'm not including stuff like Junior Boys, which leans pop), it would be Luomo's The Present Lover. Although I think Isolee's We Are Monster makes a pretty good primer for someone who doesn't listen to a lot of electronic music, just because it's so varied sonically.
― jaymc, Sunday, 8 August 2010 05:22 (fifteen years ago)
would be interested in checking out both of those records!
fwiw, i love the second junior boys record, think the latest one was whatever, and have been told by a least one ilxor that i need to get a copy of last exit asap
― markers, Sunday, 8 August 2010 05:23 (fifteen years ago)
so this is goodbye really is just such a solid record. haven't listened to the whole thing in forever but i really should soon
― markers, Sunday, 8 August 2010 05:24 (fifteen years ago)
I was really into Orbital, Chemical Brothers, Aphex Twin, etc when I was 17. In Sides & Snivilisation by Orbital remain all-time favourites. Big fan of Four Tet, Caribou, Pantha Du Prince etc these days. Like but not blown away by Luomo. Never heard We Are Monster; I guess I should.
― Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Sunday, 8 August 2010 05:43 (fifteen years ago)
Isolee's We Are Monster is fantastic (one particularly standout song, whose name escapes me atm).
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 8 August 2010 10:34 (fifteen years ago)
I'd say replace The Present Lover with Vocalcity, make it your life's goal to hear We Are Monster, and you'll be just fine.
― I'm banishing you to a time warp from which you will never return (EDB), Sunday, 8 August 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)
In Sides & Snivilisation by Orbital remain all-time favourites
In Sides is top 10 for me. I actually started following your writing on Stylus after that article where you talk about the In Sides poster you've lugged around for years.
That album got love when it came out, but I think it gets overlooked now.
― 'ello govna, Sunday, 8 August 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)
can't find a general thread for him just ones for each album
but new song & album alert!
https://www.thefourohfive.com/music/article/the-field-sets-us-sailing-through-the-spectral-who-goes-there-153
― nxd, Tuesday, 14 August 2018 14:42 (seven years ago)
I guess at some point we stopped starting new threads for new albums by The Field, but on a whim I played Infinite Moment this morning and really enjoyed it. The whole second half is wonderful, but then I always prefer the more subtle-and-understated Field tracks to the anthems.
Is it just me or was this album kinda slept on relative to the previous ones? I don't recall hearing a lot about it at the time.
Also crazy that this was released nearly six years ago! I still think of it as the "new" one.
― Paul Ponzi, Friday, 8 September 2023 14:04 (two years ago)
Haven't thought about The Field for awhile but it's good work techno (which is very distinct from business techno, lol). I remember having an early revelation about the power of a very (deceptively) simple loop listening to his first record.
― 50 Favorite Jordans (Jordan), Friday, 8 September 2023 15:03 (two years ago)
Heard one of their tracks out last night, from the second album I think. Sounded great. I'm a sucker for a kind of tasteful urgency.
― default damager (lukas), Saturday, 5 October 2024 18:52 (one year ago)
I still listen to the first album all the time. I like all of them to various degrees, but this one has always seemed special, and it still sounds really good to me.
― Paul Ponzi, Saturday, 5 October 2024 19:02 (one year ago)
still sounds wonderful
― nxd, Sunday, 6 October 2024 22:26 (one year ago)
I wonder why "Istedgade" was left off the album. Maybe to get people to buy the Sun & Ice EP.
― brimstead, Sunday, 29 June 2025 19:19 (four months ago)
Oh it’s here.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 2 July 2025 16:39 (four months ago)