Is Elvis Costello rock?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
mark s and DeRayMi cannot agree — can you help them?

mark s, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

reasons and/or explanations would be nice

mark s, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If he's not rock, what is he?

Ben Williams, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

EC mocks rock.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So what's that... meta-rock?

Ben Williams, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He's mock rock.

I'll tell you something about Elvis Costello that's slightly embarrassing to me. (Not sure why exactly.) When I was around 12 or 13 I remember hearing "Armed Forces" advertised on the radio, and having a real sense that this was new music, my generation's music, etc. (In retrospect, I think my sense of its newness was exagerrated, though it was relatively different from what I had been hearing.) Also, the punk cover band which introduced me to the genre used to play "I'm Not Angry" and that was a big favorite of mine in 7th grade (though I didn't hear the original until much later). This has nothing to do with making an argument that he is rock, but I definitely thought of his music at that time as new rock, but not something other than rock. I haven't followed his career much at all since, oh, the late 80's, so I don't know what I'd say about more recent material.

DeRayMi, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He may be generic rock, in the mass stream of pop & rock. But, to my ears he doesn't rock. (not very helpful, sorry)

jel --, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Who is the bass player for "Elvis Costello"? If Elvis Costello is rock so is Randy Newman.

Kris, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, seriously.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

maybe he is a rockist critic's darling and all that shit but come awwwwn people! y'all talk about how bands rock better with keyboards, look no further than This Years Model, it really is a scorcher.

al, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think I see Mark S's point--something about the tradition he comes out of isn't rock per se (which is band focused) but singer- songwriter even if he did and sometimes still does have a band that can scorch tar (not that Mark S would agree w/that but I get a viewpoint too). Is this correct? If so, then yeah, I understand even if I don't agree all the way.

M Matos, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He's not rockist.

He mocks rockism.

Meta-rockism?

Keiko, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

he jams with burt bacharach = he is nu-metal

geeta, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

he cooks socks! he socks rock!

he WAS pop..catchy, life affirming, angry,sense of humour etc . then lost all of above and was delivered, sweating greasily, into the jaws of rock!!

flannery culp, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know if he is/was "rock" or whatever, bit my sis ownz a copy ov "Live at the El Mocambo" which does rock harder than almost any other record I've heard.

Norman Phay, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He jams with the Brodsky Quartet = he is prog!

nickn, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

....but surely all the ‘late’ bjorkish ‘post-rock’ returns an die mutter can be more-or-less precisely mapped to equivalent ‘early’ sweaty-and-earnest (although obviously not excluding sonic passage via early-alphabetic pop bliss) mutations in pursuit of supposed innovation/difference.

ds, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

As a fanatical Costellohead, I feel eminently qualified to answer this question. And the answer is "no." He is actually a shit with pretensions of being a "serious" composer in the popular music arena (see "The Juliet Letters," "Painted From Memory," "Deep Dead Blue," "G.B.H." and "Imperial Bedroom"), but with a likable ability for self-deprecation, a great sense of personal style and a flair for catchy melodies, scathing lyrics and tight arrangements (see "Blood & Chocolate," "This Year's Model," and "Spike"). I love him with all my heart and soul, and his new album ("When I Was Cruel") is a more boring re-write of his worst album of the nineties ("Mighty Like a Rose"). I was afraid that he'd jump full-bore into jazz for a while, but it looks like that (thankfully) didn't happen.

So, to sum up--no. He occasionally "rocks" but is not "rock." He is of it but not in it. I think he's a roving minstrel, actually.

J, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ok thinking about this on the bus home just now i came to the conclusion that central to EC's whatevah are essential and defining skills and habits which are peerlessly unrockISH, yet which (increasingly) manifest in a mode which I cannot but consider UTTERLY ROCKIST. I realise I am tunneling down into catacombs and labyrinths of contradiction here from which few shall emerge alive (or more to the point, awake), so I shall stop here for now. More tomorrow maybe. I don't think there is a musician alive on who I am more conflicted, and about who I have changed my mind more often, over a quarter century (since in fact I read Nick Kent's first interview with him in nme as I waited for a bus on Barker Street and thought "Who is this idiot?"

This Year's Model does indeed rock: that is not however germane. The answer to Ben W's question is NEW WAVE: that is however an evasion.

mark s, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have to qualify any statements I've made by saying that the question originally came up in the context of Costello as an 80's figure, being mentioned in the same breath as Joy Division. I haven't heard most of what has come since the 80's, or even the mid-80's. Alas, as usual, I don't have any theoretically rich explanation of why I consider his music (through some time in the 80's) to have been rock--it just sounds that way to me.

mark s, I would consider most New Wave to be a sub-category of rock, along with punk. (I hope that's not controversial, but it probably is.)

DeRayMi, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Rock'n'roll was a musical genre.

Some deviations of it were called just "rock".

This deviations, along with other popular music acts generated a series of countercultural values that we can call "rock culture".

Punk, post punk, new wave, new pop, indie pop, and even certain kinds of electronica are different subgenres of(different points in the historical process of) ROCK CULTURE, which doesn't mean that they were ROCK MUSIC.

OK, It's just a theory and I'm not its author, actually. What do you think about?

carlos, Friday, 12 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm. Are you asking if he is a rock or if he plays rock music? heh

Bobby D. Gray, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He's pop. Pop contains rock: EC's career contains rock, but is not limited to it.

the pinefox, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, imagine EC had decided against a career in which his face was NOT currency. He becomes a songwriter, arranger, orchestrator, even session musician, sometimes. Given his unmatched encyclopaedic grasp of the turns and tricks in ALL POP OF EVERY KIND* since c.1945, his ability to pastiche in any mode, to dab and twist within any one style to flip it into neat novelty, he would — given this chosen semi-anonymity, as per counterfactual assumption — nevertheless be a LEGEND WITHOUT EQUAL, even in regions of rock which profess to disdain craftsmanship (lo-fi emo harcore blah blah).

The problem comes when all this, a startling depth of gift and talent and intelligence, is shifted into the auteur territory of the "rock" songwriter, who must (by convention) deliver his own work.
i. EC is NEVER in a position where he has to reach for clumsiness or stupidity or ill-formed crap to get himself out of an artistic impasse: he always has, courtesy his voluminous fakebook grab-bag of devices, a technical get-out-of-jail- free card. He never risks utter childish idiocy = he is not rock. (I take it as read that this is a weakness...)
ii. A lineage he only very occasionally discusses — his major anxiety of influence, says I — is GLAM. During the Get Happy!! tour, the Attractions were playing Low and Heroes on the tourbus (OK I read this once somewhere, and may have misremembered and/or elaborated: bear with me, the point's aestehtically true even if I've bugged around with the anecdotal details....)... A set evolved from Stax and Motown styles was being delivered in the context of Mr Cracked Actor in his artiest Berlin-Iggy-Eno avant-garde phase. I'll go further: I think the unspoken hero of Declan McManus's all-styles omnivore pose is BRYAN FERRY, c."These Foolish Things" => where the breadth of pop genres deployed is a direct critical attack on the rockist canon (not sweeping it away, but radically broadening it, to include exactly the things it had once defined itself against, from manufactured girl group pop to 40s crooner classics). The b-side to Oliver's Army is My Foolish Things, by Rogers and Hart. HOWEVER, even though as a band The Attractions are primarily a troupe of actors, I believe the risks (and therefore the potentials) of this have been consciously downplayed, into a virtuoso display of craft... Costello the persona is recessive in a way Bowie the persona never was (one reason: Bowie is a rubbish actor, and it has always been his vulnerabilities and incompetencies which have been his appeal and outreach; Costello is a brilliant actor, and has paid the price, attracting self-appointed connoisseurs more than self-selcted losers and outsiders....) (hence: ROCKISM...)
iii. Even at times when I've loathed him, I'd be happy to hold him up as someone who exploded and demolishes the word "post-modern" =-> as in, everything you think you're saying when you use this word becomes untrue and/or uninteresting insofar as it attaches to EC.

*No, not every kind: no latin, no metal, no prog. But the range is extraordinary. But yeah, he should have embraced prog: it weakens him that he nevah did.

Or: what Pinefox just said.

mark s, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ferry, though, has an art student promiscuity - a camp delight in the pose, panache and heartache of entertainment genres. Costello's pluralism grows out his dad's jobbing muso, big band play the hitz of the day adaptability - a platonic belief that, beneath the fashionable rococo of production, songwriting is key. (On the Get Happy tourbus, they were playing Bowie, but also ABBA - learning how to coat his writerly chops with the soundflava of the day). I would say Costello actually invents DADROCK...

Plus: Costello had one of the worst beards in the history of music -> he is not pop.

Edna Welthorpe, Mrs, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

when i am pro him - as i seem to be at the moment, rather to my surprise - i think costello has the same camp joy blah blah, just kept very low-key (after all, so do cole porter and all those beezers => suggesting his dad's taste is INTRINSICALLY BORING AND LIMITING = rockist, blimey you'll be accusing pinefox of dadrock next, edna!!

is being Against Parents rockist? I say yes. Not being one.

(sidestep BID FOR BLAB: punk = NOT OEDIPAL cuz it's yr OLDER BROTHER you are killing)

mark s, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

punk = having sex w.yr sistah oo-er I wish hadn't tht of that

mark s, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"beneath the fashionable rococo of production, songwriting is key" => so why does he always return to the Attractions? I don't buy this. It's a terrific line of attack until you actually listen to his records: then it fails.

mark s, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I am testing my theory to (apparent) destruction by listening to KING OF AMERICA. Dear God I remember why I have hated Costello so often: help me someone.

mark s, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(haha i googled "beards in music" to refute edna and the first TWO entries are ILM!!)

mark s, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

**so why does he always return to the Attractions?**

A periodic need for the pub-rock comfort blanket? It's a great question btw. I can't decide. I mean his craftsmanship, tricks, lyrics and hookiness surely = pop. His grooming in big band/show songs with dad Ross counts too. On t'other side Attractions/N.Lowe = rock, as does trying to self-consciously push into other areas like fiddlng about with chamber quartets and opera singers. (cf. Deep Purple 'n that).

On balance - 1970's he was rock than pop. Thereafter more pop than rock. How's that?

Dr. C, Saturday, 13 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Almost Blue --> Elvis Costello is COUNTRY!

Sterling Clover, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He has strings and arrangements from Billy Sherrill = he is not country.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

EC was one of my heroes back in high school (I graduated '85), but in my opinion (and I know this is dismissive and flip) he released so many boring, bloated, bad, and non-rocking albums after say "Imperial Bedroom" that I lost all interest. It's funny considering how much I loved the early records (and still do),but I really don't give a damn about Costello anymore. And the beard sucked.

Sean, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

punk = having sex w.yr sistah And here I always thought that "punk = peeing in a girl"

Sean Carruthers, Sunday, 14 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd say it goes beyond pub-rock-security-blanket (an excellent answer, by the way). Let's face it: he's a cult artist, and his cult likes him to do certain things, like play with the Attractions. It's about pleasing his fans, which for any performer who's not Mark E. Smith or [[insert example here]]] is at least somewhat synonymous with pleasing yourself. And let's face it again: they shadow him better than anyone else has, get his references, know what makes him laugh, makes him happy, and he's got to like that, too.

M Matos, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Also: wuz he not with them for Imperial Bedroom which is NOT ROCK and Brutal Yoof which was a big frikin genre mess?

Sterling Clover, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So if EC isn't rock, then I guess Bob Dylan isn't either, then.

Ben Williams, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

dylan = often writes very terrible words (right next to good ones: cf lady elaine) = rock

mark s, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course, EC has never written a terrible line in his life (cough)...

Ben Williams, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Dylan is Folk. duh. (& I'm not even being contrarian here).

Sterling Clover, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh please! You've been reading too much Griel Marcus.

Ben Williams, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He was marketed as folk --> he IS folk.

Sterling Clover, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, back in 1963 for about a year and a half, he was marketed as folk.

Ben Williams, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

actually i don't really know: IS dylan rock?

mark s, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course he is :o)

Actually, I could care less. I do think that one could use the standards applied to disqualify Elvis Costello from being rock--he's a solo artist, he's dabbled in different genres, did I miss anything?--to disqualify just about anyone else outside of maybe, oh, the Rolling Stones.

Ben Williams, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"dabbled" = not the right word

anyway, are the rolling stones rock?

mark s, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

RS are roll;
dylan is the 'n' between them

Tracer Hand, Monday, 15 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

where is n?

mark s, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The older brother thing has been a big bee in my bonnet for ages (even though my own experience with my actual real brother goes against it). Punk has an Antigone Complex!

Tom, Tuesday, 16 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

four months pass...
i have NO idea what i meant by my last post

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 28 August 2002 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
"You know why rock critics love Elvis Costello? Cause they look like him"
-David Lee Roth

Terry Gaudet, Wednesday, 24 September 2003 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Not at his best, no.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 08:34 (twenty-one years ago)

have ya seen david lee roth lately? have ya seen elvis? i would much, much rather look like elvis.

fact checking cuz, Wednesday, 24 September 2003 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
Re-vive!

Who is the bass player for "Elvis Costello"? If Elvis Costello is rock so is Randy Newman

This was a key question in this dusty old thread. The answer is Bruce Thomas, who at his best, on This Years Model and Armed Forces, was like the second coming of James Jamerson. He was an Attraction but is not an Imposter, Elvis having publicly dissed him as playing up the neck too much up too often, as well as other offenses against the musical designs of the Great One.

I mean, I am sure the guy is a musical genius, but I just really can't be bothered to follow his various projects over the years. He is a walking talking example of the Rockist idea that musicians should not be given library cards. If I want to listen to classical music I'll force myself to listen to actual classical music- instead of Anna what's her name who collaborated with EC, I'll listen to Andre Previn's wife Anne-Sophe-Mutter (which I guess technically makes her Woody Allen's Mutter-in-Law), the same way if I want to listen to jazz I'm going to listen to, well, jazz, instead of Sting.


But This Year's Model and Armed Forces are great albums as are Get Happy and even the compilation Taking Liberties.

Now please write in and tell me that actually his new ballet thing is pretty good. Or his other new Death of A Salesman thing. Or that I should google the thread where you already said that. Attention must be paid!

Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 12 November 2004 05:52 (twenty years ago)

i've never seen a rock critic who looked anything like elvis costello!

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 12 November 2004 07:58 (twenty years ago)

Well, they all used to have thick glasses, but you're probably too young to know.

Ken L (Ken L), Friday, 12 November 2004 08:03 (twenty years ago)

I'd mainly classify Elvis Costello as pop, even though he has released a couple albums throughout the years that could be described as rock.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 12 November 2004 11:32 (twenty years ago)

i've never seen a rock critic who looked anything like elvis costello!

-- J.D. (aubade8...), November 12th, 2004.

I looked like Elvis Costello when I was 14, if that counts.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 12 November 2004 11:34 (twenty years ago)

punch the clock is his most underrated album. he was clearly pop (NOT rock) on that one, and god bless him for it.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 12 November 2004 12:27 (twenty years ago)

In a similar but related topic, I heard a couple of tracks off of Steve Nieve's album last night on the radio. I suppose you would call it ambient music as it is sparse melodic piano mixed with these fuzzy Kompakt-like hissy textures. It may be a colaboration with Eno, it definitely reminded me of his work with Harold Budd. It sounded quite nice.

earlnash, Friday, 12 November 2004 13:12 (twenty years ago)

"Punch The Clock" may be a pop album, but nowhere near the quality of his best pop albums, the best of which was "Imperial Bedroom".

Particularly the brass is extremely annoying on "Punch..."

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 12 November 2004 14:06 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
No, he's scissors.

Ken L (Ken L), Sunday, 9 January 2005 04:51 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.