Props for Ned Raggett - The Buzzcocks reformation

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I've always admired Ned's reviews, and therefore I hope he doesn't mind me taking a big snip of his AMG/Pandora review below. I just wanted to share it as an example of how precise a good reviewer is when it comes to finding the exact words to describe how we feel when we listen to music, while still allowing for genuine ambivalence of the heart. Anyone who's heard early and late Buzzcocks will appreciate the even-handed objectivity of this review.

The Buzzcocks
Trade Test Transmissions

Surfacing a couple of years after the band's unexpected resurrection but after the departure of bassist Steve Garvey and drummer John Maher, who were content to continue their other lines of work, Trade Test Transmissions is at once a fine, celebratory album and something of a disappointment. On the one hand, hearing the Pete Shelley/Steve Diggle partnership fully reestablished is fantastic enough; both singers sound just fine, and their guitar abilities are no less powerful than in the group's original heyday. New bassist Tony Barber and drummer Phil Barker do their jobs quite well enough. If not as distinctly powerful as the original Garvey/Maher section -- the subtle, inventive side of Maher's work is especially hard to replace -- they approach the songs with energy and don't let anything down. For all this, though, there's a sense of unfulfilled promise through Trade. It specifically surfaces in the way that Shelley and Diggle want to draw more on the strictly listener-friendly touch of the band's original days while generally ignoring the more adventuresome side that surfaced in songs like "Late for the Train," "Why Can't I Touch It?," and "I Believe. " It's not quite pandering per se, but it's almost too easy an approach for a band that so clearly transcended the punk-pop formula as much as it perfected it. [edit] Ned Raggett, All Music Guide

moley, Saturday, 7 April 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)

I just read that and see editing that needs to be done, frankly! Word repetition, kinda flat prose, etc. But hey, one is always one's own worst critic -- thanks for the kind words!

My review of Big Dipper's last album Slam is similarly six of one, half dozen of the other in its conclusion -- what was surprising and flattering was when one of the bandmembers wrote me a couple of years later to say that I had actually hit the nail on the head!

As for Buzzcocks post-reformation, I pretty much stand by that judgment -- without that rhythm section (and without Maher in particular), they're just somehow a bit less.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 7 April 2007 12:30 (eighteen years ago)

slam was one of the biggest disappointments of my indie-rock youth. it sounds like a band that very completely and very suddenly ran out of ideas.

fact checking cuz, Saturday, 7 April 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)

four years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpVyGbjR94M

James & Bobby Quantify (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 15 June 2011 10:39 (fourteen years ago)

Sorry, meant to post that on its own thread.

James & Bobby Quantify (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 15 June 2011 10:40 (fourteen years ago)

You did.

Mark G, Wednesday, 15 June 2011 10:43 (fourteen years ago)

anyways, I went to the first reformation gigs back in the day, when it really was the four.

It was great.

Soeone was handing out 'protest' leaflets, "Buzzcocks would like to thank their fans for the money"

I've still got it, it's in my "Product" LP box set.

Ah, remember when people cared if bands 'sold-out'? nowadays, people argue about how much bands are allowed to: What's selling out "too much" and what's "just enough"...?

Mark G, Wednesday, 15 June 2011 10:49 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.