It was 7:51 a.m. on Friday, January 12, the middle of the morning rush hour. In the next 43 minutes, as the violinist performed six classical pieces, 1,097 people passed by. Almost all of them were on the way to work, which meant, for almost all of them, a government job. L'Enfant Plaza is at the nucleus of federal Washington, and these were mostly mid-level bureaucrats with those indeterminate, oddly fungible titles: policy analyst, project manager, budget officer, specialist, facilitator, consultant. Each passerby had a quick choice to make, one familiar to commuters in any urban area where the occasional street performer is part of the cityscape: Do you stop and listen? Do you hurry past with a blend of guilt and irritation, aware of your cupidity but annoyed by the unbidden demand on your time and your wallet? Do you throw in a buck, just to be polite? Does your decision change if he's really bad? What if he's really good? Do you have time for beauty? Shouldn't you? What's the moral mathematics of the moment? On that Friday in January, those private questions would be answered in an unusually public way. No one knew it, but the fiddler standing against a bare wall outside the Metro in an indoor arcade at the top of the escalators was one of the finest classical musicians in the world, playing some of the most elegant music ever written on one of the most valuable violins ever made. His performance was arranged by The Washington Post as an experiment in context, perception and priorities -- as well as an unblinking assessment of public taste: In a banal setting at an inconvenient time, would beauty transcend?
― The Macallan 18 Year, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:23 (nineteen years ago)
― The Brainwasher, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
― The Macallan 18 Year, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:26 (nineteen years ago)
― The Brainwasher, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:28 (nineteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:32 (nineteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:35 (nineteen years ago)
― The Macallan 18 Year, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:38 (nineteen years ago)
― The Macallan 18 Year, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:43 (nineteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:46 (nineteen years ago)
― the next grozart, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Mike Dixn, Monday, 9 April 2007 23:56 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 00:03 (nineteen years ago)
― jim, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 00:06 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 00:07 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 00:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Z S, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 00:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Z S, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 00:28 (nineteen years ago)
― W i l l, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 00:45 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 00:57 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 01:21 (nineteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 01:23 (nineteen years ago)
― W i l l, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 01:24 (nineteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 01:25 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 01:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 01:29 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 01:30 (nineteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 01:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Rich Smörgasbord, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 07:11 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 08:32 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 12:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Euler, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 12:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark Rich@rdson, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 12:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark Rich@rdson, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 12:51 (nineteen years ago)
― G00blar, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 13:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 13:43 (nineteen years ago)
― The Wayward Johnny B, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 13:51 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 14:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 14:19 (nineteen years ago)
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 14:46 (nineteen years ago)
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 14:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 15:00 (nineteen years ago)
― and what, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 15:04 (nineteen years ago)
― JW, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 15:49 (nineteen years ago)
― QuantumNoise, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 15:58 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:05 (nineteen years ago)
I thought the aspect of the article focused on whether art must be "framed" by a proper context to be recognizable as art, to be interesting. I guess the "experiment" was aimed at testing this hypothesis. There are lots of confounding factors, like the facts that folks are cheap, and so don't want to appreciate or even acknowledge the busker, lest they feel guilty about stiffing the guy. This scenario doesn't seem that different from how folks at non-classical concerts treat opening bands. I guess what happens there is that the setting of the presentation is off, in some people's eyes, because only the main band deserves their appreciation. Of course there are lots of sucky openers too. -- Euler, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 12:37 (3 hours ago)
― The Macallan 18 Year, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 16:23 (nineteen years ago)
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 20:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 20:32 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
― rps, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:30 (nineteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:36 (nineteen years ago)
― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark Rich@rdson, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 21:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 22:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 22:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
― rps, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 22:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 22:23 (nineteen years ago)
― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 10 April 2007 22:24 (nineteen years ago)
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 01:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Oilyrags, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 04:31 (nineteen years ago)
― NYCNative, Wednesday, 11 April 2007 05:11 (nineteen years ago)
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 21 April 2007 20:08 (nineteen years ago)