[u] Don Ho, Don Imus: Which Is More Of A Loss?[u]

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

I say the non-nappy one , who will go no more Hawaiian.(Seriously, what's up with Imus's hair? And crags? Is he really Kim Fowley?)

― dow, Sunday, 15 April 2007 06:50 (nineteen years ago)

Although if someone protests that this is one Ho and/or Imus thread too many, I won't argue.

― dow, Sunday, 15 April 2007 06:52 (nineteen years ago)

oh, dowpaws.

― musically, Sunday, 15 April 2007 07:06 (nineteen years ago)

Yes indowdy.

― dow, Sunday, 15 April 2007 07:08 (nineteen years ago)

the difference being that don imus's first name is "donald," while don ho is a "don" in the spanish/italian sense of the word.

― s1ocki, Sunday, 15 April 2007 08:01 (nineteen years ago)

YOU GOTTA LET A HO BE A HO

― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Sunday, 15 April 2007 10:16 (nineteen years ago)

don hos before hos

― sanskrit, Sunday, 15 April 2007 12:12 (nineteen years ago)

Oh No, Don Ho!
Don Imus? Um, I nod.

― Hurting 2, Sunday, 15 April 2007 18:43 (nineteen years ago)

Or even:

Don Imus: Nil? In sum, I nod.

― Hurting 2, Sunday, 15 April 2007 19:38 (nineteen years ago)

Kramer morfs from remark

― Hurting 2, Sunday, 15 April 2007 19:40 (nineteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.