― deeznuts, Monday, 23 April 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)
― henry s, Monday, 23 April 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
― henry s, Monday, 23 April 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Richard Wood Johnson, Monday, 23 April 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)
― deeznuts, Monday, 23 April 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)
― deeznuts, Monday, 23 April 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)
― m coleman, Monday, 23 April 2007 20:28 (eighteen years ago)
― sexyDancer, Monday, 23 April 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)
― henry s, Monday, 23 April 2007 21:07 (eighteen years ago)
― sexyDancer, Monday, 23 April 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)
― nickalicious, Monday, 23 April 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Monday, 23 April 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)
― deeznuts, Monday, 23 April 2007 22:16 (eighteen years ago)
― Keith, Monday, 23 April 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Monday, 23 April 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)
― darin, Monday, 23 April 2007 23:06 (eighteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:09 (eighteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:14 (eighteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:15 (eighteen years ago)
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:16 (eighteen years ago)
― Lawrence the Looter, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:50 (eighteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 01:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Bimble, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 02:26 (eighteen years ago)
― Bimble, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 02:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Bimble, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 02:32 (eighteen years ago)
― Cunga, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 06:41 (eighteen years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 07:44 (eighteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 08:34 (eighteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 08:35 (eighteen years ago)
― the next grozart, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 09:39 (eighteen years ago)
― Tom D., Tuesday, 24 April 2007 09:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Tom D., Tuesday, 24 April 2007 09:43 (eighteen years ago)
― m coleman, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Tom D., Tuesday, 24 April 2007 10:14 (eighteen years ago)
― m coleman, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 10:19 (eighteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 11:52 (eighteen years ago)
― onimo, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Tom D., Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:10 (eighteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 21:51 (eighteen years ago)
― henry s, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)
― henry s, Tuesday, 24 April 2007 22:02 (eighteen years ago)
so i heard this on the radio the other day as part of a song contest & they played the 'coca-cola' version, was i right to be somewhat giddy about that? or is that in fact totally common?
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 15:52 (seventeen years ago)
I'm not sure.
I think "Cherry Cola" is a better line anyway.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)
?? you gotta be kidding me
co-ca co-la, l-o-l-a lola
cherry cola is really awkward by comparison
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 16:24 (seventeen years ago)
no.
― kenan, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 16:43 (seventeen years ago)
makes more sense in context...
Coca Cola is more a definite recogniseable taste.
Cherry Cola, you could convince yourself it's just a very fruity champagne, maybe.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 16:44 (seventeen years ago)
LOLA POLL-A
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)
You'd have to be pretty drunk to think that either Coca Cola or cherry cola tasted like champagne. Or used to pretty bad champagne.
I know people say that this song is ambiguous, but I don't hear the ambiguity. You'd really have to twist the lyrics to get them to not mean that Lola's a man. I can sort of understand how people could read some is-he-or-isn't-he? into it and maybe it was written with those readings in mind, but the plot seems pretty clear and the song doesn't make as much sense to me otherwise. It's just that the narrator is being a bit dense, first in realizing that Lola's a man in drag, then in realizing that he's OK with that.
― dad a, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 16:50 (seventeen years ago)
Lola is both:
1. a man
2. glad the narrator is a man
everybody wins!
― sleeve, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
That works.
― dad a, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 17:00 (seventeen years ago)
Fifty years of Lola! Such a goddamn perfect pop song.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/01/arts/music/kinks-lola-ray-davies.html
― Lily Dale, Tuesday, 1 December 2020 23:37 (five years ago)
lol(a)
The band’s break from touring the U.S. gave Davies the chance to soar creatively, leading to his first concept albums, “The Kinks Are the Village Green Preservation Society” and “Arthur (Or the Decline and Fall of the British Empire).” But with “Lola” he aimed squarely at the charts. For a fresh sound, Davies sought an instrument that would stand out on the radio. He found it in a National resonator guitar, a brand of dobro that has the hard, tinny sound of a banjo. “My dad was a banjo player,” Davies said. “He said, ‘If you want a hit record, you have to get a banjo on it.’ The National guitar was the next best thing.”
― la table sur la table (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 2 December 2020 00:01 (five years ago)