Matthew Dear - Asa Breed

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.ghostly.com/1.0/img/covers/gi65-350.gif

wooooooooooow.

The Macallan 18 Year, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 16:24 (eighteen years ago)

yeah my friend called me at 8 am this morning just to tell me how great this apparently is

deej, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)

i've only heard the single which i thought was too cheesy at first but have come around to gradually

deej, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

o fuck me yes

lukas, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 16:58 (eighteen years ago)

ugh. on first listen, i'd say mostly hit or miss. pretty much the same as leave luck to heaven in that respect.

BleepBot, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 17:16 (eighteen years ago)

anyone sharing on s1sk?

Fetchboy, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)

ya, deej, i was txting friends about it right after i got to work today

but i'm gonna pace myself on verbalizing the greatness, damn thing doesn't come out until june (5th, i think?)

The Macallan 18 Year, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

so for now:

woooooooooooooow

The Macallan 18 Year, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

If this has anything to top "You're Fucking Crazy" from LLTH, I will be very happy. Still excited though.

Great cover art, too, and nice Vonnegut reference (RIP).

Telephone thing, Wednesday, 25 April 2007 19:23 (eighteen years ago)

what do you guys actually like about this album?
it's a big disappointment for me. the vocals really detract from the production and the indie-songwriting thing is unimpressive.

Fetchboy, Thursday, 26 April 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)

Did you like the pop songs on Backstroke?

nabisco, Thursday, 26 April 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)

matthew dear lyrics are not exactly the strong point

deej, Thursday, 26 April 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

not really, nabisco. but i thought they were stronger than anything on the new one.

Fetchboy, Thursday, 26 April 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, that sounds about right -- I'm really enjoying this so far, and I like the direction of it, but none of it seems quite up to the level of "Tide" or "Grut Wall." (Which I loved, of course: I know it's inevitable that people coming from the dance direction have to be all skeptical about the guy doing "song" songs, but when he does it right I'd say it's more interesting and worthwhile than most anything else he could be doing.)

nabisco, Thursday, 26 April 2007 19:17 (eighteen years ago)

amazing record--very strange songs

shy is a total ripoff of falling by the comsat angels, in a good way

cutty, Thursday, 26 April 2007 19:36 (eighteen years ago)

when he does it right I'd say it's more interesting and worthwhile than most anything else he could be doing

haven't heard the record yet, but that's a pretty ginormous claim for me, given how utterly amazing some of the latest releases he's done are.

Ronan, Thursday, 26 April 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)

as audion I mean

Ronan, Thursday, 26 April 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)

i'm definitely with ronan on this one. i'd say that the last third really lets the whole album drag ... ala everything after the depeche mode-lite of "pom pom" (i'd say inclusively, but i go back and forth). but i'll just say (for ronan as well as other mnml heads) i'm pretty sure nabisco prolly doesn't listen to enough minimal techno to understand why "it's more interesting and worthwhile than most anything else he could be doing" sounds pretty ridiculous given the last couple audion releases.

otherwise, this could be the least funky "prince-influenced" direction i could ever imagine for a dance producer (ala the wiggly vox that i somehow connect with camille)...

BleepBot, Friday, 27 April 2007 03:38 (eighteen years ago)

ronan didn't say any of that! but otherwise otm, i think, unless there's something i'm not hearing in it. not that it's awful or anything (i do like it, here and there), his other work just sets such high expectations

lucas pine, Friday, 27 April 2007 03:49 (eighteen years ago)

and to not sound like an ass, nabisco, it just rubs me the wrong way to hear that dear's cross-over material can be more intersting/worthwhile than the other stuff that he's been doing for the last nine months...

BleepBot, Friday, 27 April 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

Well, I haven't heard the album yet, but I think the single is amazing. And I'd say his lyrics in general are pretty great - ambiguous and emotive, but mechanical and seemingly random. It perfectly captures the feeling of most really good minimal for me.

Michale_D, Friday, 27 April 2007 04:07 (eighteen years ago)

Bleep, I meant I think it's more interesting as a direction for him (and others) to explore, not that the results are higher quality. In about the same way I think that about Berlinette versus other Ellen Allien stuff. I've been keeping up with Audion, but you're right that I'm not hugely invested in the movements of minimal techno as a scene.

nabisco, Friday, 27 April 2007 04:24 (eighteen years ago)

In other words, I think if the guy could manage to create a whole style of minimal/pop-song craft around the quality of stuff like "Tide," I'd probably be more wowed by that than any level of revolutionary awesomeness Audion might achieve within the "minimal" bracket, and not just because I listen to pop songs more than minimal.

nabisco, Friday, 27 April 2007 04:28 (eighteen years ago)

"I Gave You Away" and "Mouth to Mouth" are pop songs!

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)

ronan i love 'mouth to mouth' as much as the next minimal head but it is not a pop song

(i want to hear this album, out of curiosity mostly!)

lex pretend, Friday, 27 April 2007 11:57 (eighteen years ago)

they aren't fucking "minimal" anyway, it's not as though his work in that field is obtuse and difficult, it's probably the most anthemic stuff in the entire genre right now, hence mine and Bleepbot.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:01 (eighteen years ago)

's reservations with Nabisco's argument.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:01 (eighteen years ago)

I bet if I play "Tide" next week nobody dances, if I play "I Gave You Away" or "Mouth to Mouth" people scream and go crazy. And the club I play it is not by any means a minimal night.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:03 (eighteen years ago)

my point being, which are closer to pop music? I also can guarantee none of the kids who like his Audion stuff will bother listening to this record.

I'm not saying anything about the quality of it yet cos I haven't heard it, but I feel quite strongly about this pop/not pop division that's emerging. there's nothing anonymous about Audion's recent output, it's completely crossover and has bags of character, and he has a real test on his hands if he's to outdo that, on those exact terms, with this solo album, no matter how "pop" it may be. that's my point.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:06 (eighteen years ago)

I also can guarantee none of the kids who like his Audion stuff will bother listening to this record.

Oh FFS what a sweeping statement!

I'm not saying anything about the quality of it yet cos I haven't heard it

AHEM. Yet you are making assumptions about the quality of it based on the fact that it is a 'crossover' record. Kneejerk purism.

braveclub, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:08 (eighteen years ago)

Actually I never said anything about the quality of it yet, nothing at all. Nor did I say this is a bad crossover record. I have no problem with this record, I just am saying that statements like this

I think if the guy could manage to create a whole style of minimal/pop-song craft around the quality of stuff like "Tide," I'd probably be more wowed by that than any level of revolutionary awesomeness Audion might achieve within the "minimal" bracket, and not just because I listen to pop songs more than minimal.

To those listening to Audion's output at the moment, this hypes that track beyond belief. Also I'm saying that a bracket like "minimal" is not sufficient to contain Audion at the moment, there's nothing anonymous about his records, you know an Audion track when you hear one.

In fact contrary to your post you could say I'm arguing that Audion has already crossed over, massively, so Matthew Dear has a lot of work to top that crossover. But then crossing over to rockcritics obviously matters far more than anything else right?

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:13 (eighteen years ago)

So why do you think that NONE of Audion's fans will want to hear a Matthew Dear record?

braveclub, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:15 (eighteen years ago)

OK, so maybe some will, but my point was regarding the people to whom his Audion records have already crossed over, I don't really see them checking out this album. He's big enough now that there are probably tons of people who have no idea it's the same person.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:19 (eighteen years ago)

It's mainly the not just because I listen to pop songs more than minimal part I'm dubious about with N's post. But I'm sure he's more than able to explain himself.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:20 (eighteen years ago)

But you know, I really think it's amusing how as soon as you wonder why the techno output of an artist at the absolute height of his popularity is supposed to be of lesser significance than them attempting to make a song based record, people start accusing YOU of kneejerk biases.

You think I've never listened to song based music or something? What really surprises me is that the idea of people being biased against track based music seems far more logical and common than people being automatically biased against rock, and yet literally AS SOON AS you attempt to suggest that maybe an artist could actually remain making techno and have a long, creative, innovative, interesting musical career, you're accused of purism.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

I called it kneejerk cos you hadn't listened to the record, that's all.

braveclub, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:29 (eighteen years ago)

i'm trying to think of people who've made track-based techno and song-based music and excelled at both. is hard. robin do you have the matthew dear album?

lex pretend, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)

Yes but [cough] haven't got round to it yet! [gets coat]

braveclub, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:35 (eighteen years ago)

i'm trying to think of people who've made track-based techno and song-based music and excelled at both. is hard.

Ellen Allien?

braveclub, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)

yeah ellen, definitely. ada too, even apart from the 'maps' cover...

lex pretend, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)

ronan + braveclub = a duprass.

stirmonster, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)

don't you start.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)

any excuse for a bad vonnegut joke.

stirmonster, Friday, 27 April 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

I had to wikipedia it.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

excellent at both track-based & song-based techno = marcus nikolai

creme1, Friday, 27 April 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)

excellent at both track-based & song-based techno = unai

cutty, Friday, 27 April 2007 13:42 (eighteen years ago)

Okay, hopefully the fact that this argument even exists will explain my point -- the thing I'm interested in with Dear and Allien's pop directions is the possibility of getting beyond the track/song distinction into some other format entirely! That's what I'm saying would be "more impressive" to me, and that's why I'm in favor of both of them working on pop albums. It's not quite there with Dear yet, but I think it's albums like this where that sort of thing can develop.

None of which has anything to do with market crossover or quality -- though admittedly this progression is just something I'm personally really interested in seeing, and clearly neither of these artists are beholden to pleasing me!

nabisco, Friday, 27 April 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

what i'm interested in is song-based techno which works as a track - it's not as if there aren't lots of examples, most of them are remixes - eg the trentemoller 'what else is there?' and a bunch of others. v few of them are original works by techno producers though, which might be why so many techno albums are underwhelming. ellen & apparat's 'way out' is of course a gigantic and triumphant exception.

lex pretend, Friday, 27 April 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

I figured it might be that Nabisco, this reminds me of an ancient thread where this came up before.

However, personally, I still can't envisage or see what you're seeing as this other format, so I don't see that they're on the way to some other format.

I don't think the Trentemoller remix of "What Else Is There" works as a track as such, I think most of the big electrohouse anthems were closer to being song, though there were plenty tracks for DJs to fit them together.

I actually don't think I'd describe any of the artists, Allien, Unai, etc, as being EXCELLENT at doing both formats. I don't think that's really possible.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, when I hear the Unai record I think this is an individual sort of sound and enjoy it, but you just can't hit whatever part of the mind gets off on techno and the song part at the same time, 100 percent. Well, not for me anyhow.

Ronan, Friday, 27 April 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)

Can someone post ronan's fake strings of life lyrics in this thread?

I love "Dog Days" but I'm not sure how it bridges the song/track divide in any way more sophisticated or unuual than, oh, just about every half-decent vocal house track ever.

But yes, in terms of this specific style Markus Nikolai taught him everything he knows anyway.

Tim F, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:11 (eighteen years ago)

except that dear is american.

also what i was getting at was that the ultra-tracky tracks like those i mentioned are similar exercises in altering form not that they are song-based though luciano and villalobos and "fiori" come damn close.

tricky, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

"strings of life, oh i can't get enough of those wonderful strings of life, oh yeah, those strings are full of life"

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:25 (eighteen years ago)

say one - markus nikolai

lfam, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:31 (eighteen years ago)

the idea of pop/minimal convergence seems to gloss over the fact that melodic development in minimal "tracks" is far from the fore...

like i'd throw out kalabrese's "not the same shoes" as a great recent example, but i'm not sure if that's what nabisco or lex would have in mind.

BleepBot, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)

Let me take you to a place I know you want to go
it's a good life

I wanna stand around and beg you
just don't say no
no no
no no.
I have got a feeling that you're gonna like it what I'm doing to you

And I know what I'm doing
I'll be doing what you want to me to do.

Love is shining
life is thriving in the good life
good life

Good life
good life
good life
good life

in the good life
good life.

A feeling that you get from the good life.
Once you get the good life feeling

Let me tell you no one can take it away
no no
no no.

No more bad times
only glad times in the good life
good life.
Good life
good life
good life
good life

in the good life
good life

Good life
good life
good life
good life

in the good life
good life.

When the good look in then it feels as good as a good life.
I want you to want me
I want the good life all night.

No more rainy days
the sun will chase the clouds away
in the good life.
Good life
good life
good life
good life

in the good life

Good life
good life
good life
good life

in the good life
good life.

No nore sorrow
nothing borrowed in the good life
good life

Good life
good life
good life
good life

in the good life
good life.

tricky, Friday, 27 April 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)

Oops: just listening to this on the way home from work, and I'm actually kinda disappointed by a lack of trackiness AND a lack of songiness -- I think that last Safety Scissors record might already have gotten better results out of some vaguely similar territory.

nabisco, Friday, 27 April 2007 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

interesting

tricky, Saturday, 28 April 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

I just got ahold of this a few days ago and I absolutely love it--been listening to it nonstop for days.
Even though the lyrics seem to be rather bleak and cynical the songs themselves make me feel really happy and optimistic.
I like both the vocals and the music, there are lots of cool technological flourishes adding to the deceptively simple dead-pan style of Dear's singing. The album gets more interesting the more you listen to it rather than less interesting.

saudade, Thursday, 3 May 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

ok i heard this and there are a couple songs i liked but mostly way underwhelmed.

deej, Thursday, 3 May 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

What about it didn't you like?

saudade, Thursday, 3 May 2007 23:50 (eighteen years ago)

one of my albums of the year so far, LOVE don and sherri

cutty, Friday, 4 May 2007 00:06 (eighteen years ago)

Right okay, but is anything as good as Tide on it?

I know, right?, Friday, 4 May 2007 00:47 (eighteen years ago)

I'm not sure yet because I'm still listening to the album as one long song rather than analyzing the songs one at a time.
Tide is pretty freakin great, though, so I'm not sure.

saudade, Friday, 4 May 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

I didn't realize Tide was so beloved

Michael F Gill, Friday, 4 May 2007 14:17 (eighteen years ago)

I'm going to agree with cutty again here, Don and Sherri is great. Pom Pom is a little too... punchy.. although it mines the same territory. Death to Feelers might hit the singer/auteur point that a lot of reviewers spun on the last couple albums.

mh, Friday, 4 May 2007 14:45 (eighteen years ago)

brian eno all over this

cutty, Friday, 4 May 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

OK now I have actually listened to this, and I reckon Ronan's feeling about it was right. It's not half as interesting as Audion, and more than anything it reminds me of Beck circa Midnite Vultures - kind of 'quirky' in a nothingy sort of way.

I still don't see any harm in Dear indulging in both these projects, though.

braveclub, Monday, 21 May 2007 09:48 (eighteen years ago)

Sorry. I'm not exactly at my most eloquent moment. Asa Breed would be much better if it were called Ass Breed and contained 74 minutes of hardcore porn. Even the script for Ass Breed would be better than the lyrics on this disc.

Audion tracks are more interesting to the nth degree. Leave Luck to Heaven gave little indication that he was capable of lyrics this inane.

god. I'm in a testy mood...

Mr. Shirts, Monday, 21 May 2007 11:57 (eighteen years ago)

brian eno all over this

-- cutty, Friday, 4 May 2007 14:52 (2 weeks ago) Link


otm

sleep, Monday, 21 May 2007 14:26 (eighteen years ago)

this record will outlast us and our lossy compression file formats

The Macallan 18 Year, Monday, 21 May 2007 23:57 (eighteen years ago)

"deserter" is pretty, but otherwise i think i like dear's recent mix of lusine ("flat for you") more than anything else on the album.

jermainetwo, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 09:01 (eighteen years ago)

shy is a total ripoff of falling by the comsat angels, in a good way

I hear a nearly flatlined version of Japan's "Visions of China."

Andy K, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 13:00 (eighteen years ago)

Other songs remind me of Everlast.

Andy K, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)

I like the song about Don Cherry...I had no idea MD was such a hockey fan...

henry s, Wednesday, 30 May 2007 13:41 (eighteen years ago)

Is anybody else getting a really strong Nobukazu Takemura vibe off this. In particular Death to Feelers.

I know, right?, Thursday, 31 May 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

god, this sounds so pretty, but the lyrics are just so DUMB. that doesn't always preclude me from liking something, mind you, but jeeeeeez...

that said, i like the eno-y bits and the gary numan-y bits and the house-y bits, and especially when it all sounds like that together. it's fun and frothy and is an interesting listen. just try not to pay attention to what he's saying.

Emily Bjurnhjam, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 20:33 (eighteen years ago)

anyone looking for Dear in song mode should really check the Audion Blackstrobe mix. maybe it's a crazy thing to say about it but I really feel he drags the song out of a woeful original and stretches it to eleven minutes, with added techno flourishes.

Ronan, Tuesday, 5 June 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)

Is that one around anywhere online? I've been hearing about it for a couple weeks but haven't had any luck

mh, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)

Ditto re: blackstrobe mix.

Anyone think that Phil's article on Matthew in XLR8R made the dude, to some not insignificant extent, come off as an lonely asshole?

BleepBot, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 15:13 (eighteen years ago)

I thought it sounded like he's still trying on roles and personalities, which can definitely make you come off as an asshole on occasion. The lyrical bent definitely tends toward a loner's perspective, but the guy's married and there was also the bit about him having a pretty active group of friends. I'm glad Phil did it since some (most?) of the xlr8r personality pieces end up being kind of crap.

mh, Wednesday, 6 June 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

I crossed paths with him many times (because of mutek, not that I'm following him or anything) and he seemed like a rather jovial, affectionate, and freindly person. I think it's just that last paragraph in the article that gives a potential bad impression, which was probably the opposite of the article's intentions.

The important part is that from seeing his live set, and clips here http://www.matthewdear.com/ has sold me. Will very likely buy the album myself. But I agree with the above comments that mention that it was like he didn't seem confident with going for more than 3 lengths. My guess is after mouth-to-mouth, what with long lengths and all, theres either a reluctance to extend tracks because people will be adversed to hearing more song based tracks for more than traditional pop-song lengths, or he's showing that they aren't epic DJ tool-like tracks, although some of them could probably be turned into them easily, which I guess future remixers will do soon enough.

mehlt, Thursday, 7 June 2007 04:04 (eighteen years ago)

Are you talking about where he asks the folks at the bar to come hang out with him because he's bored while he was playing at WMC? I could see the lonely part but not the asshole part.

matt2, Thursday, 7 June 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

I liked Phil's piece--was atually pretty surprised Matt was married, thought for sure he was playing for t'other team.
Anyway, embarassingly enough I do follow him around-- I went to hear him 4 times last week because I'm nuts, and was never bored by any of his sets. I could literally listen to him play whatever for days on end.

saudade, Thursday, 7 June 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

one month passes...

the dj koze remix of "elementary lover" sounds like the field vs. kanye vs. j dilla

jermainetwo, Friday, 13 July 2007 12:16 (eighteen years ago)

no wait, it sounds like the avalanches on kompakt

jermainetwo, Friday, 13 July 2007 12:17 (eighteen years ago)

DESERTER = ace!
i've gone from wishing he would u know *speak up a bit* to thinking it's the perfect way to add vocals to that sort of tune. but i can still imagine nelly furtado or sugababes or whoever doing a great loud
cover.

is he just shy i wonder?

pisces, Friday, 13 July 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)

@ pisces: Deserter is pretty ace.

For someone that doesn't have a clue about minimal techno, where would be a good starting point for someone coming from 'Asa Breed' to find out more? what are the Audion/other monikers releases by Matthew Dear that are 'relevant' or at least provocative?

groutexpectations, Friday, 13 July 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)

I think the track that would be considered Audion's "breakout smash" or at least the track that truly brought him to a new level of acclaim would be "Mouth to Mouth" from last year. His follow-ups to that "I Gave You Away", "Noiser", and "Fred's Bells" are all nearly as good (or better in the case of "Noiser") if you ask me. Most (but not all) of his stuff previous to "Mouth to Mouth" was collected on the Audion album. Just a warning, that stuff is not much at all like Matthew Dear. As for his False moniker, I only know of his most recent 12" which I really like but can't recommend beyond that.

matt2, Friday, 13 July 2007 19:28 (eighteen years ago)

one month passes...

the hot chip remix of "don and sherri" is an entirely new song, and a pretty, understated synthpop one that I rather like at that.

jermainetwo, Sunday, 2 September 2007 04:41 (eighteen years ago)

six months pass...

upcoming bbc essential mixes:

15th March Matthew Dear/Audion

something for you all to discuss. i only hope it's better than luciano's tedious 'cadenza showcase' mix

sam500, Sunday, 2 March 2008 07:53 (seventeen years ago)

Isn't it supposed to be 1 part Matthew Dear, 1 part false, 1 part audion, and 1 part Jabberjaw or something?

It would probably all a DJ set anyways.

mehlt, Sunday, 2 March 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)

matthew dear bonus track for free here

http://rcrdlbl.com/artists/Matthew_Dear/music

dmr, Sunday, 2 March 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

If you haven't picked this up yet Ghostly are reissuing a "Black Edition" (CD only) with the Four Tet and Hot Chip remixes appended.

Telephone thing, Sunday, 2 March 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)

Has anybody seen him with the live band? The Big Hands thing, I mean?

I'm wondering whether I should brave Hiro Ballroom to see it in a couple of weeks.

maciej recognizing trill, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 02:42 (seventeen years ago)

two years pass...

http://kickkicksnare.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/matthew_dear_new.jpg

WELCOME BACK MD I MISSED U

The Macallan 18 Year, Wednesday, 4 August 2010 00:16 (fifteen years ago)

You Put A Smell On Me

The Macallan 18 Year, Wednesday, 4 August 2010 00:17 (fifteen years ago)

streaming on fact btw

http://www.factmag.com/2010/08/02/stream-matthew-dears-black-city-in-full-only-on-fact/

plax (ico), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 00:18 (fifteen years ago)

plax you just rule ilx right now fyi

LA river flood (lukas), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 00:21 (fifteen years ago)

one year passes...

i still listen to this record all the time

sulks (Lamp), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 23:44 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.