New BBC Series: 'Seven Ages of Rock' starts May 19th

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Can't wait for this. Made by the folk who gave us 'Walk on By' and 'Dancing in the Street' (both ludicroudly still unavailable on dvd).
_________________________

Seven Ages of Rock
6 x 60 mins & 1 x 90 mins
Starting Saturday May 19th, BBC 2

BBC 2 takes you on a journey through the Seven Ages of Rock and explores the music that has been the soundtrack to our popular culture and defined each generation since the 1960's. From the producers of award winning series Dancing in the Street, Walk on By, Lost Highway and, most recently, Soul Deep, comes another landmark television history that will chart the story of rock music from the suburb to the stadium, from the crackly '45 to the MP3 download. Along the way, rock's greatest performers, singers, writers and producers tell us how rock emerged, grew, strengthened and gave voice to each new generation.
2007 sees rock music at its healthiest state since the 1970's. Despite numerous predictions that 'rock is dead', it has survived. Fans are attending more gigs and more festivals than ever before and the guitar is definitely back as the weapon of choice. The UK alone has nurtured a rich new crop of rock bands over the last 5 years, each one building on the solid foundation and heritage of the past, creating a vibrant and promising legacy for the future.

Seven Ages of Rock will, though the prism of a central wrap-around artist or group, explore a key era in rock. From the UK electric blues boom, via the psychedelic rock of the late 60’s; from the 70’s punk explosion and on to the rise of grunge and indie rock in the 1980’s and beyond, this series tells story of each age through the music itself: breaking down key tracks, getting behind the songs and ideas and providing a social context for the progression of the music. With contributions from some of the biggest names in rock, the series will set a new standard in heritage music television.

1. The Road to Woodstock
2. Between Rock And an Art Place
3. Blank Generation
4. Never Say Die
5. Global Jukebox
6. The Last Rock Star
7. What the World is Waiting For

Full details (which for some reason ILM won't let me copy and paste)
here:

http://www.vinylvulture.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=13684

pisces, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:25 (eighteen years ago)

Looks like these people finally realise there's more to rock history than R&B, soul, funk and hip-hop. Now good and about time.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:27 (eighteen years ago)

(But still, I don't understand why they have to make a series about "white" rock alone - couldn't they have integrated it into the "Dancing In The Street" series instead - thus telling the entire rock history and not just from one cultural viewpoint?)

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:29 (eighteen years ago)

well they did a 6 part soul series, now they're doing rock.
sorta thing. rockism sure, but hey.

pisces, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:31 (eighteen years ago)

Blimey: Geir calls for integration!

Mark G, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:42 (eighteen years ago)

I understand pisces point here, but if they feel like dividing into several series (which may be natural considering a lot of important stuff will have to be left out in a series of up to 10 programs anyway) I would feel it would be more natural to create one series about 50s rock, one about 60s rock, one about 70s rock etc.

After all rock is integrated. Particularly so-called "white" rock music has a lot of "black" influence and it's completely unnatural not to stress that. I mean, why else would Yes and Genesis have had drummers (and not the odd timpani effect) if it wasn't for the influence from African American music?

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:47 (eighteen years ago)

But was it? As the millennium dawned, a new cohort of bands emerged to redefine British indie. By returning to its roots in clubs and bars, even front rooms, indie became respectable again. Once again, it meant something beyond a marketing cliché. From The Libertines to Franz Ferdinand and The Arctic Monkeys, indie labels reconnected to their fans, using both new technology and good old rock n roll to inspire and motivate a new generation to ditch the decks pick up a guitar. Rock is back. But for some, it never went away.

acrobat, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:49 (eighteen years ago)

With analysis like that this will be a must-see series.

Groke, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:50 (eighteen years ago)

BTW wasn't Dancing In The Street meant to be the all-inclusive series Geir is calling for, and then the more specialist ones have followed?

Actually a 7-part history of indie might be interesting!

Groke, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:51 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, (xpost to Geir) but that's been done so often.

Having some sort of linear progression makes more sense. The music commonly regarded as the 'sixties' didn't start in 1961 and end in 1969.

Similarly, a 1970s one would have to encompass Prog, Disco, Punk, etc. without referencing before or after.

Mark G, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:51 (eighteen years ago)

7. What the World is Waiting For

From the Stone Roses, the heir manqué of the indie music crown, via Suede’s dark sexuality and the media saturation of Brit-pop’s Blur v Oasis, indie was now a marketing device, ultimately losing any of it’s once cherished intimacy and integrity in front of 250,000 fans at Oasis’s Knebworth spectacle in 1996. Indie was mainstream. Indie was dead.
But was it?
---

Nice to see Suede are getting credit where it's due in these things.

pisces, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:52 (eighteen years ago)

"dark sexuality" is an odd alternate term for "hetero".

Dom Passantino, Friday, 11 May 2007 09:55 (eighteen years ago)

Why nothing about 50s rock'n'roll? Is it now viewed as a seperate entity from "rock music", and so we begin in the 60s?

Duane Barry, Friday, 11 May 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)

From the Stone Roses, the heir manqué of the indie music crown, via Suede’s dark sexuality and the media saturation of Brit-pop’s (sic) Blur v Oasis, indie was now a marketing device, ultimately losing any of it’s (sic) once cherished intimacy and integrity in front of 250,000 fans at Oasis’s Knebworth spectacle in 1996. Indie was mainstream. Indie was dead.

But was it?


Is James Burke presenting this or something?

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 11 May 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)

Dancing In The Street was superb. can't see how this can improve on that esp. if it's narrowing the scope/range. DITS didn't go beyond early 90s dance tho so i can see the advantages of an update.

blueski, Friday, 11 May 2007 10:31 (eighteen years ago)

the History Of The Song docu a couple of years back was also great.

Looks like these people finally realise there's more to rock history than R&B, soul, funk and hip-hop.

sorry to take the bait but who the hell are "these people" ffs

blueski, Friday, 11 May 2007 10:33 (eighteen years ago)

yeah that was the 'Walk on By' blueski.
episodes are currently availble on t0rr£nt$ an ting.

pisces, Friday, 11 May 2007 10:53 (eighteen years ago)

BTW wasn't Dancing In The Street meant to be the all-inclusive series Geir is calling for

It was not all inclusive, lacking most of the genres and movements in this new series. I think it covered British beat, punk and bluesrock. Other than that, it was R&B, soul, funk and hip-hop and nothing else.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:14 (eighteen years ago)

Any series about rock history which doesn't give a lot of attention to symphonic rock and 80s/90s/00s English indie is pointless.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:16 (eighteen years ago)

Symphonic Rock was an influential thing for, what, 3 years? Yes, should be covered, but no not a lot.

Indie over the three decades you say is a markedly different thing from first to last.

A bit like how 50's R&B is markedly different to 90's / 00's R&B

Mark G, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:19 (eighteen years ago)

Indie over the three decades you say is a markedly different thing from first to last.

Sociologically, yes. Musically, no.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:48 (eighteen years ago)

(Except 90s indie was way better and more fully realized, not at least production-wise, than 80s indie)

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:48 (eighteen years ago)

You're mixing up "any series about rock history which doesn't give a lot of attention to symphonic rock and 80s/90s/00s English indie" with "Geir Hongro."

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:50 (eighteen years ago)

Symphonic Rock was an influential thing for, what, 3 years?

Nazism didn't last for more than 10 years or something, which is hardly a long time in world history. Does this mean historians should stop bothering with WW2 as it wasn't "influential"?

Plus there's a lot of music these days that is influenced by prog. Surely, it may not have seemed very influential just after punk, but Radiohead, Spiritualized, Muse, Mansun, Flaming Lips, lots of 90s electronica - all unthinkable without prog.

Also, it is unlikely Brian Eno would have happened without Nice/ELP/Genesis/Yes paving the way. Isn't Eno influential?

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:53 (eighteen years ago)

Geir uses Nazism as allegory for symphonic rock, quelle surprise.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:55 (eighteen years ago)

Nazism has a place in history, symphonic rock has a place in history. Obviously, symhonic rock was way more positive. :)

Geir Hongro, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:57 (eighteen years ago)

But you like them both.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 11 May 2007 11:58 (eighteen years ago)

And it all had started so well...

Mark G, Friday, 11 May 2007 12:01 (eighteen years ago)

would swap this for a series on prewar british popular music

696, Friday, 11 May 2007 12:09 (eighteen years ago)

bbc4 probably working on that

also there's a "classical brittania" series in a few months time

Frogman Henry, Friday, 11 May 2007 12:52 (eighteen years ago)

This sounds intriguing. Too bad I live in the States.

Bill Magill, Friday, 11 May 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)

woop woop.
embeddable chunks of footage here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/sevenages/embeddable-video/

pisces, Friday, 18 May 2007 08:31 (eighteen years ago)

Vernon Kay's Gameshow Marathon has never been more alluring.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 18 May 2007 08:41 (eighteen years ago)

NODDY HOLDER WAS BIGGIN' THIS SERIES UP ON THE RADIO LAST NIGHT.

AND BY A STRANGE COINCIDENCE, HE WAS ALSO TALKING ABOUT HIS APPEARANCE ON VERNON KAY'S GAMESHOW MARATHON, WHERE HE CONDUCTED THE ORCHESTRA.

PJ Miller, Friday, 18 May 2007 09:46 (eighteen years ago)

Noddy be buyin 2 DVD recorders!

Mark G, Friday, 18 May 2007 09:50 (eighteen years ago)

Ginger Baker and Jack Bruce on the messy implosion of the first super-group.

Duration: 50 mins


Guys still got issues.

Billy Dods, Friday, 18 May 2007 09:53 (eighteen years ago)

That's a better "chain" than anything Radcliffe/Maconie have come up with yet! (PJ xpost)

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 18 May 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)

Any chance this series will run on BBC Prime?

Geir Hongro, Friday, 18 May 2007 10:15 (eighteen years ago)

Ginger Baker and Jack Bruce on the messy implosion of the first super-group.

Duration: 50 mins

Guys still got issues.

-- Billy Dods, Friday, 18 May 2007 10:53 (42 minutes ago)

not a whole episode about that though right? its just an er 'highlight'. i'll be giving the 'blues' episode a wide berth.

pisces, Friday, 18 May 2007 10:36 (eighteen years ago)

The indie episode looks kind of weird. Not that I am complaining about the inclusion of R.E.M, Pixies and Nirvana, but it seems weird basing an entire indie episode on those three bands, not at all focusing on such important indie names as The Smiths, Stone Roses, Happy Mondays, Suede, Blur and Oasis. It's a UK series after all, but it seems the makers behind the program are continuing their pathetic attemt to undervalue Britain's important part in rock history.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 18 May 2007 10:59 (eighteen years ago)

nah, look at the suede clips in that link! bernard! brett! etcetera!
also noel hillariously ripping into BE HERE NOW once again.

pisces, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:16 (eighteen years ago)

oh boy.

Mark G, Friday, 18 May 2007 11:18 (eighteen years ago)

No I don't think Jack Good was involved.

I can't work out why an American-funded series would leave out all those groups either.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:09 (eighteen years ago)

haha jack good. actual lol there.

pisces, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:25 (eighteen years ago)

"(But still, I don't understand why they have to make a series about "white" rock alone - couldn't they have integrated it into the "Dancing In The Street" series instead - thus telling the entire rock history and not just from one cultural viewpoint?)"

so youre saying soul should be called rock n roll too?

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:26 (eighteen years ago)

erm geir 7.
What the World is Waiting For
But was it? As the millennium dawned, a new cohort of bands emerged to redefine British indie. By returning to its roots in clubs and bars, even front rooms, indie became respectable again. Once again, it meant something beyond a marketing cliché. From The Libertines to Franz Ferdinand and The Arctic Monkeys, indie labels reconnected to their fans, using both new technology and good old rock n roll to inspire and motivate a new generation to ditch the decks pick up a guitar. Rock is back. But for some, it never went away.

acrobat, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

From the Libertines to Franz Ferdinand and The Arctic Monkeys

the broad palette of contemporary rock

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 18 May 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)

so youre saying soul should be called rock n roll too?

The entire popular music history from "Rock Around The Clock" until today could easily be put into the same series.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:06 (eighteen years ago)

But then they'd have to include all genres, even ones that only lasted for a few years, not just some of them (or the ones coincidally most important today).

Geir Hongro, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:07 (eighteen years ago)

Hmm Btw. I was looking at chapter 6, but obviously the British indie chapter is 7. My bad.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 18 May 2007 13:07 (eighteen years ago)

They couldn't even bring themselves to say who Kathleen Hanna was. She was just a friend of the band. Would it really have been so hard to say, "Kathleen Hanna of the band Bikini Kill"?

haha, yes. Already tired of how narrow its focus was, I was pleased to hear that namecheck, then baffled by her being no more than "Kurt's friend". And there I was thinking it was already kind of stupid that past Nirvana documentaries had mentioned "Kurt's friend Dylan Carlson".

I missed the first five or ten minutes of the indie one, so for me British indie was The Smiths splitting up, The Stones Roses existing for a while, then Oasis battling it out with Blur. Huzzah!

Merdeyeux, Monday, 2 July 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)

Any chance this will be released on DVD? (I imagine the licensing for all the video footage, live recordings and so on would be pretty impressive, but this is the BBC...)

StanM, Monday, 2 July 2007 10:37 (eighteen years ago)

J&MC Whistle test: Stopping the song like what?

Mark G, Monday, 2 July 2007 10:51 (eighteen years ago)

Jim shouted "stop! stop!!!" at one point, whereupon the horrible racket they were making ground to a thankful halt. Koogs is right; this wasn't in the original broadcast. I'm assuming this was a tape of the "rehearsal".

harveyw, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:02 (eighteen years ago)

Unless it was another of the programme's ill-advised "reconstructions".

harveyw, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:04 (eighteen years ago)

this ep was 'how indie killed itself'. i only caught the last 40 mins or so. i'll watch the rest later.

Alan, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:09 (eighteen years ago)

ooh! want! want!

(pssh, what are the chances? They probably used that by mistake!)

Although, how do they do those shows? They ask for the video, they get it onto a copy tape, then drop the segment in, right? (I used to work in these places)...

Mark G, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:10 (eighteen years ago)

>the whole thing was very much intended for american audiences. shows >highlighting the brilliance of The Sweetest Ache wouldn't play well in >minnesota.

How is this show meant for an American audience? What American will ever see it? It's BBC produced anyway... I doubt the American funding stipulated 4 mentions of the Pixies, but no mentions of Pavement, etc.

uhrrrrrrr10, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:26 (eighteen years ago)

Metal: no ACDC, no Whitesnake
Glam: no Marc Bolan
Indie: no Dog-Faced Hermans, no Death By Milkfloat

Kim Tortoise, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:30 (eighteen years ago)

The series is a US/UK co-production and most of the finance came from the US side.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:31 (eighteen years ago)

"The true banner of indie is carried nowadays by Rascall Flatts and Dave Matthews Band"

Dom Passantino, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:34 (eighteen years ago)

where was steve albini? how come we had to sit and suffer scott litt banging on every 10 minutes and no mention of him?

the whole 'kurt had the UNPLUGGED venue dressed like a funeral...' spiel and then the scott litt waffling that 'it had to end there with that scream...' on the last song etc felt like a stupid and dangerous thing to do. suggesting to a new audience that may not know the whole story that he maybe planned to kill himself afterwards and so on.

they made it sound like that was the last ever nirvana gig and it wasn't.

pisces, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)

Never mind Albini - just the one, very brief, passing referral to C**rtn*y L*v*? Were the producers feart of her lawyers?

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:48 (eighteen years ago)

>>ooh! want! want!

>>(pssh, what are the chances? They probably used that by mistake!)

Unlikely in the extreme. For a clip such as this one, they would normally just call up the completed programme as broadcast. It would be a very vigilant film researcher that would call up rehearsal/insert tapes too (which, by rights, shouldn't even exist). But, judging from some of the hyper-obscure Smiths footage also included, the film researcher *was* very vigilant.

harveyw, Monday, 2 July 2007 12:38 (eighteen years ago)

The series is a US/UK co-production and most of the finance came from the US side.

-- Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 11:31 (1 hour ago) Link

Yeah, but that's still irrelevent when it's made exclusively for the UK audience and written/produced by the BBC (it's British, I hear), thus making the "made for the American audience" argument invalid since no US audience is ever going to see this.

There's probably some cultural diplomacy involved (rock = something from America that's not war, etc.), but I doubt some American government agent was rubbing his hands like "yeah, more Pixies, less Pavement... yes... excellent..."

uhrrrrrrr10, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:19 (eighteen years ago)

Well, the Jesus & Mary Chain "In a hole" footage was originally shown twice. (yeah, I know, contradition in terms there)..

So, my guess is that the whole thing is filed under "J&MC Session" and the OGWT progs dropped in the completed song as per performance, and the 7Ags show just picked a satisfactory part of the whole session as illustration.

Mark G, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:33 (eighteen years ago)

ooh what was the hyper-obscure smiths footage?? didnt see the last ep.

pisces, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)

The point is that the BBC made the programme with a view to selling it overseas, so they have to concentrate on acts who are "internationally known" on a major-selling level.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)

did no one else think it was a bit of a dour ending that they basically admitted at the end that nothing new can be done, the best you can hope for now is just reassembling elements of the past (and thats it, more or less)?

the kind words from john harris and noel gallagher about the libertines seemed a bit forced.

titchyschneiderMk2, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)

As regards the Smiths footage, it seemed to consist of a snatch of their TOTP appearance with "This Charming Man" followed by an extract from the Hacienda gig which they allegedly played later the same night.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)

> Yeah, but that's still irrelevent when it's made exclusively for the UK audience and written/produced by the BBC (it's British, I hear), thus making the "made for the American audience" argument invalid since no US audience is ever going to see this.

a quick google says that the north american rights for the series have been sold to VH-1

koogs, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:45 (eighteen years ago)

wasn't there also dressing room footage of the smiths?

koogs, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

It was all fashionably smudged up.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 13:51 (eighteen years ago)

"Fashionably smudged up"!!! It was probably shot on domestic equipment (which in 1983 meant a VHS camcorder), then passed through over-compensatory video noise reduction to make it watchable. This process -while removing noise- makes the picture rather smeary. Priceless stuff, nevertheless.

harveyw, Monday, 2 July 2007 14:10 (eighteen years ago)

In terms of removing noise, it's a pity they couldn't remove Julian Rhind-Tutt's hugely irritating narration.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 14:13 (eighteen years ago)

were the housemartins in it?

acrobat, Monday, 2 July 2007 14:42 (eighteen years ago)

No.

But a generous amount of time was devoted to the Libertines, so that's near enough.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

that's very unkind marcello. paul heaton is surely the melodic elephant in this almost empty room.

acrobat, Monday, 2 July 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)

Unfortunately he didn't sell in America.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)

And also, unlike Tommy Doherty, he is not a "character."

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)

Isn't he the only convicted football hooligan to have a #1 single, though?

Dom Passantino, Monday, 2 July 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

surely the housemartins were the first "indie" act to get properly big, first to get a no 1 single anyway?

acrobat, Monday, 2 July 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

Unfortunately they didn't sell in America.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 2 July 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

marr has always said that HAPPY HOUR was a rip of I WANT THE ONE I CAN'T HAVE. he sort of has a point.

pisces, Monday, 2 July 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)

ha. i read marr as andrew marr and thought you were making a zing about some of his *alleged* revisionism in his history of britain program. happy hour is about thatcher thou innit...

acrobat, Monday, 2 July 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

Uhhhh10 is a moron. They said American funding, not funding by the American government (we don't have anything really equivalent to the BBC). And we get a lot of BBC shows over here. The rest of the post was too stupid too even bother with.

Bill Magill, Monday, 2 July 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

Intended to market overseas doesn't/shouldn't mean 'can only focus on bands known/successful outside the US and UK'. do they really base it on the logic that less people will watch if they haven't heard of everyone being talked about? it'd ridiculous.

blueski, Monday, 2 July 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)

Sorry Bill Magill, but you can choke on my hairy, foul-smelling balls. Are you one of those Brit-appeasing paste-o-philes? the only British shows we get here are those dusty Britcoms 60 year olds watch on the PBS affiliates. Otherwise, only a handful of digital cable owners get BBC4 if they select it as part of their package.

But, if the intention is for the BBC to sell it overseas, then that makes sense.

uhrrrrrrr10, Monday, 2 July 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)

Not sure what a Brit appeasing past-o-phile is, douchebag. I've actually seen some recent music-related BBC stuff on my tv, which does't happen to get BBC4. I don't know where "here" is for you but it sounds like the tv options are about as good as the education you received.

And no thanks on the offer re: your balls-I'd like to instead take the opportunity to kick the living shit out of you.

Bill Magill, Monday, 2 July 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)

take it outside, you two!

henry s, Monday, 2 July 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)

not in MY gym!

henry s, Monday, 2 July 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)

Henry S Cooper?

Mark G, Monday, 2 July 2007 22:03 (eighteen years ago)

lol noobs

blueski, Monday, 2 July 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=search_videos&search_query=seven%20ages%20of%20rock&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&search_category=0&search=Search&v=

there's your last episode right there in full. well 9 parts, but 'full' if you get me.

pisces, Thursday, 5 July 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

Is there a DVD version of this yet?

That kind of stuff rarely makes it here, but as I will be in UK next week I thought there might be a chance to pick it up, if available. I really want to see this series.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 9 November 2007 02:24 (seventeen years ago)

Looks like these people finally realise there's more to DVD entertainment than rock history programs. Now good and about time.

jeff, Friday, 9 November 2007 02:28 (seventeen years ago)

fap? (x-post)

jabba hands, Friday, 9 November 2007 02:30 (seventeen years ago)

three months pass...

Finally managed to find these as a Torrent, and have subsequently burned them to a DVD to watch in calm. Have already seen the indie episode, and it was ace. I never get tired of this kind of series, and in this case, he covers a lot of genres who have been sort of skipped in earlier series. (I guess the first and third programs are the only ones covering genres that have largely been covered very comprehensively by similar documentaries earlier)

Geir Hongro, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:19 (seventeen years ago)

this is basically the same as that other britpop doc. lameness.

I would say no. For starters, the other doc completely ignored Suede. This one, on the other hand, has none of Liam Gallagher, whose statements are entertaining and fun, but completely uniformative as the guy cannot possibly have an IQ of more than 50 at most.

Geir Hongro, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:25 (seventeen years ago)

Plus you have the entire indie history here, not just those few years from 93-94 until 1997-98. And there's also less of that other contemporary stuff such as Brit Art etc. This one concentrates on the music.

Geir Hongro, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:26 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.