Stairway to hell; the 500 best heavy metal albums by Chuck Eddy

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Intrigued by the praise heaped on him elsewhere I checked out amazon to see what was available. Usually everything on amazon gets 5 stars in the customer reviews, but here 16 out of the 17 reviews give it one star. So what's the deal then?

Billy Dods, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Who is this 'scrape100' individual asking Judas Priest fans to grow up eh??

Tom, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The deal is that it's a really good book, by the way.

Tom, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Gotta be more positive reviews than that. I know, I wrote one. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Stairway to Hell is great. It helped me realize that Sonny Sharrock and Teena Marie are waaaay more metal than Steve Albini and inspired a greater appreciation of Led Zeppelin.

The cover art, at least on the edition that I read, is pretty ass though.

adam, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I remember that book! That book taught me about Osmium by Parliament, and successfully predicted the popularity of Nine Inch Nails (via the essay about the unavoidable fusion of metal and disco). However, I think you'd have to admit his definition of heavy metal is a bit more liberal than most. Seriously, Bryan Adams? Donny Osmond??

dleone, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

People always talk about how Lester Bangs wrote "literature as rock n roll" in the spirit of the music he loved, and yeah sure fair enough but Eddy does the same thing without the writer-as-rock-STAR narcissicism that clogged up Bangs's book with "I, The Bukowski of Cough-syrup" self-mythology.

The great thing about "Stairway to Hell" is how he resists the critic's impulse to equate liking something with having reverence for it. I think he's sometimes criticized for being "ironic" or insincere about records that he champions, but he really just approaches criticism the same way real people listen to music and talk about it.

I'd really love to read a piece by Eddy on what he thinks of "Stairway" now - what he missed, what he thinks he over- and under- rated, what he makes of his prediction that disco-metal was the wave of the future, etc. etc.

fritz, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It changed my life! Then High Fidelity changed it back...

mark s, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd really love to read a piece by Eddy on what he thinks of "Stairway" now

Easily done, m'friend -- this interview isn't even a month old or so.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And he mentions Ally = he is a genius.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

thanks, Ned!

fritz, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The cover art, at least on the edition that I read, is pretty ass though.

The new edition has a much better cover. A grim B&W Alice Cooper mug glaring at you on a black cover.

Lord Custos II, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it fails due to Eddy's rather flimsy defintion of "heavy metal" (and strange affinity for the utterly hopeless band, Kix). The cover art (grim faced Alice Cooper) does indeed rock.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

his definition of heavy metal = "whatever i want to write about" (with guitars) = the only reason anyone should write a book evah

mark s, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(except the guitars bit obv)

mark s, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I clearly need this book NOW. Tanx for all the links upthread.

Jeff W, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(I got loads of hate mail from Judas Priest fans btw)

As you can embarrassingly see, I used to rate this book very highly, but after a while some things started to really grate on me. The main complaint about this book is that it 'passes itself off as something it isn't', and I think whatever it is, the author isn't really a critic. Key4me was the review of 'Who's Next' where he says "I don't know why anyone would want to put up with their oily timidity and [emphasis mine] I DON'T WANT TO KNOW." Well, you can hate the Who's pompous, rockless, droning album all you want, but I think that the second part of the sentence is kind of part of a crit's job (in the case of Eddy, he can't say that it's only a 'musical' statement because he's the one who brings up the suburban superiority/inferiority complex alot [also a reason he probably likes Canadian artists so much]). But then, for a monologue, it sure took a long time to wear out on me, so it must've been pretty well put together.

Incidentally, if the 'Top 500 Italian Disco Singles' were ever written (hint for any subjects of thread who might be googling), "Ride on Time" would be about mid-table - that's how good this genre is. Thanx for bringing it to my attention.

dave q, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Whoa, that was a bit hard on the book - I should admit that I know every word by memory, so for me to pick holes in it is a bit pathetic. Certain quotes from there - metal bands who "believe in the myth of power because they're dumb enough to believe they'll actually get some", "Out ta Get Me is more or less crap", "[grunge] was more like looking at a picture of music than listening to music" - had a that's-EXACTLY-what-I-was-trying-to-say! quality that made sure it stayed in the bog for about 3 years. Also I think the key to CE's writing (if not critical) method (and I don't care what his critical method is, everybody's got one and they're all etc. etc.) - an interview somewhere where somebody said "You really hate Sonic Youth", he replied "No I don't, not at all". "That's funny, you dog them in the book really bad." "Everybody's said 1001 good things about Sonic Youth, why do you need to read one more? Everyone already KNOWS they're good."

dave q, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I just spent three hours that I should have been studying for my final exam EVAH reading that damm interview and assorted attached articles.
Wedding Disc Jockey for hire. Have "Rasputin," will travel.
Rock and/or Roll!

Mr Noodles, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And he mentions Ally = he is a genius.

ned, you need a vacation.

blah blah, chuck eddy, brilliant, etc. probably the only writer who i disagree with more than 50% of what he says yet i still read.

jess, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not crazy about Eddy, but I hope somebody gives him money to write that 500 Greatest Techno Albums book.

Mark, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ned, you need a vacation.

Thus New Zealand. But my assertion remains true. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The reason it gets ranked so low is all the people whose reaction is "Metallica came in at only [bignum]? What an ***hole!"

I picked up a copy of the book recently and love it. (Hey, he had Teena Marie in his top 10; for that alone he's going to heaven.) Does anyone else in the Washington area want to help me start a "Stairway to Hell" dance night?

j.lu, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ugh, that interview page; dark orange text against light orange background. Awful.

Sean, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it changes colour every time you go into it sean (at least, some of rockcritics.com does)

mark s, Thursday, 18 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

an interview somewhere where somebody said "You really hate Sonic Youth", he replied "No I don't, not at all". "That's funny, you dog them in the book really bad." "Everybody's said 1001 good things about Sonic Youth, why do you need to read one more? Everyone already KNOWS they're good."

I looked up the interview. (also from rockcritics.com - it's an older one) When the interviewer pressed him a little more on this point, Eddy responded:

"the bottom line is, I want my writing to be GOOD WRITING, okay? And it's, it's like, I just don't know that I have any interesting good things to say about Springsteen. But that doesn't mean that I don't LIKE him. I write about stuff--the records I write about are not necessarily my favourite records, but they're the ones I think will make for the most interesting writing, and I say what, positively or negatively--that doesn't mean I'm lying, but because I write about Debbie Gibson a lot, that doesn't mean that she's my favourite artist, it just means that I think I have a lot of interesting things to say about Debbie Gibson. If I wrote about Springsteen as much as I liked him, I think what I wrote about him would be pretty boring."

I guess that's reasonable, but it sums up what I don't like about Eddy. He's a very good writer, very clever and observant and he's always coming up with lines I wish I'd thought of, but there's something dishonest about his writing. It seems like his main concern is writing 'interesting' reviews (i.e., reviews just overflowing with his trademark wit and penchant for saying outrageously stupid things which even he'll later recant by insisting that you should never take him all THAT seriously, come on, what are you some kind of nerd?), and the results are undeniably entertaining but ultimately empty and unrevealing. I don't think I've ever gotten any great insights from an Eddy review - as I have from Bangs, Meltzer, Marcus, and even Christgau, who I usually can't stand. I just can't picture Lester Bangs giving a fuck about Debbie Gibson, that's all. Even if he'd liked her music, he wouldn't have written dozens of pages on her just to show what an "interesting" writer he could be.

I mean, I think a lot of the people who post to ILM are better writers and more interesting thinkers than Chuck Eddy. And as for the humor, hell, Mark Prindle makes me laugh more often than he does.

Oh, and I always thought "Out Ta Get Me" was great. Just one long screaming paranoid freakout. Beats "Paradise City" by a mile.

Justyn Dillingham, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Eddy's method is pretty dead-on, to be honest - if you're going to be writing about pop music then it's not a bad idea to try to say things that other people aren't saying. It is mostly a bad idea to write stuff you don't actually think but that's not what he's doing. But then I have got loads of insights out of his writing - which is what I take "interesting" to mean, rather than stylistically amusing.

Tom, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"I just can't picture Lester Bangs giving a fuck about Debbie Gibson" ==> Lester wrote a whole BOOK about Deborah Harry, Justyn.

mark s, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And Hall and Oates!

Andrew L, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I am/have been a big admirer of Stairway to Hell and am re-reading it at the moment. I instantly liked Chuck Eddy. Perhaps subconsciously I felt he took more of a female fan perspective on music: there's no need to prove credentials, it's more important to prove emotions - and you need facts to back up your emotions, not just a load of watery self-importance, ala Meltzer. And the underdog thing: championing the unchampioned just because - for some reason - you feel a need to spit in everybody's face - not out of malice, but for fun - and not championing the well-known underdog, but wriggling further and further out on a limb until in your contortions you've found something that's your joke alone - which is why I HATE it that he likes Sonic Youth. He's so right when he says he doesn't really dog them - what a stooge he proved to be at those moments.

I was surprised to find that his writing is less punchy than I remembered. It seems much more human now, more like what I might write - I used to think that his writing was compact and packed with more insights than anyone else I'd read.

maryann, Friday, 19 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
Have you guys seen the latest reviews on amazon?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/030680817X/ref=cm_cr_dp_2_1/002-2661522-2536830?%5Fencoding=UTF8&me=ATVPDKIKX0DER

Rocky Robin, Friday, 15 October 2004 09:59 (twenty-one years ago)

"Stairway To Hell" is a wildly entertaining read, with its off-the-wall insights, provocative opinions, outright bullshit (intentional or un-) and sometimes infuriating contradictions; it's also one of the 3 or 4 funniest-ever books about rock music. What it's NOT is an encyclopedic guide to metal LPs (you want Martin Popoff's staggering/impenetrable "Collectors Guide" for that.) But one thing "Stairway" accidentally documents is Eddy's changing taste in metal during the period it was written. Hard to believe, but longtime readers recall a time (mid-'80s) when Chuck regularly dissed glammers like Poison and Bon Jovi in favour of then-innovative speed-metallers like Slayer and noise-bands such as Scratch Acid and Butthole Surfers. (Even made the occasional "disco sucks"-type remark!) Then, for whatever reason, his allegiances began to reverse; and, as many folks pointed out, he begins to get cranky and negative even before Heavy Metal Album #200! Whether writing the book itself soured him to music he formerly liked or just reflects his loss of enthusiasm is unclear. But even after "Stairway" appeared in stores, mere MONTHS after in fact, Chuck was ALREADY(!) rewriting the book in his head, kicking himself in print in his "Singles Going Steady" column, saying stuff like "don't buy this book, it was written by an imposter who overpraised Funkadelic" and the like. Anyhow, "Stairway To Hell" is a perfectly typical display of the Chuck-as-Eeyore you know and love/hate. And full of jokes, my favourites regarding the awed stoner seeing his own face on a Uriah Heep album cover; and the title It Takes A Nation Of Millions To Make Us Multiplatinum.

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Friday, 15 October 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I count Mr. Blount, George Smith and myself as the three ILXors who have left reviews.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 October 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

and don't forget "A reader" on August 27, 1999 (cf. Tom upthread) who has since removed his ID and partially withdrawn review (again, see upthread)

zebedee (zebedee), Friday, 15 October 2004 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

You can basically blame this book (1st edition) for the fact that I write.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha, you are not alone, my friend. It's definitely a big part of it, though stylistically we've obviously taken different courses.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 October 2004 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm flattered, guys. Perhaps even blushing.

Some sundry stuff I've been thinking about heavy metal lately can be found in my posts here, if anybody's wondering (as some people seem to be, upthread): Rolling 2004 Metal Thread

And not sure whether I've ever pointed this out before, but if there is a book that initially inspired my music-critijism (and eventually much of *Stairway to Hell*) the way *Stairway* allegedly inspired a couple people on this thread, it would probably be this one here:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0316104299/qid=1097871290/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-3859423-1851969?v=glance&s=books

chuck, Friday, 15 October 2004 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

(What I mean is, to paraphrase Anthony above, "You can basically blame that book for the fact that I write." The first published article I ever wrote [for my high school newspaper, 9th grade) was about baseball cards. The first music review I ever got paid for (Village Voice, early 1984] was about how Bad Religion's *Into the Future* sounded like anthemic '70s prog-metal radio rock. And paging through that book last week, I totally realized that this line [I'm quoting from memory, but it goes something like this] must have hit me as a mission statement: "Someday, there will be nostalgia for the 1970s. And when that finally happens, I plan to be ready for it." But in general, *Stairway's voice is stolen WAY more from that baseball card book than from Lester Bangs, no matter what people think.)

chuck, Friday, 15 October 2004 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)

(x-post)
holy shit that was a great book -- and i can totally see the connection!

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:24 (twenty-one years ago)

while I still have the response I got, I can't seem to find the fan letter I sent to Chuck almost five years ago. I found an e-mail address of his in a Popped interview I found off google (I had just found Stairway in a used bookstore in Boston and was searching for more info). I had no idea he was now the editor of the Voice and asked what places I should e-mail if I wanted to try writing (well, try writing again, I did local stuff a few year earlier but I got burnt out fast writing non-critical previes of shows I couldn't give a shit about). I also asked what he thought of Beck's Midnight Vultures and Sloan. Guess what the answer was.

Before finding the book I was basically a little Jim DeRo-esque sprat (here's proof) who was feeling further and further alienated by the rockcrit world (as I knew it from Spin, Rolling Stone and stuff like Magnet and the Big Takeover - before that e-mail the only person I'd talked to at all was Jack Rabid). I was basically planning to give up on it entirely when I found the book and was finally reading something that joyfully praised the qualities that I actually took pleasure in rather than shit like authenticity and credibility. It did remind me of the Lester Bangs I'd read in middle school but without the whole "the world has betrayed me" bitterness. It was a real mind-blower.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

it would probably be this one here

Hey, neat. And it's cheap!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:44 (twenty-one years ago)

What was the answer (about Beck and Sloan)?

xpost

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 15 October 2004 19:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I assume Chuck doesn't mind me posting this.

I don't have time to make a full reply, except to say that the 311 (a rather easy target, no? -- but given the kinda rap-metal that's come since, not all that evil; they actually had a kind of Sublime-like dub thing going on) stuff I've heard actually struck me as more interesting than the Sloan stuff I heard (they were OKAY, but pretty generically post-Husker weepy-jangly from what I remember, which isn't that much -- mainly the first album, which I reviewed for a Canadian magazine --, so maybe I'm wrong; don't recall being especially rocked by them or made to laugh -- a little too beatlessly "pure" pop for my tastes, but hey, it's cool that they hail from the Maritimes and all..) Can't even remember if I kept my copy of "Midinite Vultures" for that song "Debra" (which once inspired by 11-year-old daughter to draw a great picture of Beck-as-a-little- girl!); let me check....um, I don't see it on the shelf in the hall, but I also doubt I'd sell it, so maybe I loaned it to someone then never got it back, goddammit.

Oh well. I thought he did the artsy-guy-going-soul move okay, but not nearly as convincingly, as say, Bowie around '76 or so (which struck me as the obvious comparison, unless you wanna talk mid-'80s Prince, though rhythmically/ vocally Beck doesn't quite stand up to that, either, and Prince himself was pretty restrained rhytmically and vocally compared to say, Michael Jackson or Teena Marie.) Plus, I remember the first single from *Vultures,* whatever it was called, as being a completely awfully boring late-Beatles ripoff; of his four (right?) major label albums, I probably like this one *least.*

Oh and to correct Blount's Albert Goldman-esque assertion on ILX and on Matos's site that my fan letter came with a resume attached, I had no idea Chuck was an editor. If I had, I wouldn't have titled the e-mail (dear...god...) "Know any Mere Pseud Mag. Editors?"

*shoots self*

It was actually another two years before I sent him anything (an article on Desaparecidos article). And that was mainly because Chuck had put my name on the Pazz'n'Jop list for '01 and I felt like I should earn it by at least submitting something. By the time I did I was embarassed by about 85% of the letter I had sent.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 15 October 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh maaan, where was that trading card book when *I* was 12? (Wasn't eritten yet, oops I'm old.)Speaking of DeRo, he denounced Stairway for eading our youth astray, because it sez "metal" on the ocver and it's not metal. I used to work in a store that sold books about music, and nobody ever returned it. (They did return some Real Metal books, the clipping-service-"based" 'uns:"Hey, I already read this stuff!")(Not that we don't need more good Real Metal books; where's the Rough Guide, or maybe they've finally done it? They've done everything else.) Before I defend it anymore, I should admit that he prints my stuff in the Voice, and that I'm in STAIRWAY's stairwell of acknowledgements or thanks or whatever they are (thank you CE). As far as liking Bruce but not having anything interesting to say about him, I say "Amen" to that (also I've enough Miles Davis and Sun Ra albums to build a lowercase stairway, but hardly ever thought of anything to say about 'em, that somebody else hadn't said as well or better than I could). Who the hell wants to read the same thing said by nine million diffent people? A lot of people want it, a lot want to write it too (hopefully not nine million though). Chuck does and always has changed his opinions (in the ratings sense) a lot. See the afterword to the second edition, and the title of his second book, THE ACCIDENTAL EVOLUTION OF ROCK 'N' ROLL, def. applies to him and anyone else who gives evidence of really *continuig to listen,* and reflecting/comunicating his listening experience. He keeps changing his mind about the new Drive-By Truckers, but in the wrong direction! Alas, we all have our tragic flaws.

don, Friday, 15 October 2004 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I was bummed to see that top 25 metal albums Rust Never Sleeps and Rocks didnt make the must-hear discography in Accidental Evolution (which I might like more but was already led astray). Those are two of my favorite albums of all time!

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 15 October 2004 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

oh and the 2nd edition of Stairway To Hell is in the REFERENCE section of the PSU Main Library. Most "list" type books get put there. I don't think they have Popoff's book so PSU must feel Eddy is the final word on the subject of metal.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 15 October 2004 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)

REFERENCE section

meaning you can't check it out (too important as a resource)

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 15 October 2004 20:30 (twenty-one years ago)

That baseball card book was one of my favorite books when I was a child. (Another was Lawrence Ritter's The Glory of Their Times.) I wouldn't mind reading it again.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 16 October 2004 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Chuck, which album is the equivalent of the '52 Gus Zernial card?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 16 October 2004 02:17 (twenty-one years ago)

the one where gus is wearing a pink t-shirt under his philly athletics jersey, and there's seven baseballs attached to the bat? well, the first disco tex and the sexolettes album, obviously! (or maybe big and rich...) not metal, but hey, neither was zernial, right?

i actually used to own a DIFFERENT '52 A's card as a kid, but i forget who it was off hand. it was the oldest topps card in my collection. (oldest card total was, um, vern bickford or vern bickman or whatever his name was, on the boston braves -- a little 1949 bowman card.)

chuck, Saturday, 16 October 2004 04:01 (twenty-one years ago)

wow, i don't know what i was on about in 2002 - especially with the debbie gibson thing - and i'm a little embarrassed that chuck eddy himself had to read my incredibly uninformed ranting about him (i think i also called meltzer "the worst rock writer ever" in another really old thread from about this time). this thread just caught me in my last stage of reactionary-rockism, i guess. now that i've actually read it all, i think stairway to hell is a fantastic, fun, useful book, and accidental evolution has its moments too (though i haven't made it through the whole thing yet).

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 16 October 2004 07:13 (twenty-one years ago)

over the yrs, one nagging question remains: how could Truth by the Jeff Beck Group not be one of the 500 b h/m LPs?

lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Saturday, 16 October 2004 10:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Perhaps "Old Man River" tipped the scales?

don, Saturday, 16 October 2004 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Powerage wuz robbed, but this was discussed elsewhere

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 16 October 2004 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

It occurs to me (and maybe this is obvious) that the main reason the book is so controversial is the contrast between the packaging in terms of title and cover art (which were possibly not even Chuck's choices - but they really do make it look like a totally orthodox look at metal) and the actual contents of the book. It was influential on me too but you can't totally fault someone for feeling a little cheated who actually, y'know, wanted to read about metal (as commonly defined even in 1991) records (especially given that metal doesn't really get that much cred from the critical establishment as is). If it had been called something else, it would probably be freely recognized by its audience for what it is (among other things, a witty and entertaining read and a singular look at records that you wouldn't normally think to classify together but that do sort of fit by a certain logic). And orthodox metal fans wouldn't even bother to pick it up. No one faults Prendergast too much for finding common ground between Erik Satie, Led Zeppelin, and DJ Shadow or seems that bothered that the Billboard Guide to Progressive Music looks equally at Jethro Tull, Throbbing Gristle, Rachel's, and Glenn Branca.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Saturday, 16 October 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

(Similarly, The Wire places Missy Elliot and Derek Bailey on the same end-of-year chart without any huge kerfuffle.)

sundar subramanian (sundar), Saturday, 16 October 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

sundar OTM

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Saturday, 16 October 2004 16:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Chuck's acknowledged the artwork issue elsewhere (wasn't his idea). If they ever do a third edition they should do something like Accidental Evolution where they put multiple artists on the front, giving a better idea of the variety within (pictures of Sonic Youth and Teena Marie would help).

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 16 October 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah I can see how the artwork *could* throw somebody (and, though I haven't read the Amazoners yet, possible they took the word of a previous customer who approved it without adequately describing the varitety of albums therein; that's one prob with having almost all reviews written by customers,not that some aren't helpful). But like I said, nobody ever returned it to our store, where they could look inside the book(although come to think of it, Amazon lets you look at repros of pages, in a lot of cases; don't know about that one).

don, Sunday, 17 October 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)

nah, i didn't pick the cover(s). and i never liked them much. so at first sundar's seeminglycompletely reasonable post made sense to me, unitl i remembered that the people on the covers are led zeppelin (first edition) and alice cooper (second edition), both of whom figure very prominently throughout the book and (maybe more importantly) both of whom many metal fans would probably already not have classifed as metal by 2001. both of them are pretty well aligned with the scope of *stairway*, too; it's not like the publishing companies put, say, iron maiden and cannibal corpse on the cover. (as an aside, i've never really understood the whining about maiden/priest/crue/etc.'s ommission; the book is not subtitled "the 500 most popular heavy metal albums in the universe"; it's called "the 500 greatest.." if i didn't think those groups were any good -- or good enough, anyway -- why *would* i have included them? anthony is right about *powerage,* though. there's lots of albums i should have included that i didn't; i say that in an appendix to the second edition. heck, if i had to do it over, i might even include a priest or crue album or two in there. but at the time, they just plain didn't seem good enough -- how is that not obvious??) as for anthony's suggestion that i put teena marie on the cover, i don't buy it -- she's clearly an exception in the book, not remotely typical no matter how often she gets mentioned when people write about it. kix or george clinton or sonny sharrock or heart or voivod might make more sense, maybe. i do like the idea of an *accidental*-style collage cover, if a third edition is ever published (which i kinda doubt one ever will be, to be honest.)

chuck, Sunday, 17 October 2004 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)

your writings suck mate! you don't know much about your chosen subject and still you soldier on like you're the king of musical criticism. here's a new title for a 3rd edition that will never be printed:

Irrelevant Writings of a Half-Formed Pretentious Wannabe Metalhead. Post Modern Schlock Galore.

- did you just once in your book hit 'it' right on? i think not.

xheks, Sunday, 17 October 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

dude, you are so going to get slammed here.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 17 October 2004 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)

um, maybe if he said something worth reacting to.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 17 October 2004 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm currently reading Accidental Evolution (haven't read Stairway yet) -- I checked it out from the library, but a bunch of pages were torn out!

jaymc, Sunday, 17 October 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Everyones entitled to their opinions. Even if i dont agree with the comments he made. Noone should get slammed here. Perhaps the guy was a newbie.

x-x-post

Obvious But.., Sunday, 17 October 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

well, the guy wasn't remotely coherent, whoever he was....anyway, i wanted to add to my earlier post that, since *stairway* came out in 1991 and all, i obviously didn't write it assuming people would be ordering it sight-unseen on amazon; i figured they *would* page through it in a store before buying it. (not that i feel the need to apologize to the ones who haven't done so since, but still...) also, i disagree with sundar if he thinks there was just *one* common definition of metal in 1991 {when it came out} (or 2001, the random date he mentioned, or whenever) -- different people defined the word in different ways in those years, just as they always have before or since. (which, again, was clearly one of the whole points of the book in the first place.) and again, neither zep nor cooper were ever remotely "orthodox" metal purists anyway. so i'm stumped about why sundar would think the book covers are misleading -- their typefaces, maybe?? (i didn't pick those either.)

chuck, Sunday, 17 October 2004 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)

and the book is not subtitled "the 500 MOST METAL metal albums," either. (if it was, *that* might be misleading, i admit.)

chuck, Sunday, 17 October 2004 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

woops; 2001 = random date *i* mentioned, not sundar. (i'd meant 1991 -- not sure where 2001 came from. though the point applies to people buying the book then even more so.)

chuck, Sunday, 17 October 2004 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

there is no way I would have bought this book if I hadn't flipped through it.

I would totally buy a 500 MOST metal albums book without having looked through it though. What albums are there NONE more metal than??? I want to know. Best,? Bah, critic stuff.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 17 October 2004 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)

by the way, people should definitely check out this great heavy metal album guide, from the '70s:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0816011001/thebompbookstore/103-9292186-0275866

i didn't get ahold of a copy until after *stairway* came out, but the authors include tom petty and rick springfield (which means their defintion might be even *wider* than mine!)

and oh yeah, another big influence i remember on *stairway*'s scope was a special CREEM metal issue from 1980 or so, with rob halford on the cover. i remember being shocked at the time that they included the runaways, the dictators, and mx-80 sound. and i think that might have helped open the floodgates for me....

chuck, Sunday, 17 October 2004 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh yeah, your book was def. of the Creemian stairway, in that metal and punk were orig meta-terms, not referring to a subgenre per se. or at least, Bangs did his damndest to use 'em that way, self-parodically expounding on the punkitude of Helen Reddy and James Taylor (ahving prev. written "James Taylor, Marked For Death" itself self-parodic enogh, already glimpsing the kneejerk aspect of passport punkthrodoxy etc.) And way before STAIRWAY, Chuck was already messing with metal vs. punk borders in Creem Metal (a zine I much miss).

don, Sunday, 17 October 2004 22:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Though as manthony says, enjoyable *differences* between LB and CE, like between diff punk, metal etc.

don, Sunday, 17 October 2004 22:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Chuck: It's not a huge issue to me since a) I like lots of it but I'm not a fanatic for metal by any of its definitions, b) the book is almost 15 years old, c) I still liked or at least was affected by the book, and d) it's your book anyway. All I'm saying is that it seems to me that the most interesting and worthy challenges posed by the book are i) finding commonalities between artists and musics thought by many people to be more disparate than they might actually be and ii) making a smart literary critical case for mainstream hard rock from the 70s and 80s that doesn't (or at least didn't) maybe get enough attention from music critics who could write and engage with the music on an artistic level and on an equal footing with punk or indie or funk (as opposed to, say, from technically oriented guitar mags or trade magazines or radio stations). And that it would be easier for people to deal with these challenges on their own terms if the book wasn't necessarily presented as a book about heavy metal, which seems to just raise another issue ("What is the definition of heavy metal after all?") but that this issue is a less interesting semantic one. Maybe it's not to you - maybe you are interested in making a linguistic point as well. Which is fine. I'm just saying that this makes the contents of the book more controversial than they might be otherwise. (In fact, one thing that struck me when I looked at the book more recently was, give or take a Kix or Poison, how much it actually does subscribe to classic rock critical thought, down to the frequent Journey and Styx disses. Even G'n'R and Def Leppard were highly acclaimed by mainstream rock critics - they were probably the most acclaimed bands of the genre, as they are in your book as well. Led Zeppelin IV is the ultimate canonical classic rock album; Neil Young is pretty much a deity of rock critics. . .) Which is also fine - controversy isn't inherently bad and maybe it's what you were going for.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 18 October 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

there is no way I would have bought this book if I hadn't flipped through it.

I'm trying to remember if I did! I saw it at the UCLA bookstore, I was a fan of Led Zeppelin, I loved the joke of the title and I thought it would be fun. And it was. Shortly thereafter the book was mentioned briefly on MTV.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 October 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Wasn't there a compilation album (a benefit for victims of substance abuse?) in the late 80s with that exact title? Featuring Bon Jovi and Gorky Park IIRC?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 18 October 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, it was called Stairway to Heaven/Highway to Hell.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 18 October 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

give or take a Kix or Poison

actually Poison is one of the few metal bands Christgau ever seemed to have any time for, judging by his consumer guide (them and Motorhead). And Kix and Hot Wire got four stars in the Rolling Stone Album guide from J.D Considine (Blow My Fuse got four and a HALF!). Since that was the first album guide I ever read, I always assumed Kix was a critic's band.

manthony m1cc1o (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 18 October 2004 15:51 (twenty-one years ago)

They actually did get some airplay, though.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 October 2004 15:51 (twenty-one years ago)

The book came out not only of the context of Creem and Creem metal, but also of Musician and, as Sundar mentions, the guitar mags, when thiere was a sense that the 80s had brought a range of pan-stylistic/subgeneric and even generic possibilities and *practices* into play. And metal, incl. stereotypic-even-at-the-time hair metal did this too. A band biting Zep was biting all or some of what Zep bit too: various kinds of blues, folk, funk, r&B, rockabilly etc, on some level, if only by association with the familiar/inescapbale Zep approach. And hairmetal band A might bite it differently than B, then upstart C come along and bite some of A and/or B (and thus dif/overlapping bits of LZ, but remixed differently now). Music junkies ("player and listener," as Musician Magazine's original title continued were already involved in consumption-production-comsumption *as always*, but seemed like a good time for folks to be come more self-aware of this, and to extend it. If you like Jimmy Page becsuse of this quality, here's somebody else who's got it (go where it's *freash,* instead of chewing over every scrap of Zep). And if the other guy only got it right a few times at most, screw him, try *this*. And when you've had enough of that whole approach, for luch anyway, try this over here. And yeah, can be obscure *or* somebody who's popular, too "popular" via being jammed down your throat by radio or MTV--but check the album behind the overexposed hit; it's actually good, or some of it is (even if the Wrong People like it).


don, Monday, 18 October 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
"SURPRISING"

Enrique IX: The Mediator (Enrique), Thursday, 18 May 2006 11:20 (nineteen years ago)

Surprising to some.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 18 May 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)

Can we have fiction? And not, strictly speaking, about music?

High Fidelity.
Posted by Spinny on May 17, 2006 12:19 PM.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 18 May 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)

Shamefully more than 4 years on I still haven't got around to purchasing a copy despite enjoying Chuck's posts here. If it's now going to be the hip name to drop I'd better get one quick.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 18 May 2006 19:55 (nineteen years ago)

three years pass...

1 new from $9,900.00
+ $3.99 shipping

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/030680817X/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&qid=1268027257&sr=1-2&condition=new

ice cr?m abdul-jabbar (Leee), Monday, 8 March 2010 05:54 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.