OK this is the last one I promise. Sorry Josh and Nicole.
― Tom, Wednesday, 11 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Mork, Wednesday, 11 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
(And to answer a question you asked long ago, Tom, yes I'm, the clown that read Of Grammatology because of this record!)
― mark s, Wednesday, 11 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Mark Morris, Wednesday, 11 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
(runs off stage left, avoiding rotten veg, eggs etc)
― stevie t, Wednesday, 11 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― , Wednesday, 11 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Geoff, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― alex thomson, Thursday, 12 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
*bow*
― don't derride tha derrida, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 17 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― K-reg, Friday, 27 April 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
― RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 11 March 2005 02:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 11 March 2005 02:09 (nineteen years ago) link
― Steve Gertz (sgertz), Friday, 11 March 2005 02:19 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.cobussen.com/proefschrift/100_outwork/110_music_deconstruction_ethics/music_deconstruction_ethics.htm
― Steve Gertz (sgertz), Friday, 11 March 2005 02:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 11 March 2005 12:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― the bellefox, Saturday, 26 November 2005 14:24 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 26 November 2005 15:06 (nineteen years ago) link
― the bellefox, Saturday, 26 November 2005 15:08 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 26 November 2005 15:10 (nineteen years ago) link
― the bellefox, Saturday, 26 November 2005 16:16 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 26 November 2005 16:19 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dr X O'Skeleton, Monday, 28 November 2005 13:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 28 November 2005 13:55 (nineteen years ago) link
why? what could they learn from this slightly underproduced gem?
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 28 November 2005 13:58 (nineteen years ago) link
― Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Monday, 28 November 2005 14:00 (nineteen years ago) link
― Abbadabba Berman (Hurting), Monday, 28 November 2005 14:03 (nineteen years ago) link
That they too could one day be immortalized in song. (Anything to draw away from the grinding reality of grad school.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 28 November 2005 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link
i don't get the mispronunciation thing or that it's a gag, really. I mean it's pronounced in an anglicised way which fits more with the rhythm of the song - is that the gag? if so i suppose it's a pretty subtle one.
― jed_, Sunday, 13 June 2010 17:49 (fourteen years ago) link
actually, i accept that it's a gag but i want someone to explain it to me. is THAT the gag?
― jed_, Sunday, 13 June 2010 17:56 (fourteen years ago) link
or is it just the fact that he makes it sound like da-reader?
― jed_, Sunday, 13 June 2010 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link
I don't think he meant it as a gag, he just pronounced it wrong.
― anagram, Sunday, 13 June 2010 18:13 (fourteen years ago) link
I'm in love with Jacques De-Read-er, kinda, isn't it? i.e. a pun on "reading" as in deconstructionism of texts
― Euler, Sunday, 13 June 2010 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link
regardless, this is now my favourite scritti single and i think i probably get the joke - about translation/meaning/slippage (is this close?) - as much as one can who knows only vaguely about JD.
xxpost
and likely GG did mean it as a gag - the meaning of something changing when you 1. translate it and 2. impose another system upon it, in this case a rhythm.
― jed_, Sunday, 13 June 2010 18:19 (fourteen years ago) link