― dave q, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
The weird thing about Dickinson's claim is that Black Sabbath fits nowhere in there.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Radiohead: five studio albums and one live album. Two of the studio albums are unlistenable, pretentious crap. Named after a weak track on possibly the Talking Heads' least satisfying album. Cover art for every album is absolute wank (especially PABLO HONEY). Completely inconsistent. Overrated way beyond the pale of human comprehension. No sense of humour. A few great singles: "Creep," "Just," "Karma Police," "Paranoid Android." Are gradualy losing status as the "it" band to namedrop by tonsorially-challenged hepcats with ironic glasses and aging Anglophiles.
Iron Maiden: twelve studio albums and countless live albums. At least two of the studio albums are crap (the ones between Dickinson's departure and return). Names after a medieval torture device. Once hailed -- prematurely -- as the band that would bridge the chasm between Punk and Metal (a feat they failed to achieve after thuggish Paul Dianno's exit) Cover art for each album (with the exception of 'X' and FEAR OF THE DARK) is stunning -- in an admittedly juvenile fashion. Largely consistent. A sense of humour. Perpetually underrated outside of their core faithful audience. An iron-clad gauntlet-full of classic singles: "The Trooper," "Run to the Hills," "Number of the Beast," "Two Minutes to Midnight," "Wasted Years," etc. Have *ALWAYS* been a band for bedenimed, acne-scarred cretins who hang out in the parking lots of mini-marts.
The winner? IRON MAIDEN!
― Alex in NYC, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― chimchim, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
And funny enough, this charisma stays effective for a long time. Who would've expected that at least a decade after Iron Maidens best albums in 1993/94 dozens of Swedish bands (who admittedly all sounded terribly alike), playing essentially nothing more than Maiden songs with modern intensity, vocal style and production, suddenly emerged and sold (still do, actually) like hot cakes. I wonder if a band like Radiohead actually incites such lasting enthusiasm that in 2015 a whole wave of single-minded Radiohead worshippers will emerge....
On Daves comment on Maidens goal to be just like Deep Purple: For a long time I've been intrigued why the most innovative bands in Metal from the last twenty years (Maiden, Slayer, Death, Hellhammer, Bathory, Venom, Darkthrone, Paradise Lost, Burzum, Immortal, Kreator, Beherit, Graveland, Sodom, Napalm Death, Destruction, Metallica, Entombed) all denied any ambition to be innovators. Every single one of these bands has stated they "only wanted the play the music of our heroes" or "we just play Metal, that's it". Even the band names reflect this - I've noticed that the most innovative bands tend to bear the most uninviting stereotypically "Metal" names, whereas the "followers" tend to be much more creative. And it's equally odd to see that a lot of also-ran bands most loudly claiming to be "all about innovation" turn out to have far less influence on the actual progress in the genre (say, an Opeth or Ulver or Emperor or Therion). Come to think of it - this isn't much different in any genre. The innovations in electronic music to name but one have largely come out of the club or pirate radio scene where no-one gives a hoot about "innovation" as long as it makes the crowd move (case in point: House, Techno, Rave, Jungle, UK Garage, Trance), whereas some artists largely outside of the cutting edge club scene (say, a Moby, a William Orbit) proclaim high ambitions but are largely sidelined in the main thrust of the genre.
― Siegbran Hetteson, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nick Southall, Sunday, 21 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Siegbran Hetteson, Monday, 22 April 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jesse James, Sunday, 7 May 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)
this settles it…
www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1WKYmx4i1Q
― Veronica Moser, Monday, 30 July 2007 14:10 (eighteen years ago)
Gotta say, I was a little rough on Radiohead there (oh, those headstrong days of `02). I mean, `Maiden still wins -- OBVIOUSLY -- but I do like me some Radiohead. I've even warmed considerably to Kid A and Hail to the Thief.
But, y'know, UP THE IRONS
― Alex in NYC, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 00:50 (eighteen years ago)
No shit, this is a blowout.
― Bill Magill, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
alex in nyc otm, though radiohead live ca. kid a were almost as good as maiden live ca. brave new world
― kamerad, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 05:21 (seventeen years ago)
everyone who says something bad about radiohead acts like they are the first person to ever think radiohead isn't the greatest band ever
― M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 05:29 (seventeen years ago)
Seriously. Radiohead is the soil wherein a thousand challenging opinions grow.
― latebloomer, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 05:38 (seventeen years ago)
I'm much more curious about the new Iron Maiden record that I haven't bought than the new Radiohead album I haven't bought.
― Nate Carson, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 09:48 (seventeen years ago)
I must have listened to Killers 20 times this year, Maiden fucking rules
― J0hn D., Wednesday, 23 April 2008 10:34 (seventeen years ago)
This is true and I'm guilty as sin of it; the problem is that every time you say something bad about Radiohead in certain (often large) circles you get made to FEEL like you're the first person ever to think Radiohead aren't the greatest band ever. And that you should thusly get the fuck out of town.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:46 (seventeen years ago)
Radiohead isn't bad-it's just that Maiden slays.
Re: Killers-one of my favorite moments in music is the buildup through Ides of March, then the short pause and the bass intro to Wrathchild. God that's awesome.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 13:53 (seventeen years ago)
Even "Kid A" era Radiohead is way better than Iron Maden.
― Geir Hongro, Thursday, 24 April 2008 09:40 (seventeen years ago)
geir, with all your prog-love, you're missing out on some serious jams
― kamerad, Thursday, 24 April 2008 13:56 (seventeen years ago)
I prefer Radiohead
― stephen, Thursday, 24 April 2008 14:22 (seventeen years ago)
LEAVE the hall! :)
― BigLurks, Thursday, 24 April 2008 14:32 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i'm kinda surprised geir doesn't like maiden or a lot of classic power metal stuff which is all really melodic and uses (what sounds to me) like a lot of "classic" songwriting type chord progressions and classical influence
― M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 24 April 2008 15:26 (seventeen years ago)
but maybe geir's love of all limp, pussy-ass music overwhelms his love of melody at times.
I don't like anything that features screaming or exaggerated use of emotion. I prefer my music cool, calm and collected, which leaves out anything heavier than Van Halen.
― Geir Hongro, Friday, 25 April 2008 10:21 (seventeen years ago)
yes yes we know. But I think you're overestimating the screaming etc in Maiden. It's really not even as "heavy" as Van Halen.
― Thomas, Friday, 25 April 2008 10:45 (seventeen years ago)
The main two problems about Iron Maiden are:
- The awful "operatic" screaming of Bruce Dickinson - An extremely annoying drummer that uses his bassdrum way too much and way too fast.
― Geir Hongro, Friday, 25 April 2008 11:55 (seventeen years ago)
so wait. jon anderson isn't annoying, but bruce dickinson is?
― kamerad, Friday, 25 April 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
Jon Anderson isn't screaming. He has a natural alto voice and doesn't need to scream.
― Geir Hongro, Friday, 25 April 2008 22:33 (seventeen years ago)
One cannot underestimate the fun of Maiden. They're like the Hungry Hungry Hippos of metal. Who else writes songs about the Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Alexander the Great, and The Prisoner tv show? UP THE IRONS!
― VegemiteGrrrl, Saturday, 26 April 2008 03:26 (seventeen years ago)
Why can't we live in the world without such division? Why can't Radiohead and `Maiden co-exist happily on my disc shelves? IF WE CAN WALK TOGETHER WHY CAN'T WE ROCK TOGETHER?
Regardless, Iron Maiden trump Radiohead every time.
― Alex in NYC, Saturday, 26 April 2008 22:41 (seventeen years ago)
Truthfully, I think Thom & Bruce harmonizing together would be a beautiful thing. With Eddie swaying in the background. Damn this blasted war.
― VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 27 April 2008 03:55 (seventeen years ago)
Unlike Iron Maiden, Radiohead actually recorded a song I liked once, but I have to go with Iron Maiden anyway. (They just seem more important and influential in the historical scheme of things.)
― xhuxk, Sunday, 27 April 2008 04:00 (seventeen years ago)
Exactly. Taste be damned. Important & influential! Yes! Chuck, your wisdom is to be praised (if it hasn't been already).
― VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 27 April 2008 04:12 (seventeen years ago)
revive!!
― geeta, Friday, 27 May 2011 11:34 (fourteen years ago)
show them no fear, show them no pain . . . versus . . . crushed like a bug in the ground
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 20 March 2014 19:13 (eleven years ago)
I want these two bands to collaborate on an album and call the project "Maidenhead"
― Sir Lord Baltimora (Myonga Vön Bontee), Thursday, 20 March 2014 20:07 (eleven years ago)